Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × author_ss:"Losee, R.M."
  1. Losee, R.M.: Decisions in thesaurus construction and use (2007) 0.00 
    6.115257E-4 = product of:
  0.00856136 = sum of:
    0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00856136 = score(doc=924,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    A thesaurus and an ontology provide a set of structured terms, phrases, and metadata, often in a hierarchical arrangement, that may be used to index, search, and mine documents. We describe the decisions that should be made when including a term, deciding whether a term should be subdivided into its subclasses, or determining which of more than one set of possible subclasses should be used. Based on retrospective measurements or estimates of future performance when using thesaurus terms in document ordering, decisions are made so as to maximize performance. These decisions may be used in the automatic construction of a thesaurus. The evaluation of an existing thesaurus is described, consistent with the decision criteria developed here. These kinds of user-focused decision-theoretic techniques may be applied to other hierarchical applications, such as faceted classification systems used in information architecture or the use of hierarchical terms in "breadcrumb navigation".
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.4, S.958-968
  2. Willis, C.; Losee, R.M.: ¬A random walk on an ontology : using thesaurus structure for automatic subject indexing (2013) 0.00 
    2.8827597E-4 = product of:
  0.0040358636 = sum of:
    0.0040358636 = weight(_text_:information in 1016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040358636 = score(doc=1016,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 1016, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1016)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1330-1344

Years