-
Walker, D.: AusSI Web indexing prizewinners (1997)
0.01
0.009224131 = product of:
0.064568914 = sum of:
0.054580662 = weight(_text_:web in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054580662 = score(doc=3728,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009988253 = score(doc=3728,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Describes the 26 entires to the 1996 Australian society of Indexers' (AusSI) Prize for Web indexes. Entries showed a variety of approaches to Web indexing and included: linear back-of-book style indexes; annotated bibliographies; Yahoo-style hierachical sites; and beautiful castles with rooms full of links. Entries were judges on ease of use of the index for a novice user, content and breadth of coverage, and usefulness at getting information that could answer questions. The winner was the Australian Parliamentary Library Index by Alan Wilson, an index to the information on the Commonwealth Parliamentary Library's Web site and from othe departments of the Australian Parliament. A brief description of each entrey is given together with its URL and the compiler's email address. All entries can be reached on the Web
-
Z39.4-199X: Indexes and related information retrieval devices (1993)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Jones, R.: Indexing the British Medical Journal (1994)
0.01
0.007436463 = product of:
0.05205524 = sum of:
0.044992477 = weight(_text_:wide in 7924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044992477 = score(doc=7924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 7924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7924)
0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 7924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070627616 = score(doc=7924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7924)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- As a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) contains a wide range of subject matter, and many types of information need to be incorporated in its semi-annual index, Index Medicus vocabulary can be used for clinical articles, but non-clinical matter presents problems of soft language. A weekly publication, the BMJ runs to about 1.600 pages a volume; so succint indexing is important, as is keeping to schedule. The number of authors and the vagueness of the journal users present particular problems that can be ameliorated by the design of the index. Medicine is a useful adjunct for subject access. Both the journal and the index have changed during a decade in which social and political aspects of medicine have assumed greater importance
-
Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.00683917 = product of:
0.04787419 = sum of:
0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013980643 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033893548 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Consideration of some of the choices for computerization of indexes, including word processing, records administration systems, and text-retrieval packages. Some of the general concepts relating to indexes are also covered, including various approaches to indexing such as subject, word, and hierarchical indexing, and the use of coordinated themes. The options available within each type of computerization of indexing are also specified
- Source
- Information management and technology. 25(1992) no.3, S.120-122
-
Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996)
0.01
0.0063181263 = product of:
0.04422688 = sum of:
0.014268933 = weight(_text_:information in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014268933 = score(doc=7185,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029957948 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
-
Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999)
0.01
0.0054672468 = product of:
0.038270727 = sum of:
0.01730016 = weight(_text_:information in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01730016 = score(doc=6682,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020970564 = score(doc=6682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- We describe Rosetta, an indexing and retrieval system for collections of research papers. Rosetta indexes papers in a collection based on the way they have been described when referenced by other papers in the collection. With this technique, indices for papers describe information provided in the same way a query describes information needed. Using Rosetta, simple natural language queries retrieve high-precision results in which descriptions based on citations clearly summarize retrieved papers; allowing users to quickly determine which papers most closely meet their information needs
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.00524566 = product of:
0.036719617 = sum of:
0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070627616 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029656855 = score(doc=949,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997)
0.01
0.00524566 = product of:
0.036719617 = sum of:
0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070627616 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029656855 = score(doc=3905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
-
Walker, D.: Web indexing prize 1997 (1998)
0.01
0.005176898 = product of:
0.07247657 = sum of:
0.07247657 = weight(_text_:web in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07247657 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.7494315 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Briefly describes the 20 entries to the 1997 AusSI web indexing prize, with a discussion of trends in web and online indexing
-
Wright, J.C.: Indexing after the millenium 1 : getting the tools right (1998)
0.01
0.0051382817 = product of:
0.035967972 = sum of:
0.027896244 = weight(_text_:web in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027896244 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008071727 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Briefly discusses 3 developing areas in indexing: embedded indexing, online and interactive indexing, and Web-based indexing. Sees these areas as new challenges for indexers' skills and suggests that indexers should be influencing the development of information tools and of the publishing process in the electronic environment
-
Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996)
0.01
0.005054501 = product of:
0.035381503 = sum of:
0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011415146 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023966359 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
-
BIOSIS introduces new relational indexing scheme and additional information in 1998 (1998)
0.01
0.005054501 = product of:
0.035381503 = sum of:
0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011415146 = score(doc=2595,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023966359 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- In 1998 BIOSIS will introduce a new relational indexing system to provide more specific natural language retrieval for its electronic products. Printed publications will have a redesigned subject index to replace the KWIC index and an organism index, replacing the current generic and biosystematic indexes, will allow hierarchical access to kingdom, family and common genus species names
- Source
- Information today. 15(1998) no.4, S.11
-
Bell, H.: On the indexability of butterflies (1992)
0.00
0.0045768693 = product of:
0.032038085 = sum of:
0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008071727 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023966359 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Most publishers, who are cost-conscious, and the majority of authors, who are creativity-conscious, oppos indexes for fiction. However, maintains, that there is a case to be made for the indexing of serious fiction, whose readers have the same needs for information retrieval with regard to characters, places and events, as readers of biographies and histories
-
Earle, R.E.; Berry, R.; Nichols, M.C.: Indexing online information (1996)
0.00
0.0045768693 = product of:
0.032038085 = sum of:
0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008071727 = score(doc=5126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023966359 = score(doc=5126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- To take full advantage of search facilities, online indexes can be designed with a flat structure in which each index entry is clearly worded and makes use of keywords from the subject matter. Indexers can include additional keywords as synonyms that point to the relevant index entries. When indexers take advantage of these concepts and when index users clearly understand what to expect from online indexes, then the indexs become an extremely powerful retrieval medium
-
Anderson, J.D.: Guidelines for indexes and related information retrieval devices (1997)
0.00
0.0044962796 = product of:
0.031473957 = sum of:
0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060537956 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.025420163 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025420163 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This technical report provides guidelines for the content, organization, and presentation of indexes used for the retrieval of documents and parts of documents. It deals with the principles of indexing, regardless of the type of material indexed, the indexing method used (intellectual analysis, machine algorithm, or both), the medium of the index, or the method of presentation for searching. It emphasizes 4 processes essential for all indexes: comprehensive design, vocabulary management, and the provision of systax. It includes definitions of indexes and of their parts, attributes, and aspects; a uniform vocabulary; treatment of the nature and variety of indexes; and recommendations regarding the design, organization, and presentation of indexes. It does not suggest guidelines for every detail or technique of indexing. These can be determined for each index on the basis of factors covered in the technical report
-
Anderson, J.D.: Indexing standards : Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother? (1993)
0.00
0.0044226884 = product of:
0.030958816 = sum of:
0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009988253 = score(doc=8087,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020970564 = score(doc=8087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibility and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. Describes the current draft of the NISO American Standard Guidelines for indexes in information retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of 3 fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management and comprehensive planning and design. Concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
- Source
- Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
-
Anderson, J.D.: Standards for indexing : revising the American National Standard guidelines Z39.4 (1994)
0.00
0.0044226884 = product of:
0.030958816 = sum of:
0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 8266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009988253 = score(doc=8266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 8266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8266)
0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020970564 = score(doc=8266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 8266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8266)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibiliy and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. it describes the current draft of the NISO American Standards Guidelines for Indexes in Information Retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of three fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management, and comprehensive planning and design. The article concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.628-636
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.00
0.00402389 = product of:
0.02816723 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.016059637 = product of:
0.04817891 = sum of:
0.04817891 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04817891 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
-
Walker, D.: AusSI Web indexing prize 1998 (1999)
0.00
0.0039851777 = product of:
0.05579249 = sum of:
0.05579249 = weight(_text_:web in 6264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05579249 = score(doc=6264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 6264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6264)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Henninger, M.: What makes a good Web index? (1999)
0.00
0.0039851777 = product of:
0.05579249 = sum of:
0.05579249 = weight(_text_:web in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05579249 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
