Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Multimedia"
  1. Jörgensen, C.: ¬The MPEG-7 standard : multimedia description in theory and application (2007) 0.03
    0.03248337 = product of:
      0.11369179 = sum of:
        0.045449268 = weight(_text_:wide in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045449268 = score(doc=472,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
        0.046129078 = weight(_text_:web in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046129078 = score(doc=472,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=472,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
        0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014978974 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Allowing the description of the structure of documents has been one of the key factors for the success of the hypertext markup language (HTML) family of markup languages. This capability has motivated the phenomenon that has become known as the World Wide Web (the "Web"). The next generation of the Web, known as the Semantic Web (Berners-Lee, Hendler. & Lassila, 2001), aims at describing the meaning rather than the structure of data, adding more intelligent search, retrieval, and other agent functionalities to the Web, and tools that make the implementation of this Semantic Web possible are greatly needed. The increasing availability of multimedia on the World Wide Web makes metadata description efforts for multimedia a pressing need, yet with the volume of content being created, often only a rudimentary description of the multimedia content is available. In addition, the digital mode entails a host of other descriptive needs, such as the format, factors such as compression and transmission, and issues such as copyright restrictions and terns for usage. Thus, new and efficient ways of describing multimedia content and meaning are needed as well as a structure that is capable of carrying such descriptions. Several attempts have been made to grapple with this issue using descriptive metadata, one of the earliest of which was the revision of the Dublin Core to ascertain essential features necessary to resource discovery of visual items in a networked environment (Weibel & Miller, 1997). Other metadata schemes, such as the Visual Resources Association Core Categories (http://www.vraweb.org/vracore3.htm), also include format information necessary to the use and display of digital images.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1323-1328
  2. Mandl, T.: Web- und Multimedia-Dokumente : Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen (2003) 0.02
    0.021329055 = product of:
      0.099535584 = sum of:
        0.027896244 = weight(_text_:web in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027896244 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
        0.01804893 = weight(_text_:information in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01804893 = score(doc=1734,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
        0.05359041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05359041 = score(doc=1734,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die Menge an Daten im Internet steigt weiter rapide an. Damit wächst auch der Bedarf an qualitativ hochwertigen Information Retrieval Diensten zur Orientierung und problemorientierten Suche. Die Entscheidung für die Benutzung oder Beschaffung von Information Retrieval Software erfordert aussagekräftige Evaluierungsergebnisse. Dieser Beitrag stellt neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen vor und zeigt den Trend zu Spezialisierung und Diversifizierung von Evaluierungsstudien, die den Realitätsgrad derErgebnisse erhöhen. DerSchwerpunkt liegt auf dem Retrieval von Fachtexten, Internet-Seiten und Multimedia-Objekten.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.4, S.203-210
  3. Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005) 0.02
    0.020407904 = product of:
      0.07142766 = sum of:
        0.036985543 = weight(_text_:web in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036985543 = score(doc=150,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38244262 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.006178629 = weight(_text_:information in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006178629 = score(doc=150,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.11877254 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.02246846 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02246846 = score(doc=150,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25065678 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.0057950234 = product of:
          0.01738507 = sum of:
            0.01738507 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01738507 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Classification
    006.7 22
    Date
    7. 3.2007 19:30:22
    DDC
    006.7 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.
    Semantic web technologies are explained, and ontology representation is emphasized. There is an excellent summary of the fundamental theory behind applying a knowledge-engineering approach to vision problems. This summary represents the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis. A definition of the fuzzy knowledge representation that can be used for realization in multimedia content applications has been provided, with a comprehensive analysis. The second part of the book introduces the multimedia content analysis approaches and applications. In addition, some examples of methods applicable to multimedia content analysis are presented. Multimedia content analysis is a very diverse field and concerns many other research fields at the same time; this creates strong diversity issues, as everything from low-level features (e.g., colors, DCT coefficients, motion vectors, etc.) up to the very high and semantic level (e.g., Object, Events, Tracks, etc.) are involved. The second part includes topics on structure identification (e.g., shot detection for video sequences), and object-based video indexing. These conventional analysis methods are supplemented by results on semantic multimedia analysis, including three detailed chapters on the development and use of knowledge models for automatic multimedia analysis. Starting from object-based indexing and continuing with machine learning, these three chapters are very logically organized. Because of the diversity of this research field, including several chapters of recent research results is not sufficient to cover the state of the art of multimedia. The editors of the book should write an introductory chapter about multimedia content analysis approaches, basic problems, and technical issues and challenges, and try to survey the state of the art of the field and thus introduce the field to the reader.
    The final part of the book discusses research in multimedia content management systems and the semantic web, and presents examples and applications for semantic multimedia analysis in search and retrieval systems. These chapters describe example systems in which current projects have been implemented, and include extensive results and real demonstrations. For example, real case scenarios such as ECommerce medical applications and Web services have been introduced. Topics in natural language, speech and image processing techniques and their application for multimedia indexing, and content-based retrieval have been elaborated upon with extensive examples and deployment methods. The editors of the book themselves provide the readers with a chapter about their latest research results on knowledge-based multimedia content indexing and retrieval. Some interesting applications for multimedia content and the semantic web are introduced. Applications that have taken advantage of the metadata provided by MPEG7 in order to realize advance-access services for multimedia content have been provided. The applications discussed in the third part of the book provide useful guidance to researchers and practitioners properly planning to implement semantic multimedia analysis techniques in new research and development projects in both academia and industry. A fourth part should be added to this book: performance measurements for integrated approaches of multimedia analysis and the semantic web. Performance of the semantic approach is a very sophisticated issue and requires extensive elaboration and effort. Measuring the semantic search is an ongoing research area; several chapters concerning performance measurement and analysis would be required to adequately cover this area and introduce it to readers."
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Multimedia / Automatische Indexierung / Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Multimedia / Automatische Indexierung / Information Retrieval
    Semantic Web
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Tjondronegoro, D.; Spink, A.: Web search engine multimedia functionality (2008) 0.02
    0.020018486 = product of:
      0.093419604 = sum of:
        0.069391035 = weight(_text_:web in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069391035 = score(doc=2038,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.717526 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
        0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060537956 = score(doc=2038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
        0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01797477 = score(doc=2038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Web search engines are beginning to offer access to multimedia searching, including audio, video and image searching. In this paper we report findings from a study examining the state of multimedia search functionality on major general and specialized Web search engines. We investigated 102 Web search engines to examine: (1) how many Web search engines offer multimedia searching, (2) the type of multimedia search functionality and methods offered, such as "query by example", and (3) the supports for personalization or customization which are accessible as advanced search. Findings include: (1) few major Web search engines offer multimedia searching and (2) multimedia Web search functionality is generally limited. Our findings show that despite the increasing level of interest in multimedia Web search, those few Web search engines offering multimedia Web search, provide limited multimedia search functionality. Keywords are still the only means of multimedia retrieval, while other methods such as "query by example" are offered by less than 1% of Web search engines examined.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.340-357
  5. Visual based retrieval systems and Web mining (2001) 0.02
    0.019264605 = product of:
      0.08990149 = sum of:
        0.041844364 = weight(_text_:web in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041844364 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
        0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012107591 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.10, S.829-875
  6. E-Text : Strategien und Kompetenzen. Elektronische Kommunikation in Wissenschaft, Bildung und Beruf (2001) 0.02
    0.015006117 = product of:
      0.07002854 = sum of:
        0.013948122 = weight(_text_:web in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013948122 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
        0.05072721 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05072721 = score(doc=622,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.361987 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
        0.0053532133 = product of:
          0.016059639 = sum of:
            0.016059639 = weight(_text_:22 in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016059639 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Elektronische Produktion, Verbreitung und Rezeption von Texten - deren integrative Wechselbeziehungen eingeschlossen - verändern unausweichlich unsere Forschungs-, Lernund Arbeitsbedingungen. In diesem Wandel braucht es Orientierung, Strategien und Kompetenzen. Dieser Band bietet sie in interdisziplinärer Vielfalt. Teil 1 befaßt sich mit Wissen und Wissenschaft. Er spannt den Bogen der Medientheorie von der Antike bis ins 21. Jahrhundert und bietet einen konstruktivistischen Ansatz für das Wissensmanagement. Textsortenkonventionen und Hypertext sind ebenso Schwerpunkte wie empiriegestützte Guidelines und innovative Werkzeuge für das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten. Teil 2 ist Lernumgebungen gewidmet. Reflexionen zur Theorie von hypermedialem Lernen und Kognition werden ergänzt durch ein Produktionssystem für interaktive Software. Eine Felduntersuchungvergleicht Varianten kooperativen Schreibens, ein Schreibdidaktik-Projekt vermittelt zwischen Studium und Beruf. Teil 3 vereint unter dem Titel «Domänen der Praxis» empirische Erhebungen zur Text(re)produktion und elektronischen Kommunikation im Berufsalltag, die Konzeption eines Werkzeugs für die Übersetzungsarbeit und den Ausblick auf kulturspezifische Web-Sites in der Wirtschaft.
    Date
    12. 8.2012 18:05:22
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  7. Büttner, S.; Weisel, L.: Telelernen : Illusion oder Revolution (2000) 0.01
    0.014957888 = product of:
      0.104705215 = sum of:
        0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 5522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050448296 = score(doc=5522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5522)
        0.09966038 = weight(_text_:kongress in 5522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09966038 = score(doc=5522,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19442701 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.51258504 = fieldWeight in 5522, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5522)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Series
    Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI); Bd.1)(Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V.; Bd.3
    Source
    Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer
  8. Ozmutlu, S.; Spink, A.; Ozmutlu, H.C.: Multimedia Web searching trends : 1997-2001 (2003) 0.01
    0.009968339 = product of:
      0.069778375 = sum of:
        0.05979012 = weight(_text_:web in 1072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05979012 = score(doc=1072,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 1072, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1072)
        0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 1072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009988253 = score(doc=1072,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1072, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1072)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Multimedia is proliferating on Web sites, as the Web continues to enhance the integration of multimedia and textual information. In this paper we examine trends in multimedia Web searching by Excite users from 1997 to 2001. Results from an analysis of 1,025,910 Excite queries from 2001 are compared to similar Excite datasets from 1997 to 1999. Findings include: (1) queries per multimedia session have decreased since 1997 as a proportion of general queries due to the introduction of multimedia buttons near the query box, (2) multimedia queries identified are longer than non-multimedia queries, and (3) audio queries are more prevalent than image or video queries in identified multimedia queries. Overall, we see multimedia Web searching undergoing major changes as Web content and searching evolves.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.4, S.611-621
  9. Loviscach, J.: ¬Die elektronische Uni : Neue Medien in der Lehre (2001) 0.01
    0.009897309 = product of:
      0.06928116 = sum of:
        0.058574736 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058574736 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.41798657 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
        0.010706427 = product of:
          0.032119278 = sum of:
            0.032119278 = weight(_text_:22 in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032119278 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2001 19:09:22
  10. Tjondronegoro, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: ¬A study and comparison of multimedia Web searching : 1997-2006 (2009) 0.01
    0.008895609 = product of:
      0.06226926 = sum of:
        0.055134792 = weight(_text_:web in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055134792 = score(doc=3090,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=3090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Searching for multimedia is an important activity for users of Web search engines. Studying user's interactions with Web search engine multimedia buttons, including image, audio, and video, is important for the development of multimedia Web search systems. This article provides results from a Weblog analysis study of multimedia Web searching by Dogpile users in 2006. The study analyzes the (a) duration, size, and structure of Web search queries and sessions; (b) user demographics; (c) most popular multimedia Web searching terms; and (d) use of advanced Web search techniques including Boolean and natural language. The current study findings are compared with results from previous multimedia Web searching studies. The key findings are: (a) Since 1997, image search consistently is the dominant media type searched followed by audio and video; (b) multimedia search duration is still short (>50% of searching episodes are <1 min), using few search terms; (c) many multimedia searches are for information about people, especially in audio search; and (d) multimedia search has begun to shift from entertainment to other categories such as medical, sports, and technology (based on the most repeated terms). Implications for design of Web multimedia search engines are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.9, S.1756-1768
  11. Iyengar, S.S.: Visual based retrieval systems and Web mining (2001) 0.01
    0.008017795 = product of:
      0.037416376 = sum of:
        0.019725623 = weight(_text_:web in 6520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019725623 = score(doc=6520,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 6520, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6520)
        0.005707573 = weight(_text_:information in 6520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005707573 = score(doc=6520,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 6520, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6520)
        0.0119831795 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0119831795 = score(doc=6520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 6520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6520)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance has been a difficult concept to define, let alone measure. In this paper, a simple operational definition of relevance is proposed for a Web-based library catalog: whether or not during a search session the user saves, prints, mails, or downloads a citation. If one of those actions is performed, the session is considered relevant to the user. An analysis is presented illustrating the advantages and disadvantages of this definition. With this definition and good transaction logging, it is possible to ascertain the relevance of a session. This was done for 905,970 sessions conducted with the University of California's Melvyl online catalog. Next, a methodology was developed to try to predict the relevance of a session. A number of variables were defined that characterize a session, none of which used any demographic information about the user. The values of the variables were computed for the sessions. Principal components analysis was used to extract a new set of variables out of the original set. A stratified random sampling technique was used to form ten strata such that each new strata of 90,570 sessions contained the same proportion of relevant to nonrelevant sessions. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the regression coefficients for nine of the ten strata. Then, the coefficients were used to predict the relevance of the sessions in the missing strata. Overall, 17.85% of the sessions were determined to be relevant. The predicted number of relevant sessions for all ten strata was 11 %, a 6.85% difference. The authors believe that the methodology can be further refined and the prediction improved. This methodology could also have significant application in improving user searching and also in predicting electronic commerce buying decisions without the use of personal demographic data
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.10, S.829-830
  12. Multimedia information retrieval and management : technological fundamentals and applications (2003) 0.01
    0.008009522 = product of:
      0.05606665 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
        0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194113 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  13. Sacco, G.M.: Accessing multimedia infobases through dynamic taxonomies (2004) 0.01
    0.007148144 = product of:
      0.050037004 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=2637,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
        0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033893548 = score(doc=2637,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional query methods are good at retrieving items an the basis of a precise specification, but they are not useful when the user wants to explore an information base in order to find interesting items. Dynamic Taxonomies were recently proposed for guided browsing and retrieval from heterogeneous information bases. We discuss their application to multimedia information bases and provide an example of interaction.
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Benitez, A.B.; Zhong, D.; Chang, S.-F.: Enabling MPEG-7 structural and semantic descriptions in retrieval applications (2007) 0.01
    0.006964882 = product of:
      0.04875417 = sum of:
        0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00856136 = score(doc=518,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
        0.04019281 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04019281 = score(doc=518,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The MPEG-7 standard supports the description of both the structure and the semantics of multimedia; however, the generation and consumption of MPEG-7 structural and semantic descriptions are outside the scope of the standard. This article presents two research prototype systems that demonstrate the generation and consumption of MPEG-7 structural and semantic descriptions in retrieval applications. The active system for MPEG-4 video object simulation (AMOS) is a video object segmentation and retrieval system that segments, tracks, and models objects in videos (e.g., person, car) as a set of regions with corresponding visual features and spatiotemporal relations. The region-based model provides an effective base for similarity retrieval of video objects. The second system, the Intelligent Multimedia Knowledge Application (IMKA), uses the novel MediaNet framework for representing semantic and perceptual information about the world using multimedia. MediaNet knowledge bases can be constructed automatically from annotated collections of multimedia data and used to enhance the retrieval of multimedia.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1377-1380
  15. Rising III, H.K.; Jörgensen, C.: Semantic description in MPEG-7 : the rich recursion of ripeness (2007) 0.01
    0.006374111 = product of:
      0.044618774 = sum of:
        0.03856498 = weight(_text_:wide in 458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03856498 = score(doc=458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=458)
        0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060537956 = score(doc=458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=458)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata describing multimedia can address a wide variety of purposes, from the purely physical characteristics of an item, to the circumstances surrounding its production, to attributes that cannot necessarily be determined by examining the item itself directly. These latter attributes, often dealing with "meaning" or interpretation of an item's content, are frequently deemed too difficult to determine and subject to individual and cultural variability. At the same time, however, research has shown that these abstract, interpretive attributes, which carry meaning, are frequently the ones for which people search. To describe an item fully, therefore, means to describe it at both the "syntactic" and the "semantic" levels. This article discusses the development of the semantic description schemes within the MPEG-7 standard from both a historical and an intellectual perspective, as well as the difficulties inherent in creating a descriptive schema that can fully capture the complexity of "narrative worlds."
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1338-1345
  16. Fatemi, N.: MPEG-7 in practice : analysis of a television news retrieval application (2007) 0.01
    0.0061978353 = product of:
      0.043384846 = sum of:
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
        0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036322083 = score(doc=473,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an overview of our experiments in using MPEG-7 in a television news retrieval application. Our study is based on a survey of professional users in the Television Suisse Romande (TSR) television news production environment. We present here two main issues. First, we describe the way the generic and voluminous MPEG-7 Schema can be exploited in the context of a specific application domain. Second, we discuss the problem of how to search MPEG-7 descriptions, which are detailed and complex by nature, via a high-level user-oriented retrieval model.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1364-1366
  17. Hertzum, M.: Requests for information from a film archive : a case study of multimadia retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.005361108 = product of:
      0.037527755 = sum of:
        0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012107591 = score(doc=4454,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
        0.025420163 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025420163 = score(doc=4454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Multimedia retrieval is a complex and to some extent still unexplored area. Based on a full year of e-mail requests addressed to a large film archive this study analyses what types of information needs real users have and how these needs are expressed. The findings include that the requesters make use of a broad range of need attributes in specifying their information needs. These attributes relate to the production, content, subject, context and screening of films. However, a few attributes - especially title, production year and director - account for the majority of the attribute instances. Further, as much as 43 per cent of the requests contain no information about the context that gives rise to the request. The current indexing of the archived material is restricted to production-related attributes, and access to the material is, thus, frequently dependent on the archivists' extensive knowledge of the archived material and films in general.
  18. Haass, U.L.: Elektronische Distribution : Voraussetzung für die Erschließung des Potenzials von Bildungsmedien (2001) 0.01
    0.0051773246 = product of:
      0.07248254 = sum of:
        0.07248254 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 6360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07248254 = score(doc=6360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.517232 = fieldWeight in 6360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6360)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die elektronische Distribution auch für digitalisierte Videos und Bilder zu nutzen ist Ziel zahlreicher Überlegungen. Damit wird nicht nur die Verfügbarkeit der bislang nur über die Ausleihe vertriebenen Titel am Lernort erheblich verbessert. Die Integration von Internet, Software und digitalen Videos wird aber auch ganz neue didaktische Konzepte für das Lernen und Lehren ermöglichen. Das Potenzial wird noch einmal dadurch gesteigert, wenn zusätzlich digitale Medienmodule (Videoclips, Grafiken, Tondateien, Texte usw.) produziert und angeboten werden können. In dem im Landkreis München begonnenen Projekt BMOD wird die Distribution und Nutzung von digitalisierten FWU-Medien in einem kommunalen Intranet erprobt
  19. Schweibenz, W.: Evaluation des Intranet-Angebots Multimediales Lernen bei DaimlerCrysler, Standort Stuttgart (2001) 0.01
    0.0050917473 = product of:
      0.03564223 = sum of:
        0.029588435 = weight(_text_:web in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029588435 = score(doc=5852,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
        0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060537956 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag beschreibt eine Usability-Studie zur Evaluation eines betrieblichen IntranetAngebots zum Thema Multimediales Lernen. Es wurde eine mehrstufige, kombinierte Evaluation durchgeführt eine heuristische Evaluation mit den neu entwickelten Heuristicsfor Web Communication als expertenorientierte Methode und ein Produkttest (Benutzertest) im Usability-Labor mit der Methode des lauten Denkens als benutzerorientierte Methode. Die Durchführung der Studie wird beschrieben und die Methoden diskutiert. Die Heuristics for Web Communication benötigen geschulte Gutachter, sind schnell und einfach anzuwenden und unterstützen ein systematisches Vorgehen beim Entdecken von Usability-Problemen. Die Evaluation mit den Heuristiken ist gut kombinierbar mit einem Benutzertest und ergänzt ihn, indem sie Usability-Probleme aufdeckt, die in Produkttests vermutlich nicht gefunden werden. Der Aufwand für den Produkttest ist sehr hoch, er liefert anschauliche und aussagekräftige Aussagen von echten Nutzern und rechtfertigt unter Umständen den Aufwand
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  20. Christel, M.G.: Automated metadata in multimedia information systems : creation, refinement, use in surrogates, and evaluation (2009) 0.00
    0.0049329763 = product of:
      0.034530833 = sum of:
        0.013347364 = weight(_text_:information in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013347364 = score(doc=3086,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
        0.021183468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021183468 = score(doc=3086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Improvements in network bandwidth along with dramatic drops in digital storage and processing costs have resulted in the explosive growth of multimedia (combinations of text, image, audio, and video) resources on the Internet and in digital repositories. A suite of computer technologies delivering speech, image, and natural language understanding can automatically derive descriptive metadata for such resources. Difficulties for end users ensue, however, with the tremendous volume and varying quality of automated metadata for multimedia information systems. This lecture surveys automatic metadata creation methods for dealing with multimedia information resources, using broadcast news, documentaries, and oral histories as examples. Strategies for improving the utility of such metadata are discussed, including computationally intensive approaches, leveraging multimodal redundancy, folding in context, and leaving precision-recall tradeoffs under user control. Interfaces building from automatically generated metadata are presented, illustrating the use of video surrogates in multimedia information systems. Traditional information retrieval evaluation is discussed through the annual National Institute of Standards and Technology TRECVID forum, with experiments on exploratory search extending the discussion beyond fact-finding to broader, longer term search activities of learning, analysis, synthesis, and discovery.
    Content
    Table of Contents: Evolution of Multimedia Information Systems: 1990-2008 / Survey of Automatic Metadata Creation Methods / Refinement of Automatic Metadata / Multimedia Surrogates / End-User Utility for Metadata and Surrogates: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction
    Series
    Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval & services

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 17

Types