Search (188 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.24
    0.23670322 = product of:
      0.52074707 = sum of:
        0.051144376 = product of:
          0.15343313 = sum of:
            0.15343313 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15343313 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032201413 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15343313 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15343313 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.009303299 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009303299 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.15343313 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15343313 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.15343313 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15343313 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27300394 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Informationsmanagement - Chancen ergreifen (1999) 0.14
    0.13857451 = product of:
      0.5081065 = sum of:
        0.013156851 = weight(_text_:information in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013156851 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
        0.259913 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.259913 = score(doc=2329,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21127632 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            1.2302041 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
        0.23503666 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23503666 = score(doc=2329,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18154396 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            1.2946543 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Universitätsverlag
    RSWK
    Informationsvermittlung / Informationsmanagement / Kongress / Konstanz <1999>
    Subject
    Informationsvermittlung / Informationsmanagement / Kongress / Konstanz <1999>
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  3. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.03
    0.02724367 = product of:
      0.09989345 = sum of:
        0.069845125 = weight(_text_:wide in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069845125 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.015505497 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015505497 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.014542824 = product of:
          0.04362847 = sum of:
            0.04362847 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04362847 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032201413 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  4. Medien-Informationsmanagement : Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte ; [Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar und Folgetagung 2001 in Köln] (2003) 0.02
    0.024103964 = product of:
      0.053028718 = sum of:
        0.020953536 = weight(_text_:wide in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020953536 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.011367664 = weight(_text_:web in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011367664 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.0065784254 = weight(_text_:information in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065784254 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.009766244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009766244 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.0043628467 = product of:
          0.01308854 = sum of:
            0.01308854 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01308854 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032201413 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    Als in den siebziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts immer häufiger die Bezeichnung Informationsmanager für Leute propagiert wurde, die bis dahin als Dokumentare firmierten, wurde dies in den etablierten Kreisen der Archivare und Bibliothekare gelegentlich belächelt und als Zeichen einer Identitätskrise oder jedenfalls einer Verunsicherung des damit überschriebenen Berufsbilds gewertet. Für den Berufsstand der Medienarchivare/Mediendokumentare, die sich seit 1960 in der Fachgruppe 7 des Vereins, später Verbands deutscher Archivare (VdA) organisieren, gehörte diese Verortung im Zeichen neuer inhaltlicher Herausforderungen (Informationsflut) und Technologien (EDV) allerdings schon früh zu den Selbstverständlichkeiten des Berufsalltags. "Halt, ohne uns geht es nicht!" lautete die Überschrift eines Artikels im Verbandsorgan "Info 7", der sich mit der Einrichtung von immer mächtigeren Leitungsnetzen und immer schnelleren Datenautobahnen beschäftigte. Information, Informationsgesellschaft: diese Begriffe wurden damals fast nur im technischen Sinne verstanden. Die informatisierte, nicht die informierte Gesellschaft stand im Vordergrund - was wiederum Kritiker auf den Plan rief, von Joseph Weizenbaum in den USA bis hin zu den Informations-Ökologen in Bremen. Bei den nationalen, manchmal auch nur regionalen Projekten und Modellversuchen mit Datenautobahnen - auch beim frühen Btx - war nie so recht deutlich geworden, welche Inhalte in welcher Gestalt durch diese Netze und Straßen gejagt werden sollten und wer diese Inhalte eigentlich selektieren, portionieren, positionieren, kurz: managen sollte. Spätestens mit dem World Wide Web sind diese Projekte denn auch obsolet geworden, jedenfalls was die Hardware und Software anging. Geblieben ist das Thema Inhalte (neudeutsch: Content). Und - immer drängender im nicht nur technischen Verständnis - das Thema Informationsmanagement. MedienInformationsManagement war die Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar überschrieben, und auch die Folgetagung 2001 in Köln, die der multimedialen Produktion einen dokumentarischen Pragmatismus gegenüber stellte, handelte vom Geschäftsfeld Content und von Content-Management-Systemen. Die in diesem 6. Band der Reihe Beiträge zur Mediendokumentation versammelten Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge auf diesen beiden Tagungen beleuchten das Titel-Thema aus den verschiedensten Blickwinkeln: archivarischen, dokumentarischen, kaufmännischen, berufsständischen und juristischen. Deutlich wird dabei, daß die Berufsbezeichnung Medienarchivarln/Mediendokumentarln ziemlich genau für all das steht, was heute mit sog. alten wie neuen Medien im organisatorischen, d.h. ordnenden und vermittelnden Sinne geschieht. Im besonderen Maße trifft dies auf das Internet und die aus ihm geborenen Intranets zu. Beide bedürfen genauso der ordnenden Hand, die sich an den alten Medien, an Buch, Zeitung, Tonträger, Film etc. geschult hat, denn sie leben zu großen Teilen davon. Daß das Internet gleichwohl ein Medium sui generis ist und die alten Informationsberufe vor ganz neue Herausforderungen stellt - auch das durchzieht die Beiträge von Weimar und Köln.
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (Dokumentarische Aspekte): Günter Perers/Volker Gaese: Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von Gr+J (Weimar 2000) Thomas Gerick: Finden statt suchen. Knowledge Retrieval in Wissensbanken. Mit organisiertem Wissen zu mehr Erfolg (Weimar 2000) Winfried Gödert: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (Weimar 2000) Elisabeth Damen: Klassifikation als Ordnungssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (Köln 2001) Clemens Schlenkrich: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit - Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (Köln 2001) Josef Wandeler: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof'? - Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (Köln 200 1)
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:49:22
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
    Subject
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
  5. Levasseur, D.: ¬Les solutions reseau pour optimiser la gestion des documents et leur diffusion dans les organisations (Groupware, Workflow, Intranet) (1998) 0.02
    0.02016701 = product of:
      0.0739457 = sum of:
        0.041907072 = weight(_text_:wide in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041907072 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
        0.022735327 = weight(_text_:web in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022735327 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
        0.009303299 = weight(_text_:information in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009303299 = score(doc=5111,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Part 3 of a 3-part series on the electronic management of documents parts 1 and 2 of which appeared in Argus 26(3) 1997 and 27(1) 1998 respectively. Looks at 3 concepts relating to the management and communication of electronic documents within the corporate network: groupware, or the automation of work in groups; workflow, or the management of the flow of information to be treated; and intranet, which indicates the private network of an organization supplying internally the technologies responsible for the success of Internet and the World Wide Web. Considers the advantages of the electronic document operated on computer networks over paper handled through traditional channels focusing on intranet because of the importance it is given as an infrastructure for integration of document management activities and because it represents a major challenge for the information professionals of today
  6. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.02
    0.01883154 = product of:
      0.06904898 = sum of:
        0.0132931955 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0132931955 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.045575805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045575805 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.010179976 = product of:
          0.030539928 = sum of:
            0.030539928 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539928 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032201413 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  7. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.02
    0.015190945 = product of:
      0.05570013 = sum of:
        0.0132931955 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0132931955 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.032226957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032226957 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.010179976 = product of:
          0.030539928 = sum of:
            0.030539928 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539928 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032201413 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  8. Casey, C.: ¬The cyberarchive : a look at the storage and preservation of Web sites (1998) 0.02
    0.015035925 = product of:
      0.082697585 = sum of:
        0.07502276 = weight(_text_:web in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07502276 = score(doc=2987,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
        0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00767483 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Although librarians recognize the Internet as a resource for knowledge and information, they have yet to make a formal effort to collect and preserve the Web sites found there. Addresses the need to set up a cyberarchive and some of the issues involved. With Web sites appearing and disappearing constantly from the Internet, there is an immediate need to recognize that they are precious part of cultural and intellectual history and to preserve them for future study. Issues discussed include: Web site authorship vs. Web space ownership; physical media used to hold Web sites (hard drive, mainframe, CD-ROMs); collection development; acquiring Web sites; and adding Web sites to a collection
  9. Bittleston, R.: Managing documents in the wider ares : intelligent document management (1995) 0.01
    0.014692577 = product of:
      0.08080917 = sum of:
        0.069845125 = weight(_text_:wide in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069845125 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
        0.0109640425 = weight(_text_:information in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0109640425 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at a range of techniques which offer intelligent mechanisms for managing documents in a wide area network. Describes differing techniques for increasing bandwidth, reducing data traffic, synchronizing documentation, achieving partial synchronization, audit trails, navigation, distribution control and security
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.5, S.208-213
  10. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.01
    0.013193469 = product of:
      0.07256407 = sum of:
        0.008771234 = weight(_text_:information in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008771234 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
        0.06379284 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06379284 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  11. Hofmeister, H.-W.: Gezielte Informationsrecherche durch Konzept-Retrieval (1995) 0.01
    0.011077357 = product of:
      0.060925465 = sum of:
        0.01534966 = weight(_text_:information in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01534966 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
        0.045575805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045575805 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  12. Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994) 0.01
    0.011077357 = product of:
      0.060925465 = sum of:
        0.01534966 = weight(_text_:information in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01534966 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
        0.045575805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045575805 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
  13. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.01
    0.011065067 = product of:
      0.060857866 = sum of:
        0.008771234 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008771234 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.052086633 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052086633 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
  14. Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995) 0.01
    0.011065067 = product of:
      0.060857866 = sum of:
        0.008771234 = weight(_text_:information in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008771234 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
        0.052086633 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052086633 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
    Source
    ACM transactions on information systems. 13(1995) no.3, S.237-268
  15. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01
    0.0109841125 = product of:
      0.060412616 = sum of:
        0.042870145 = weight(_text_:web in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042870145 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
        0.017542468 = weight(_text_:information in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017542468 = score(doc=1502,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  16. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.01
    0.010660024 = product of:
      0.05863013 = sum of:
        0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00767483 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
        0.0509553 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509553 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  17. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.01
    0.010456864 = product of:
      0.05751275 = sum of:
        0.012404398 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012404398 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
        0.04510835 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04510835 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems
  18. Haynes, D.: Retention and control of electronic records (1994) 0.01
    0.010364101 = product of:
      0.057002556 = sum of:
        0.0109640425 = weight(_text_:information in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0109640425 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
        0.046038512 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046038512 = score(doc=981,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    With the proliferation of electronic data one of the key problems is identifying and organizing electronic records for retention and retrieval. Defines electronic records and sets out strategies for management of electronic records. Covers: policy, information and assett analysis, retention scheduling, inactive records, indexing and retrieval, version control, standards, and electronic mail
  19. Witten, I.H.; Moffat, A.; Bell, T.C.: Managing gigabytes : compressing and indexing documents and images (1994) 0.01
    0.00990586 = product of:
      0.05448223 = sum of:
        0.021928085 = weight(_text_:information in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021928085 = score(doc=3083,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
        0.032554146 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032554146 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Offers both students and professionals guidance on large-scale information systems. This resource describes a new generation of techniques for compressing, storing, and retrieving information - both machine readable text and optically scanned documents. Appropriate for information science and information retrieval courses
  20. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.01
    0.009895101 = product of:
      0.054423053 = sum of:
        0.0065784254 = weight(_text_:information in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065784254 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
        0.047844626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047844626 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032201413 = queryNorm
            0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.5, S.251-262

Years

Languages

  • e 117
  • d 63
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 154
  • m 16
  • x 10
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • el 1
  • More… Less…