Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weibel, S."
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Weibel, S.: ¬The Dublin Core : a simple content description model for electronic resources (1997) 0.02
    0.021555783 = product of:
      0.10059366 = sum of:
        0.042278 = weight(_text_:web in 2563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042278 = score(doc=2563,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 2563, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2563)
        0.051252894 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 2563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051252894 = score(doc=2563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.36573824 = fieldWeight in 2563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2563)
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 2563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=2563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2563)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core is a 15 element set intended to facilitate discovery of electronic resources. Its characteristics are: simplicity, semantic interoperability, international consensus, flexibility, metadata modularity on the Web and a metadata architecture for the Web. The WWW Consortium is developing the Resource Description Framework to support different metadata needs. It will support 3 resource description models: embedded metadata, third party metadata, and view filter. Development continues into: refinement of elements, user education and application guides, metadata registries, tools and standardization. Includes a list of related Web sites and details of the core elements
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1997) no.1, Oct.,/Nov., S.9-11
  2. Weibel, S.: ¬The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative : The Frankfurt Focus and the Year 2000 (2000) 0.01
    0.009005572 = product of:
      0.063039 = sum of:
        0.024409214 = weight(_text_:web in 4450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024409214 = score(doc=4450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4450)
        0.038629785 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038629785 = score(doc=4450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 4450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4450)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core Metadata Iniative (DCMI) is nearing the fifth anniversary of what has become the broadest international, interdisciplinary effort in resource description on the Internet. It is the leading initiative for improving resource discovery on the Web. Die Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt hosted the 7th of the series of international metadata workshops of this 5-year-old-initiative. This article reviews the progress made during 1999 and summarizes some of the developments resulting from the Frankfurt meeting and how these developments can be expected to shape DCMI activities for the year 2000
  3. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.01
    0.0067889965 = product of:
      0.047522973 = sum of:
        0.039451245 = weight(_text_:web in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039451245 = score(doc=1561,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Content
    The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
  4. Bearman, D.; Miller, E.; Rust, G.; Trant, J.; Weibel, S.: ¬A common model to support interoperable metadata : progress report on reconciling metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI communities (1999) 0.00
    3.6034497E-4 = product of:
      0.0050448296 = sum of:
        0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050448296 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core metadata community and the INDECS/DOI community of authors, rights holders, and publishers are seeking common ground in the expression of metadata for information resources. Recent meetings at the 6th Dublin Core Workshop in Washington DC sketched out common models for semantics (informed by the requirements articulated in the IFLA Functional Requirements for the Bibliographic Record) and conventions for knowledge representation (based on the Resource Description Framework under development by the W3C). Further development of detailed requirements is planned by both communities in the coming months with the aim of fully representing the metadata needs of each. An open "Schema Harmonization" working group has been established to identify a common framework to support interoperability among these communities. The present document represents a starting point identifying historical developments and common requirements of these perspectives on metadata and charts a path for harmonizing their respective conceptual models. It is hoped that collaboration over the coming year will result in agreed semantic and syntactic conventions that will support a high degree of interoperability among these communities, ideally expressed in a single data model and using common, standard tools.