-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.04
0.038049873 = product of:
0.10146633 = sum of:
0.045056276 = weight(_text_:wide in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045056276 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.042337947 = weight(_text_:web in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042337947 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.014072108 = product of:
0.028144216 = sum of:
0.028144216 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028144216 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia; vgl. auch: http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/posters/1846/com1846.htm.
-
Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998)
0.03
0.034719437 = product of:
0.09258516 = sum of:
0.038619664 = weight(_text_:wide in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038619664 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.041903697 = weight(_text_:web in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041903697 = score(doc=4190,freq=8.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.012061807 = product of:
0.024123615 = sum of:
0.024123615 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024123615 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Object
- Nordic Web Index
-
Robbins, F.: ¬An exploration of the application of classification systems as a method for resource delivery on the World Wide Web (1999)
0.03
0.029785756 = product of:
0.119143024 = sum of:
0.07723933 = weight(_text_:wide in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07723933 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.041903697 = weight(_text_:web in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041903697 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.03
0.028736055 = product of:
0.07662948 = sum of:
0.038619664 = weight(_text_:wide in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038619664 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.020951848 = weight(_text_:web in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020951848 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.017057972 = product of:
0.034115944 = sum of:
0.034115944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034115944 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002)
0.03
0.02571402 = product of:
0.06857072 = sum of:
0.022528138 = weight(_text_:wide in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022528138 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.171337 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.03456879 = weight(_text_:web in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456879 = score(doc=97,freq=16.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.011473786 = weight(_text_:data in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011473786 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.12227618 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Devadason, F.J.: Facet analysis and Semantic Web: musings of a student of Ranganathan. Unter: http://www.geocities.com/devadason.geo/FASEMWEB.html#FacetedIndex.
-
Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998)
0.02
0.024821464 = product of:
0.099285856 = sum of:
0.0643661 = weight(_text_:wide in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0643661 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
0.03491975 = weight(_text_:web in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03491975 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
-
Möller, G.: Automatic classification of the World Wide Web using Universal Decimal Classification (1999)
0.02
0.024821464 = product of:
0.099285856 = sum of:
0.0643661 = weight(_text_:wide in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0643661 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.03491975 = weight(_text_:web in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03491975 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
-
Quick Guide to Publishing a Classification Scheme on the Semantic Web (2008)
0.02
0.022158504 = product of:
0.088634014 = sum of:
0.04888765 = weight(_text_:web in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04888765 = score(doc=3061,freq=8.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.039746363 = weight(_text_:data in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039746363 = score(doc=3061,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This document describes in brief how to express the content and structure of a classification scheme, and metadata about a classification scheme, in RDF using the SKOS vocabulary. RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other RDF data by semantic web applications. The Semantic Web, which is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF), provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries. Publishing classifications schemes in SKOS will unify the great many of existing classification efforts in the framework of the Semantic Web.
-
McKiernan, G.: Parallel universe : the organization of information elements and access in a World Wide Web (WWW) Virtual Library (1996)
0.02
0.021061711 = product of:
0.084246844 = sum of:
0.054616455 = weight(_text_:wide in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054616455 = score(doc=5184,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.029630389 = weight(_text_:web in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029630389 = score(doc=5184,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- For generations, libraries have facilitated access to information sources by the development and use of a wide range of appropriate organizational processes. Within a Web-based demonstration prototype, we have applied several established library procedures, principles and practices to enhance access to selected Internet resources in science and technology. In seeking to manage these sources, we have established defined collection, adopted an established library classification scheme as an organizational framework, and sought to stimulate the features and functions of a physical library collection and conventional reference sourcees. This paper describes the key components of this prototype, reviews research which supports its approach, and profiles suggested enhancements which could further facilitate identification, access and use of significant Internet and WWW resources
-
Hanke, M.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme im semantischen Web : zu Chancen und Problemen von Linked-data-Repräsentationen ausgewählter Klassifikationssysteme (2014)
0.02
0.020229518 = product of:
0.08091807 = sum of:
0.046849765 = weight(_text_:web in 2463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046849765 = score(doc=2463,freq=10.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 2463, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2463)
0.03406831 = weight(_text_:data in 2463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03406831 = score(doc=2463,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 2463, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2463)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Pflege und Anwendung von Klassifikationssystemen für Informationsressourcen sind traditionell eine Kernkompetenz von Bibliotheken. Diese Systeme sind häufig historisch gewachsen und die Veröffentlichung verschiedener Systeme ist in der Vergangenheit typischerweise durch gedruckte Regelwerke oder proprietäre Datenbanken erfolgt. Die Technologien des semantischen Web erlauben es, Klassifikationssysteme in einer standardisierten und maschinenlesbaren Weise zu repräsentieren, sowie als Linked (Open) Data für die Nachnutzung zugänglich zu machen. Anhand ausgewählter Beispiele von Klassifikationssystemen, die bereits als Linked (Open) Data publiziert wurden, werden in diesem Artikel zentrale semantische und technische Fragen erörtert, sowie mögliche Einsatzgebiete und Chancen dargestellt. So kann beispielsweise die für die Maschinenlesbarkeit erforderliche starke Strukturierung von Daten im semantischen Web zum besseren Verständnis der Klassifikationssysteme beitragen und möglicherweise positive Impulse für ihre Weiterentwicklung liefern. Für das semantische Web aufbereitete Repräsentationen von Klassifikationssystemen können unter anderem zur Kataloganreicherung oder für die anwendungsbezogene Erstellung von Konkordanzen zwischen verschiedenen Klassifikations- bzw. Begriffssystemen genutzt werden..
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The UDC and the World Wide Web (2003)
0.02
0.020108365 = product of:
0.08043346 = sum of:
0.045513712 = weight(_text_:wide in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045513712 = score(doc=3814,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.03491975 = weight(_text_:web in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03491975 = score(doc=3814,freq=8.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the potentiality of the Universal Decimal Classification as a means for retrieving subjects from the World Wide Web. The analytico-synthetic basis of the scheme provides the facility to link concepts at the input or search stage and to isolate concepts via the notation so as to retrieve the separate parts of a compound subject individually if required. Its notation permits hierarchical searching and overrides the shortcomings of natural language. Recent revisions have been constructed with this purpose in mind, the most recent being for Management. The use of the classification embedded in metadata, as in the GERHARD system or as a basis for subject trees is discussed. Its application as a gazetteer is another Web application to which it is put. The range of up to date editions in many languages and the availability of a Web-based version make its use as a switching language increasingly valuable.
-
Dodd, D.G.: Grass-roots cataloging and classification : food for thought from World Wide Web subject-oriented hierarchical lists (1996)
0.02
0.019906268 = product of:
0.07962507 = sum of:
0.045056276 = weight(_text_:wide in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045056276 = score(doc=7270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
0.03456879 = weight(_text_:web in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456879 = score(doc=7270,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The explosion of the use of the Internet by the genral public, particularly via the WWW, has given rise to the proliferation of semiprofessional attempts to give some subject based access to Internet resources via hierarchical guides (hotlists) on Web search engines such as Yahoo and Magellan. Examines the structure and principles of various hierachical lists, and compares them, when possible, to broad LCC and DDC schemes, and to LCSH. Explores the approaches taken by non librarians in their efforts to organize and provide access to materials on the Internet. Focuses on the dichotomy between the hierarchical 'browse' and the analytical 'search' approaches to finding materials, as exemplified by these various attempts to organize the Internet
-
Wätjen, H.-J.: GERHARD : Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web (1998)
0.02
0.019906268 = product of:
0.07962507 = sum of:
0.045056276 = weight(_text_:wide in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045056276 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.03456879 = weight(_text_:web in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456879 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Die intellektuelle Erschließung des Internet befindet sich in einer Krise. Yahoo und andere Dienste können mit dem Wachstum des Web nicht mithalten. GERHARD ist derzeit weltweit der einzige Such- und Navigationsdienst, der die mit einem Roboter gesammelten Internetressourcen mit computerlinguistischen und statistischen Verfahren auch automatisch vollständig klassifiziert. Weit über eine Million HTML-Dokumente von wissenschaftlich relevanten Servern in Deutschland können wie bei anderen Suchmaschinen in der Datenbank gesucht, aber auch über die Navigation in der dreisprachigen Universalen Dezimalklassifikation (ETH-Bibliothek Zürich) recherchiert werden
-
Louie, A.J.; Maddox, E.L.; Washington, W.: Using faceted classification to provide structure for information architecture (2003)
0.02
0.018727332 = product of:
0.07490933 = sum of:
0.038619664 = weight(_text_:wide in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038619664 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.03628967 = weight(_text_:web in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03628967 = score(doc=2471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This is a short, but very thorough and very interesting, report on how the writers built a faceted classification for some legal information and used it to structure a web site with navigation and searching. There is a good summary of why facets work well and how they fit into bibliographic control in general. The last section is about their implementation of a web site for the Washington State Bar Association's Council for Legal Public Education. Their classification uses three facets: Purpose (the general aim of the document, e.g. Resources for K-12 Teachers), Topic (the subject of the document), and Type (the legal format of the document). See Example Web Sites, below, for a discussion of the site and a problem with its design.
- Content
- A very large PDF of the six-foot-wide illustrated poster from their poster session is available at http://depts.washington.edu/pettt/presentations/conf_2003/IASummit-Poster-Louie.pdf.
-
Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999)
0.02
0.018727332 = product of:
0.07490933 = sum of:
0.038619664 = weight(_text_:wide in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038619664 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.03628967 = weight(_text_:web in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03628967 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
-
Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: ¬The relevance of facet analysis for World Wide Web subject organization and searching (2000)
0.02
0.017062513 = product of:
0.06825005 = sum of:
0.038619664 = weight(_text_:wide in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038619664 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
0.029630389 = weight(_text_:web in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029630389 = score(doc=2477,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Different forms of indexing and search facilities available on the Web are described. Use of facet analysis to structure hypertext concept structures is outlined in relation to work on (1) development of hypertext knowledge bases for designers of learning materials and (2) construction of knowledge based hypertext interfaces. The problem of lack of closeness between page designers and potential users is examined. Facet analysis is suggested as a way of alleviating some difficulties associated with this problem of designing for the unknown user.
-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.02
0.016629778 = product of:
0.06651911 = sum of:
0.046849765 = weight(_text_:web in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046849765 = score(doc=5698,freq=10.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.019669347 = weight(_text_:data in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019669347 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
-
Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006)
0.02
0.01573994 = product of:
0.06295976 = sum of:
0.04888765 = weight(_text_:web in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04888765 = score(doc=88,freq=8.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.014072108 = product of:
0.028144216 = sum of:
0.028144216 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028144216 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991)
0.01
0.014218761 = product of:
0.056875043 = sum of:
0.03218305 = weight(_text_:wide in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03218305 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
0.024691992 = weight(_text_:web in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024691992 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- "Online retrieval" conjures up a very different mental image now than in 1991, the year this article was written, and the year Tim Berners-Lee first revealed the new hypertext system he called the World Wide Web. Gödert shows that truncation and Boolean logic, combined with notation from a faceted classification system, will be a powerful way of searching for information. It undoubtedly is, but no system built now would require a user searching for material on "nervous systems of bone fish" to enter "Fdd$ and Leaa$". This is worth reading for someone interested in seeing how searching and facets can go together, but the web has made this article quite out of date.
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.01
0.013897399 = product of:
0.055589598 = sum of:
0.039507188 = weight(_text_:web in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039507188 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.01608241 = product of:
0.03216482 = sum of:
0.03216482 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03216482 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
