Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Oberhauser, O.: Praktische Lösungen für lokale Systematiken (2) : Ein einfaches Interface für den Online-Katalog (2007) 0.01 
    0.009257306 = product of:
  0.06480114 = sum of:
    0.046826374 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046826374 = score(doc=724,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.38489348 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag berichtet über die Erstellung eines hierarchischen Browse- und Abfrage-Interfaces für die lokale Systematik der Bibliothek der Sigmund Freud Privatstiftung (Wien), deren Online-Katalog an der Zentrale des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes (OBVSG) unter Aleph 500 geführt wird. Da dieses System selbst keinerlei Features für die klassifikatorische Recherche vorsieht, wurden 25 HTLM-Seiten in den OPAC integriert, die eine hierarchische Navigation auf den drei Ebenen der Systematik ermöglichen. Mittels eines wöchentlich automatisch eingesetzten Perl-Programms wird dabei auch angezeigt, mit welchen Treffermengen in der jeweiligen Klasse bzw. den zugehörigen Unterklassen (in etwa) zu rechnen ist; diese Anzeige ist ausserdem mit der unmittelbaren Suche nach den betreffenden Titeln verlinkt. Da vonseiten der Bibliothek lediglich die Notationen katalogisiert werden, erfolgt bei der Titel-Vollanzeige mittels einer JavaScript-basierten Umnutzung der Aleph-Funktion "Suchdienste" ebenfalls ein Link auf das hierarchische Interface, um die Bedeutung der jeweiligen Notation im systematischen Kontext zu veranschaulichen.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Oberhauser, O.: Praktische Lösungen für lokale Systematiken (3) : automatisierte Anzeige der Klassenbenennungen (2007) 0.01 
    0.009257306 = product of:
  0.06480114 = sum of:
    0.046826374 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046826374 = score(doc=1402,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.38489348 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Im letzten Heft der VÖB-Mitteilungen wurde über die Erstellung eines hie-rarchischen Browse- und Abfrage-Interfaces für die lokale Systematik im Online-Katalog der Bibliothek der Sigmund Freud Privatstiftung, der im Rahmen eines Aleph-Sharing-Lokalsystems an der Verbundzentrale OBVSG betrieben wird, berichtet. Im Hinblick auf die Darstellung der den Titeldatensätzen jeweils zugeordneten Systematikgruppen in der Vollanzeige des OPACs galt damals noch (sinngemäß): Da vonseiten der Bibliothek lediglich die Notationen katalogisiert werden, wird bei der Titel-Vollanzeige mittels einer JavaScript-basierten Umnutzung der Aleph-Funktion "Suchdienste" ein Link auf das hierarchische Interface generiert, um die Bedeutung der jeweiligen Notation im systematischen Kontext zu veranschaulichen. Diese Lösung, die zwar durchaus besser als das kommentarlose Display einzelner "nackter" Notationen war, ist nunmehr obsolet geworden. Ein vor kurzem implementierter, einfacher Automatismus aus der "Werkstatt" der Verbundzentrale bewirkt die Einspielung der Klassennamen bereits im Katalogisierungsprozess und macht so die Anzeige dieser Benennungen im Katalog (OPAC bzw. Bearbeitungs-GUI) möglich.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.01 
    0.006620335 = product of:
  0.046342343 = sum of:
    0.020922182 = weight(_text_:web in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020922182 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
    0.025420163 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025420163 = score(doc=3102,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification has been used to organize materials owned by the three scientific libraries at the University of Pavia, and to allow integrated browsing in their union catalogue through SciGator, a home built web-based user interface. Classification acts as a bridge between collections located in different places and shelved according to different local schemes. Furthermore, cross-discipline relationships recorded in the system allow for expanded queries that increase recall. Advantages and possible improvements of such a system are discussed.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Pollitt, A.S.; Tinker, A.J.; Braekevelt, P.A.J.: Improving access to online information using dynamic faceted classification (1998) 0.01 
    0.005849582 = product of:
  0.040947072 = sum of:
    0.019976506 = weight(_text_:information in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019976506 = score(doc=4427,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
    0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020970564 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The human natural ability to store and process images and speech provides clues for improving access to online information. The principles underpinning the maps people use in their minds can be applied to maps that can be presented at the user interface to online systems. Traditional classification organizes information into structured hierarchies and simplifies the search problem, but has serious limitations. Discusses the prospects for improving access to online information through the application of dynamic faceted classification. Presents a glimpse into the navigation of n-dimensional information space for future library OPACs using a modified DDC
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Online information 98: 22nd International Online Information Meeting, Proceedings, London, 8-10 December 1998. Ed.: .
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Pasanen-Tuomainen, I.: Analysis of subject searching in the TENTTU books database (1992) 0.01 
    0.005670654 = product of:
  0.039694577 = sum of:
    0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00856136 = score(doc=4252,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
    0.031133216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031133216 = score(doc=4252,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 4252, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4252)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Presents a pilot study for an Internordic project to monitor the use of online catalogues in the Nordic technological university libraries. Focuses on the use of classification in subject searching, how the UDC is used and the extent of its use. Studies user interaction with the OPACs and improvements to information retrieval in the catalogues using the transaction log method to gather data. The pilot study examnines the TENTTU Books database which is the online union catalogue of the Helsinki Univ. of Technology Library, a multilingual database with true information retrieval. The Internordic study itself will make comparisons between the TENTTU system and the new Virginia Tech Library System. Discusses the users monitored, method of analysis, subject searching in the database, results and how the UDC codes were used. Compares this to other studies conducted in Finland and evaluates the project
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages (2006) 0.01 
    0.0056635872 = product of:
  0.03964511 = sum of:
    0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009988253 = score(doc=232,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=232,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Boeckx, T.: Onderwerpontsluiting in de on-line publiekscatalogus (1986) 0.00 
    0.004841936 = product of:
  0.067787096 = sum of:
    0.067787096 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067787096 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. LaBarre, K.: Faceted navigation and browsing features in new OPACs : a more robust solution to problems of information seekers? (2007) 0.00 
    0.003790876 = product of:
  0.02653613 = sum of:
    0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00856136 = score(doc=688,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    At the end of 2005, impending digitization efforts and several developments related to the creation of access and discovery tools for informational and cultural objects resulted in a series of responses that continue to ripple throughout the library, museum and archive communities. These developments have broad implications for all three communities because of the goals shared by each in the creation of description, control and enhanced access to informational and cultural objects. This position paper will consider new implementations of faceted navigation and browsing features in online catalogs. It is also a response to challenges to develop interwoven approaches to the study of information seeking and the design and implementation of search and discovery systems. Urgently needed during this time of experimentation, development and implementation is a framework for system evaluation and critical analysis of needed and missing features that is grounded in traditional principles, borne out by practice. Such a framework could extend feature analysis protocols established during the early years of online catalog development.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017) 0.00 
    0.0037468998 = product of:
  0.026228298 = sum of:
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
    0.021183468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021183468 = score(doc=5148,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Documents in digital and paper libraries may be arranged, based on their topics, in order to facilitate browsing. It may seem intuitively obvious that ordering documents by their subject should improve browsing performance; the results presented in this article suggest that ordering library materials by their Gray code values and through using links consistent with the small world model of document relationships is consistent with improving browsing performance. Below, library circulation data, including ordering with Library of Congress Classification numbers and Library of Congress Subject Headings, are used to provide information useful in generating user-centered document arrangements, as well as user-independent arrangements. Documents may be linearly arranged so they can be placed in a line by topic, such as on a library shelf, or in a list on a computer display. Crossover links, jumps between a document and another document to which it is not adjacent, can be used in library databases to allow additional paths that one might take when browsing. The improvement that is obtained with different combinations of document orderings and different crossovers is examined and applications suggested.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  10. Kowalk, W.: ¬Der OPAC der Universitätsbibliothek Saarbrücken (1989) 0.00 
    0.0034237658 = product of:
  0.047932718 = sum of:
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=569,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 569, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=569)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. Markey, K.: Subject searching in library catalogs : Before and after the introduction of online catalogs (1984) 0.00 
    0.0034237658 = product of:
  0.047932718 = sum of:
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  12. McGarry, D.: Displays of bibliographic records in call number order : functions of the displays and data elements needed (1992) 0.00 
    0.0031590632 = product of:
  0.02211344 = sum of:
    0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071344664 = score(doc=2384,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
    0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014978974 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Online displays of bibliographic records in call number order can serve various functions. A literature search showed no papers or books discussing this topic directly. Various displays from online catalogues available via the Internet were examined, as were displays sent to the author by colleagues. A number of the displays were uninformative to the extent that the identification of works associated with call numbers was difficult or impossible without follow-up searching of the individual bibliographic records. Other displays provided information where further searching of the database would not be required for most purposes. Displays noted ranged from displays with call numbers alone, with no bibliographic information, to records including main entry, title, statement of responsibility, place, publisher, and date. Suggestions of useful data elements to be included in displays of bibliographic records in call number order are made for the following functions: shelflisting, cataloguing, catalogue maintenance, reference, public searches, acquisition and collection development, and inventory control. Recommendations are made that the following data elements should be present in call number displays: entire call number as a sequencing element; main entry; entire title proper, and the date. Concern is expressed that the call number filing arrangement be that followed in traditional shelflists, and a suggestion is made that possible consensus on the placement of the data elements within a display be considered in the future
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Kowalk, W.: ¬Der OPAC der Universitätsbibliothek Saarbrücken (1991) 0.00 
    0.002995795 = product of:
  0.04194113 = sum of:
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  14. Rosenberger, B.: ¬Die neue Online-Systematik der Universitätsbibliothek Hagen (2000) 0.00 
    0.002995795 = product of:
  0.04194113 = sum of:
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=4354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  15. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Konzepte für ein interaktives Retrieval im OPAC : Oder: Von der Informationserschließung zur Wissenserkundung (2004) 0.00 
    0.0029650682 = product of:
  0.041510954 = sum of:
    0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041510954 = score(doc=2195,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Konzepte für ein interaktives Retrieval im OPAC : Oder: Von der Informationserschließung zur Wissenserkundung (2004) 0.00 
    0.0029650682 = product of:
  0.041510954 = sum of:
    0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041510954 = score(doc=2491,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  17. Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005) 0.00 
    0.0027874985 = product of:
  0.01951249 = sum of:
    0.014828428 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014828428 = score(doc=3353,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
    0.0046840613 = product of:
      0.014052183 = sum of:
        0.014052183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014052183 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Das in den letzten Jahren wiedererwachte Interesse an der klassifikatorischen Erschließung und Recherche hat sich allem Anschein nach noch nicht ausreichend bis zu den Herstellern integrierter Bibliothekssysteme herumgesprochen. Wie wäre es sonst zu erklären, dass im OPAC-Modul eines führenden Systems wie Aleph 500 so gut wie keine Features für klassifikationsbasierte Recherchen zu erblicken sind? Tatsächlich finden wir heute einen im Vergleich zum einstigen System Bibos kaum veränderten Zustand vor: Notationen eines oder mehrerer Klassifikationssysteme können in einer durch MAB dafür bestimmten Kategorie (700, nebst Indikatoren) katalogisiert und dann recherchiert bzw. angezeigt werden. Doch welcher Benutzer weiß schon, was diese Notationen im einzelnen bedeuten? Wer macht sich die Mühe, dies selbst herauszufinden, um dann danach zu recherchieren? Hier liegt im wesentlich dasselbe Problem vor, das schon dem systematischen Zettelkatalog anhaftete und ihn zu einem zwar mühevoll erstellten, aber wenig genutzten Rechercheinstrument machte, das nur dann (zwangsläufig) angenommen wurde, wenn ein verbaler Sachkatalog fehlte. Nun könnte eingewandt werden, dass im Vergleich zu früher unter Aleph 500 wenigstens das Aufblättern von Indizes möglich sei, sodass im OPAC ein Index für die vergebenen Notationen angeboten werden kann (bzw. mehrere solche Indizes bei Verwendung von mehr als nur einem Klassifikationssystem). Gewiss, doch was bringt dem Uneingeweihten das Aufblättern des Notationsindex - außer einer alphabetischen Liste von kryptischen Codes? Weiter könnte man einwenden, dass es im Aleph-500-OPAC die so genannten Suchdienste ("services") gibt, mithilfe derer von bestimmten Elementen einer Vollanzeige hypertextuell weiternavigiert werden kann. Richtig, doch damit kann man bloß wiederum den Index aufblättern oder alle anderen Werke anzeigen lassen, die dieselbe Notationen - also einen Code, dessen Bedeutung meist unbekannt ist - aufweisen. Wie populär mag dieses Feature beim Publikum wohl sein? Ein anderer Einwand wäre der Hinweis auf das inzwischen vom Hersteller angebotene Thesaurus-Modul, das vermutlich auch für Klassifikationssysteme eingesetzt werden könnte. Doch wie viele Bibliotheken unseres Verbundes waren bisher bereit, für dieses Modul, das man eigentlich als Bestandteil des Basissystems erwarten könnte, gesondert zu bezahlen? Schließlich mag man noch einwenden, dass es im Gegensatz zur Bibos-Zeit nun die Möglichkeit gibt, Systematiken und Klassifikationen als Normdateien zu implementieren und diese beim Retrieval für verbale Einstiege in die klassifikatorische Recherche oder zumindest für die Veranschaulichung der Klassenbenennungen in der Vollanzeige zu nutzen. Korrekt - dies ist möglich und wurde sogar einst für die MSC (Mathematics Subject Classification, auch bekannt als "AMS-Klassifikation") versucht. Dieses Projekt, das noch unter der Systemversion 11.5 begonnen wurde, geriet jedoch nach einiger Zeit ins Stocken und fand bedauerlicherweise nie seinen Weg in die folgende Version (14.2). Mag auch zu hoffen sein, dass es unter der neuen Version 16 wieder weitergeführt werden kann, so weist dieses Beispiel doch auf die grundsätzliche Problematik des Normdatei-Ansatzes (zusätzlicher Aufwand, Kontinuität) hin. Zudem lohnt sich die Implementierung einer eigenen Normdatei 4 wohl nur bei einem größeren bzw. komplexen Klassifikationssystem, wogegen man im Falle kleinerer Systematiken kaum daran denken würde.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  18. Erdei, K.: Systematik im Online-Katalog der UB Kiel : Ein Werkstattbericht (1999) 0.00 
    0.0025678244 = product of:
  0.03594954 = sum of:
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  19. Tinker, A.J.; Pollitt, A.S.; O'Brien, A.; Braekevelt, P.A.: ¬The Dewey Decimal Classification and the transition from physical to electronic knowledge organisation (1999) 0.00 
    0.0022884347 = product of:
  0.016019043 = sum of:
    0.0040358636 = weight(_text_:information in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040358636 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
    0.0119831795 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0119831795 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The physical organisation of items on library shelves using any classification scheme is inevitable a compromise. The best efforts to achieve an arrangement that is helpful to users will be thwarted by the multifaceted nature of these items and the specific needs of the user and the library. Items on a particular subject will be scattered throughout the library building(s) across disciplines, by physical form, by frequency of use and whether and for how long they may be borrowed. Even thought he rich information content of multifaceted items may be represented in the notation, the items required by a user will be scattered across library shelves when the item is placed in a single relative location. This paper explores these issues uisng examples from a University Library classified using the DDC. The electronic context of the library OPAC can transcend the constraints imposed by the predominantly physical nature of library collections, yet the current use of classification schemes in on-line systems retains many of these limitations. Examples of such systems applying DDC on the WWW are discussed and compared with a system that seeks to use DDC in what is called view-based searching. The interface and the resulting browsing and searching capability of a view-based OPAC are described. Ways in which subject access to library collections can be improved and disciplinary scatter resolved by assigning multiple class number to items and exploiting the rich Dewey structure in a faceted form are discussed. It is suggested that the informative power of visual classificatory structures at the search interface will be beneficial to the broader learning experience of the user. The paper concludes that the application of classification schemes in electronic interfaces should not be bound by the the physical constraints that no longer apply in an electronic context but be exploited to provide a complete, flexible and individual interface as determined by the needs of each user
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  20. Heinz, S.: Realisierung und Evaluierung eines virtuellen Bibliotheksregals für die Informationswissenschaft an der Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim (2003) 0.00 
    0.002118347 = product of:
  0.029656855 = sum of:
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=5982,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5982, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5982)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 22
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes