Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sullivan, M.V."
  • × author_ss:"Borgman, C.L."
  1. Sullivan, M.V.; Borgman, C.L.: Bibliographic searching by end-users and intermediaries : front-end software vs native DIALOG commands (1988) 0.00
    0.0041820253 = product of:
      0.029274177 = sum of:
        0.010785352 = weight(_text_:information in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010785352 = score(doc=3560,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
        0.018488824 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018488824 = score(doc=3560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.092201896 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    40 doctoral student were trained to search INSPEC or ERIC on DIALOG using either the Sci-Mate Menu or native commands. In comparison with 20 control subjects for whom a free search was performed by an intermediary, the experiment subjects were no less satisfied with their retrievals, which were fewer in number but higher in precision than the retrievals produced by the intermediaries. Use of the menu interface did not affect quality of retrieval or user satisfaction, although subjects instructed to use native commands required less training time and interacted more with the data bases than did subjects trained on the Sci-Mate Menu. INSPEC subjects placed a higher monetary value on their searches than did ERIC subjects, indicated that they would make more frequent use of ddata bases in the future, and interacted more with the data base.
    Imprint
    Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information Inc.
    Source
    ASIS '88. Information Technology: planning for the next fifty years. Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Atlanta, Georgia, 23-27.10.1988. Vol.25. Ed. by C.L. Borgman and E.Y.H. Pai
  2. Sullivan, M.V.; Borgman, C.L.; Wippern, D.: End-users, mediated searches, and front-end assistance programs on dialig : a comparison of learning, performance, and satisfaction (1990) 0.00
    0.0035308218 = product of:
      0.024715751 = sum of:
        0.006226926 = weight(_text_:information in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006226926 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
        0.018488824 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018488824 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.092201896 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    We trained 40 doctoral students to search INSPEC or ERIC on DIALOG using either the SCI-MATE menu or native commands. Each student then performed a free search on his or her chosen research topic. In comparison with 20 control subjects - doctoral students for whom a free search was performed by a skilled librarian - the experimental subjects were no less satisfied with their retrievals, which were smaller but higher in precision than the retrievals produced by the intermediaries. End-users retrieved as many relevant references as the intermediaries. Use of the menu interface did not affect quality of retrieval or user satisfaction, although subjects instructed to use native commands required less training time, and interacted more with the databases than subjects trained on the SCI-MATE menu.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.1, S.27-42

Types