Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × author_ss:"Green, R."
  1. Green, R.: See-also relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification (2011) 0.00
    0.0014978976 = product of:
      0.020970564 = sum of:
        0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020970564 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Green, R.; Panzer, M.: Relations in the notational hierarchy of the Dewey Decimal Classification (2011) 0.00
    0.001245368 = product of:
      0.017435152 = sum of:
        0.017435152 = weight(_text_:web in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017435152 = score(doc=4823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    As part of a larger assessment of relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system, this study investigates the semantic nature of relationships in the DDC notational hierarchy. The semantic relationship between each of a set of randomly selected classes and its parent class in the notational hierarchy is examined against a set of relationship types (specialization, class-instance, several flavours of whole-part).The analysis addresses the prevalence of specific relationship types, their lexical expression, difficulties encountered in assigning relationship types, compatibility of relationships found in the DDC with those found in other knowledge organization systems (KOS), and compatibility of relationships found in the DDC with those in a shared formalism like the Web Ontology Language (OWL). Since notational hierarchy is an organizational mechanism shared across most classification schemes and is often considered to provide an easy solution for ontological transformation of a classification system, the findings of the study are likely to generalize across classification schemes with respect to difficulties that might be encountered in such a transformation process.
  3. Green, R.: Facet detection using WorldCat and WordNet (2014) 0.00
    6.6915166E-4 = product of:
      0.009368123 = sum of:
        0.009368123 = product of:
          0.028104367 = sum of:
            0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 1419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028104367 = score(doc=1419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1419)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.00
    4.7796548E-4 = product of:
      0.0066915164 = sum of:
        0.0066915164 = product of:
          0.020074548 = sum of:
            0.020074548 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020074548 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22