Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  1. Bates, M.J.: ¬An explanatory paradigm for online information retrieval (1986) 0.01
    0.00859496 = product of:
      0.06016472 = sum of:
        0.024215182 = weight(_text_:information in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024215182 = score(doc=733,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Intelligent information systems for the information society. Proc. of the 6th Int, Research Forum in Information Science, Frascati, 16.-18.9.1985. Ed.: B.C. Brooks
  2. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.01
    0.008009522 = product of:
      0.05606665 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194113 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989) 0.00
    0.0034237658 = product of:
      0.047932718 = sum of:
        0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047932718 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.00
    0.002118347 = product of:
      0.029656855 = sum of:
        0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029656855 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  5. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.00
    0.002118347 = product of:
      0.029656855 = sum of:
        0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029656855 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Bates, M.J.: How to use information search tactics online (1987) 0.00
    0.0011531039 = product of:
      0.016143454 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  7. Bates, M.J.: Search techniques (1981) 0.00
    0.0011531039 = product of:
      0.016143454 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.139-170