Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.036204513 = product of:
  0.09051128 = sum of:
    0.058677625 = weight(_text_:wide in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058677625 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19977365 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045087915 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.03183365 = weight(_text_:web in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03183365 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14714488 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045087915 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Linked Open Data (LOD) are a set of principles for publishing structured, connected data available for reuse under an open license. The objective of this paper is to analyze the publishing of bibliographic data such as LOD, having as a product the elaboration of theoretical-methodological recommendations for the publication of these data, in an approach based on the ten best practices for publishing LOD, from the World Wide Web Consortium. The starting point was the conduction of a Systematic Review of Literature, where initiatives to publish bibliographic data such as LOD were identified. An empirical study of these institutions was also conducted. As a result, theoretical-methodological recommendations were obtained for the process of publishing bibliographic data such as LOD.

0.011863702 = product of:
  0.05931851 = sum of:
    0.05931851 = weight(_text_:web in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05931851 = score(doc=59,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14714488 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045087915 = queryNorm
        0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Author name disambiguation (AND) is a challenging problem due to several issues such as missing key identifiers, same name corresponding to multiple authors, along with inconsistent representation. Several techniques have been proposed but maintaining consistent accuracy levels over all data sets is still a major challenge. We identify two major issues associated with the AND problem. First, the namesake problem in which two or more authors with the same name publishes in a similar domain. Second, the diverse topic problem in which one author publishes in diverse topical domains with a different set of coauthors. In this work, we initially propose a method named ATGEP for AND that addresses the namesake issue. We evaluate the performance of ATGEP using various ambiguous name references collected from the Arnetminer Citation (AC) and Web of Science (WoS) data set. We empirically show that the two aforementioned problems are crucial to address the AND problem that are difficult to handle using state-of-the-art techniques. To handle the diverse topic issue, we extend ATGEP to a new variant named ATGEP-web that considers external web information of the authors. Experiments show that with enough information available from external web sources ATGEP-web can significantly improve the results further compared with ATGEP.

0.007427852 = product of:
  0.03713926 = sum of:
    0.03713926 = weight(_text_:web in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03713926 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14714488 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045087915 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.

0.006845724 = product of:
  0.03422862 = sum of:
    0.03422862 = weight(_text_:wide in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03422862 = score(doc=717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19977365 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045087915 = queryNorm
        0.171337 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The circ stats say it all: graphic novels' popularity among library users keeps growing, with more being published (and acquired by libraries) each year. The unique challenges of developing and managing a graphics novels collection have led the Association of Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS) to craft this guide, presented under the expert supervision of editor Ballestro, who has worked with comics for more than 35 years. Examining the ever-changing ways that graphic novels are created, packaged, marketed, and released, this resource gathers a range of voices from the field to explore such topics as: a cultural history of comics and graphic novels from their World War II origins to today, providing a solid grounding for newbies and fresh insights for all; catching up on the Big Two's reboots: Marvel's 10 and DC's 4; five questions to ask when evaluating nonfiction graphic novels and 30 picks for a core collection; key publishers and cartoonists to consider when adding international titles; developing a collection that supports curriculum and faculty outreach to ensure wide usage, with catalogers' tips for organizing your collection and improving discovery; real-world examples of how libraries treat graphic novels, such as an in-depth profile of the development of Penn Library's Manga collection; how to integrate the emerging field of graphic medicine into the collection; and specialized resources like The Cartoonists of Color and Queer Cartoonists databases, the open access scholarly journal Comic Grid, and the No Flying, No Tights website. Packed with expert guidance and useful information, this guide will assist technical services staff, catalogers, and acquisition and collection management librarians.

0.0063667297 = product of:
  0.03183365 = sum of:
    0.03183365 = weight(_text_:web in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03183365 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14714488 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045087915 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi's 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter's Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.

0.0048870323 = product of:
  0.02443516 = sum of:
    0.02443516 = product of:
      0.04887032 = sum of:
        0.04887032 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04887032 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578902 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045087915 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

2. 3.2020 19:04:22

0.003665274 = product of:
  0.01832637 = sum of:
    0.01832637 = product of:
      0.03665274 = sum of:
        0.03665274 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03665274 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578902 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045087915 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2023 12:00:14

0.003054395 = product of:
  0.015271976 = sum of:
    0.015271976 = product of:
      0.030543951 = sum of:
        0.030543951 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030543951 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578902 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045087915 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

11. 7.2020 13:22:58

0.003054395 = product of:
  0.015271976 = sum of:
    0.015271976 = product of:
      0.030543951 = sum of:
        0.030543951 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030543951 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578902 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045087915 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 1.2023 18:40:36