Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Fugmann, R."
  1. Fugmann, R.: On the role of subjectivity in establishing, using, operating and evaluating information retrieval systems : treatise 2 on information retrieval theory (1973) 0.01 
    0.012862653 = product of:
  0.10290122 = sum of:
    0.025925098 = weight(_text_:information in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025925098 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
    0.07697612 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07697612 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.353-372
  2. Fugmann, R.: ¬The theoretical foundation of the IDC-system : 6 postulates for information retrieval; treatise 1 on information retrieval theory (1972) 0.01 
    0.012002641 = product of:
  0.09602113 = sum of:
    0.024191719 = weight(_text_:information in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024191719 = score(doc=1672,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
    0.071829416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071829416 = score(doc=1672,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
  3. Fugmann, R.: ¬The glamour and the misery of the thesaurus approach : treatise 4 on information retrieval theory (1974) 0.01 
    0.008487149 = product of:
  0.06789719 = sum of:
    0.017106129 = weight(_text_:information in 1671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017106129 = score(doc=1671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1671)
    0.050791066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050791066 = score(doc=1671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1671)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
  4. Fugmann, R.; Isenberg, M.; Winter, J.H.: ¬Das Suchen nach verallgemeinerter Information : treatise 9 on retrieval system theory (1985) 0.01 
    0.008487149 = product of:
  0.06789719 = sum of:
    0.017106129 = weight(_text_:information in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017106129 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.050791066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050791066 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
  5. Fugmann, R.: Toward a theory of information supply and indexing : treatise 6 on retrieval system theory (1976) 0.01 
    0.008487149 = product of:
  0.06789719 = sum of:
    0.017106129 = weight(_text_:information in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017106129 = score(doc=4766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
    0.050791066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050791066 = score(doc=4766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
  6. Fugmann, R.; Kusemann, G.; Winter, H.J.: ¬The supply of information an chemical reactions in the IDC system (1979) 0.01 
    0.008201242 = product of:
  0.06560994 = sum of:
    0.021167753 = weight(_text_:information in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021167753 = score(doc=1648,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
    0.044442184 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044442184 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 15(1979), S.303-323
  7. Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983) 0.01 
    0.007888949 = product of:
  0.06311159 = sum of:
    0.019125232 = weight(_text_:information in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019125232 = score(doc=215,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
    0.043986354 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043986354 = score(doc=215,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
    Information retrieval
  8. Fugmann, R.; Nickelsen, H.; Nickelsen, I.; Winter, J.H.: Representation of concept relations using the TOSAR system of IDC : treatise 3 on information retrieval theory (1974) 0.01 
    0.007029636 = product of:
  0.056237087 = sum of:
    0.018143788 = weight(_text_:information in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018143788 = score(doc=1674,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
    0.0380933 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0380933 = score(doc=1674,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 25(1974), S.287-307
  9. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.01 
    0.005647273 = product of:
  0.045178182 = sum of:
    0.02390654 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02390654 = score(doc=1085,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
    0.021271642 = product of:
      0.042543285 = sum of:
        0.042543285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042543285 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-1-3/what-is-information-an-information-veteran-looks-back-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-1?page=1.
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Theme
    Information
  10. Fugmann, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change (2000) 0.00 
    0.0049095606 = product of:
  0.026184322 = sum of:
    0.00798859 = product of:
      0.01597718 = sum of:
        0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01597718 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.007559912 = weight(_text_:information in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007559912 = score(doc=1182,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
    0.010635821 = product of:
      0.021271642 = sum of:
        0.021271642 = weight(_text_:22 in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021271642 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Contemporary information systems, both the private and the commercially available ones, have often been blamed for their low effectiveness in terms of precision and recall, especially when they have reached considerable size with respect to file volume and use frequency (see, for example, Belkin, 1980; Blair, 1996, p.19; Desai, 1997; Drabenstott, 1996; Knorz, 1998). Saracevic (1989), after having reviewed the contemporary design of online subject access, calls "for radically different design principles and implementation" (p. 107). Van Rijsbergen (1990) writes: "The keywords approach with statistical techniques has reached its theoretical limit and further attempts for improvement are considered a waste of time" (p. 111). Lancaster (1992) deplores that very little really significant literature an subject indexing has been published in the last thirty or so years. In her preface to the Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference an Classification Research in 1997, Mcllwaine (1997) writes, "many were surprised to find that the problems with which they wrestle today are not greatly different from those that have been occupying the minds of specialists in the field for over a generation, and probably a great deal longer" (p. v).
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  11. Fugmann, R.: Subject analysis and indexing : theoretical foundation and practical advice (1993) 0.00 
    0.004869459 = product of:
  0.038955674 = sum of:
    0.01673458 = weight(_text_:information in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01673458 = score(doc=8756,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
    0.022221092 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022221092 = score(doc=8756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Information and information systems; Information system survival power; Theoretical considerations on information storage and retrieval; Indexing (representation of the essence of documents; extractive, assignment, consistent indexing, indexing and abstracting, book indexing, index language vocabulary, syntax, concept analysis, evaluation of indexing quality); Technology of information supply; Glossary of terms used; Systematic and 'basic index'
  12. Fugmann, R.: Representational predictibility : key to the resolution of several pending issues in indexing and information supply (1994) 0.00 
    0.0046486193 = product of:
  0.037188955 = sum of:
    0.0149678625 = weight(_text_:information in 7739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0149678625 = score(doc=7739,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7739, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7739)
    0.022221092 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022221092 = score(doc=7739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 7739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7739)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    The low effectiveness of most current information systems has often been pointed out and deplored. A number of misconceptions and experiments under unrealistic conditions have contributed to the faulty design and evaluation of information systems. The postulate of representational predictibility can help to clarify some of the still pending issues as there are the strenghts and limitations of uncontrolled natural language text in retrieval systems, factors for their evaluation, the reliability, consistency, and exhaustivity of indexing, the postulated 'inverse precision-recall relationship', and the usefulness of syntactical evices. The performance of information systems can be imporved if representational predictibility is aimed at in their design and operational use
  13. Fugmann, R.; Winter, J.H.: Reverse retrieval : toward analogy inferences by mechanized classification (treatise 7 on retrieval system theory) (1979) 0.00 
    0.0044893385 = product of:
  0.071829416 = sum of:
    0.071829416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071829416 = score(doc=4771,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
  14. Fugmann, R.; Denk, W.: Variations in the order-creating power of interactive retrieval systems : treatise 8 on retrieval system theory (1980) 0.00 
    0.0044893385 = product of:
  0.071829416 = sum of:
    0.071829416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071829416 = score(doc=4772,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
  15. Fugmann, R.: Unusual possibilities in indexing and classification (1990) 0.00 
    0.0042435746 = product of:
  0.033948597 = sum of:
    0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008553064 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
    0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025395533 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Contemporary research in information science has concentrated on the development of methods for the algorithmic processing of natural language texts. Often, the equivalence of this approach to the intellectual technique of content analysis and indexing is claimed. It is, however, disregarded that contemporary intellectual techniques are far from exploiting their full capabilities. This is largely due to the omission of vocabulary categorisation. It is demonstrated how categorisation can drastically improve the quality of indexing and classification, and, hence, of retrieval
  16. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985) 0.00 
    0.0039304327 = product of:
  0.03144346 = sum of:
    0.0060479296 = weight(_text_:information in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060479296 = score(doc=3641,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
    0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025395533 = score(doc=3641,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    The second Cranfield experiment (Cranfield II) in the mid-1960s challenged assumptions held by librarians for nearly a century, namely, that the objective of providing subject access was to bring together all materials an a given topic and that the achieving of this objective required vocabulary control in the form of an index language. The results of Cranfield II were replicated by other retrieval experiments quick to follow its lead and increasing support was given to the opinion that natural language information systems could perform at least as effectively, and certainly more economically, than those employing index languages. When the results of empirical research dramatically counter conventional wisdom, an obvious course is to question the validity of the research and, in the case of retrieval experiments, this eventually happened. Retrieval experiments were criticized for their artificiality, their unrepresentative sampies, and their problematic definitions-particularly the definition of relevance. In the minds of some, at least, the relative merits of natural languages vs. indexing languages continued to be an unresolved issue. As with many eitherlor options, a seemingly safe course to follow is to opt for "both," and indeed there seems to be an increasing amount of counsel advising a combination of natural language and index language search capabilities. One strong voice offering such counsel is that of Robert Fugmann, a chemist by training, a theoretician by predilection, and, currently, a practicing information scientist at Hoechst AG, Frankfurt/Main. This selection from his writings sheds light an the capabilities and limitations of both kinds of indexing. Its special significance lies in the fact that its arguments are based not an empirical but an rational grounds. Fugmann's major argument starts from the observation that in natural language there are essentially two different kinds of concepts: 1) individual concepts, repre sented by names of individual things (e.g., the name of the town Augsburg), and 2) general concepts represented by names of classes of things (e.g., pesticides). Individual concepts can be represented in language simply and succinctly, often by a single string of alphanumeric characters; general concepts, an the other hand, can be expressed in a multiplicity of ways. The word pesticides refers to the concept of pesticides, but also referring to this concept are numerous circumlocutions, such as "Substance X was effective against pests." Because natural language is capable of infinite variety, we cannot predict a priori the manifold ways a general concept, like pesticides, will be represented by any given author. It is this lack of predictability that limits natural language retrieval and causes poor precision and recall. Thus, the essential and defining characteristic of an index language ls that it is a tool for representational predictability.
  17. Fugmann, R.: ¬Das Buchregister : Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (2006) 0.00 
    0.0020403776 = product of:
  0.01632302 = sum of:
    0.0026728325 = weight(_text_:information in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026728325 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.048488684 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
    0.013650188 = weight(_text_:software in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013650188 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.10957812 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    6. In diesem Buch wird in den Kapiteln 2 bis 5 ein Grundkursus zur Theorie der Inhaltserschließung angeboten, wobei die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von natursprachiger und indexsprachiger Ausdrucksweise geklärt werden, sowie auch der Unterschied zwischen Ausdruck und Begriff, zwischen den Recherchetypen von Erinnerung und Entdeckung, zwischen den Indexierungstypen von Zuteilung und Extraktion und auch der Unterschied zwischen Register und Konkordanz. Auf einer solchen Grundlage kann der Indexer besser den Nutzen der einzelnen Indexierungswerkzeuge abschätzen, sowie auch die nachteiligen Folgen, welche durch den Verzicht auf das eine oder das andere dieser Werkzeuge zwangsläufig eintreten. In der Literatur ist zwar der Standpunkt anzutreffen, dass "allzu viel Theorie" zu vermeiden sei, weil sie doch so "grau" sei. Aber wir schließen uns lieber dem Standpunkt des Physikers Ludwig Boltzmann an: "Nichts ist praktischer als Theorie", wenn eine solche Theorie das Beobachtbare erklären und das Zukünftige voraussagen kann. 7. Im Kapitel 7 werden die Bestandteile des Schlagwort-Registers in Gestalt von Schlagwort und Fundstelle, Untereintrag und Verweisung abgehandelt und das Zusammenfügen dieser Komponenten zum Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art. Dieser Registertyp ist gekennzeichnet durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich der Inanspruchnahme von Platz für den Druck und durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich des Aufwandes an Zeit und Geld zu seiner Erstellung. Es werden die hiermit zwangläufig verbundenen Mängel dargelegt. 8. Im Kapitel 8 wird die Überwindung dieser Mängel durch die Einführung von reichlichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen gezeigt. Das Register nimmt hierdurch einen ausgesprochen informativen Charakter an. Zugleich werden auf diesem Weg auch Wesen und Nutzen eines systematischen Registers dargelegt, welches zusätzlich zum herkömmlichen alphabetischen Register vorgelegt wird. 9. Die Möglichkeit zu alledem eröffnet sich dadurch, dass eine hochentwickelte Software eingesetzt wird und dass ein außergewöhnlicher Arbeitsaufwand aufseiten des Indexers nicht gescheut wird, verbunden mit entsprechend hohen Kosten. Dieser Aufwand ist erforderlich für die Formulierung von zahlreichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen, zum Aufbau eines systematischen, thesaurusgestützten Schlagwort-Vokabulars und für eine besonders sorgfältige Indexierung. 10. Dieses Modell eines kompletten informativen Registers ist als eine Art Werkzeugkasten zu verstehen, aus welchem man diejenigen gedanklichen und technischen Werkzeuge auswählen und miteinander kombinieren kann, welche der jeweils herrschenden Bedarfslage am besten angemessen sind. Man wird von diesen Werkzeugen besonders dann ausgiebig Gebrauch machen, wenn hohe Anforderungen an die Treffsicherheit und Leichtigkeit der Recherche gestellt werden, Anforderungen, welche mit einem Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art nicht erfüllbar sind. Der hohe Aufwand für ein gutes Register ist natürlich nur dann gerechtfertigt, wenn aufseiten der Leser auch wirklich Bedarf zum Nachschlagen besteht. Man wird kein Register für ein Buch anlegen, welches nur zur Unterhaltung und Erbauung gelesen und dann für alle Zeiten beiseite gelegt wird.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 58(2007) H.3, S.186 (J. Bertram): "Bei aller Kritik: Das Buch gemahnt eindrücklich daran, dass ein gutes Register sowohl den Anforderungen einer Entdeckungsrecherche als auch denen einer Erinnerungsrecherche dienlich sein sollte, um es mit Fugmanns Worten auszudrücken. Heißt: Es soll nicht nur denen zugute kommen, die das Buch gelesen haben, sondern eben gerade auch denjenigen, die es nicht gelesen haben. Nicht nur erinnerte Wortlaute sollen mit ihm wieder auffindbar sein, vielmehr soll das Register auch schnelle Antworten auf die Frage ermöglichen, ob ein Buch zum interessierenden Thema Ergiebiges enthält. Und dass für das zweite Anliegen ein Aufwand zu betreiben ist, der über ein reines Stichwortregister hinausgeht, wird von Fugmann anschaulich und überzeugend dargestellt. Auch seinem Wunsch, dass bei der Rezension vor Büchern Vorhandensein und Qualität des Registers (stärkere) Berücksichtigung finden mögen, ist uneingeschränkt zuzustimmen. Dass das vor ihm produzierte Register des Guten zu viel tut, steht auf einem anderen Blatt."
  18. Fugmann, R.: ¬Der Mangel an Grammatik bei Indexsprachen und seine Folgen (1987) 0.00 
    0.001694636 = product of:
  0.027114175 = sum of:
    0.027114175 = product of:
      0.05422835 = sum of:
        0.05422835 = weight(_text_:online in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05422835 = score(doc=257,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.569044 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    9. Online-Frühjahrstagung der Online-Benutzergruppe der DGD, Frankfurt am Main, 12.-14.5.1987: Vorträge
  19. Fugmann, R.: ¬The5[¬five] axiom theory of indexing and information supply (1985) 0.00 
    0.0015119824 = product of:
  0.024191719 = sum of:
    0.024191719 = weight(_text_:information in 1944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024191719 = score(doc=1944,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1944, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1944)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36(1985) no.2, S.116-129
  20. Fugmann, R.: Peculiarities of chemical information from a theoretical viewpoint (1985) 0.00 
    0.0015119824 = product of:
  0.024191719 = sum of:
    0.024191719 = weight(_text_:information in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024191719 = score(doc=4026,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of chemical information and computer sciences. 25(1985), S.174-180

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 24
  • d 10

Types

  • a 31
  • m 3

Themes

Subjects

Classifications