Search (104 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Ethics and the librarian : [papers presented at the Allerton Park Institute held October 29-31,1989, Allerton Conference Center, Robert Allerton Park, Monticello, Illinois] (1991) 0.04 
    0.0449961 = product of:
  0.2099818 = sum of:
    0.056193136 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056193136 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12513994 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.44904238 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
    0.010273904 = weight(_text_:information in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010273904 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
    0.14351475 = weight(_text_:kongress in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14351475 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19998738 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.71761906 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    BK
    06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
    Classification
    06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / Ethik / Aufsatzsammlung (HBZ)
    Bibliothekar / Berufsethik / Kongress / Urbana <Ill., 1989> (HBZ)
    Subject
    Bibliothek / Ethik / Aufsatzsammlung (HBZ)
    Bibliothekar / Berufsethik / Kongress / Urbana <Ill., 1989> (HBZ)
  2. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.04 
    0.037394878 = product of:
  0.13088207 = sum of:
    0.025107287 = weight(_text_:web in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025107287 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
    0.0072647473 = weight(_text_:information in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072647473 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
    0.021570295 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021570295 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.092201896 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
    0.07693974 = weight(_text_:wien in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07693974 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17413543 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.4418385 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  3. Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008) 0.02 
    0.019466741 = product of:
  0.13626719 = sum of:
    0.02028975 = weight(_text_:web in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02028975 = score(doc=213,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
    0.11597743 = weight(_text_:kongress in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11597743 = score(doc=213,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19998738 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.57992375 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    Inhalt: Rafael Capurro: Einleitung Klaus Wiegerling: Ubiquitous Computing als konkrete Utopie Michael Nagenborg: Wenn Roboter alles wissen und Kühlschränke nicht lügen Tassilo Pellegrini: Semantic Web als konkrete Utopie - Eine praktische Annäherung Falko Blask: TV kontra Web: Mythos Medien - Medienmythen Hans Kräh: Filme als Zeitreisen: Medienszenarien in Zukunftsszenarien Uwe Jochum: Zur Zeit wird hier der Raum - Die digitale Inversion des Karfreitagszaubers Thomas Nisslmüller: Der cybergnostische Imperativ: Sich lesen in Zeiten virtueller Versuchsspiele Manfred Lang: Good Night, and Good Luck! Zur Geschichte informationspolitischer Utopien
    RSWK
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Ethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Informationsethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
    Subject
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Ethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Informationsethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
  4. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01 
    0.012367968 = product of:
  0.08657578 = sum of:
    0.07693974 = weight(_text_:wien in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07693974 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17413543 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.4418385 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
    0.009636039 = product of:
      0.028908115 = sum of:
        0.028908115 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028908115 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10673865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  5. Rösch, H.: Informationsethik und Bibliotheksethik : Grundlagen und Praxis (2021) 0.01 
    0.01176905 = product of:
  0.08238334 = sum of:
    0.076156415 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076156415 = score(doc=222,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.12513994 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.60857004 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
    0.006226926 = weight(_text_:information in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006226926 = score(doc=222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Neben den theoretischen und allgemeinen Grundlagen von Informationsethik und Bibliotheksethik wird das Spektrum ethischer Konflikte und Dilemmata an Beispielen aus der Praxis des Berufsfelds Bibliothek und Information konkret erläutert. Dabei wird deutlich, dass wissenschaftlich fundierte Aussagen der Informationsethik und der Bibliotheksethik grundlegend für die wertbezogene Standardisierung bibliothekarischer Arbeit und äußerst hilfreich für ethisch abgesicherte Entscheidungen im Berufsalltag sind.
    Classification
    AN 65100: Begriff, Wesen der Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    RSWK
    Bibliothek
    RVK
    AN 65100: Begriff, Wesen der Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    Subject
    Bibliothek
  6. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01 
    0.010146724 = product of:
  0.04735138 = sum of:
    0.034411125 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034411125 = score(doc=459,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12513994 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.27498117 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
    0.008122235 = weight(_text_:information in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008122235 = score(doc=459,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.1517936 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
    0.0048180195 = product of:
      0.014454057 = sum of:
        0.014454057 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014454057 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10673865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
  7. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.009134963 = product of:
  0.06394474 = sum of:
    0.008987795 = weight(_text_:information in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008987795 = score(doc=1696,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
    0.05495695 = weight(_text_:wien in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05495695 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17413543 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.3155989 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  8. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01 
    0.008697193 = product of:
  0.0405869 = sum of:
    0.029495254 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029495254 = score(doc=462,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12513994 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.23569816 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
    0.0069619156 = weight(_text_:information in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0069619156 = score(doc=462,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.1301088 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
    0.0041297306 = product of:
      0.012389191 = sum of:
        0.012389191 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012389191 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10673865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
  9. Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik - Die Entwicklung von Normen für den Umgang mit Wissen und Information in elektronischen Räumen (2005) 0.01 
    0.008164645 = product of:
  0.057152513 = sum of:
    0.04541091 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04541091 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12513994 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.36288103 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
    0.011741605 = weight(_text_:information in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011741605 = score(doc=3687,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Bibliothekswissenschaft - quo vadis? Eine Disziplin zwischen Traditionen und Visionen: Programme - Modelle - Forschungsaufgaben / Library Science - quo vadis? A Discipline between Challenges and Opportunities: Programs - Models - Research Assignments. Mit einem Geleitwort von / With a Preface by Guy St. Clair Consulting Specialist for Knowledge Management and Learning, New York, NY und einem Vorwort von / and a Foreword by Georg Ruppelt Sprecher von / Speaker of BID - Bibliothek & Information Deutschland Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksund Informationsverbände e.V. Hrsg. von P. Hauke
  10. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.01 
    0.007849867 = product of:
  0.054949068 = sum of:
    0.028694041 = weight(_text_:web in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028694041 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
    0.026255026 = weight(_text_:information in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026255026 = score(doc=1865,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.490671 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1124-1127
    Theme
    Information
  11. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01 
    0.0068903924 = product of:
  0.032155164 = sum of:
    0.017933775 = weight(_text_:web in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017933775 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
    0.007338503 = weight(_text_:information in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007338503 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
    0.006882885 = product of:
      0.020648655 = sum of:
        0.020648655 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020648655 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10673865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  12. Huber, W.: Menschen, Götter und Maschinen : eine Ethik der Digitalisierung (2022) 0.01 
    0.005827469 = product of:
  0.04079228 = sum of:
    0.026445258 = weight(_text_:wide in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026445258 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13505316 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
    0.014347021 = weight(_text_:web in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014347021 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    Vorwort -- 1. Das digitale Zeitalter -- Zeitenwende -- Die Vorherrschaft des Buchdrucks geht zu Ende -- Wann beginnt das digitale Zeitalter? -- 2. Zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse -- Digitalisierung. Einfach. Machen -- Euphorie -- Apokalypse -- Verantwortungsethik -- Der Mensch als Subjekt der Ethik -- Verantwortung als Prinzip -- 3. Digitalisierter Alltag in einer globalisierten Welt -- Vom World Wide Web zum Internet der Dinge -- Mobiles Internet und digitale Bildung -- Digitale Plattformen und ihre Strategien -- Big Data und informationelle Selbstbestimmung -- 4. Grenzüberschreitungen -- Die Erosion des Privaten -- Die Deformation des Öffentlichen -- Die Senkung von Hemmschwellen -- Das Verschwinden der Wirklichkeit -- Die Wahrheit in der Infosphäre -- 5. Die Zukunft der Arbeit -- Industrielle Revolutionen -- Arbeit 4.0 -- Ethik 4.0 -- 6. Digitale Intelligenz -- Können Computer dichten? -- Stärker als der Mensch? -- Maschinelles Lernen -- Ein bleibender Unterschied -- Ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz -- Medizin als Beispiel -- 7. Die Würde des Menschen im digitalen Zeitalter -- Kränkungen oder Revolutionen -- Transhumanismus und Posthumanismus -- Gibt es Empathie ohne Menschen? -- Wer ist autonom: Mensch oder Maschine? -- Humanismus der Verantwortung -- 8. Die Zukunft des Homo sapiens -- Vergöttlichung des Menschen -- Homo deus -- Gott und Mensch im digitalen Zeitalter -- Veränderung der Menschheit -- Literatur -- Personenregister.
  13. Information society : new media, ethics and postmodernism (1996) 0.01 
    0.0056532533 = product of:
  0.03957277 = sum of:
    0.026445258 = weight(_text_:wide in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026445258 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13505316 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
    0.013127513 = weight(_text_:information in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013127513 = score(doc=2451,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.2453355 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    This volume examines 3 critical debates of the post-industrial society: culture and technology, information society, and postmodernism. It aims to provide theoretical and methodological underpinnings for the analysis and design of information, communication and multimedia technologies. It is a thoroughly interdisciplinara volume, which will be of interest to students, researchers and practitioners in a wide area of disciplines including information and communication systems, education and social sciences
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: COOLEY, M.: Visions and problems of the post-industrial society; GILL, K.S.: Knowledge and the post-industrial society; LYTJE, I.: Media and the cultural condition: language and education; WHISTON, T.: Knowledge and sustainable development: towards the furtherance of a global communication system; SHIPLEY, P.: The keyboard blues: modern technology and the rights and risks of people at work; LEAL, F.: Ethics is fragile, goodness is not; HIROSE, L.M.: Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics; THORPE, J.: Information system design: human centres approaches; BESSELAAR, P. van den u. T. MOM: Technological change, social innovation and employment; JONES, M.: Empowerment and enslavement: business process reeingineering and the transformation of work; LEVY, P.: The role of creativity in post-industrial society: exploring the implications of non-conventional technologies for work and management organisation; JANSEN, A.: The global information society and rural economics; DAY, P.: Information communication technology and society: a community-based approach; CYSNE, F.P.: Technology transfer and development; COOPER, J.: Information, knowledge and empowerment: the role of information in rural development; CLAY, J.: Participative citizenry in the information ages: the role of science and technology towards democratic education in a multicultural society; TAYLOR, J.: New media and cultural representation; BLACK, M.T.: Consensus and authenticity in representations: simulation as participative theatre; GORAYSKA, B. u. J.L. MEY: Cognitive technology; BOYNE, C.W.: Electronic mail, IT productivity and workplace culture; Squires, P.: Deadly technology in the post-industrial society: a case study of firearms and firearms control; COLE, M. u. D. HILL: Resitance postmodernism: emancipatory politics for a new era or academic chic for a defeatist intelligentsia?; McFEE, G.: Postmodernism, dance and post-industrial society; MULLER, R.C.: Creativity constellation for innovation and cooperation
  14. San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Frías Montoya, J.A.: Ethical issues in control by algorithms : the user is the content (2023) 0.01 
    0.0052373647 = product of:
  0.03666155 = sum of:
    0.030434625 = weight(_text_:web in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030434625 = score(doc=1132,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
    0.006226926 = weight(_text_:information in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006226926 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In this paper we discuss some ethical issues and challenges of the use of algorithms on the web from the perspective of knowledge organization. We review some of the problems that these algorithms and the filter bubbles pose for the users. We contextualize these issues within the user-based approaches to knowledge organization in a larger sense. We review some of the technologies that have been developed to counter these problems as well as initiatives from the knowledge organization field. We conclude with the necessity of adopting a critical and ethical stance towards the use of algorithms on the web and the need for an education in knowledge organization that addresses these issues.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: 4th International Conference on the Ethics of Information and Knowledge Organization, June 8-9, University of Lille, France.
  15. Van der Walt, M.S.: Ethics in indexing and clssification (2006) 0.01 
    0.0050752084 = product of:
  0.03552646 = sum of:
    0.018095028 = weight(_text_:information in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018095028 = score(doc=5876,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.33817163 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
    0.01743143 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01743143 = score(doc=5876,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.092201896 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    To start off I would like to briefly address the relationship between indexing and classification, which are very technical activities performed by information professionals, and the concept of social responsibility (the focus of this conference), which refer to the human side of the profession. Although indexing and classification involve many technicalities, the basic objective of these activities is to provide access to informationbearing objects, thereby contributing to the social process of information transfer. Information transfer takes place between authors (creators of information- bearing objects) and information users. The authors have something to communicate, and the users have information needs that must be satisfied by the information professional acting as intermediary. In the process of facilitating this information transfer the indexer and classifier therefore has a responsibility towards both authors and information users. Authors can expect the information professional to represent their creations as accurately and exhaustively as possible in retrieval systems, within the constraints of time and cost. Users can expect the information professional to index and classify in such a way as to ensure that information that can satisfy their information needs will be retrievable within the shortest time and with the least effort possible. One can also see the social responsibility of indexers and classifiers in a broader context. They do not only have a responsibility towards specific authors and users, but also towards communities as a whole, e.g. the scientific community, the business community, or society at large. In the case of the scientific community effective transfer of information about advances in research can be seen as essential for the progress of science. Providing effective and suitable information retrieval systems to make this transfer possible can therefore be seen as a responsibility of information professionals. In a business enterprise the effective organization of business records and other business information sources can make a significant contribution to the smooth operation of the enterprise, may be essential for legal purposes, and can enable management to use the information for decision-making at all levels. The information manager therefore has a responsibility towards the enterprise to properly organize and index all these resources.
  16. Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0039254967 = product of:
  0.05495695 = sum of:
    0.05495695 = weight(_text_:wien in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05495695 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17413543 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.3155989 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7129507 = idf(docFreq=396, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  17. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.00 
    0.003627584 = product of:
  0.025393087 = sum of:
    0.014380471 = weight(_text_:information in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014380471 = score(doc=3027,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
    0.011012616 = product of:
      0.033037845 = sum of:
        0.033037845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033037845 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10673865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Within the looming threat of the combination of computer databases with monitoring and surveillance devices, attempts to define the notion of privacy and its parameters. Considers the ethical issues posed by databases, touching on disclosure to organizations of matters such as personal taxation and financial information or security surveillance. Highlights the increasing information imbalance between persons and organizations and suggests ways to improve autonomy
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.42-48
  18. Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.00 
    0.0036103255 = product of:
  0.025272278 = sum of:
    0.017933775 = weight(_text_:web in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017933775 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
    0.007338503 = weight(_text_:information in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007338503 = score(doc=419,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_d.pdf.
  19. Bagatini, J.A.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: Algorithmic discriminations and their ethical impacts on knowledge organization : a thematic domain-analysis (2023) 0.00 
    0.0033032687 = product of:
  0.02312288 = sum of:
    0.017933775 = weight(_text_:web in 1134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017933775 = score(doc=1134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1134)
    0.005189105 = weight(_text_:information in 1134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005189105 = score(doc=1134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1134)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Personal data play a fundamental role in contemporary socioeconomic dynamics, with one of its primary aspects being the potential to facilitate discriminatory situations. This situation impacts the knowledge organization field especially because it considers personal data as elements (facets) to categorize persons under an economic and sometimes discriminatory perspective. The research corpus was collected at Scopus and Web of Science until the end of 2021, under the terms "data discrimination", "algorithmic bias", "algorithmic discrimination" and "fair algorithms". The obtained results allowed to infer that the analyzed knowledge domain predominantly incorporates personal data, whether in its behavioral dimension or in the scope of the so-called sensitive data. These data are susceptible to the action of algorithms of different orders, such as relevance, filtering, predictive, social ranking, content recommendation and random classification. Such algorithms can have discriminatory biases in their programming related to gender, sexual orientation, race, nationality, religion, age, social class, socioeconomic profile, physical appearance, and political positioning.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: 4th International Conference on the Ethics of Information and Knowledge Organization, June 8-9, University of Lille, France.
  20. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.00 
    0.003250603 = product of:
  0.02275422 = sum of:
    0.011741605 = weight(_text_:information in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011741605 = score(doc=6063,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
    0.011012616 = product of:
      0.033037845 = sum of:
        0.033037845 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033037845 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10673865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030480823 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden verschiedene Aspekte einer Begründung einer Informationsethik betrachtet. Zunächst wird eine sinnvolle Abgrenzung zu konkurrierenden Ethiken - Netz- und Medienethik - gesucht. Aus Sicht der Generierung, Distribution und Bewahrung von Information wird die Informationsethik als umfassender und allgemeiner als die anderen angesehen. Weiterhin wird die Option einer diskursethischen und damit absoluten Begründung der Informationsethik diskutiert und zugunsten einer pragmatistischen Sichtweise zurückgewiesen.
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Source
    Information und Sprache: Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 85
  • d 17
  • m 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 87
  • m 14
  • s 7
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications