Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02 
    0.018319076 = product of:
  0.08548902 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
    0.021412853 = product of:
      0.064238556 = sum of:
        0.064238556 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064238556 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  2. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.02 
    0.015004051 = product of:
  0.0700189 = sum of:
    0.014268933 = weight(_text_:information in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014268933 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
    0.042366937 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042366937 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella
  3. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01 
    0.013135179 = product of:
  0.061297502 = sum of:
    0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009988253 = score(doc=5001,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=5001,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
    0.009368123 = product of:
      0.028104367 = sum of:
        0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028104367 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  4. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.01 
    0.011011096 = product of:
  0.077077664 = sum of:
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
    0.066988006 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066988006 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  5. Salton, G.; McGill, M. J.: Information Retrieval: Grundlegendes für Informationswissenschaftler (1987) 0.01 
    0.009909214 = product of:
  0.069364496 = sum of:
    0.017475804 = weight(_text_:information in 8648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017475804 = score(doc=8648,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 8648, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8648)
    0.05188869 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05188869 = score(doc=8648,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 8648, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8648)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Information Retrieval: eine Einführung; Invertierte Dateisysteme; Textanalyse und automatisches Indexieren; Die experimentellen Retrievalsysteme SMART und SIRE; Die Bewertung von Retrievalsystemen; Fortgeschrittene Retrievaltechniken; Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache; Informationstechnologie: Hardware und Software; Datenbankmanagementsysteme; Zukünftige Entwicklungen im Information Retrieval
  6. Salton, G.: Automatic text processing : the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer (1989) 0.01 
    0.009909214 = product of:
  0.069364496 = sum of:
    0.017475804 = weight(_text_:information in 1307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017475804 = score(doc=1307,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 1307, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1307)
    0.05188869 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05188869 = score(doc=1307,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 1307, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1307)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    Subject
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  7. Salton, G.; McGill, M. J.: Introduction to modern information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 2328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=2328,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2328, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2328)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=2328,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2328, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2328)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  8. Research and development in information retrieval : Proc., Berlin, 18.-20.5.1982 (1983) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  9. Fuhr, N.; Knorz, G.: Retrieval test evaluation of a rule based automatic indexing (AIR/PHYS) (1984) 0.01 
    0.008992559 = product of:
  0.062947914 = sum of:
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
    0.050840326 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050840326 = score(doc=2321,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Research and development in information retrieval. Proc. of the 3rd joint BCS and ACM symp., Cambridge, 2.-6.7.1984. Ed.: C.J. van Rijsbergen
  10. Griffiths, A.; Luckhurst, H.C.; Willett, P.: Using interdocument similarity information in document retrieval systems (1986) 0.01 
    0.008845377 = product of:
  0.061917633 = sum of:
    0.019976506 = weight(_text_:information in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019976506 = score(doc=2415,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986) no.1, S.3-11
  11. Advances in intelligent retrieval: Proc. of a conference ... Wadham College, Oxford, 16.-17.4.1985 (1986) 0.01 
    0.008727639 = product of:
  0.06109347 = sum of:
    0.013536699 = weight(_text_:information in 1384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013536699 = score(doc=1384,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1384, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1384)
    0.04755677 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04755677 = score(doc=1384,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 1384, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1384)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ADDIS, T.: Extended relational analysis: a design approach to knowledge-based systems; PARKINSON, D.: Supercomputers and non-numeric processing; McGREGOR, D.R. u. J.R. MALONE: An architectural approach to advances in information retrieval; ALLEN, M.J. u. O.S. HARRISON: Word processing and information retrieval: some practical problems; MURTAGH, F.: Clustering and nearest neighborhood searching; ENSER, P.G.B.: Experimenting with the automatic classification of books; TESKEY, N. u. Z. RAZAK: An analysis of ranking for free text retrieval systems; ZARRI, G.P.: Interactive information retrieval: an artificial intelligence approach to deal with biographical data; HANCOX, P. u. F. SMITH: A case system processor for the PRECIS indexing language; ROUAULT, J.: Linguistic methods in information retrieval systems; ARAGON-RAMIREZ, V. u. C.D. PAICE: Design of a system for the online elucidation of natural language search statements; BROOKS, H.M., P.J. DANIELS u. N.J. BELKIN: Problem descriptions and user models: developing an intelligent interface for document retrieval systems; BLACK, W.J., P. HARGREAVES u. P.B. MAYES: HEADS: a cataloguing advisory system; BELL, D.A.: An architecture for integrating data, knowledge, and information bases
  12. Panyr, J.: Vektorraum-Modell und Clusteranalyse in Information-Retrieval-Systemen (1987) 0.01 
    0.007927371 = product of:
  0.055491596 = sum of:
    0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013980643 = score(doc=2322,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
    0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041510954 = score(doc=2322,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von theoretischen Indexierungsansätzen wird das klassische Vektorraum-Modell für automatische Indexierung (mit dem Trennschärfen-Modell) erläutert. Das Clustering in Information-Retrieval-Systemem wird als eine natürliche logische Folge aus diesem Modell aufgefaßt und in allen seinen Ausprägungen (d.h. als Dokumenten-, Term- oder Dokumenten- und Termklassifikation) behandelt. Anschließend werden die Suchstrategien in vorklassifizierten Dokumentenbeständen (Clustersuche) detailliert beschrieben. Zum Schluß wird noch die sinnvolle Anwendung der Clusteranalyse in Information-Retrieval-Systemen kurz diskutiert
  13. Porter, M.F.: ¬An algorithm for suffix stripping (1980) 0.01 
    0.006865305 = product of:
  0.04805713 = sum of:
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.313-316.
  14. Croft, W.B.: Automatic indexing : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989) 0.01 
    0.005721087 = product of:
  0.04004761 = sum of:
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 2412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=2412,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2412, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2412)
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=2412,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2412, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2412)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  15. Salton, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents (1985) 0.01 
    0.0056823203 = product of:
  0.03977624 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=3650,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
    0.03170451 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03170451 = score(doc=3650,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3536936 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The attempt to computerize a process, such as indexing, abstracting, classifying, or retrieving information, begins with an analysis of the process into its intellectual and nonintellectual components. That part of the process which is amenable to computerization is mechanical or algorithmic. What is not is intellectual or creative and requires human intervention. Gerard Salton has been an innovator, experimenter, and promoter in the area of mechanized information systems since the early 1960s. He has been particularly ingenious at analyzing the process of information retrieval into its algorithmic components. He received a doctorate in applied mathematics from Harvard University before moving to the computer science department at Cornell, where he developed a prototype automatic retrieval system called SMART. Working with this system he and his students contributed for over a decade to our theoretical understanding of the retrieval process. On a more practical level, they have contributed design criteria for operating retrieval systems. The following selection presents one of the early descriptions of the SMART system; it is valuable as it shows the direction automatic retrieval methods were to take beyond simple word-matching techniques. These include various word normalization techniques to improve recall, for instance, the separation of words into stems and affixes; the correlation and clustering, using statistical association measures, of related terms; and the identification, using a concept thesaurus, of synonymous, broader, narrower, and sibling terms. They include, as weIl, techniques, both linguistic and statistical, to deal with the thorny problem of how to automatically extract from texts index terms that consist of more than one word. They include weighting techniques and various documentrequest matching algorithms. Significant among the latter are those which produce a retrieval output of citations ranked in relevante order. During the 1970s, Salton and his students went an to further refine these various techniques, particularly the weighting and statistical association measures. Many of their early innovations seem commonplace today. Some of their later techniques are still ahead of their time and await technological developments for implementation. The particular focus of the selection that follows is an the evaluation of a particular component of the SMART system, a multilingual thesaurus. By mapping English language expressions and their German equivalents to a common concept number, the thesaurus permitted the automatic processing of German language documents against English language queries and vice versa. The results of the evaluation, as it turned out, were somewhat inconclusive. However, this SMART experiment suggested in a bold and optimistic way how one might proceed to answer such complex questions as What is meant by retrieval language compatability? How it is to be achieved, and how evaluated?
    Footnote
    Original in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 21(1970) no.3, S.187-194.
  16. Lochbaum, K.E.; Streeter, A.R.: Comparing and combining the effectiveness of latent semantic indexing and the ordinary vector space model for information retrieval (1989) 0.01 
    0.005670654 = product of:
  0.039694577 = sum of:
    0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00856136 = score(doc=3458,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
    0.031133216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031133216 = score(doc=3458,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    A retrievalsystem was built to find individuals with appropriate expertise within a large research establishment on the basis of their authored documents. The expert-locating system uses a new method for automatic indexing and retrieval based on singular value decomposition, a matrix decomposition technique related to the factor analysis. Organizational groups, represented by the documents they write, and the terms contained in these documents, are fit simultaneously into a 100-dimensional "semantic" space. User queries are positioned in the semantic space, and the most similar groups are returned to the user. Here we compared the standard vector-space model with this new technique and found that combining the two methods improved performance over either alone. We also examined the effects of various experimental variables on the system`s retrieval accuracy. In particular, the effects of: term weighting functions in the semantic space construction and in query construction, suffix stripping, and using lexical units larger than a a single word were studied.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 25(1989) no.6, S. 665-676
  17. Fagan, J.L.: ¬The effectiveness of a nonsyntactic approach to automatic phrase indexing for document retrieval (1989) 0.01 
    0.0055279788 = product of:
  0.03869585 = sum of:
    0.008737902 = weight(_text_:information in 1845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008737902 = score(doc=1845,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1845, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1845)
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=1845,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1845, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1845)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    It may be possible to improve the quality of automatic indexing systems by using complex descriptors, for example, phrases, in addition to the simple descriptors (words or word stems) that are normally used in automatically constructed representations of document content. This study is directed toward the goal of developing effective methods of identifying phrases in natural language text from which good quality phrase descriptors can be constructed. The effectiveness of one method, a simple nonsyntactic phrase indexing procedure, has been tested on five experimental document collections. The results have been analyzed in order to identify the inadequacies of the procedure, and to determine what kinds of information about text structure are needed in order to construct phrase descriptors that are good indicators of document content. Two primary conclusions have been reached: (1) In the retrieval experiments, the nonsyntactic phrase construction procedure did not consistently yield substantial improvements in effectiveness. It is therefore not likely that phrase indexing of this kind will prove to be an important method of enhancing the performance of automatic document indexing and retrieval systems in operational environments. (2) Many of the shortcomings of the nonsyntactic approach can be overcome by incorporating syntactic information into the phrase construction process. However, a general syntactic analysis facility may be required, since many useful sources of phrases cannot be exploited if only a limited inventory of syntactic patterns can be recognized. Further research should be conducted into methods of incorporating automatic syntactic analysis into content analysis for document retrieval.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989) no.2, S.115-132
  18. Lustig, G.: Automatische Indexierung : Erfahrungen und Perspektiven (1989) 0.00 
    0.0045768693 = product of:
  0.032038085 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Es wird zunächst ein "ideales Information-Retrieval-System" beschrieben und diskutiert. Als Kernproblem für -selbst bescheidene - Entwicklungen in die dadurch aufgezeigte Richtung wird das "Verstehen" von Texten durch den Computer angesehen, wobei je nach der Aufgabenstellung einer Systemkomponente stets nur ein partielles Verstehen erforderlich ist. Ein relativ einfaches, aber keineswegs triviales Beispiel dieser Art ist die automatische Indexierung von Referatetexten bei vorgegebenen Deskriptorensystem. Von diesem Problem werden Ansätze, Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen mitgeteilt. Darauf aufbauend werden weitere Forschungsrichtungen und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten mitgeteilt
  19. Needham, R.M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Keywords and clumps (1985) 0.00 
    0.0040628472 = product of:
  0.02843993 = sum of:
    0.0049941265 = weight(_text_:information in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049941265 = score(doc=3645,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.0960027 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
    0.023445804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023445804 = score(doc=3645,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26155996 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The selection that follows was chosen as it represents "a very early paper an the possibilities allowed by computers an documentation." In the early 1960s computers were being used to provide simple automatic indexing systems wherein keywords were extracted from documents. The problem with such systems was that they lacked vocabulary control, thus documents related in subject matter were not always collocated in retrieval. To improve retrieval by improving recall is the raison d'être of vocabulary control tools such as classifications and thesauri. The question arose whether it was possible by automatic means to construct classes of terms, which when substituted, one for another, could be used to improve retrieval performance? One of the first theoretical approaches to this question was initiated by R. M. Needham and Karen Sparck Jones at the Cambridge Language Research Institute in England.t The question was later pursued using experimental methodologies by Sparck Jones, who, as a Senior Research Associate in the Computer Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, has devoted her life's work to research in information retrieval and automatic naturai language processing. Based an the principles of numerical taxonomy, automatic classification techniques start from the premise that two objects are similar to the degree that they share attributes in common. When these two objects are keywords, their similarity is measured in terms of the number of documents they index in common. Step 1 in automatic classification is to compute mathematically the degree to which two terms are similar. Step 2 is to group together those terms that are "most similar" to each other, forming equivalence classes of intersubstitutable terms. The technique for forming such classes varies and is the factor that characteristically distinguishes different approaches to automatic classification. The technique used by Needham and Sparck Jones, that of clumping, is described in the selection that follows. Questions that must be asked are whether the use of automatically generated classes really does improve retrieval performance and whether there is a true eco nomic advantage in substituting mechanical for manual labor. Several years after her work with clumping, Sparck Jones was to observe that while it was not wholly satisfactory in itself, it was valuable in that it stimulated research into automatic classification. To this it might be added that it was valuable in that it introduced to libraryl information science the methods of numerical taxonomy, thus stimulating us to think again about the fundamental nature and purpose of classification. In this connection it might be useful to review how automatically derived classes differ from those of manually constructed classifications: 1) the manner of their derivation is purely a posteriori, the ultimate operationalization of the principle of literary warrant; 2) the relationship between members forming such classes is essentially statistical; the members of a given class are similar to each other not because they possess the class-defining characteristic but by virtue of sharing a family resemblance; and finally, 3) automatically derived classes are not related meaningfully one to another, that is, they are not ordered in traditional hierarchical and precedence relationships.
  20. Automatische Indexierung zwischen Forschung und Anwendung (1986) 0.00 
    0.004004761 = product of:
  0.028033325 = sum of:
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=953,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 953, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=953)
    0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020970564 = score(doc=953,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 953, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=953)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Die automatische Indexierung von Dokumenten für das Information Retrieval, d. h. die automatische Charakterisierung von Dokumentinhalten mittels Deskriptoren (Schlagwörtern) ist bereits seit über 25 Jahren ein Gebiet theoretischer und experimenteller Forschung. Dagegen wurde erst im Oktober 1985 mit der Anwendung der automatischen Indexierung in der Inputproduktion für ein großes Retrievalsystem begonnen. Es handelt sich um die Indexierung englischer Referatetexte für die Physik-Datenbasis des Informationszentrums Energie, Physik, Mathematik GmbH in Karlsruhe. In dem vorliegenden Buch beschreiben Mitarbeiter der Technischen Hochschule Darmstadt ihre Forschungs- und Entwicklungsarbeiten, die zu dieser Pilotanwendung geführt haben.

Authors

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 18
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 31
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • d 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes