Search (149 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bauer, R.: ¬Die digitale Bibliothek von Babel : über den Umgang mit Wissensressourcen im Web 2.0 (2010) 0.09 
    0.08666462 = product of:
  0.20221743 = sum of:
    0.045449268 = weight(_text_:wide in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045449268 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.046129078 = weight(_text_:web in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046129078 = score(doc=4080,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.05177324 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05177324 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3694514 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.027592704 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027592704 = score(doc=4080,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.22680065 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=4080,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.021183468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021183468 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Abstract
    Das Web 2.0 hat einen Paradigmenwechsel im Umgang mit Informationen und damit eng verbunden im Wissenserwerb eingeleitet. Theoretisch gesehen hat jeder offenen Zugang zu vielfältigen Informationen und kann gleichzeitig selbst Inhalte beisteuern - z.B. in Sozialen Netzwerken, in Weblogs oder Wikis - und Websites oder andere Dokumente (Videos, Slideshows o.ä.) veröffentlichen und mit anderen Nutzern teilen. Dieser Demokratisierungsprozess von Wissensproduktion, -kommunikation und -erwerb ist allerdings nicht frei von Kontroversen. Das verstärkte Nebeneinander von sachlich richtiger und relevanter Information einerseits und Belanglosigkeiten andererseits ruft auch Gegner auf den Plan. Sie sprechen von einem Information Overkill und befürchten den Niedergang der klassischen Bildung. Führen freie Wissenszugänge im Netz tatsächlich zu weniger Bildung? Was macht eine Website zu einer zuverlässigen und vertrauenswürdigen Quelle? Wie können aus der Fülle von Webressourcen die qualitativ hochwertigen herausgefiltert werden? Welchen Beitrag kann dabei Social Software leisten? Welches sind die Konstituenten einer Informationskompetenz 2.0, über die User verfügen sollten, um mit vorgefundenen Ressourcen adäquat umgehen zu können? Und inwiefern sind Bibliotheken - die sich ja zunehmend als Teaching Libraries verstehen - hier gefordert? Auf diese Fragen versucht das vorliegende Buch Antworten zu geben. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Umgang mit Wissensressourcen im Web 2.0, wobei ebenso theoretische wie praktische Implikationen berücksichtigt und ausgewählte Evaluierungsansätze hinsichtlich ihrer praktischen Anwendbarkeit für die User diskutiert werden.
    BK
    05.38 / Neue elektronische Medien <Kommunikationswissenschaft>
    Classification
    05.38 / Neue elektronische Medien <Kommunikationswissenschaft>
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Information Retrieval / Informationskompetenz
    Series
    Web 2.0
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Information Retrieval / Informationskompetenz
  2. Franke, F; Klein, A.; Schüller-Zwierlein, A.: Schlüsselkompetenzen : Literatur recherchieren in Bibliotheken und Internet (2010) 0.06 
    0.055169273 = product of:
  0.15447396 = sum of:
    0.019725623 = weight(_text_:web in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019725623 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.029287368 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029287368 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20899329 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.06622249 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06622249 = score(doc=4721,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.54432154 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.009885807 = weight(_text_:information in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009885807 = score(doc=4721,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.029352674 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029352674 = score(doc=4721,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.32745665 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
  0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    Content
    Pressestimmen So bringt Literatursuche Lust statt Frust. www.literaturmarkt.info Dieser Ratgeber demonstriert Schritt für Schritt, wie man die passende Literatur, z.B. für Seminar- und Hausarbeiten, findet und verarbeitet. www.lehrerbibliothek.de Schlüsselkompetenzen: Literatur recherchieren in Bibliotheken und Internet führt Studenten in die Geheimnisse der Uni-Bibliothek ein. Das Buch liefert zudem Informationen über Online-Kataloge, Datenbanken, die Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB) und die gängigen Suchmaschinen. www.stellenboersen.de Nützliches und höchst informatives Lehrbuch zu der Schlüsselkompetenz Literaturrecherche. Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg Gutes Recherchieren will gelernt sein, zumal in der heutigen Zeit, da das Informationsangebot ungeahnte Ausmaße angenommen hat und sich viele davon überfordert fühlen. Da nicht alle Hochschulen entsprechende Kurse anbieten, ist es gut, einen kundigen Ratgeber wie diesen zur Hand zu haben. STUDIUM Der Ratgeber besticht durch seinen übersichtlichen Aufbau und eignet sich deshalb auch als Nachschlagewerk. Zahlreiche Beispielrecherchen, Checklisten und Tipps zur Literatursuche erleichtern die Umsetzung des Gelesenen. ph akzente Im Zentrum steht nicht nur die Recherche, sondern ein umfassender Begriff der Informationskompetenz. Germanistik Der preisgünstige Band verdient eine nachdrückliche Kaufempfehlung bei Studierenden (und Lehrenden). Informationsmittel (IFB) : digitales Rezensionsorgan für Bibliotheken und Wissenschaft.
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    Web search engines
    RSWK
    Literaturrecherche / Bibliothek / Internet / Ratgeber (SBB)
    Information Retrieval / Bibliothek / Internet (BVB)
    Information Retrieval / Internet / Bibliothek / Lehrbuch (BVB)
    Literaturrecherche / Bibliothek / Internet (DNB)
    Subject
    Literaturrecherche / Bibliothek / Internet / Ratgeber (SBB)
    Information Retrieval / Bibliothek / Internet (BVB)
    Information Retrieval / Internet / Bibliothek / Lehrbuch (BVB)
    Literaturrecherche / Bibliothek / Internet (DNB)
    Information retrieval
    Web search engines
  3. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: User models as revealed in web-based research services (2012) 0.01 
    0.012439005 = product of:
  0.058048688 = sum of:
    0.029588435 = weight(_text_:web in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029588435 = score(doc=76,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=76,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    The user-centered approach to information retrieval emphasizes the importance of a user model in determining what information will be most useful to a particular user, given their context. Mediated search provides an opportunity to elaborate on this idea, as an intermediary's elicitations reveal what aspects of the user model they think are worth inquiring about. However, empirical evidence is divided over whether intermediaries actually work to develop a broadly conceived user model. Our research revisits the issue in a web research services setting, whose characteristics are expected to result in more thorough user modeling on the part of intermediaries. Our empirical study confirms that intermediaries engage in rich user modeling. While intermediaries behave differently across settings, our interpretation is that the underlying user model characteristics that intermediaries inquire about in our setting are applicable to other settings as well.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.584-599
  4. Lin, S.; Xie, I.: Behavioral changes in transmuting multisession successive searches over the web (2013) 0.01 
    0.01176724 = product of:
  0.05491379 = sum of:
    0.020922182 = weight(_text_:web in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020922182 = score(doc=959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
    0.016016837 = weight(_text_:information in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016016837 = score(doc=959,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Multisession successive information searches are common but little research has focused on quantitative analysis. This article enhances our understanding of successive information searches by employing an experimental method to observe whether and how the behavioral characteristics of searchers statistically significantly changed over sessions. It focuses on a specific type of successive search called transmuting successive searches, in which searchers learn about and gradually refine their information problems during the course of the information search. The results show that searchers' behavioral characteristics indeed exhibit different patterns in different sessions. The identification of the behavioral characteristics can help information retrieval systems to detect stages or sessions of the information search process. The findings also help validate a theoretical framework to explain successive searches and suggest system requirements for supporting the associated search behavior. The study is one of the first to not only test for statistical significance among research propositions concerning successive searches but to also apply the research principles of implicit relevance feedback to successive searches.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1259-1283
  5. Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011) 0.01 
    0.009176578 = product of:
  0.04282403 = sum of:
    0.03121758 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03121758 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.25659564 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.0040358636 = weight(_text_:information in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040358636 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.007570586 = product of:
      0.022711758 = sum of:
        0.022711758 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022711758 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    In den letzten Jahren wurde die Vermittlung von lnformationskompetenz (und manchmal darüber hinausgehend die Medienkompetenz) als ein neuer zentraler Baustein des Berufsbildes der Bibliothekarin/des Bibliothekars entwickelt. Ausgehend von den Führungen durch die Bibliothek und Schulungen in der Handhabung des Katalogs gehören mittlerweile neben der Katalogrecherche zur Informationskompetenzvermittlung auch die Datenbankrecherche und die Recherche in Suchdiensten nach frei im Netz verfügbaren Informationen. Aber nicht nur die Suchdienste, auch die recherchierbaren Inhalte haben sich erweitert. Ebenso hat man didaktisch konzeptionell viele Überlegungen angestellt und diese pädagogisch auf der Höhe der Zeit in einem stimmigen Konzept zusammengefasst, der Teaching Library. Hierzu gehören beispielsweise Grundsätze wie - Verschlankung des zu vermittelnden Inhalts - zusätzliche Visualisierung der Information ist besser als alleinige Übermittlung durch Sprache - selbst Ausprobieren bringt den Teilnehmern/Teilnehmerinnen mehr Lernerfolge als Inhalte und Lösungen lediglich vorgeführt zu bekommen Darüber hinaus bemühen sich viele Bibliotheken, die Inhalte von Schulungen zusätzlich in Tutorials und Selbstlernkursen auf der Homepage der Bibliothek anzubieten und auch sonst Anleitungstexte dort zu platzieren, wo Benutzer Defizite in der Handhabung von Suchdiensten und des Wissens über Fachrecherche haben könnten, beispielsweise direkt beim Online-Katalog (OPAC). Das macht Sinn, erreicht man doch durch Präsenzveranstaltungen aus verschiedenen Gründen nur einen Bruchteil der Benutzer und vermittelt nur teilweise die notwendigen Schlüsselqualifikationen zur Recherche, die für ein solides und effektives wissenschaftliches Arbeiten vonnöten wären. Online-Kurse und -Informationen zur Recherche sind hochverfügbar, die Benutzer können sie durcharbeiten oder abrufen, wann immer sie das Bedürfnis verspüren, Wissenslücken über die Recherche auszugleichen. Aber stimmt dieses positive Bild mit der Realität überein? Erreichen die Online-Tutorials ihre Zielgruppen? Werden die richtigen Methoden zur Umsetzung der Inhalte gewählt, so dass dieses eLearning effektiver ist als eine Vermittlung in der Face-to-face-Situation einer Schulung? Welche Anforderungen, welche Möglichkeiten, welche Hemmnisse gibt es hier? Diese Checkliste soll zumindest das Feld der Möglichkeiten und Widrigkeiten umreißen und Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten aufzeigen, wie man - angemessen an die jeweiligen Zielgruppen - Informationskompetenz als Schlüsselqualifikation online vermitteln kann.
    Date
    29. 5.2012 14:20:22
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  6. Chew, S.W.; Khoo, K.S.G.: Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites (2016) 0.01 
    0.008755388 = product of:
  0.040858474 = sum of:
    0.017435152 = weight(_text_:web in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017435152 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
    0.016731806 = weight(_text_:information in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016731806 = score(doc=2643,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
    0.0066915164 = product of:
      0.020074548 = sum of:
        0.020074548 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020074548 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Large amounts of health-related information of different types are available on the web. In addition to authoritative health information sites maintained by government health departments and healthcare institutions, there are many social media sites carrying user-contributed information. This study sought to identify the types of drug information available on consumer-contributed drug review sites when compared with authoritative drug information websites. Content analysis was performed on the information available for nine drugs on three authoritative sites (RxList, eMC, and PDRhealth) as well as three drug review sites (WebMD, RateADrug, and PatientsLikeMe). The types of information found on authoritative sites but rarely on drug review sites include pharmacology, special population considerations, contraindications, and drug interactions. Types of information found only on drug review sites include drug efficacy, drug resistance experienced by long-term users, cost of drug in relation to insurance coverage, availability of generic forms, comparison with other similar drugs and with other versions of the drug, difficulty in using the drug, and advice on coping with side effects. Drug efficacy ratings by users were found to be different across the three sites. Side effects were vividly described in context, with user assessment of severity based on discomfort and effect on their lives.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:24:05
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.333-349
  7. Brauer, T.; Ahlers, T.; Krumscheid, J.; Theis, N.; Brünner, M.: Basiswissen Informationskompetenz I-Ill an der Universitätsbibliothek Lüneburg : Vermittlung von lnformationskompetenz für Studienanfänger an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (2010) 0.01 
    0.007627886 = product of:
  0.053395197 = sum of:
    0.049359333 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049359333 = score(doc=3498,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40571335 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
    0.0040358636 = weight(_text_:information in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040358636 = score(doc=3498,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Dass das Berufsbild des Bibliothekars in den vergangenen Jahren keinen Paradigmenwechsel erlebte sondern sich um eine neue Kernaufgabe, die Vermittlung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz, erweiterte; zeigt das Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. Dem Vermittlungsbedarf wissenschaftlicher Information wurde hier schon seit Jahren durch einen gut organisierten Auskunftsdienst, Informationsmaterialien und zusätzliche Informationsbereiche auf der Website der Bibliothek Rechnung getragen. Auch konnte die Bibliothek im Laufe der Zeit eine Reihe an regelmäßigen Katalog- und Datenbankschulungen anbieten, die allen Bibliotheksbenutzern - vor allem Studierenden und Mitarbeitern der Universität - offen stehen und dieses Angebot durch weitere interessante Veranstaltungen rund um Bibliotheksbenutzung, Recherche und wissenschaftliches Arbeiten ergänzen. Die Teilnahme erfolgt bis zum heutigen Tage auf freiwilliger Basis und ein großer Zulauf blieb zunächst aus, bis im Wintersemester 2007/2008 das Schulungsangebot der Bibliothek durch die feste Integration dreier Lehrveranstaltungen, Basiswissen Informationskompetenz I-III, in das jeweils startende erste Semester, das Leuphana Semester, erweitert wurde. Alle drei Veranstaltungen unterliegen der Teilnahmepflicht, wodurch sichergestellt werden soll, dass jede neue Studentin bzw. jeder neue Student nicht nur mit der eigenen Bibliothek vertraut gemacht sondern in die Lage versetzt wird, die ständig steigende Informationsflut zu beherrschen und relevante Informationen zu finden, zu beurteilen und zu verarbeiten. Ziel der drei Veranstaltungen ist dennoch nicht, Informationsspezialisten auszubilden, sondern einen Einstieg in Bibliotheksbenutzung, Recherche und Medienkompetenz zu bieten, Präsenz zu zeigen und das vielfältige Serviceangebot zu präsentieren. Das komprimierte, vermittelte Wissen kann anschließend im Rahmen regelmäßiger Schulungsangebote der Universitätsbibliothek vertieft werden.
    Die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz stellte sich an der Universitätsbibliothek durch die ständig wachsenden Anforderungen als eine klare Teamarbeit heraus. Viele Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter der Bibliothek ergriffen die Chance, sich und ihre Arbeit neu zu entdecken, schlüpften in die Rolle des Dozenten, sahen sich dabei jedoch auch mit ganz neuen Herausforderungen und Problemen konfrontiert. Lux und Sühl-Strohmenger sprechen hier von der Erforderlichkeit einer pädagogisch-didaktischen Qualifizierung der mit Schulungsaufgaben betrauten Bibliotheksmitarbeiterinnen und -mitarbeiter. In den vergangenen Jahren fand diese Qualifizierung für das Personal der Universitätsbibliothek Lüneburg statt durch Inhouse-Seminare und Workshops zur didaktischen Ausgestaltung von Schulungsveranstaltungen, zu Präsentations-, Stimm- und Redetechniken und nicht zuletzt zum Lernverhalten der Teilnehmer.
  8. Dawson, H.: Know it all, find it fast for academic libraries (2012) 0.01 
    0.00755431 = product of:
  0.052880168 = sum of:
    0.046826374 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046826374 = score(doc=3728,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.38489348 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    A comprehensive and easy-to-use version of the best-selling "Know it All, Find It Fast" developed specifically for information professionals working in academic libraries, this will help you to tackle the questions most commonly asked by students, academics and researchers. It is a broad cross-disciplinary A-Z of themes including topics such as literature searching, plagiarism and using online resources are covered helping you to address any query confidently and quickly. Each topic is split into four sections to guide your response: typical questions listing the common enquiries you'll encounter; considerations exploring the issues and challenges that might arise; where to look listing annotated resources in print and online; and, tips and pitfalls outlining useful suggestions and common problems. This will prove an indispensable day-to-day guide for anyone working with students, academics and researchers in an academic library.
    RSWK
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek / Auskunftsdienst
    Subject
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek / Auskunftsdienst
  9. Fidel, R: Human information interaction : an ecological approach to information behavior (2012) 0.01 
    0.00752059 = product of:
  0.052644126 = sum of:
    0.021188283 = weight(_text_:information in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021188283 = score(doc=538,freq=72.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40730494 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          8.485281 = tf(freq=72.0), with freq of:
            72.0 = termFreq=72.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
    0.031455845 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031455845 = score(doc=538,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.35091949 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Human information interaction (HII) is an emerging area of study that investigates how people interact with information; its subfield human information behavior (HIB) is a flourishing, active discipline. Yet despite their obvious relevance to the design of information systems, these research areas have had almost no impact on systems design. One issue may be the contextual complexity of human interaction with information; another may be the difficulty in translating real-life and unstructured HII complexity into formal, linear structures necessary for systems design. In this book, Raya Fidel proposes a research approach that bridges the study of human information interaction and the design of information systems: cognitive work analysis (CWA). Developed by Jens Rasmussen and his colleagues, CWA embraces complexity and provides a conceptual framework and analytical tools that can harness it to create design requirements. CWA offers an ecological approach to design, analyzing the forces in the environment that shape human interaction with information. Fidel reviews research in HIB, focusing on its contribution to systems design, and then presents the CWA framework. She shows that CWA, with its ecological approach, can be used to overcome design challenges and lead to the development of effective systems. Researchers and designers who use CWA can increase the diversity of their analytical tools, providing them with an alternative approach when they plan research and design projects. The CWA framework enables a collaboration between design and HII that can create information systems tailored to fit human lives. Human Information Interaction constructs an elegant argument for an ecological approach to information behavior. Professor Raya Fidel's cogent exposition of foundational theoretical concepts including cognitive work analysis delivers thoughtful guidance for future work in information interaction. Raya Fidel provides the human information interaction field with a manifesto for studying human information behavior from a holistic perspective, arguing that context dominates human action and we are obligated to study it. She provides a tutorial on cognitive work analysis as a technique for such study. This book is an important contribution to the Information field. Raya Fidel presents a nuanced picture of research on human information interaction, and advocates for Cognitive Work Analysis as the holistic approach to the study and evaluation of human information interaction.
    Content
    Inhalt: Basic concepts -- What is human information interaction? -- Theoretical constructs and models in information seeking behavior -- The information need -- The search strategy -- Two generations of research -- In-context -- Theoretical traditions in human information behavior -- Interlude : models and their contribution to design -- Human information behavior and information retrieval : is collaboration possible? -- Cognitive work analysis : dimensions for analysis -- Cognitive work analysis : harnessing complexity -- Enhancing the impact of research in human information interaction.
    LCSH
    Information behavior
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Anthropologie / Information Retrieval / Informationsverhalten (BVB)
    Informationsverhalten / Information Retrieval / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation
    Subject
    Anthropologie / Information Retrieval / Informationsverhalten (BVB)
    Informationsverhalten / Information Retrieval / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation
    Information behavior
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information retrieval
  10. Genuis, S.K.: Constructing "sense" from evolving health information : a qualitative investigation of information seeking and sense making across sources (2012) 0.01 
    0.0072876443 = product of:
  0.051013507 = sum of:
    0.032137483 = weight(_text_:wide in 370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032137483 = score(doc=370,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 370, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=370)
    0.018876024 = weight(_text_:information in 370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018876024 = score(doc=370,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 370, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=370)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Focusing on information behavior in a context where medical evidence is explicitly evolving (management of the menopause transition), this investigation explored how women interact with and make sense of uncertain health information mediated by formal and informal sources. Based on interviews with 28 information seekers and 12 health professionals (HPs), findings demonstrate that participants accessed and valued a wide range of information sources, moved fluidly between formal and informal sources, and trust was strengthened through interaction and referral between sources. Participants were motivated to seek information to prepare for formal encounters with HPs, evaluate and/or supplement information already gathered, establish that they were "normal," understand and address the physical embodiment of their experiences, and prepare for future information needs. Findings revealed four strategies used to construct sense from health information mediated by the many information sources encountered and accessed on an everyday basis: women assumed analytic and experiential "postures"; they valued social contexts for learning and knowledge construction; information consistency was used as a heuristic representing accuracy and credibility; and an important feature of sense making was source complementarity. Implications for health information literacy and patient education are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1553-1566
  11. Görtz, M.: aktuelle Herausforderungen wissenschaftlicher Ansätze zur Modellierung von Informationsverhalten : Informationssuchverhalten und das Social Web (2010) 0.01 
    0.0066748243 = product of:
  0.046723768 = sum of:
    0.036238287 = weight(_text_:web in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036238287 = score(doc=4015,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=4015,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In Zeiten zunehmend wissensintensiver Berufsbilder besteht eine große Herausforderung heutiger Unternehmen darin, die zur Unterstützung organisatorischen Handelns erforderliche Information effizient und effektiv zur Verfügung zu stellen. Eine Grundlage für die Entwicklung einer adäquaten Informationsumgebung legt dabei das umfassende Verständnis des Kontexts und Verhaltens von Mitarbeitern im Umgang mit Information. Beides unterliegt jedoch einem steten Wandel und stellt hohe Anforderungen an die Flexibilität von Arbeitsplatzkonzepten und der Gestaltung von Informationsumgebungen. In diesem Artikel wird daher die aktuelle Bedeutung und Entwicklung informationswissenschaftlicher Ansätze zur Modellierung von Informationssuchverhalten, deren Methoden, sowie zentrale Konzepte und Erkenntnisse vorgestellt. Anschließend wird die Bedeutung dieser Modelle für den Arbeitsplatz-Kontext in Zeiten zunehmend wissensintensiver Tätigkeiten untersucht. Anhand der Wandlung des primär informativ genutzten Internet zu einem partizipativen Social Web wird daraufhin erörtert, welche neuen Entwicklungen es in der Erforschung des Nutzerkontexts zu berücksichtigen gilt. Die beispielhafte Betrachtung aktueller Forschungsergebnisse auf diesem Gebiet mündet in einer Diskussion weiteren Forschungsbedarfs.
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.6/7, S.375-384
  12. Barry, E.; Bedoya, J.K.; Groom, C.; Patterson, L.: Virtual reference in UK academic libraries : the virtual enquiry project 2008-2009 (2010) 0.01 
    0.006374111 = product of:
  0.044618774 = sum of:
    0.03856498 = weight(_text_:wide in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03856498 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a snapshot of virtual reference services (the use of instant messaging or chat for enquiries) in UK academic libraries, and provide information about software for libraries considering providing a virtual reference service. Design/methodology/approach - The paper summarises the results of a 2008 UK-wide survey of academic libraries and gives a brief overview and comparison matrix of top virtual reference software products as tested by the Virtual Enquiry Project. Findings - Virtual reference services are not widespread in UK academic libraries. However, current service providers are planning to continue or expand services and a majority of academic libraries surveyed are considering starting a service. Originality/value - This is the first survey of its kind among UK academic libraries.
  13. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2012) 0.01 
    0.0063181263 = product of:
  0.04422688 = sum of:
    0.014268933 = weight(_text_:information in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014268933 = score(doc=3802,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=3802,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2016) 0.01 
    0.006202879 = product of:
  0.04342015 = sum of:
    0.017475804 = weight(_text_:information in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017475804 = score(doc=3803,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
    0.025944345 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025944345 = score(doc=3803,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The 4th edition of this popular and well-cited text is now co-authored, and includes significant changes from earlier texts. Presenting a comprehensive review of over a century of research on information behavior (IB), this book is intended for students in information studies and disciplines interested in research on information activities. The initial two chapters introduce IB as a multi-disciplinary topic, the 3rd provides a brief history of research on information seeking. Chapter four discusses what is meant by the terms "information" and "knowledge. "Chapter five discusses "information needs," and how they are addressed. The 6th chapter identifies many related concepts. Twelve models of information behavior (expanded from earlier editions) are illustrated in chapter seven. Chapter eight reviews various paradigms and theories informing IB research. Chapter nine examines research methods invoked in IB studies and a discussion of qualitative and mixed approaches. The 10th chapter gives examples of IB studies by context. The final chapter looks at strengths and weaknesses, recent trends, and future development.
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Series
    Studies in information
    Subject
    Information Retrieval
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  15. Savolainen, R.: Source preference criteria in the context of everyday projects : relevance judgments made by prospective home buyers (2010) 0.01 
    0.005912691 = product of:
  0.041388836 = sum of:
    0.02465703 = weight(_text_:web in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02465703 = score(doc=3620,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
    0.016731806 = weight(_text_:information in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016731806 = score(doc=3620,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to elaborate how source preference criteria are defined in the context of everyday projects that require the seeking of problem-specific information. More specifically, to find out how information seekers explain their preference criteria by characterizing the perceived strengths and weaknesses of diverse sources. Design/methodology/approach - The approach takes the form of qualitative content analysis of empirical data gathered by semi-structured interviews with 16 prospective home buyers in 2008. The source preference criteria were elicited by making use of the construct of information source horizon. Findings - Networked sources were favoured most strongly, followed by printed media, human sources and organizational sources. Content of information was the primary source preference criterion. Availability of information was a fairly important criterion, while user characteristics, usability of information and situational factors were fairly marginal in this regard. In the definition of the preference criteria, more emphasis was placed on the perceived strengths than weaknesses of sources. Positive qualities such as "provides updated information" were referred to particularly while judging the relevance of the networked sources. Negative qualities like "outdated information" were primarily associated with printed media and organizational sources. Research limitations/implications - The study is exploratory, drawing on a relatively small sample recruited through a web-based service. Thus, the findings cannot be generalized to prospective home buyers. Practical implications - Prospective home buyers tend to favour web-based information sources and services. They should provide the customers with detailed information about the property, including photos. Originality/value - The paper specifies the picture of user-defined relevance judgment in the context of everyday life information seeking.
  16. Werr, N.: Fünf Jahre Studieneinheit "Informationskompetenz / information literacy (INK)" : Rückblick und Ausblick (2010) 0.01 
    0.0055950056 = product of:
  0.03916504 = sum of:
    0.033111244 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033111244 = score(doc=4074,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 4074, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4074)
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 4074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=4074,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4074, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4074)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Die Studieneinheit "Informationskompetenz" "sollte verpflichtender Kurs für Studenten aller Fachrichtungen sein" - so lautete eine der Rückmeldungen zu den beiden von der Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg betreuten Kursen im Rahmen der Evaluation von INK des Sommersemesters 2010. Ähnliche Rückmeldungen gehen fast jedes Sommersemester ein, so im Jahr 2006: "Mein Vorschlag ist, diesen Kurs in abgespeckter Form zu Beginn eines jeden Semesters für alle Studenten anzubieten, da hier sehr viel über die Benutzung der Bibliothek und richtiges Suchen gelernt werden kann, was eigentlich für alle Studenten sehr wichtig ist." Oder aus den Jahren 2008 ("Ich fände es gut, wenn der Kurs als Pflichtkurs für jeden Studenten eingerichtet werden würde bzw. Teilbereiche wie DBIS, EZB etc. als Pflichtveranstaltung in möglichst allen Fachbereichen existent wären.") und 2010 ("Sollte verpflichtender Kurs für Studenten aller Fachrichtungen sein!"). Diese Einschätzungen sowie die im fünften Jahr der Studieneinheit um fast 20% gestiegene Teilnehmerzahl seien daher Anlass zu einem kleinen Rückblick.
  17. Ceynowa, K.: Informationsdienste im mobilen Internet : das Beispiel der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (2011) 0.01 
    0.0055950056 = product of:
  0.03916504 = sum of:
    0.033111244 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033111244 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Überzeugung, dass der Zugriff auf digitale Information künftig primär,wenn nicht sogar ausschließlich über mobile Endgeräte wie Smartphones und Tablets erfolgen wird, stellt die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek gegenwärtig ihre Basisdienste ebenso wie ihre digitalen Content-Angebote sukzessive als mobile Applikationen bereit. Zuerst wurden der Online-Katalog und die Website der Bibliothek als generische, auf allen gängigen Smartphone-Browsern lauffähige, mobile Applikationen programmiert. In einem weiteren Schritt hat die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek 5o digitalisierte Spitzenstücke ihres Bestandes als native App »Famous Books -Treasures of the Bavarian State Library« für iPad und iPhone bereitgestellt, darauf folgte im Frühling 2011 die App »Islamic Books - Oriental treasures of the Bavarian State Library«. Aktuell experimentiert die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek zudem mit Augmented-Reality-Anwendungen. In einer mobilen Applikation »Ludwig II.« soll digitalisierter Bibliothekscontent zum berühmten bayerischen »Märchenkönig« georeferenziert an herausragenden Wirkungsstätten des Königs wie Schloss Neuschwanstein als Augmented-Reality-Applikation angeboten werden. Der Artikel stellt die verschiedenen mobilen Services und Anwendungen der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek vor, beleuchtet ihre technische Realisierung und bewertet die Chancen und Grenzen bibliothekarischer Dienste im mobilen Internet.
  18. Niu, X.; Hemminger, B.M.; Lown, C.; Adams, S.; Brown, C.; Level, A.; McLure, M.; Powers, A.; Tennant, M.R.; Cataldo, T.: National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States (2010) 0.01 
    0.0055833673 = product of:
  0.03908357 = sum of:
    0.020922182 = weight(_text_:web in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020922182 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
    0.018161386 = weight(_text_:information in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018161386 = score(doc=3449,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    As new technologies and information delivery systems emerge, the way in which individuals search for information to support research, teaching, and creative activities is changing. To understand different aspects of researchers' information-seeking behavior, this article surveyed 2,063 academic researchers in natural science, engineering, and medical science from five research universities in the United States. A Web-based, in-depth questionnaire was designed to quantify researchers' information searching, information use, and information storage behaviors. Descriptive statistics are reported. Additionally, analysis of results is broken out by institutions to compare differences among universities. Significant findings are reported, with the biggest changes because of increased utilization of electronic methods for searching, sharing, and storing scholarly content, as well as for utilizing library services. Generally speaking, researchers in the five universities had similar information-seeking behavior, with small differences because of varying academic unit structures and myriad library services provided at the individual institutions.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.869-890
  19. Koltay, T.: Information literacy for amateurs and professionals : the potential of academic, special and public libraries (2011) 0.01 
    0.0055623534 = product of:
  0.038936473 = sum of:
    0.03019857 = weight(_text_:web in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03019857 = score(doc=3631,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
    0.008737902 = weight(_text_:information in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008737902 = score(doc=3631,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of information literacy (IL) and digital literacy under the circumstances and challenges of the Web 2.0 environment. Design/methodology/approach - Desk research was done in order acquire a picture about the nature of the Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 in regard to their influence on literacy requirements. The hypothesis that differential literacies have to be offered to diverging groups of users, similarly to traditional library services that cater for different user needs depending on the type of the given library was tested. Findings - Professional goals characterize first of all different groups of professionals, teaching staff and researchers, as well as students. Thus, their need in information is different from that of other categories of users. Consequently, they require literacies similar to services traditionally offered by academic and special libraries. Amateur content is more compatible with the mission of public libraries and it is more suitable for Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 applications. Research limitations/implications - New principles of IL are outlined in this paper which will help practitioners in designing goal-oriented IL education. Practical implications - The practical implications need to be studied in the course of further research. Originality/value - The findings represent a small but valuable asset to the discussion about new approaches towards IL education.
  20. Borlund, P.; Dreier, S.: ¬An investigation of the search behaviour associated with Ingwersen's three types of information needs (2014) 0.01 
    0.0054361345 = product of:
  0.03805294 = sum of:
    0.020078167 = weight(_text_:information in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020078167 = score(doc=2691,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=2691,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    We report a naturalistic interactive information retrieval (IIR) study of 18 ordinary users in the age of 20-25 who carry out everyday-life information seeking (ELIS) on the Internet with respect to the three types of information needs identified by Ingwersen (1986): the verificative information need (VIN), the conscious topical information need (CIN), and the muddled topical information need (MIN). The searches took place in the private homes of the users in order to ensure as realistic searching as possible. Ingwersen (1996) associates a given search behaviour to each of the three types of information needs, which are analytically deduced, but not yet empirically tested. Thus the objective of the study is to investigate whether empirical data does, or does not, conform to the predictions derived from the three types of information needs. The main conclusion is that the analytically deduced information search behaviour characteristics by Ingwersen are positively corroborated for this group of test participants who search the Internet as part of ELIS.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.4, S.493-507

Authors

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 49

Types

  • a 133
  • m 11
  • x 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications