Search (137 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Lippold, H.; Hett, H.M.: BIFOA-Marktstudie Retrievalsoftware für die elektronische Dokumentenverwaltung (1992) 0.01 
    0.0073218425 = product of:
  0.10250579 = sum of:
    0.10250579 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10250579 = score(doc=1269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.7314765 = fieldWeight in 1269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1269)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  2. Sieverts, E.G.; Lobbestael, G.; Groeniger, B.O.; Provost, F.; Sikovà, ?: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.5: personal information managers, hypertext and relevance ranking programs (1992) 0.01 
    0.0072540357 = product of:
  0.050778247 = sum of:
    0.01482871 = weight(_text_:information in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01482871 = score(doc=5049,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=5049,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In this article, the fifth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of seven programs are presented and various properties and qualitites of theses programs are discussed. In this instalment of the series we discuss programs for information storage and retrieval which are primarily characterised by the properties of personal information managers (PIMs), hypertext programs, or best match and ranking retrieval systems. The programs reviewed in this issue are the personal information managers 3by5/RediReference, askSam, Dayflo Tracker, and Ize; Personal Librarian uses best match and ranking; the hypertext programs are Folio Views and the HyperKRS/HyperCard combination (aksSam, Ize and Personal Librarian boast hypertext features as well). HyperKRS/HyperCard is only available for the Apple Macintosh. All other programs run under MS-DOS; versions of Personal Librarian also run under Windows and some other systems. For each of the seven programs about 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually
  3. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Nieuwland, A.; Groeneveld, C.; Zwart, B. de: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.6: various additional programs (1993) 0.01 
    0.007239756 = product of:
  0.05067829 = sum of:
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 5051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=5051,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5051, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5051)
    0.04019281 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04019281 = score(doc=5051,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 5051, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5051)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In this article, the sixth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of nine programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. We discuss additional programs for information storage and retrieval and for text retrieval from several of the various categories which have been looked at in previous instalments. On new (secondary) type of ISR software is defined as administrative software. The program review in this issue are BRS-Search, dtSearch, InfoBank, Micro-OPC, Q&A, STN-PFS, Strix, TINman and ZYIndex. All but dtSearch and ZYIndex can be regarded as primarily classical retrieval packages; Q&A boasts comprehensive administrative features as well; dtSearch and ZYIndex are indexing programs. For ZYIndex a new Windows version has been tested. All other programs run under MS-DOS. For each of the nine programs about 100 facts and test results are tabulated. All the programs are individually discussed as well
  4. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.: Software for information storage and retrieval, evaluated and compared : pt.7: what to choose, or the purpose of it all (1994) 0.01 
    0.0066335746 = product of:
  0.04643502 = sum of:
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 6885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=6885,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 6885, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6885)
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=6885,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6885, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6885)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The more than 3700 data presented in the tables of preceding articles in this series, pertaining 37 different software packages for information storage and retrieval (ISR), may seem overwhelming to the reader who needs to make a well-founded choice. To make this task easier, some general questions can be asked with respect to the desired ISR application. These questions can be summarised as: what sort of information? How much? For whom? For what purpose? At what cost? The discussion about user needs, typical applications and lists of demands centres around these five basic questions in relation to the categories of retrieval software which were identified in the six earlier articles. They cover the whole range from bibliographic software to advanced full-text retrieval software
  5. Kulkarni, M.; Gupta, V.K.; Viswanathan, T.: ¬An automatic index generation and information retrieval system for bibliographic database developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (1996) 0.01 
    0.0064928103 = product of:
  0.04544967 = sum of:
    0.015792815 = weight(_text_:information in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015792815 = score(doc=4525,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Information processing is concerned with the representation, storage, organization and access of data. In the case of online databases, it is expected that the information should be retrieved as fast as possible. The query time depends upon how the information has been stored in the database, that is the record structure and associated indexes, as well as the file organization. Based on these concepts, information retrieval software has been developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (INSDOC) for bibliographic databases. Describes the salient features of this software
  6. Nieuwenhuysen, P.: Computerised storage and retrieval of structured text information : CDS/ISIS version 2.3 (1991) 0.01 
    0.006472671 = product of:
  0.045308694 = sum of:
    0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011415146 = score(doc=5042,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=5042,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The computer software package CDS/ISIS is suitable for the storage and retrieval of structured, text-oriented information, such as bibliographic descriptions. Versions exist for various hardware including IBM microcomputers and compatibles. The software is very attractive, mainly because it is powerful and because the producer, Unesco, normally fulfils requests to use it for free. Micro CDS/ISIS is reviewed in this paper which includes recent experience with version 2.3
  7. dwi: Quellenarchiv (2002) 0.01 
    0.006432551 = product of:
  0.045027856 = sum of:
    0.017435152 = weight(_text_:web in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017435152 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
    0.027592704 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027592704 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.22680065 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    "Für bibliografische Angaben wie Autor, Titel und Erscheinungsjahr ist der obere Teil der Eingabemaske vorgesehen. Der Mittelteil hilft bei Beschaffung und Archi-vierung der Materialien: Ein Häkchen zeigt, ob eine Veröffentlichung noch fehlt oder schon abgelegt wurde. Angaben dazu, unter welcher Signatur und in welcher Bibliothek das Werk verfügbar ist, finden hier ebenso Platz wie Verweise auf das heimische Ablagesystem. Die Stichwort-Zuordnung erleichtert später das Suchen nach Material zu einem bestimmten Teilgebiet. In das Feld für die Zusammenfassung passen bis zu 4000 Zeichen; sinnvoll sind hier eine Inhaltsangabe oder einige kurze Zitate. Mit dem Literaturmanager kann man zwar beliebig viele Datenbanken aufbauen, allerdings immer nur eine zur selben Zeit öffnen. Der Export der Daten ist nur in eine Textdatei möglich, dabei kann man das Format mit einem kleinen Editor festlegen. Zum Import geeignet sind Datensätze aus Standard-Datenbanken, außerdem versteht Liman Excel- und Txt-Dateien. Hersteller infoball hofft vor allem auf Anwender, die das Web-Portal infoball.de zur Literaturrecherche benutzen. Der Import dieses Recherche-Ergebnisses in die Liman-Datenbank ist dabei für Inhaber eines kostenpflichtigen Accounts besonders einfach, möglich ist er aber bereits nach einer kostenlosen Registrierung. Insgesamt ist Liman 2.7 ein unkompliziertes Einsteigerprogramm, das auch für Studenten erschwinglich ist (? 50)."
  8. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.01 
    0.0063204495 = product of:
  0.044243146 = sum of:
    0.022830293 = weight(_text_:information in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022830293 = score(doc=3254,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
    0.021412853 = product of:
      0.064238556 = sum of:
        0.064238556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064238556 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  9. Raper, D.: Selecting library housekeeping and information retrieval software (1993) 0.01 
    0.0063181263 = product of:
  0.04422688 = sum of:
    0.014268933 = weight(_text_:information in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014268933 = score(doc=48,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Describes how a review of the library and information services of D.J. Freeman was carried out, a soecification for a software package prepared, and the choice of the UNICORN system made. Points out that previous knowledge of available systems enabled the selection process to be condensed
  10. Krajewski, M.: Elektronische Literaturverwaltungen : Kleiner Katalog von Merkmalen und Möglichkeiten (2003) 0.01 
    0.006275865 = product of:
  0.087862104 = sum of:
    0.087862104 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087862104 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.6269798 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  11. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.01 
    0.0062697097 = product of:
  0.043887965 = sum of:
    0.034519844 = weight(_text_:web in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034519844 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
    0.009368123 = product of:
      0.028104367 = sum of:
        0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028104367 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  12. Glassco, R.A.: Evaluating commercial text search-and-retrieval packages (1993) 0.01 
    0.00599504 = product of:
  0.041965276 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 7414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=7414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7414)
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=7414,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 7414, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7414)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Presents a guide to evaluating commercial text search and retrieval programs. Gives an overview of text searching and discusses operating environments, features commonly found in commercial text-search packages, and features that distinguish one text-search from each other e.g. platforms, size of database, query-formulation capabiblities, hypertext capabilities, real-time data-entry and classification, and browsing aids
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 12(1993) no.4, S.413-421
  13. Brown, S.: Total recall from Dataware Technologies (1996) 0.01 
    0.00599504 = product of:
  0.041965276 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=5808,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=5808,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    During 1994, Dataware Technologies acquired the BRS/SEARCH text retrieval package from InfoPro Technologies, as well as exclusive worldwide marketing rights for the Total Recall application programming interface from Kinesis. The products are now being used to create information management applications which offer users the best of 2 very different worlds: the processing power of the relational database, together with the content based searching facilities of a text retrieval system. Discusses the advantages of this, noting also that the package can be used in setting up WWW sites
  14. Jucquois-Delpierre, M.: Is information retrieval with microcomputers mini-information-retrieval? (1992) 0.01 
    0.005984274 = product of:
  0.041889917 = sum of:
    0.012233062 = weight(_text_:information in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012233062 = score(doc=5287,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=5287,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 17(1992) no.1, S.18-23
  15. Ewers, A.: ¬A review of new developments in text retrieval systems (1994) 0.01 
    0.005984274 = product of:
  0.041889917 = sum of:
    0.012233062 = weight(_text_:information in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012233062 = score(doc=1063,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=1063,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Reports a review of current and planned developments of the leading suppliers of text retrieval software, aimed at trying to establish trends in the industry. The products evaluated are those from minicomputer and mainframe computer backgrounds and can be best described as fully functional text information management systems, the majority of which operate in inverted file structures which index every word. The survey was conducted by means of interviews with senior executives of the suppliers concerned and the suppliers and systems reviewed were: Information Dimensions (BASISplus); BRS Dataware (BRS/Search); Excalibur Technologies (EFS); Status/IQ (Status/IQ); and Verity (TOPIC)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.6, S.438-443
  16. Dyer, H. u. A. Gunson (Comp.): ¬A directory of library and information retrieval software for microcomputers (1990) 0.01 
    0.005721087 = product of:
  0.04004761 = sum of:
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  17. EndNote X (2006) 0.01 
    0.0056654443 = product of:
  0.039658107 = sum of:
    0.025709987 = weight(_text_:wide in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025709987 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
    0.013948122 = weight(_text_:web in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013948122 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 59(2006) H.4, S.81-88 (O. Oberhauser): ""Endnoten" erfüllen bekanntlich denselben Zweck wie Fußnoten, werden jedoch an das Ende des Werkes (Artikels, Kapitel, Buch usw.) gestellt, um die Textseiten nicht mit Zitaten und Anmerkungen zu überfrachten. EndNote hingegen ist ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm für Windows und MacOSX, dessen Name sicher nicht ohne Grund gewählt wurde, zumal der Hauptzweck dieser Software darin besteht, die Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und Zitaten beim Abfassen von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten zu unterstützen. Solche Programme zur Literaturverwaltung, auch Bibliographieprogramme genannt, gibt es heute in großer Zahl. Viele sind kommerzielle Softwareprodukte, andere kostenlose oder auch Open Source-Programme. EndNote, ein Produkt von Thomson ISI ResearchSoft,' zählt zur ersteren Gattung und wird in unseren Breiten von der Adept Scientific GmbH (Frankfurt am Main)' vertrieben. Mit einem Preis von ungefähr 200 Euro - genauere Angaben müssen aufgrund wechselnder Aktionen der Homepage entnommen werden - liegt das Programm eher im oberen Bereich der Produktgruppe; de facto wird dies aber durch günstigere Studentenversionen, vor allem aber auch durch Campuslizenzen für die Angehörigen der meisten österreichischen Universitäten durchaus nach unten relativiert. EndNote ist schon seit langem ein Begriff, das Produkt gilt bereits als "Klassiker" unter den Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen und ist derzeit in Version X (bzw. X.0.2 nach einem rezenten Patch-Update) auf dem Markt. Schon vor etlichen Jahren konnte man einer immer noch lesenswerten Broschüre entnehmen, dass ein Bibliographieprogramm - grob gesprochen - zumindest folgende Aufgaben unterstützen müsse: (a) Eingabe von Literaturzitaten ("references"), (b) Editieren von Literaturzitaten, (c) Suche bzw. Wiederauffinden von Literaturzitaten, (d) Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und (e) Unterstützung von Qualität und Integrität der Datensammlung. Diese Anforderungen gelten immer noch, wobei heute die Punkte (a) und (b) vor allem durch das seitdem hinzugekommene World Wide Web beeinflusst werden, während für Punkt (d) inzwischen auch noch die Anforderung einer Verknüpfung mit Textverarbeitungsprogrammen entstanden ist (Eingabe von Platzhaltern fürvorläufige Zitate, die später durch die endgültige Form ersetzt werden). Im folgenden soll das von mir selbst nach vielen Jahren des Verwendens bzw. Ausprobierens anderer Programme vor knapp einem Jahr für die persönliche Literaturverwaltung ausgewählte Produkt EndNote (Windows-Version) im Hinblick auf diese Kriterien näher beschrieben und beurteilt werden.
  18. Valas, G.: Comparison of some widespread CD-ROM information retrieval software packages (1994) 0.01 
    0.0056635872 = product of:
  0.03964511 = sum of:
    0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009988253 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study, conducted at the National Technical Information Centre and Library (OMIKK), Hungary, to compare 5 popular proprietary CD-ROM searching software packages: OPTIWARE; BRS/Search; ProQuest; SPIRS; and Dialog OnDisc Manager. Software evaluation was based on analysis of a range of CD-ROM bibliographic databases (with the exception of BRS/Search for which the library held no bibliographic databases) and focused on: response times for various activities (logging on, searching, retrieval, display); other performance factors; direct searching features (Boolean operators, proximity operators, arithmetic relations, truncation); index browsing; search strategy handling; display possibilities; output possibilities; and ergonomic and user friendliness factors. No general conclusions are drawn and users are left to draw their own conclusions
  19. The, K.H.; Wong, S.F.: Developing a CDS/ISIS-based online cataloguing and information retrieval interface for use in small libraries (1996) 0.01 
    0.0056131016 = product of:
  0.03929171 = sum of:
    0.013347364 = weight(_text_:information in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013347364 = score(doc=2736,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.256578 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
    0.025944345 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025944345 = score(doc=2736,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Describes the development, by the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Malaya University, of ONLIS (Online Library Information System), a customized user interface for coputerized MARC cataloguing and information retrieval, targeted for use in small libraries and information centres. Micro CDS/ISIS ver. 3.07 software package and its built in PAscal language were used for the design process and development. Design philosophy centres on the development of a very user friendly and simple interface, capable of mimicking the salient features of a contemporary commercial library package, yet easy to implement and maintain in a small library environment requiring little or no technical expertise. The system incorporates many new features and comprises 2 main components: data entry and file maintenace; and information retrieval. A security system is incorporated into the former environment to ensure data integrity and regulate important file maintenance tasks. While the system is ready for immediate implementation in libraries, modifications and enhancements are currently being undertaken to make it a truly reliable product. Concludes that some degree of user training in MARC and cataloguing using AACR2 is necessary to get the maximum benefits from the systems
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 1(1996) no.1, S.1-20
  20. Rohlfien, K.: Sacherschließung der Monographien, Serienwerke und Stücktitel der Entomologischen Bibliothek mit dem Literaturverwaltungssystem VCH-BIBLIO (1994) 0.01 
    0.005574568 = product of:
  0.07804395 = sum of:
    0.07804395 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07804395 = score(doc=8970,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.6414891 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Situation der Entomologischen Bibliothek werden sowohl die Stellung des Sachkataloges im Literatursystem der Projektgruppe Entomologie als auch die Anforderungen an eine Sacherschließung erörtert und die Anpassung des Literaturverwaltungssystems VCH-BIBLIO sowie die erarbeiteten Ordnungsmittel beschrieben

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 103
  • d 21
  • i 3
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • ru 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 112
  • m 16
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • ? 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications