Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sparck Jones, K."
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Sparck Jones, K.; Jackson, D.M.: ¬The use of automatically obtained keyword classification for information retrieval (1970) 0.01 
    0.012945342 = product of:
  0.09061739 = sum of:
    0.022830293 = weight(_text_:information in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022830293 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
    0.067787096 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067787096 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 5(1970), S.175-201
  2. Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic keyword classification for information retrieval (1971) 0.01 
    0.011442174 = product of:
  0.08009522 = sum of:
    0.020179318 = weight(_text_:information in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020179318 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
    0.059915897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059915897 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  3. Sparck Jones, K.: Index term weighting (1973) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.619-633
  4. Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979) 0.01 
    0.007581752 = product of:
  0.05307226 = sum of:
    0.01712272 = weight(_text_:information in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01712272 = score(doc=1939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.
  5. Sparck Jones, K.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Progress in documentation : Information retrieval test collection (1976) 0.01 
    0.0061978353 = product of:
  0.043384846 = sum of:
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 4161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=4161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4161)
    0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036322083 = score(doc=4161,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4161, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4161)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Many retrieval experiments have been based on inadequate test collections, and current research is hampered by the lack of proper collections. This short review does not attempt a fully docuemted survey of all the collections used in the past decade: hopefully representative examples have been studied to throw light on the requriements test collections should meet, to show how past collections have been defective, and to suggest guidelines for a future "ideal" test collection. This specifications for this collection can be taken as an indirect comment on our present state of knowledge of major retrieval system variables, and experience in conducting experiments.
  6. Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (1970) 0.01 
    0.0059622396 = product of:
  0.041735675 = sum of:
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=4327,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
    0.036690846 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036690846 = score(doc=4327,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40932083 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically raises some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which are required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties have not been sufficiently considered, and the paper therefore attempts an analysis of them, though no solution of immediate application can be suggested. Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. The problem which follows is that since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precises statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976) 0.01 
    0.0054210005 = product of:
  0.037947003 = sum of:
    0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013980643 = score(doc=71,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146
  8. Sparck Jones, K.: ¬A statistical interpretation of term specifity and its application in retrieval (1972) 0.00 
    0.0034237658 = product of:
  0.047932718 = sum of:
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  9. Sparck Jones, K.; Kay, M.: Linguistik und Informationswissenschaft (1976) 0.00 
    0.0017118829 = product of:
  0.023966359 = sum of:
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit befaßt sich mit den sprachlichen Aspekten der Informationswissenschaft, insbesondere mit den sprachlichen Komponenten der Analyse, der beschreibung und dem Retrieval von Dokumenten. Dabei wird erforscht, welche linguistischen Verfahren und Theorien von der Informationswissenschaft genützt werden können. Unter anderem werden untersucht die Anwendung der Sprachtheorie auf die Struktur der Erkenntnis, die Verwertung der Phonologie, Morphologie, Syntax und Semantik in der Organisation, der Speicherung und in der Überbringung von Informationen
  10. Kay, M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Automated language processing (1971) 0.00 
    0.0011531039 = product of:
  0.016143454 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 6(1971), S.141-166

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes