-
Kuhlen, R.; Hess, M.S.: Passagen-Retrieval : auch eine Möglichkeit der automatischen Verknüpfung in Hypertexten (1993)
0.03
0.029525163 = product of:
0.108258925 = sum of:
0.0065784254 = weight(_text_:information in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065784254 = score(doc=1947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.033831265 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033831265 = score(doc=1947,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.067849234 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067849234 = score(doc=1947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18154396 = queryWeight, product of:
5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.37373447 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Das Passagen-Retrieval erlaubt explorierendes Navigieren in Volltextdatenbanken, aber auch in textorientierten Hypertextbasen. Es wird experimentell an fünf, im Information Retrieval geläufigen Assoziationskoeffizienten überprüft, inwieweit mit ihnen Textpassagen, gewonnen aus der Konversion von Absätzen aus einer Buchvorlage (Hypertextbuch von R. Kuhlen, 1991b), automatisch verknüpft werden können. Voraussetzung für die Anwendung der Maße ist eine Volltextinvertierung mit linguistisch abgesicherter Stammformenreduktion. Die Ergebnisse, gewonnen aus der Bewertung der Verknüpfungsangebote entsprechend den Berechnungen nach den fünf Koeffizienten und aus dem Vergleich mit einer intellektuellen Verknüpfungsvorgabe, zeigen eine deutliche Präferenz zugunsten des Asymmetrie-Maßes, das vielleicht noch durch eine Kombination mit dem Cosinus-Maß verbessert werden könnte. Die automatisch erstellten Verknüpfungsangebote sind sowohl im Autoren-Modus zur Unterstützung des Aufbaus von Hypertextbasen sinnvoll als auch im Lese-Modus als Möglichkeit des assoziativen Navigierens in großen Hypertextbasen verwendbar.
- Imprint
- Konstanz : Universität, FG Informationswissenschaft
-
Studer, R.; Studer, H.-P.; Studer, A.: Semantisches Knowledge Retrieval (2001)
0.03
0.027376426 = product of:
0.10038023 = sum of:
0.039378747 = weight(_text_:web in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039378747 = score(doc=4322,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
0.013156851 = weight(_text_:information in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013156851 = score(doc=4322,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
0.047844626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047844626 = score(doc=4322,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Dieses Whitepaper befasst sich mit der Integration semantischer Technologien in bestehende Ansätze des Information Retrieval und die damit verbundenen weitreichenden Auswirkungen auf Effizienz und Effektivität von Suche und Navigation in Dokumenten. Nach einer Einbettung in die Problematik des Wissensmanagement aus Sicht der Informationstechnik folgt ein Überblick zu den Methoden des Information Retrieval. Anschließend werden die semantischen Technologien "Wissen modellieren - Ontologie" und "Neues Wissen ableiten - Inferenz" vorgestellt. Ein Integrationsansatz wird im Folgenden diskutiert und die entstehenden Mehrwerte präsentiert. Insbesondere ergeben sich Erweiterungen hinsichtlich einer verfeinerten Suchunterstützung und einer kontextbezogenen Navigation sowie die Möglichkeiten der Auswertung von regelbasierten Zusammenhängen und einfache Integration von strukturierten Informationsquellen. Das Whitepaper schließt mit einem Ausblick auf die zukünftige Entwicklung des WWW hin zu einem Semantic Web und die damit verbundenen Implikationen für semantische Technologien.
- Content
- Inhalt: 1. Einführung - 2. Wissensmanagement - 3. Information Retrieval - 3.1. Methoden und Techniken - 3.2. Information Retrieval in der Anwendung - 4. Semantische Ansätze - 4.1. Wissen modellieren - Ontologie - 4.2. Neues Wissen inferieren - 5. Knowledge Retrieval in der Anwendung - 6. Zukunftsaussichten - 7. Fazit
- Series
- Ontoprise "Semantics for the Web" - Whitepaper series
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998)
0.02
0.024359718 = product of:
0.06698922 = sum of:
0.032152608 = weight(_text_:web in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032152608 = score(doc=3685,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.0065784254 = weight(_text_:information in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065784254 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.019532489 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019532489 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.008725693 = product of:
0.02617708 = sum of:
0.02617708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02617708 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Presents the findings of the South Ayrshire Libraries OPen Learning and the Internet project, Sep 1997 to Oct 1998. The objective was to demonstrate how open learning materials available on the Internet could be integrated with the provision of local open learning resources to provide an enhanced learning environment in public libraries. The main areas of concentration within the project were information skills support to public library users and the provision of WWW based independent materials to learners. The organisation and retrieval of Web based resources for local use was a major issue throughout the project. Recommends the adoption of Dublin Core metadata standards, the connection of databases of resources with searchable wen pages, and the development of thesauri of terms used to index the Web based resources locally. Sstaff training, and the new skills which will need to be developed, were identified as issues. Cost was also identified as a related issue, extending to issues such as access to open learning material and the Internet
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 18:55:19
-
Horch, A.; Kett, H.; Weisbecker, A.: Semantische Suchsysteme für das Internet : Architekturen und Komponenten semantischer Suchmaschinen (2013)
0.02
0.02325079 = product of:
0.085252896 = sum of:
0.037892215 = weight(_text_:web in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037892215 = score(doc=4063,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.0109640425 = weight(_text_:information in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0109640425 = score(doc=4063,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.03639664 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03639664 = score(doc=4063,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- In der heutigen Zeit nimmt die Flut an Informationen exponentiell zu. In dieser »Informationsexplosion« entsteht täglich eine unüberschaubare Menge an neuen Informationen im Web: Beispielsweise 430 deutschsprachige Artikel bei Wikipedia, 2,4 Mio. Tweets bei Twitter und 12,2 Mio. Kommentare bei Facebook. Während in Deutschland vor einigen Jahren noch Google als nahezu einzige Suchmaschine beim Zugriff auf Informationen im Web genutzt wurde, nehmen heute die u.a. in Social Media veröffentlichten Meinungen und damit die Vorauswahl sowie Bewertung von Informationen einzelner Experten und Meinungsführer an Bedeutung zu. Aber wie können themenspezifische Informationen nun effizient für konkrete Fragestellungen identifiziert und bedarfsgerecht aufbereitet und visualisiert werden? Diese Studie gibt einen Überblick über semantische Standards und Formate, die Prozesse der semantischen Suche, Methoden und Techniken semantischer Suchsysteme, Komponenten zur Entwicklung semantischer Suchmaschinen sowie den Aufbau bestehender Anwendungen. Die Studie erläutert den prinzipiellen Aufbau semantischer Suchsysteme und stellt Methoden der semantischen Suche vor. Zudem werden Softwarewerkzeuge vorgestellt, mithilfe derer einzelne Funktionalitäten von semantischen Suchmaschinen realisiert werden können. Abschließend erfolgt die Betrachtung bestehender semantischer Suchmaschinen zur Veranschaulichung der Unterschiede der Systeme im Aufbau sowie in der Funktionalität.
- RSWK
- Suchmaschine / Semantic Web / Information Retrieval
Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Datenstruktur / Kontextbezogenes System
- Subject
- Suchmaschine / Semantic Web / Information Retrieval
Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Datenstruktur / Kontextbezogenes System
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995)
0.02
0.02148057 = product of:
0.11814313 = sum of:
0.09778318 = weight(_text_:wide in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09778318 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.685348 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.020359952 = product of:
0.061079856 = sum of:
0.061079856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061079856 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Date
- 30.11.1995 20:53:22
-
Hodge, G.: Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries : beyond traditional authority files (2000)
0.02
0.02016701 = product of:
0.0739457 = sum of:
0.041907072 = weight(_text_:wide in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041907072 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.022735327 = weight(_text_:web in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022735327 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.009303299 = weight(_text_:information in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009303299 = score(doc=4723,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Access of digital materials continues to be an issue of great significance in the development of digital libraries. The proliferation of information in the networked digital environment poses challenges as well as opportunities. The author reports on a wide array of activities in the field. While this publication is not intended to be exhaustive, the reader will find, in a single work, an overview of systems of knowledge organization and pertinent examples of their application to digital materials
- Content
- (1) Knowledge organization systems: an overview; (2) Linking digital library resources to related resources; (3) Making resources accessible to other communities; (4) Planning and implementing knowledge organization systems in digital libraries; (5) The future of knowledge organization systems on the Web
- Imprint
- Washington, DC : The Digital Library Federation; Council on Library and Information resources
-
Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007)
0.02
0.017465144 = product of:
0.06403886 = sum of:
0.036292594 = weight(_text_:wide in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036292594 = score(doc=1271,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.2543695 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.019689374 = weight(_text_:web in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019689374 = score(doc=1271,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.18735787 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.008056893 = weight(_text_:information in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008056893 = score(doc=1271,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.14252704 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
The Library of Congress must begin by prioritizing the recommendations that are directed in whole or in part at LC. Some define tasks that can be achieved immediately and with moderate effort; others will require analysis and planning that will have to be coordinated broadly and carefully. The Working Group has consciously not associated time frames with any of its recommendations. The recommendations fall into five general areas: 1. Increase the efficiency of bibliographic production for all libraries through increased cooperation and increased sharing of bibliographic records, and by maximizing the use of data produced throughout the entire "supply chain" for information resources. 2. Transfer effort into higher-value activity. In particular, expand the possibilities for knowledge creation by "exposing" rare and unique materials held by libraries that are currently hidden from view and, thus, underused. 3. Position our technology for the future by recognizing that the World Wide Web is both our technology platform and the appropriate platform for the delivery of our standards. Recognize that people are not the only users of the data we produce in the name of bibliographic control, but so too are machine applications that interact with those data in a variety of ways. 4. Position our community for the future by facilitating the incorporation of evaluative and other user-supplied information into our resource descriptions. Work to realize the potential of the FRBR framework for revealing and capitalizing on the various relationships that exist among information resources. 5. Strengthen the library profession through education and the development of metrics that will inform decision-making now and in the future. The Working Group intends what follows to serve as a broad blueprint for the Library of Congress and its colleagues in the library and information technology communities for extending and promoting access to information resources.
-
Bredemeier, W.; Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Branche elektronischer Geschäftsinformationen in Deutschland 2000/2001 (2001)
0.02
0.016805843 = product of:
0.06162142 = sum of:
0.034922563 = weight(_text_:wide in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034922563 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.018946107 = weight(_text_:web in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946107 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.0077527487 = weight(_text_:information in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0077527487 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Content
- Der deutsche Markt für Elektronische Informationsdienste im Jahre 2000 - Ergebnisse einer Umsatzerhebung - Von Willi Bredemeier: - Abgesicherte Methodologie unter Berücksichtigung der Spezifika des EIS-Marktes und der aktuellen Entwicklung - teilweise Vergleichbarkeit der Daten ab 1989 - Weitgehende quantitative Markttransparenz, da der Leser die Aggregationen der Markt- und Teilmarktdaten aus einzelwirtschaftlichen Daten voll nachvollziehen kann - 93 zum Teil ausführliche Tabellen vorwiegend zu einzelnen Informationsanbietern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Geschäftsjahre 2000 und 1999, unterteilt in die Bereiche Gesamtmarkt für Elektronische Informationsdienste, Datev, Realtime-Finanzinformationen, Nachrichtenagenturen, Kreditinformationen, Firmen- und Produktinformationen, weitere Wirtschaftsinformationen, Rechtsinformationen, Wissenschaftlich-technisch-medizinische Informationen - Intellectual Property, Konsumentendienste, Nachbarmärkte - Analyse aktueller Markttrends. Qualität professioneller Firmeninformationen im World Wide Web - Von Mechtild Stock und Wolfgang G. Stock: - Weiterführung der Qualitätsdiskussion und Entwicklung eines Systems von Qualitätskriterien für Informationsangebote, bezogen auf Firmeninformationen im Internet - "Qualitätspanel" für die Bereiche Bonitätsinformationen, Firmenkurzdossiers, Produktinformationen und Adressinformationen mit den Anbietern Bürgel, Creditreform, Dun & Bradstreet Deutschland, ABC online, ALLECO, Hoppenstedt Firmendatenbank, Who is Who in Multimedia, Kompass Deutschland, Sachon Industriedaten, Wer liefert was?, AZ Bertelsmann, Schober.com - Hochdifferenzierte Tests, die den Kunden Hilfen bei der Auswahl zwischen Angeboten und den Anbietern Hinweise auf Maßnahmen zu qualitativen Verbesserungen geben - Detaillierte Informationen über eingesetzte Systeme der Branchen- und Produktklassifikationen - Rankings der Firmeninformationsanbieter insgesamt sowie nach Datenbasen, Retrievalsystemen und Websites, Detailinformationen zu allen Qualitätsdimensionen
- Imprint
- Hattingen : Institute for Information Economics
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Hammwöhner, R.; Kuhlen, R.: Semantic control of open hypertext systems by typed objects (1993)
0.02
0.015787685 = product of:
0.08683227 = sum of:
0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00767483 = score(doc=1902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
0.07915744 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07915744 = score(doc=1902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18154396 = queryWeight, product of:
5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.43602353 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- The C(K)onstance Hypertext system (KHS) is an elaborated example of an open hypertext system. Open hypertext systems combine heterogeneous resources and different hypertext applications such as email, text and image hypertexts with access to online data bases or other information resources. These hypertexts, to which heterogeneous users have access, grow steadily in size. This paper takes an object-oriented approach and proposes a rigorous typing of hypertext objexts to overcome the problems of open hypertext. The advantage of this typing is shown an an e-mail hypertext as a special application of the KHS system. KHS is written in Smalltalk and is being developed an UNIX-machines.
- Imprint
- Konstanz : Universität, FG Informationswissenschaft
-
Multilingual information management : current levels and future abilities. A report Commissioned by the US National Science Foundation and also delivered to the European Commission's Language Engineering Office and the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, April 1999 (1999)
0.02
0.015663015 = product of:
0.05743105 = sum of:
0.015156886 = weight(_text_:web in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015156886 = score(doc=6068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
0.01315685 = weight(_text_:information in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01315685 = score(doc=6068,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
0.029117314 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029117314 = score(doc=6068,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.29892567 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Over the past 50 years, a variety of language-related capabilities has been developed in machine translation, information retrieval, speech recognition, text summarization, and so on. These applications rest upon a set of core techniques such as language modeling, information extraction, parsing, generation, and multimedia planning and integration; and they involve methods using statistics, rules, grammars, lexicons, ontologies, training techniques, and so on. It is a puzzling fact that although all of this work deals with language in some form or other, the major applications have each developed a separate research field. For example, there is no reason why speech recognition techniques involving n-grams and hidden Markov models could not have been used in machine translation 15 years earlier than they were, or why some of the lexical and semantic insights from the subarea called Computational Linguistics are still not used in information retrieval.
This picture will rapidly change. The twin challenges of massive information overload via the web and ubiquitous computers present us with an unavoidable task: developing techniques to handle multilingual and multi-modal information robustly and efficiently, with as high quality performance as possible. The most effective way for us to address such a mammoth task, and to ensure that our various techniques and applications fit together, is to start talking across the artificial research boundaries. Extending the current technologies will require integrating the various capabilities into multi-functional and multi-lingual natural language systems. However, at this time there is no clear vision of how these technologies could or should be assembled into a coherent framework. What would be involved in connecting a speech recognition system to an information retrieval engine, and then using machine translation and summarization software to process the retrieved text? How can traditional parsing and generation be enhanced with statistical techniques? What would be the effect of carefully crafted lexicons on traditional information retrieval? At which points should machine translation be interleaved within information retrieval systems to enable multilingual processing?
-
Sykes, J.: ¬The value of indexing : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2001)
0.01
0.013540625 = product of:
0.049648955 = sum of:
0.021435073 = weight(_text_:web in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021435073 = score(doc=720,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.015192224 = weight(_text_:information in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015192224 = score(doc=720,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.013021658 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013021658 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Finding particular documents after they have been reviewed and stored has been a challenge since the advent of the printed word. "Findability" is emphatically more important as we deal with information overload in general and with the specific need to quickly find relevant background information to support business decisions in a networked environment. Because time is arguably the most valuable asset in today's economy, information users value tools that help them (1) quickly find the information they are seeking and (2) manage the quantity and quality of information they manipulate and work with on a regular basis. Although the term "indexing" may lack the cachet of some other terms we use to describe current information organization and management concepts, indexing is fundamental to precise information organization and retrieval, especially when dealing with large sets of documents. Power users find great value in using a known, granular indexing language that can surface the most relevant items and filter out items of peripheral or no interest. Web architects and interface designers can likewise take advantage of indexing labels to present only the information meeting certain requirements for users who do not wish to learn the indexing structure or taxonomy. The user finds what is needed while the indexing language is used behind the scenes and is transparent to the user.
The importance of indexing in developing a content navigation strategy for corporate intranets or portals and the value of high-quality indexing when retrieving information from external resources are reviewed in this white paper. Some general background information on indexing and the use of controlled vocabularies (or taxonomies) are included for a historical perspective. Factiva Intelligent Indexing-which incorporates the best indexing expertise from both Dow Jones Interactive and Reuters Business Briefing-is described, along with some novel customer applications that take advantage of Factiva's indexing to create or improve information products delivered to users. Examples from the Excite and Google web search engines and from Dow Jones Interactive and Reuters Business Briefing are included in an Appendix section to illustrate how indexing influences the amount and quality of information retrieved in a specific search.
-
Fuhr, N.: Hypertext und Information-Retrieval (1990)
0.01
0.0126598375 = product of:
0.0696291 = sum of:
0.017542468 = weight(_text_:information in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017542468 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.052086633 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052086633 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
-
Belkin, N.J.; Vickery, A.: Interaction in information systems : a review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems (1985)
0.01
0.012233364 = product of:
0.0672835 = sum of:
0.021707697 = weight(_text_:information in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021707697 = score(doc=3295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
0.045575805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045575805 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Series
- Library and information science report; 35
-
Sykes, J.: Making solid business decisions through intelligent indexing taxonomies : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2003)
0.01
0.0112277465 = product of:
0.041168403 = sum of:
0.015156886 = weight(_text_:web in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015156886 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
0.007596112 = weight(_text_:information in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007596112 = score(doc=721,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
0.018415406 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018415406 = score(doc=721,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- In 2000, Factiva published "The Value of Indexing," a white paper emphasizing the strategic importance of accurate categorization, based on a robust taxonomy for later retrieval of documents stored in commercial or in-house content repositories. Since that time, there has been resounding agreement between persons who use Web-based systems and those who design these systems that search engines alone are not the answer for effective information retrieval. High-quality categorization is crucial if users are to be able to find the right answers in repositories of articles and documents that are expanding at phenomenal rates. Companies continue to invest in technologies that will help them organize and integrate their content. A March 2002 article in EContent suggests a typical taxonomy implementation usually costs around $100,000. The article also cites a Merrill Lynch study that predicts the market for search and categorization products, now at about $600 million, will more than double by 2005. Classification activities are not new. In the third century B.C., Callimachus of Cyrene managed the ancient Library of Alexandria. To help scholars find items in the collection, he created an index of all the scrolls organized according to a subject taxonomy. Factiva's parent companies, Dow Jones and Reuters, each have more than 20 years of experience with developing taxonomies and painstaking manual categorization processes and also have a solid history with automated categorization techniques. This experience and expertise put Factiva at the leading edge of developing and applying categorization technology today. This paper will update readers about enhancements made to the Factiva Intelligent IndexingT taxonomy. It examines the value these enhancements bring to Factiva's news and business information service, and the value brought to clients who license the Factiva taxonomy as a fundamental component of their own Enterprise Knowledge Architecture. There is a behind-the-scenes-look at how Factiva classifies a huge stream of incoming articles published in a variety of formats and languages. The paper concludes with an overview of new Factiva services and solutions that are designed specifically to help clients improve productivity and make solid business decisions by precisely finding information in their own everexpanding content repositories.
-
Rudolph, S.; Hemmje, M.: Visualisierung von Thesauri zur interaktiven Unterstüzung von visuellen Anfragen an Textdatenbanken (1994)
0.01
0.011085048 = product of:
0.060967762 = sum of:
0.00949514 = weight(_text_:information in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00949514 = score(doc=2382,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
0.051472623 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051472623 = score(doc=2382,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.5284309 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- In der folgenden Studie wird eine Komponente für eine visuelle Benutzerschnittstelle zu Textdatenbanken entworfen. Mit Hilfe einer Terminologievisualisierung wird dem Benutzer eine Hilfestellung bei der Relevanzbewertung von Dokumenten und bei der Erweiterung seiner visuellen Anfrage an das Retrieval-System gegeben. Dazu werden zuerst die grundlegenden Information-Retrieval-Modelle eingehender vorgestellt, d.h., generelle Retrieval-Modelle, Retrievaloperationen und spezielle Retrieval-Modelle wie Text-Retrieval werden erläutert. Die Funktionalität eines Text-Retrieval-Systems wird vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus werden bereits existierende Implementierungen visueller Information-Retrieval-Benutzerschnittstellen vorgestellt. Im weiteren Verlauf der Arbeit werden mögliche Visualisierungen der mit Hilfe eines Text-Retrieval-Systems gefundenen Dokumente aufgezeigt. Es werden mehrere Vorschläge zur Visualisierung von Thesauri diskutiert. Es wird gezeigt, wie neuronale Netze zur Kartierung eines Eingabebereiches benutzt werden können. Klassifikationsebenen einer objekt-orientierten Annäherung eines Information-Retrieval-Systems werden vorgestellt. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch die Eigenschaften von Thesauri sowie die Architektur und Funktion eines Parsersystems erläutert. Mit diesen Voraussetzung wird die Implementierung einer visuellen Terminologierunterstützung realisiert. Abschließend wird ein Fazit zur vorgestellten Realisierung basierend auf einem Drei-Schichten-Modell von [Agosti et al. 1990] gezogen.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994)
0.01
0.011077357 = product of:
0.060925465 = sum of:
0.01534966 = weight(_text_:information in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01534966 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.045575805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045575805 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: Approaches to search formulation and query expansion in information systems : DRS, DBMS, ES (1992)
0.01
0.010364101 = product of:
0.057002556 = sum of:
0.0109640425 = weight(_text_:information in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0109640425 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.046038512 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046038512 = score(doc=3871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Discusses the ways in which systems and/or users formulate and reformulate searches in documents retrieval systems (DRS), database management systems (DBMS) and expert systems (ES). Concludes that query formulation and reformulation has been neglected in these fields
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017)
0.01
0.010284804 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.04889159 = weight(_text_:wide in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04889159 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14267668 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
0.00767483 = weight(_text_:information in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00767483 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Issue
- Revised after world-wide review. Endorsed by the IFLA Professional Committe.
-
Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006)
0.01
0.009756724 = product of:
0.035774656 = sum of:
0.015156886 = weight(_text_:web in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015156886 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10508965 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
0.007596112 = weight(_text_:information in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007596112 = score(doc=5013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
0.013021658 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013021658 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
-
ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998)
0.01
0.009500893 = product of:
0.034836605 = sum of:
0.0065784254 = weight(_text_:information in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065784254 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05652887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.019532489 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019532489 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09740654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.008725693 = product of:
0.02617708 = sum of:
0.02617708 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02617708 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032201413 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Describes the final phase of the work on the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) project at De Montfort University, Leicester, which concluded in 1996. ELINOR was 2 phase project with 3 overall goals: to create a practical pilot system based on a commercial product (Excalibur EFS); to investigate the expansion of a small scale electronic library to a larger, distributed library system; and to develop a more efficient and effective means of accessing and sharing resources within a networked multi campus institution. ELINOR was successful in demonstrating that libraries may conveniently digitize and supply smal collections of high demand materials over a campus network in text anf TIFF format. Operational conditions have so far indicated that the barriers are not technological but involve copyright, use issues and sustainability
- Series
- British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
