Search (69 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Gödert, W."
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.27 
    0.27470878 = product of:
  0.60435927 = sum of:
    0.059668448 = product of:
      0.17900534 = sum of:
        0.17900534 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17900534 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17900534 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17900534 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00767483 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.17900534 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17900534 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.17900534 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17900534 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  2. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.09 
    0.09209532 = product of:
  0.2026097 = sum of:
    0.059265554 = weight(_text_:wide in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059265554 = score(doc=987,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.060152028 = weight(_text_:web in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060152028 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.022788335 = weight(_text_:information in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022788335 = score(doc=987,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.051678102 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051678102 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.008725693 = product of:
      0.02617708 = sum of:
        0.02617708 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02617708 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    Abstract
    This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.
    Content
    Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    Information retrieval
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Information organization
    World Wide Web / Subject access
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    Information retrieval
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Information organization
    World Wide Web / Subject access
    Semantic Web
    Information Retrieval
  3. Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991) 0.04 
    0.040921543 = product of:
  0.11253424 = sum of:
    0.034922563 = weight(_text_:wide in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034922563 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.026793841 = weight(_text_:web in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026793841 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.0077527487 = weight(_text_:information in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077527487 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.043065086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043065086 = score(doc=5825,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.442117 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings
    "Online retrieval" conjures up a very different mental image now than in 1991, the year this article was written, and the year Tim Berners-Lee first revealed the new hypertext system he called the World Wide Web. Gödert shows that truncation and Boolean logic, combined with notation from a faceted classification system, will be a powerful way of searching for information. It undoubtedly is, but no system built now would require a user searching for material on "nervous systems of bone fish" to enter "Fdd$ and Leaa$". This is worth reading for someone interested in seeing how searching and facets can go together, but the web has made this article quite out of date.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.03 
    0.026147183 = product of:
  0.07190475 = sum of:
    0.034922563 = weight(_text_:wide in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034922563 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.018946107 = weight(_text_:web in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018946107 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.0077527487 = weight(_text_:information in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077527487 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.010283329 = product of:
      0.030849986 = sum of:
        0.030849986 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030849986 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  5. Gödert, W.: Facets and typed relations as tools for reasoning processes in information retrieval (2014) 0.02 
    0.019648556 = product of:
  0.0720447 = sum of:
    0.026524551 = weight(_text_:web in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026524551 = score(doc=1565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
    0.0132931955 = weight(_text_:information in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0132931955 = score(doc=1565,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
    0.032226957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032226957 = score(doc=1565,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Faceted arrangement of entities and typed relations for representing different associations between the entities are established tools in knowledge representation. In this paper, a proposal is being discussed combining both tools to draw inferences along relational paths. This approach may yield new benefit for information retrieval processes, especially when modeled for heterogeneous environments in the Semantic Web. Faceted arrangement can be used as a selection tool for the semantic knowledge modeled within the knowledge representation. Typed relations between the entities of different facets can be used as restrictions for selecting them across the facets.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
  6. Gödert, W.: Facets and typed relations as tools for reasoning processes in information retrieval (2014) 0.02 
    0.01898328 = product of:
  0.06960536 = sum of:
    0.026524551 = weight(_text_:web in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026524551 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
    0.010853848 = weight(_text_:information in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010853848 = score(doc=3816,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
    0.032226957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032226957 = score(doc=3816,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Faceted arrangement of entities and typed relations for representing different associations between the entities are established tools in knowledge representation. In this paper, a proposal is being discussed combining both tools to draw inferences along relational paths. This approach may yield new benefit for information retrieval processes, especially when modeled for heterogeneous environments in the Semantic Web. Faceted arrangement can be used as a selection tool for the semantic knowledge modeled within the knowledge representation. Typed relations between the entities of different facets can be used as restrictions for selecting them across the facets.
  7. Gödert, W.: ¬Die Dezimalklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1990) 0.01 
    0.014694434 = product of:
  0.08081938 = sum of:
    0.013156851 = weight(_text_:information in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013156851 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
    0.06766253 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06766253 = score(doc=5067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Gödert, W.: Zwischen Individuum und Wissen : Computergestützte Schnittstellen für ein Lernen der Zukunft (2002) 0.01 
    0.012949241 = product of:
  0.04748055 = sum of:
    0.02793805 = weight(_text_:wide in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02793805 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
    0.015156886 = weight(_text_:web in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015156886 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
    0.004385617 = weight(_text_:information in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004385617 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Es ist nicht neu, Institutionen als Mittler zwischen Wissen und Nutzer zu betrachten. Bibliotheken und andere Einrichtungen des Bildungssystems wurde schon immer diese Rolle zugeschrieben. Neu ist es allerdings, die Schnittstelle selbst als ein Bildungsobjekt zu betrachten, das nicht allein vermittelnd zwischen Wissen und Nutzer steht, sondern dessen Eigenschaften selbst wissensrelevant sind. Des weiteren kann diese Schnittstelle nicht mehr individuell für jede Institution gesehen werden, sondern sie besteht aus mehreren Stufen. Deren erste - das World Wide Web - ist eine mediale Ebene mit eigenen Eigenschaften, erst darunter kommt die institutionenbezogene Schnittstelle. Mit dem WWW ist ein Zwischenmedium entstanden ist, das Zugriff auf eine Vielzahl von Anbietern gestattet, die miteinander konkurrieren, die sich mit ihren Leistungsmöglichkeiten werbend präsentieren müssen, die auch probehalber oder mehr oder weniger zufällig aufgesucht werden. In jedem Fall muss sich nun jede Institution, die Präsenz unter dieser Schnittstelle zeigen will, mit den Spielregeln, den Möglich-keiten und Problemen dieser medialen Schnittstelle auseinander setzen. In dieser neuen Situation weichen ehemals scharfe Grenzen zwischen Anbietern auf, entweder weil die Anbieter selbst es so wollen oder weil über die Nutzer explizit oder gemäß einer impliziten Erwartung so agiert wird. Dabei gilt es zu fragen, ob und ggf. wie die Schnittstelle die bisherige Auffassung von der eigenen Rolle im Prozess der Wissensvermittlung verändert, welche Aufgaben fortgeführt werden können, welche verändert, welche mit Partnern verfolgt, welche vielleicht auch aufgegeben werden sollten. Es ist die Frage zu beachten, welches Verhältnis die anbietende Institution zur Schnittstelle haben soll. Soll die Schnittstelle eine Zugangsfunktion für die Institution mit ihren Angeboten bieten? Werden über die Schnittstelle Inhalte der Institution bereitgestellt oder ist sie nur ein Portal als Zugang für Angebote anderer? Ist die Schnittstelle der Selbstbestimmung der Insti-tution nachgeordnet oder soll sie die Identifikationsfunktion für die Institution übernehmen? Vorstehende Fragen spielen für Bibliotheken eine Rolle, da man sie als Anbieter von Materialien ansieht, die als Träger von Information zum Zwecke der Wissensaneignung dienen. Darüber hinaus treten Bibliotheken des öfteren auch in der Rolle von Mediatoren im Prozess der Wissensaneignung auf. Damit stellt sich die Frage nach der Rolle der Bibliotheken für Konzepte des Lebenslangen Lernens und der selbstbestimmten Aneignung von Wissen. Besonders mit dem Konzept der Virtuellen oder Digitalen Bibliothek sind vielfältige Erwartungen geweckt worden, welche Rolle Bibliotheken im Rahmen der Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft spielen können.
  9. Gödert, W.: ¬An ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval (2013) 0.01 
    0.012182885 = product of:
  0.067005865 = sum of:
    0.008771234 = weight(_text_:information in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008771234 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
    0.05823463 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05823463 = score(doc=1510,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Starting from an unsolved problem of information retrieval this paper presents an ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval. The model combines the methods and experiences of cognitive-to-interpret indexing languages with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of hit quantities in the context of retrieval processes. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.
  10. Gödert, W.: Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval im Wandel : Konzepte für die Ausbildung in Deutschland (2001) 0.01 
    0.011373534 = product of:
  0.062554434 = sum of:
    0.014709807 = weight(_text_:information in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014709807 = score(doc=4833,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
    0.047844626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047844626 = score(doc=4833,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Es wird ein Überblick gegeben, wie sich die Veränderungen sich im Bereich der Informationsverarbeitung und -technik auf die Gestaltung von Studienkonzepten im Bereich Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval in deutschen bibliothekarischen Ausbildungseinrichtungen ausgewirkt haben. Dabei wird unterschieden in Bereiche der Veränderungen und in Bereiche der Stabilität. Die Bereiche der Veränderungen lassen sich den Verfahren und Anwendungen in der Praxis zuordnen. Sie sind zum einen geprägt durch eine integrative Sicht auf Indexierung und Information Retrieval und lassen sich zum anderen durch folgende Trends charakterisieren: - Von Katalogen zu OPACs und WebOPACs - Von der Katalogisierung zum intelligenten Information Retrieval und Suchmaschinen mit benutzerfreundlichen Interaktionsschnittstellen - Vom lokalen Katalog zum kooperativen Erschließen und Retrieval in heterogenen Netzen - Von intellektueller zu automatischer Indexierung - Von Regelwerken zu strukturierten Beschreibungsebenen (z.B. Metadaten) - Von Beschreibung und Bewertung zu Entwicklungen und Produktdesign Die Bereiche der Stabilität lassen sich der Theorie und den Methoden zuordnen und sind durch folgende Themen beschreibbar: - Grundlagen der Wissensorganisation und Informationserschließung (z.B. in Philosophie, Linguistik, Informatik, Kognitionspsychologie) - Grundlagen der Gestaltung von Dokumentationssprachen - Grundlagen des Information Retrieval
  11. Boteram, F.; Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.: Semantic interoperability and retrieval paradigms (2010) 0.01 
    0.010456864 = product of:
  0.05751275 = sum of:
    0.012404398 = weight(_text_:information in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012404398 = score(doc=3362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
    0.04510835 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04510835 = score(doc=3362,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a new approach to understanding how indexing strategies, models for interoperability and retrieval paradigms interact in information systems and how this can be used to support the design and implementation of components of a semantic navigation for information retrieval systems.
  12. Gödert, W.: ¬An ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval (2016) 0.01 
    0.009681934 = product of:
  0.053250633 = sum of:
    0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00767483 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
    0.045575805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045575805 = score(doc=2777,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The presented ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval combines the methods and experiences of traditional indexing languages with their cognitively interpreted entities and relationships with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of result sets in the context of retrieval processes. A proposal for a general, but condensed, inventory of typed relations is given. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.594-609
  13. Gödert, W.: Externalisierung von Wissen : eine informationstheoretische Betrachtung aus konstruktivistischer Sicht (1995) 0.01 
    0.009494878 = product of:
  0.052221827 = sum of:
    0.013156851 = weight(_text_:information in 1116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013156851 = score(doc=1116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1116)
    0.039064977 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039064977 = score(doc=1116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1116)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
    Theme
    Information
  14. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Dokumenterschließung, Information Retrieval und Navigation in Informationsräumen (1995) 0.01 
    0.008951857 = product of:
  0.04923521 = sum of:
    0.012404398 = weight(_text_:information in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012404398 = score(doc=4438,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
    0.036830813 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036830813 = score(doc=4438,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Examines the advantages and disadvantages of precoordinated, postcoordinated and automatic indexing with regard to existing information storage systems, such as card catalogues, OPACs, CR-ROM databases, and online databases. Presents a general model of document content representation and concludes that the library profession needs to address the development of databank design models, relevance feedback methods and automatic indexing assessment methods, to make indexing more effective
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  15. Gödert, W.: Knowledge organization and information retrieval in times of change : concepts for education in Germany (2001) 0.01 
    0.0086502945 = product of:
  0.047576617 = sum of:
    0.01534966 = weight(_text_:information in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01534966 = score(doc=3413,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
    0.032226957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032226957 = score(doc=3413,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    A survey is given, how modifications in the field of the information processing and technology have influenced the concepts for teaching and studying the subjects of knowledge organization and information retrieval in German universities for library and information science. The discussion will distinguish between fields of modifications and fields of stability. The fields of the modifications are characterised by procedures and applications in libraries. The fields of stability are characterised by theory and methods
  16. Gödert, W.: ¬Ein Ontologie basiertes Modell für Indexierung und Retrieval (2014) 0.01 
    0.008291282 = product of:
  0.045602046 = sum of:
    0.008771234 = weight(_text_:information in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008771234 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
    0.036830813 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036830813 = score(doc=1266,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird ausgehend von einem ungelösten Problem der Informationserschließung ein Modell vorgestellt, das die Methoden und Erfahrungen zur inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung mittels kognitiv zu interpretierender Dokumentationssprachen mit den Möglichkeiten formaler Wissensrepräsentation verbindet. Die Kernkomponente des Modells besteht aus der Nutzung von Inferenzen entlang der Pfade typisierter Relationen zwischen den in Facetten geordneten Entitäten innerhalb einer Wissensrepräsentation zur Bestimmung von Treffermengen im Rahmen von Retrievalprozessen. Es werden die möglichen Konsequenzen für das Indexieren und Retrieval diskutiert.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.83-98
  17. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.01 
    0.007917411 = product of:
  0.029030506 = sum of:
    0.0054820213 = weight(_text_:information in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0054820213 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.016277073 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016277073 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.007271412 = product of:
      0.021814235 = sum of:
        0.021814235 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021814235 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Die Verwendung von Erschließungsinstrumenten zur Beschreibung von Informationsressourcen kann Effizienz und Effektivität thematischer Recherchen wesentlich steigern: standardisierte Begriffe unterstützen Recall und Precision begrifflicher Suchen; Ausweisung von Relationen bietet die Grundlage für explorative Suchprozesse. Eine zusätzliche Steigerung der Funktionalitäten des Retrievals kann mittels einer Ausdifferenzierung und Spezifizierung der in Normdaten enthaltenen semantischen Informationen erreicht werden, die über die in Thesauri und Klassifikationen verbreiteten grundlegenden Relationstypen (äquivalent, hierarchisch, assoziativ) hinausgehen. In modernen Informationsräumen, in denen Daten verschiedener Institutionen über eine Plattform zeit- und ortsunabhängig zugänglich gemacht werden, können einzelne Wissenssysteme indes nur unzureichend das Information Retrieval unterstützen. Zu unterschiedlich sind die für thematische Suchanfragen relevanten Indexierungsdaten. Eine Verbesserung kann mittels Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen den verschiedenen Dokumentationssprachen erreicht werden. Im Vortrag wird dargelegt, in welcher Art und Weise die in Wissenssystemen enthaltenen semantischen Informationen zur Unterstützung thematischer Recherchen optimiert werden können und inwiefern Interoperabilität zwischen Systemen geschaffen werden kann, die gleichwertige Funktionalitäten in heterogenen Informationsräumen gewährleisten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf aktuelle Mappingprojekte wie das DFG-Projekt CrissCross oder das RESEDA-Projekt, welches sich mit den Möglichkeiten der semantischen Anreicherung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen befasst, eingegangen.
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  18. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Informationserschließung und Automatisches Indexieren : ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch (2011) 0.01 
    0.007912398 = product of:
  0.04351819 = sum of:
    0.0109640425 = weight(_text_:information in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0109640425 = score(doc=2550,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.032554146 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032554146 = score(doc=2550,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information Retrieval
  19. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.01 
    0.007347217 = product of:
  0.04040969 = sum of:
    0.0065784254 = weight(_text_:information in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065784254 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.033831265 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033831265 = score(doc=5138,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  20. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Semantische Umfeldsuche im Information Retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.00725487 = product of:
  0.039901786 = sum of:
    0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00767483 = score(doc=606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
    0.032226957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032226957 = score(doc=606,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032201413 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 54
  • e 15

Types

  • a 56
  • el 9
  • m 5
  • r 2
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications