Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

0.028088983 = product of:
  0.13108192 = sum of:
    0.07712996 = weight(_text_:wide in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07712996 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
    0.041844364 = weight(_text_:web in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041844364 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.1-49

0.023407485 = product of:
  0.10923493 = sum of:
    0.06427497 = weight(_text_:wide in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06427497 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
    0.034870304 = weight(_text_:web in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034870304 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.24-32

0.005950577 = product of:
  0.04165404 = sum of:
    0.03660921 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03660921 = score(doc=1549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2612416 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=1549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Elektronische Technologien durchdringen zunehmend alle Lebens- und Arbeitsbereiche wie Politik, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Kultur. Vor allem durch die breite Nutzung des Internets formiert sich die so genannte Informationsgesellschaft. Innerhalb dieser haben Archive zusammen mit Bibliotheken und Museen für die Sicherung und Bereitstellung des Kulturerbes einen bedeutenden Stellenwert. Im Zeitalter globaler Kommunikation treten so neben konventionelle Formen des Informationsangebots zunehmend auch neue Wege der Informationsvermittlung. Die Staatliche Archivverwaltung Baden-Württemberg als traditioneller Dienstleister für Verwaltung und Forschung entwickelt sich in den letzten Jahren verstärkt zu einem öffentlichen Informationsdienstleister. Dabei werden auch neue Kooperationsformen eingeschlagen, wozu auch die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) gehört. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Entwicklung eines kundenorientierten, mehrstufigen Internetangebots, das bis zur Präsentation von digitalisiertem Archivgut auf der untersten Stufe reicht. So wurden in den letzten Jahren neue Lösungen für Online-Findmittel mit Präsentationsmodulen für digitalisiertes Archivgut entwickelt, die die Basis für die Teilnahme an verschiedenen Portal-Projekten bilden. Durch die Digitalisierung von Archivgut besteht die Möglichkeit, interessierten Bürgern, Wissenschaftlern, Studenten und Schülern den Zugang zu den Quellen über Online-Medien wie dem Internet zu ermöglichen. Dadurch können einerseits die wertvollen Originale und Unikate geschützt werden, andererseits erhält der Nutzer unabhängig von Ort und Zeit völlig neue Zugriffsmöglichkeiten auf Archivgut. In diesem Beitrag werden verschiedene Internet-Angebote und Technologien der Staatlichen Archivverwaltung Baden-Württemberg vorgestellt, die neue Möglichkeiten des Zugangs zu Archivgut bilden. Dabei werden folgende Themenbereiche angesprochen: - Abbildung archivischer Information im Internet - Mehrdimensionaler Zugang zu Archivinformationen durch Internet-Portale - Online-Findmittel und digitalisierte Archivalien im Internet - Technologien für Online-Angebote

0.0057248455 = product of:
  0.040073916 = sum of:
    0.029588435 = weight(_text_:web in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029588435 = score(doc=4288,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=4288,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Users interact with museum application interfaces for many reasons. There are various types of users, who want to perform various tasks, in various contexts, that can access the same Web site. Thus, it is important to have user interfaces able to adapt to these different user requirements to facilitate the accomplishment of the desired goals. Most current interfaces to museum information do not take into account this variety of types of users, thus providing interfaces that some users find confusing to achieve their goals. In this article we discuss the various possible levels of support that can be given to different users during navigation of museum information. In particular, we focus our attention on how to obtain adaptable and adaptive interfaces using the web site for the Marble Museum, which we have designed and developed, as a source of examples for our discussion of possible solutions

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.5-13

0.00463059 = product of:
  0.032414127 = sum of:
    0.017435152 = weight(_text_:web in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017435152 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
    0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014978974 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Der Bestand eines Fernseharchivs gleicht auf dem ersten Blick einem Irrgarten. Täglich werden große Mengen an audiovisuellen Informationen über den Äther geschickt und gleichzeitig für eine eventuelle Wiederverwendung digital gespeichert. Die Herausforderung für jeden Archivar besteht darin, aus Millionen von Sendeminuten auf Anfrage möglichst schnell das passende Material zusammenzustellen. Mit diesem Problem befasste sich das EU-Projekt Primavera (Personalized Retrieval und Indexing of Media Assets in Virtual Environments for Real-Time Access). Die darin entwickelte Software testet der Österreichische Rundfunk in Wien seit einem Jahr. Sie wurde vom Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme (IPSI) in Darmstadt, der tecmath AG in Kaiserslautern und dem Instituto Trentino Di Cultura (ITC) in Trient gemeinsam entworfen. Neuer Suchansatz Suchte ein Redakteur bisher in archivierten Sendungen, bestellte er schließlich mehrere, vermutlich passende Mitschnitte. Viele davon erweisen sich jedoch schnell als nutzlos. Nun kann man bereits am Bildschirm anhand von Schlüsselbildern - den Keyframes genannten Standbildern markanter Szenen - eine Vorauswahl treffen. Einzelne Zugriffe auf das System erfolgen über einen Web-Browser, wobei Suchergebnisse grafisch aufberei tet werden. Damit eine Suche erfolgreich ist, müssen die Archivbestände exakt klassifiziert sein. Mit einem Werkzeug namens Piclasso beschleunigt das Programm die Verschlagwortung von bereits vorhandenen Filmen, indem es deren Klassifizierung sozusagen lernt und auf neu hinzukommendes Material automatisch anwendet. Der Archivar hat dabei aber jederzeit die Wahl, ob er einen Vorschlag übernimmt oder nicht. Zudem kann der Nutzer nicht nurtext-, sondern auch bildbezogen suchen.

0.0035036046 = product of:
  0.02452523 = sum of:
    0.01928249 = weight(_text_:wide in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01928249 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.0052427407 = weight(_text_:information in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052427407 = score(doc=1464,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.10078184 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

For the first time, under the leadership of the Visual Resources Association, a cross section of five visual and cultural heritage experts, along with scores of reviewers from varied institutions, have created a new data content standard focused on cultural materials. This cutting-edge reference offers practical resources for cataloging and flexibility to meet the needs of a wide range of institutions - from libraries to museums to archives to visual collections. Consistently following these guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate metadata elements in cultural materials' catalog records: promotes good descriptive cataloging and reduces redundancy; builds a foundation of shared documentation; creates data sharing opportunities; and, complements existing standards

BK

06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines

Classification

06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 34(2007) no.4, S. 264-265 (L.C. Howarth): "At a time when cataloguing code revision is continuing apace with the consolidation of the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), the drafting of RDA: Resource Description and Access, and the development of common principles for an international cataloguing code (International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code [IME ICC]), the publication of a guide for cataloguing cultural objects is timely and purposeful. Compiling this data content standard on behalf of the Visual Resources Association, the five editors - with oversight from an advisory board - have divided the guide into three parts. Following a brief introduction outlining the purpose, intended audience, and scope and methodology for the publication, Part One, General Guidelines, explains both what the Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) guide is "a broad document that includes rules for formatting data, suggestions for required information, controlled vocabulary requirements, and display issues" (p. I) and is not "not a metadata element set per se" (p. 1). Part Two, Elements, is further divided into nine chapters dealing with one or more metadata elements, and describing the relationships between and among each element. Part Three, Authorities, discusses what elements to include in building authority records. A Selected Bibliography, Glossary, and Index, respectively, round out the guide.

0.0022884347 = product of:
  0.016019043 = sum of:
    0.0040358636 = weight(_text_:information in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040358636 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
    0.0119831795 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0119831795 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.

Source

Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.0015953153 = product of:
  0.022334414 = sum of:
    0.022334414 = weight(_text_:information in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022334414 = score(doc=5000,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.42933714 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Museum informatics is the study of the sociotechnical interactions that take place at the intersection of people, information, and technology in museums. This entry presents an overview of museum informatics, covering such topics as information representation, information organization and access, information management, information technology, information interactions, and information professionals in museums. It explores the impact of information science and technology on museums, museum professionals, and museum visitors, and argues that museum researchers must take a sociotechnical approach to studying the use of information resources and technologies in museums.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.0012230515 = product of:
  0.01712272 = sum of:
    0.01712272 = weight(_text_:information in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01712272 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Footnote

Abschlussarbeit am Institut für Information und Dokumentation an der Fachhochschule Potsdam

Imprint

Potsdam : Institut für Information und Dokumentation

0.001008966 = product of:
  0.014125523 = sum of:
    0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 1334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014125523 = score(doc=1334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1334)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.6, S.339-346

8.64828E-4 = product of:
  0.012107591 = sum of:
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.33-38

8.64828E-4 = product of:
  0.012107591 = sum of:
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.39-48

8.64828E-4 = product of:
  0.012107591 = sum of:
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=3103,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

In 1996, with funding from the Henry Luce Foundation, Jack Lenor Larsen and an advisory committee composed of distinguished museum and design professionals developed Objects Classified by Mediums in response to the concern that existing systems do not provide the tools for comparing information on objects. A common understanding and definitions of terms are crucial to the success of a classification project meant to cross institutional and national boundaries. Objects Classified by Mediums seeks to organize areas of study in fiber, clay, metal, wood, and so on, to allow curators and scholars to compare information on similar methods used, build a conceptual framework for the greater understanding of whole categories of objects rather than as isolated works, and provide a finding tool for cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary investigation.

Footnote

Beitrag im Schwerpunktthema "Perspectives on design: information technologies and creative practices"

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.9, S.1907-1914

5.7655195E-4 = product of:
  0.008071727 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=1020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.6, S.333-338

4.32414E-4 = product of:
  0.0060537956 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 1019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=1019,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1019, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1019)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.6, S.327-332

4.32414E-4 = product of:
  0.0060537956 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.3, S.159-161

4.32414E-4 = product of:
  0.0060537956 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=3759,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

3.6034497E-4 = product of:
  0.0050448296 = sum of:
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 4289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=4289,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4289, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4289)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.14-23

3.6034497E-4 = product of:
  0.0050448296 = sum of:
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both