Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Marcus, J.: Full text year in review : 1996 (1996) 0.02
    0.019149017 = product of:
      0.07659607 = sum of:
        0.039507188 = weight(_text_:web in 7737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039507188 = score(doc=7737,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 7737, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7737)
        0.03708888 = weight(_text_:data in 7737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03708888 = score(doc=7737,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 7737, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7737)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments in full text databases in 1996. Online services are differentiated through quantity rather than niche specializations of content. Full text databases are appearing on the WWW. Examines examples of trade magazine on the WWW from the networking and data communications area. Covers: Networks World Fusion; Data Communications on the Web; Communications Week Interactive; Network Computing Online; LAN Times Online and LAN on the Web
  2. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01
    0.012850125 = product of:
      0.0514005 = sum of:
        0.039338693 = weight(_text_:data in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039338693 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.012061807 = product of:
          0.024123615 = sum of:
            0.024123615 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024123615 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029675366 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  3. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.01
    0.007097564 = product of:
      0.056780513 = sum of:
        0.056780513 = weight(_text_:data in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056780513 = score(doc=4931,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.60511017 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
  4. Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987) 0.01
    0.0064366106 = product of:
      0.051492885 = sum of:
        0.051492885 = weight(_text_:wide in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051492885 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
  5. White, F.: ISYS 3.01 : a review (1993) 0.01
    0.0064366106 = product of:
      0.051492885 = sum of:
        0.051492885 = weight(_text_:wide in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051492885 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS, a full text retrieval system from Odyssey developments. ISYS supports a wide variety of wordprocessor, text and spreadsheet formats. A programming interface is included for developers to integrate ISYS into their own applications. Describes how to use ISYS to create a database index for a set of documents and then query that index to locate, retrieve and display information from the indexed documents. Discusses configuration options, precedence of operators, displaying and manipulating search results, the advanced menu, ease of learning and use, documentation and library applications
  6. Wildemuth, B.M.: Measures of success in searching a full-text fact base (1990) 0.00
    0.0049682953 = product of:
      0.039746363 = sum of:
        0.039746363 = weight(_text_:data in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039746363 = score(doc=2050,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The traditional measures of online searching proficiency (recall and precision) are less appropriate when applied to the searching of full text databases. The pilot study investigated and evaluated 5 measures of overall success in searching a full text data bank. Data was drawn from INQUIRER searches conducted by medical students at North Carolina Univ. at Chapel Hill. INQUIRER ia an online database of facts and concepts in microbiology. The 5 measures were: success/failure; precision; search term overlap; number of search cycles; and time per search. Concludes that the last 4 measures look promising for the evaluation of fact data bases such as ENQUIRER
  7. Böhle, K.; Riehm, U.: German fulltexts in working contexts : empirical findings on how end-users make use of fulltext databases (1989) 0.00
    0.00463611 = product of:
      0.03708888 = sum of:
        0.03708888 = weight(_text_:data in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03708888 = score(doc=2877,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the result of a brief review of West German full text data bases and a user survey of over 40 users in the fields of medicine, law and economics. Questions common assumptions about the advantages and disadvantages of full text data bases.
  8. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.00
    0.004321099 = product of:
      0.03456879 = sum of:
        0.03456879 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03456879 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  9. Schmidt, J.: Full-text searching : as seen from a non-bibliographic searcher's point of view (1989) 0.00
    0.004056596 = product of:
      0.03245277 = sum of:
        0.03245277 = weight(_text_:data in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03245277 = score(doc=2876,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines searching capabilities and search results relating to the same full text data base made available by: a host that offers a command language designed for searching bibliographic data bases and a host that provides search facilities that have been specially designed for full text retrieval. Moreover, the CD-ROM format of an encyclopedia is compared with the equivalent on-line version of the same work, Academic American Encyclopedia. Results reveal that it is easier to search on those systems that offer searching facilities which have been specially designed for full text retrieval.
  10. Voorbij, H.: Title keywords and subject descriptors : a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences (1998) 0.00
    0.0040228814 = product of:
      0.03218305 = sum of:
        0.03218305 = weight(_text_:wide in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03218305 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In order to compare the value of subject descriptors and title keywords as entries to subject searches, two studies were carried out. Both studies concentrated on monographs in the humanities and social sciences, held by the online public access catalogue of the National Library of the Netherlands. In the first study, a comparison was made by subject librarians between the subject descriptors and the title keywords of 475 records. They could express their opinion on a scale from 1 (descriptor is exactly or almost the same as word in title) to 7 (descriptor does not appear in title at all). It was concluded that 37 per cent of the records are considerably enhanced by a subject descriptor, and 49 per cent slightly or considerably enhanced. In the second study, subject librarians performed subject searches using title keywords and subject descriptors on the same topic. The relative recall amounted to 48 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Failure analysis revealed the reasons why so many records that were found by subject descriptors were not found by title keywords. First, although completely meaningless titles hardly ever appear, the title of a publication does not always offer sufficient clues for title keyword searching. In those cases, descriptors may enhance the record of a publication. A second and even more important task of subject descriptors is controlling the vocabulary. Many relevant titles cannot be retrieved by title keyword searching because of the wide diversity of ways of expressing a topic. Descriptors take away the burden of vocabulary control from the user.
  11. McKinin, E.J.; Sievert, M.E.; Johnson, D.; Mitchell, J.A.: ¬The Medline/full-text research project (1991) 0.00
    0.0034770824 = product of:
      0.027816659 = sum of:
        0.027816659 = weight(_text_:data in 5385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027816659 = score(doc=5385,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 5385, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5385)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This project was designed to test the relative efficacy of index terms and full-text for the retrieval of documents in those MEDLINE journals for which full-text searching was also available. The full-text files used were MEDIS from Mead Data Central and CCML from BRS Information Technologies. One hundred clinical medical topics were searches in these two files as well as the MEDLINE file to accumulate the necessary data. It was found that full-text identified significantly more relevant articles than did the indexed file. Most relevant items missed in the full-text files, but identified in MEDLINE, were missed because the searcher failed to account for some aspect of natural language, used a logical or positional operator that was too restrictive, or included a concept which was implied, but not expressed in the natural language. Very few of the unique relevant full-text citations would have been retrievaed by title or abstract alone. Finally, as of July, 1990 the more current issue of a journal was just as likely to appear in MEDLINE as in one of the full-text files.
  12. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 1. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.00
    0.0030554782 = product of:
      0.024443826 = sum of:
        0.024443826 = weight(_text_:web in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024443826 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Ports Authority in the Netherlands the Habour information database includes a press cuttings service and various online databases. To enable research staff to have direct access to information the POINT (Point Information Net) was begun in 1993. Using Verity software POINT provides simultaneously full text searching on a range of databases. The software uses current Web indexing technqiues to overcome the problems of excessive recall and low precision. A key element is the system's ability to recognise word combinations
  13. Melucci, M.: Passage retrieval : a probabilistic technique (1998) 0.00
    0.0028684465 = product of:
      0.022947572 = sum of:
        0.022947572 = weight(_text_:data in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022947572 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a probabilistic technique to retrieve passages from texts having a large size or heterogeneous semantic content. The proposed technique is independent on any supporting auxiliary data, such as text structure, topic organization, or pre-defined text segments. A Bayesian framework implements the probabilistic technique. We carried out experiments to compare the probabilistique technique to one based on a text segmentation algorithm. In particular, the probabilistique technique is more effective than, or as effective as the one based on the text segmentation to retrieve small passages. Results show that passage size affects passage retrieval performance. Results do also suggest that text organization and query generality may have an impact on the difference in effectiveness between the two techniques
  14. Blake, P.: Leading edge : Verity keeps it in the family (1997) 0.00
    0.002618981 = product of:
      0.020951848 = sum of:
        0.020951848 = weight(_text_:web in 7398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020951848 = score(doc=7398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 7398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7398)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Verity Search 97 software will index and search e-mail, attachments, folders and documents on local and network disk drives. The Internet may be searched via the same front end and changes to particular documents or pages may be monitored. Documents may be viewed in their native formats including ASCII, HTML, PDF and popular word processors, with highlighted search terms. Agents may be launched into the Internet to retrieve information according to a user-specified profile. The software can index about 700 MB an hour. Describes the search technology which includes fuzzy logic and natural language. The Web version of Personal Search 97 works with Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, while the Exchange version will work regardless of any attachment to an Exchange server. Search 97 Personal improves online time and access time and allows searches to be refined offline
  15. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.00
    0.0024586683 = product of:
      0.019669347 = sum of:
        0.019669347 = weight(_text_:data in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019669347 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
  16. Pearce, C.; Nicholas, C.: TELLTALE: Experiments in a dynamic hypertext environment for degraded and multilingual data (1996) 0.00
    0.0024586683 = product of:
      0.019669347 = sum of:
        0.019669347 = weight(_text_:data in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019669347 = score(doc=4071,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  17. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.00
    0.0020103012 = product of:
      0.01608241 = sum of:
        0.01608241 = product of:
          0.03216482 = sum of:
            0.03216482 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03216482 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029675366 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  18. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.00
    0.0020103012 = product of:
      0.01608241 = sum of:
        0.01608241 = product of:
          0.03216482 = sum of:
            0.03216482 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03216482 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029675366 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
  19. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.00
    0.0020103012 = product of:
      0.01608241 = sum of:
        0.01608241 = product of:
          0.03216482 = sum of:
            0.03216482 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03216482 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029675366 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  20. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.00
    0.0020103012 = product of:
      0.01608241 = sum of:
        0.01608241 = product of:
          0.03216482 = sum of:
            0.03216482 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03216482 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029675366 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197