Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.02 
    0.017282974 = product of:
  0.080653876 = sum of:
    0.019976506 = weight(_text_:information in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019976506 = score(doc=7322,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
    0.018736245 = product of:
      0.056208733 = sum of:
        0.056208733 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056208733 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  2. Kantor, P.B.; Voorhees, E.: Information retrieval with scanned texts (2000) 0.01 
    0.012945342 = product of:
  0.09061739 = sum of:
    0.022830293 = weight(_text_:information in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022830293 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
    0.067787096 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067787096 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Information retrieval. 2(2000), S.165-176
  3. Wormell, I.: Factual data retrieval according to SAP-technique (1983) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.13-15
  4. Wormell, I.: Factual data retrieval according to SAP technique (1983) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983) no.3, S.13-15
  5. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Means to improve subject access and representation in modern information retrieval (1988) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  6. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01 
    0.008668196 = product of:
  0.060677372 = sum of:
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
    0.018736245 = product of:
      0.056208733 = sum of:
        0.056208733 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056208733 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  7. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.01 
    0.008009522 = product of:
  0.05606665 = sum of:
    0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014125523 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 6(1981), S.24-28
  8. Hauer, M.: Collaborative catalog enrichment : 4. Benutzertreffen intelligentCAPTURE / dandelon.com (2007) 0.01 
    0.007899201 = product of:
  0.036862936 = sum of:
    0.019314893 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019314893 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.15876046 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=515,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.010485282 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010485282 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Content
    "AGI - Information Management Consultants (www.agi-imc.de) hatte am 8. und 9. Mai 2007 zum vierten Mal Bibliotheken und Partner zum Erfahrungsaustausch nach Neustadt an der Weinstraße eingeladen. Die angereisten Teilnehmer betreiben bereits mittels intelligentCAPTURE die Produktion und über dandelon.com den Austausch und die Publikation (www.dandelon.com). Mittlerweile wird intelligentCAPTURE in Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein, Italien und in der Schweiz eingesetzt. Die PDF-Dateien gelangen über einen Partner bis zur weltgrößten Bibliothek, der Library of Congress in Washington. In Deutschland ist der GBV - Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverband in Göttingen (www.gbv.de) Partner von AGI und der größte Sekundärnutzer von dandelon.com. In dandelon.com sind derzeit über 220.000 Bücher suchbar, die Datenbank wächst täglich. Weitere 62.000 Titel werden nach einem Software-Update demnächst geladen; sie stammen aus Projekten mit der Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg und der TIB Hannover. Vergleichbare Scanprojekte laufen derzeit in einer Spezialbibliothek in Hamburg, der UB Braunschweig und UB Mainz. AGI geht von 400 bis 500.000 Buchtiteln bis Ende 2007 aus. Erstmals sahen die Teilnehmer "intelligentCAPTURE mobile". Eine Lösung, welche die Scanner selbst zwischen die engsten Regale fährt und somit erheblich den Transportaufwand reduziert - der Scanner wird zum Buch transportiert, nicht Tonnen von Büchern zu Scannern. Gemeinsam mit dem führenden Anbieter von Bibliothekseinrichtungen Schulz Speyer (www.schulzspeyer.de) wurde intelligentCAPTURE mobil gemacht.
    Bis zu 530 Bücherinhaltsverzeichnisse wurden bisher von einer Person an einem Tag damit produziert. Rund 1.000 Bücher pro Tag ist die durchschnittliche Menge bei einem Scanteam mit drei Scanstationen. Digitalisiert wird immer nur der urheberrechtsfreie bzw. durch Lizenzierung zulässige Bereich. Neben Büchern werden auch Zeitschriften ausgewertet. So sind z.B. die Aufsätze aus der Zeitschrift "IWP - Information. Wissenschaft und Praxis" der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis (http://www.dgi-info.de) komplett digital - und einige auch mit MP3Hördateien ergänzt. Anwendung finden seit 2006 die Lösungen von AGI auch in der Suche von Parlamentsmaterialien, also in der öffentlichen Verwaltung - konkret dem wirtschaftlich erfolgreichsten Bundesland Österreichs, Vorarlberg. Diese Leistung wird als Dienstleistung der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (http://vlb-katalog.vorarlberg.de) erbracht (www.vorarlberg.at/landtag/landtag/parlamentarischematerialien/recherche.htm)
    Das Highlight unter den Referaten bei dieser Tagung waren die Ausführungen des Vordenkers Andreas Prokoph, Lead Architect - Search Technologies and Portal Server Development, vom deutschen IBM Entwicklungslabor. Er sprach über Information Retrieval. Mit über 200 Patenten, darunter auch seinen eigenen, liegt IBM in diesem Forschungsfeld weit vorne. Die IBM Suchmaschine OMNIFIND soll möglichst bald die Suchtechnik hinter dandelon.com ersetzen und den Suchraum auf Kataloge, Open Archives, Verlage, Hochschul-Server ausdehnen. Schon heute basieren intelligentCAPTURE und dandelon.com weitgehend auf IBM-Technologien, konkret Lotus Notes & Domino und Lotus Sametime (www.ibm.corn/ lotus/hannover), aber auch auf integrierten Modulen anderer international führender Technologiespezialisten."
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.5, S.311
  9. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.01 
    0.0059455284 = product of:
  0.041618697 = sum of:
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=5421,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
    0.031133216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031133216 = score(doc=5421,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.5, S.378-390
  10. Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981) 0.01 
    0.005721087 = product of:
  0.04004761 = sum of:
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
  11. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.01 
    0.00531243 = product of:
  0.03718701 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
    0.031133216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031133216 = score(doc=2230,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.01 
    0.005054501 = product of:
  0.035381503 = sum of:
    0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011415146 = score(doc=8116,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
  13. Pienaar, R.E.: Enhancement of subject access in online public access catalogues (OPACs) (1989) 0.00 
    0.0034326524 = product of:
  0.024028566 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Subject access plays an important part when plans are made for an on-line public access catalogue (OPAC). Therefore, current subject searching facilities in OPACs should be accessed carefully. These facilities include, amongst other things, phrase searching, keyword searching and class number retrieval. Users reaction have been instrumental in identifying certain shortcomings in subject access to OPACs. Points out certain shortcomings in subject access, as shown by a number of research projects undertaken during the past decade. Highlights aspects which could, in future, improve subject access in OPACs. This could be achieved by either enhancing content representation in the records within the OPAC data base or by enhancing the searchability and browsability of the OPAC. Considers whether the on-line catalogue will ever be a finished, perfect product, or achieve the universal, familiar uniformity experienced by users of the 20th century card catalogue.
    Source
    South African journal of library and information science. 57(1989) no.4, S.378-382
  14. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.00 
    0.0034326524 = product of:
  0.024028566 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
  15. Dillon, M.: Enhanced bibliographic record retrieval experiments (1989) 0.00 
    0.0034237658 = product of:
  0.047932718 = sum of:
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  16. Dillon, M.; Wenzel, P.: Retrieval effectiveness of enhanced bibliographic records (1990) 0.00 
    0.0034237658 = product of:
  0.047932718 = sum of:
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  17. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.00 
    0.0021770028 = product of:
  0.01523902 = sum of:
    0.009885807 = weight(_text_:information in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009885807 = score(doc=520,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.0053532133 = product of:
      0.016059639 = sum of:
        0.016059639 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016059639 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  18. Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995) 0.00 
    0.0021398535 = product of:
  0.029957948 = sum of:
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
  19. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.00 
    0.002011945 = product of:
  0.014083615 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.008029819 = product of:
      0.024089456 = sum of:
        0.024089456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024089456 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  20. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.00 
    0.001815726 = product of:
  0.025420163 = sum of:
    0.025420163 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025420163 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 36
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes