Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  1. Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991) 0.01
    0.008808877 = product of:
      0.061662138 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
        0.05359041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05359041 = score(doc=1155,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A model system, the Dewey Online Retrieval System (DORS), was implemented as an interface to an online catalog for the purpose of experimenting with classification-based search strategies and generally seeking further understanding of the role of traditional classifications in automated information retrieval. Specifications for a classification retrieval interface were enumerated and rationalized and the system was developed in accordance with them. The feature that particularly distinguishes the system and enables it to meet its stated specifications is an automatically generated chain index
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Svenonius, E.: ¬The impact of computer technology on knowledge representations (1992) 0.01
    0.0072068013 = product of:
      0.050447606 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=2379,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
        0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036322083 = score(doc=2379,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The advent of the computer has brought epistemological questions, heretofore the province of classificationists and philosophers, into the limelight of popular thought. No longer of only theoretical interest, such questions stand in need of operational answers, at least if computers are to process information intelligently. Answers to these questions are embodied in what today are known as knowledge representations. Knowledge representations are used for a variety of related purposes, including language and text understanding, cognitive research, expert system development and information retrieval. This paper focuses on the use of three computer-based knowledge representations of potential relevance for information retrieval: hypertext systems, cluster analysis and knowledge representations accomodating rule-based reasoning. It then considers research that might be pursued to inform the development of knowledge representations for information retrieval
  3. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988) 0.01
    0.006472671 = product of:
      0.045308694 = sum of:
        0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011415146 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
        0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033893548 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Svenonius, E.: ¬The epistemological foundations of knowledge representations (2004) 0.01
    0.00599504 = product of:
      0.041965276 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
        0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033893548 = score(doc=766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at the epistemological foundations of knowledge representations embodied in retrieval languages. It considers questions such as the validity of knowledge representations and their effectiveness for the purposes of retrieval and automation. The knowledge representations it considers are derived from three theories of meaning that have dominated twentieth-century philosophy.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
  5. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.004841936 = product of:
      0.067787096 = sum of:
        0.067787096 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067787096 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986) 0.00
    0.0045768693 = product of:
      0.032038085 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023966359 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986) no.5, S.331-340
  7. Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978) 0.00
    0.0044226884 = product of:
      0.030958816 = sum of:
        0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009988253 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
        0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020970564 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
  8. Svenonius, E.: ¬The intellectual foundation of information organization (2000) 0.00
    0.0043331743 = product of:
      0.030332219 = sum of:
        0.013385445 = weight(_text_:information in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013385445 = score(doc=5056,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25731003 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
        0.016946774 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016946774 = score(doc=5056,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.173-175 (G. Campbell): "Bibliographic control rests on a rich and intriguing theoretical foundation. All too often, however, students and scholars of information studies pass this foundation over, perhaps because of its fragmentation. Information organization theory has evolved in tandem with practice, and particularly through innumerable policy decisions: its central tenets, therefore, appear in prefaces to manuals and catalogues, in library bulletins, in standards and rule interpretations, and in professional and scholarly conference proceedings. Gathering this theory together is a formidable task, and Svenonius has already made a significant contribution through the two sourcebooks she has coedited: Foundations of Cataloging (1985), and Theory of Subject Analysis (1985). With The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 'Svenonius goes a huge step further: she pulls the fragments of bibliographic control theory together and sets them within a holistic theoretical framework. The result is a significant contribution to LIS scholarship, one which evokes the best of all possible responses: dissatisfied cries for more. Svenonius divides her treatise into two parts containing five chapters each. The first part provides a theoretically-grounded articulation of the objectives, entities, languages and principles of information organization. The field, she argues, rests on three distinct philsophical traditions. Systems philosophy, as developed in library circles by Charles Cutter, gives a holistic and visionary dimension to bibliographic control: a tendency to see individual processes as part of a larger, coherent structure. The philosophy of science, typified in the field by Cyril Cleverdon in the 1950s, emphasizes the need to quantify and generalize, and to subject the tenets of information retrieval to empirical verification. Language philosophy introduces the concept of language rules, and argues that information organization is a "particular kind of language use" (p. 6): an approach which enables us to employ linguistic concepts of semantics, vocabulary and syntax to explain the processes of information organization. Having established this framework, Svenonius goes on to discuss the objectives of bibliographic retrieval systems. Deftly combining the seminal contributions of Cutter, Seymour Lubetzky, the Paris Principles of 1961, and the IFLA objectives of 1997, she produces five central objectives of bibliographic control: locating entitles (finding), identifying entitles (collocating), selecting them (choice), acquiring or gaining access to them (acquisition), and navigating a bibliographic database (navigation) (p. 20)". -
    Weitere Rez. in: Information processing and management 37(2001) no.5, S.763-764 (G.C. Bowker); College and research libraries 62(2001) no.2, S.203-206 (M. Winston)
    LCSH
    Information organization
    Subject
    Information organization
  9. Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998) 0.00
    0.0036609212 = product of:
      0.051252894 = sum of:
        0.051252894 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051252894 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.36573824 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  10. Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1997) 0.00
    0.0034326524 = product of:
      0.024028566 = sum of:
        0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060537956 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
        0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01797477 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
    Imprint
    The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
  11. Svenonius, E.: ¬An ideal classification for an on-line catalog (1989) 0.00
    0.0025678244 = product of:
      0.03594954 = sum of:
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  12. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.00
    0.001815726 = product of:
      0.025420163 = sum of:
        0.025420163 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025420163 = score(doc=2114,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The last several years have seen the evolution of prototype systems exploiting the use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as an interface to online catalogs. One such system, calles DORS (Dewy Online Retrieval System) was developed at the University of California, Los Angeles by the authors. The feature distinguishing this system is an automatically generated chain index, in particular the algorithms that were created for its automatic generation and the problems that were encountered. The problems were of three kinds: those that were overcome, but were not for lack of time and resources and those that we believe cannot be overcome. The paper concludes with suggestions for future resaerch and possible formatting changes to the DDC feature headings that would facilitate chain-index generation
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.00
    0.0017118829 = product of:
      0.023966359 = sum of:
        0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023966359 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  14. Svenonius, E.; Witthus, R.: Information science as a profession (1981) 0.00
    0.0016307352 = product of:
      0.022830293 = sum of:
        0.022830293 = weight(_text_:information in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022830293 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.291-317
  15. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00
    0.0012839122 = product of:
      0.01797477 = sum of:
        0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01797477 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  16. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    0.0012839122 = product of:
      0.01797477 = sum of:
        0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01797477 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  17. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    0.0012839122 = product of:
      0.01797477 = sum of:
        0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01797477 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  18. Svenonius, E.; Schmierer, H.P.: Current issues in the subject control of information (1977) 0.00
    0.0011531039 = product of:
      0.016143454 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  19. Svenonius, E.: ¬The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging (1989) 0.00
    0.001008966 = product of:
      0.014125523 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Series
    Library and information science
  20. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.00
    0.001008966 = product of:
      0.014125523 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]