-
Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000)
0.06
0.059787113 = product of:
0.11957423 = sum of:
0.06689123 = weight(_text_:wide in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06689123 = score(doc=720,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.508739 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.020951848 = weight(_text_:web in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020951848 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.019669347 = weight(_text_:data in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019669347 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.012061807 = product of:
0.024123615 = sum of:
0.024123615 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024123615 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- The flexibility and extensibility of XML have largely contributed to its wide acceptance beyond the traditional realm of SGML. Yet, there is still one more obstacle to be overcome before XML is able to become the evangelized universal data/document format. The obstacle is posed by the limitations of the legacy standard for constraining the contents of an XML document. The traditionally used DTD (document type definition) format does not lend itself to be used in the wide variety of applications XML is capable of handling. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has charged the XML schema working group with the task of developing a schema language to replace DTD. This XML schema language is evolving based on early drafts of XML schema languages. Each one of these early efforts adopted a slightly different approach, but all of them were moving in the same direction.
- Date
- 28. 1.2006 19:01:22
-
Clarke, K.S.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) (2009)
0.04
0.035114933 = product of:
0.09363982 = sum of:
0.038619664 = weight(_text_:wide in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038619664 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.020951848 = weight(_text_:web in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020951848 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.03406831 = weight(_text_:data in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03406831 = score(doc=3781,freq=6.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- XML, the Extensible Markup Language is a syntax for tagging, or marking-up, textual information. It is a standard, established by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) that many use when sharing or working with structured information. XML isn't used by itself, but as a tool to create other data-specific markup languages. One benefit to using XML is that it enables these languages to distinguish the content that is being marked up from its presentation, allowing for greater flexibility and data reuse. The library community has embraced XML and uses it as the foundation for many of their own data-specific markup languages. Perhaps the greatest strength of XML is that it is very easy to start working with and yet, in conjunction with many other XML-related standards and technologies, can also be used to develop complex applications.
-
Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005)
0.03
0.031814523 = product of:
0.08483873 = sum of:
0.025746442 = weight(_text_:wide in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025746442 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.019753594 = weight(_text_:web in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019753594 = score(doc=3005,freq=4.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.039338693 = weight(_text_:data in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039338693 = score(doc=3005,freq=18.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
-
Chang, M.: ¬An electronic finding aid using extensible markup language (XML) and encoded archival description (EAD) (2000)
0.02
0.017375026 = product of:
0.0695001 = sum of:
0.045056276 = weight(_text_:wide in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045056276 = score(doc=4886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13148437 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
0.024443826 = weight(_text_:web in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024443826 = score(doc=4886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Increasingly, XML applications are appearing on the World Wide Web, from e-commerce to information management. In the case of libraries and archives, XML enables more flexible information management and retrieval than using MARC or a relational database management system. Describes a project to explore the use of XML and the EAD, and the development of a prototype electronic finding aid. It focuses on the technical aspects, and reviews the options available and the choices made. This is done within the setting of a small- to medium-sized archive with minimal tools and resources.
-
Schröder, A.: Web der Zukunft : RDF - Der erste Schritt zum semantischen Web
0.02
0.01611716 = product of:
0.06446864 = sum of:
0.048386227 = weight(_text_:web in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048386227 = score(doc=1457,freq=6.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.01608241 = product of:
0.03216482 = sum of:
0.03216482 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03216482 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden.
- Source
- XML Magazin und Web Services. 2003, H.1, S.40-43
-
Warwick, C.; Pritchard, E.: 'Hyped' text markup language : XML and the future of web markup (2000)
0.01
0.013989754 = product of:
0.055959016 = sum of:
0.03628967 = weight(_text_:web in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03628967 = score(doc=718,freq=6.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.019669347 = weight(_text_:data in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019669347 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- There is a widespread perception that, in terms of web-technology, XML is going to be the 'next big thing'. Given the amount of comment that it has generated, it seems to be on its way to achieving that status. But how much of the praise should be taken at face value, and how much of the hype is credible? In the following article we examine some of the claims made about the importance of XML and consider how far the enthusiasm about it can be justified. Will XML cause a revolution that will change the way that everyone uses the Internet, whether as searchers or data creators? Or is it a tool for certain types of e-commerce and large-scale markup, which may not have a significant impact on the majority of web users?
-
Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004)
0.01
0.00925492 = product of:
0.03701968 = sum of:
0.022947572 = weight(_text_:data in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022947572 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.014072108 = product of:
0.028144216 = sum of:
0.028144216 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028144216 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 10:39:22
-
Bold, M.: ¬Die Zukunft des Web : Standards für das Web der Zukunft (2004)
0.01
0.0075603477 = product of:
0.06048278 = sum of:
0.06048278 = weight(_text_:web in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06048278 = score(doc=1725,freq=6.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.6245262 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Neue Technologien und Standards sollen die Zukunft des Web prägen. Internet Professionell erklärt, was es mit XML, XSLT, XHTML, XPath und XLink auf sich hat
-
Qin, J.: Representation and organization of information in the Web space : from MARC to XML (2000)
0.01
0.005237962 = product of:
0.041903697 = sum of:
0.041903697 = weight(_text_:web in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041903697 = score(doc=3918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.096845865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Salminen, A.: Modeling documents in their context (2009)
0.00
0.0028684465 = product of:
0.022947572 = sum of:
0.022947572 = weight(_text_:data in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022947572 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- This entry describes notions and methods for analyzing and modeling documents in an organizational context. A model for the analysis process is provided and methods for data gathering, modeling, and user needs analysis described. The methods have been originally developed and tested during document standardization activities carried out in the Finnish Parliament and ministries. Later the methods have been adopted and adapted in other Finnish organizations in their document management development projects. The methods are intended especially for cases where the goal is to develop an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based solution for document management. This entry emphasizes the importance of analyzing and describing documents in their organizational context.
-
as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001)
0.00
0.0025128766 = product of:
0.020103013 = sum of:
0.020103013 = product of:
0.040206026 = sum of:
0.040206026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040206026 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 3.2003 11:06:22
-
Fiander, D. J.: Applying XML to the bibliographic description (2001)
0.00
0.0024586683 = product of:
0.019669347 = sum of:
0.019669347 = weight(_text_:data in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019669347 = score(doc=5441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Over the past few years there has been a significant amount of work in the area of cataloging internet resources, primarily using new metadata standards like the Dublin Core, but there has been little work on applying new data description formats like SGML and XML to traditional cataloging practices. What little work has been done in the area of using SGML and XML for traditional bibliographic description has primarily been based on the concept of converting MARC tagging into XML tagging. I suggest that, rather than attempting to convert existing MARC tagging into a new syntax based on SGML or XML, a more fruitful possibility is to return to the cataloging standards and describe their inherent structure, learning from how MARC has been used successfully in modern OPAC while attempting to avoid MARC's rigid field-based restrictions.
-
Patrick, D.A.: XML in der Praxis : Unternehmensübergreifende Vorteile durch Enterprise Content Management (1999)
0.00
0.0017590135 = product of:
0.014072108 = sum of:
0.014072108 = product of:
0.028144216 = sum of:
0.028144216 = weight(_text_:22 in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028144216 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029675366 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 3.2003 10:50:22
