Search (207 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.35 
    0.35307467 = product of:
  0.8070278 = sum of:
    0.04987225 = product of:
      0.14961675 = sum of:
        0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009071894 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.4375 = coord(7/16)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Medien-Informationsmanagement : Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte ; [Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar und Folgetagung 2001 in Köln] (2003) 0.03 
    0.026331414 = product of:
  0.0702171 = sum of:
    0.020432351 = weight(_text_:wide in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020432351 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.011084911 = weight(_text_:web in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011084911 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006414798 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.009523325 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009523325 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.016380226 = weight(_text_:software in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016380226 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13149375 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.0063814926 = product of:
      0.012762985 = sum of:
        0.012762985 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012762985 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(6/16)
    Abstract
    Als in den siebziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts immer häufiger die Bezeichnung Informationsmanager für Leute propagiert wurde, die bis dahin als Dokumentare firmierten, wurde dies in den etablierten Kreisen der Archivare und Bibliothekare gelegentlich belächelt und als Zeichen einer Identitätskrise oder jedenfalls einer Verunsicherung des damit überschriebenen Berufsbilds gewertet. Für den Berufsstand der Medienarchivare/Mediendokumentare, die sich seit 1960 in der Fachgruppe 7 des Vereins, später Verbands deutscher Archivare (VdA) organisieren, gehörte diese Verortung im Zeichen neuer inhaltlicher Herausforderungen (Informationsflut) und Technologien (EDV) allerdings schon früh zu den Selbstverständlichkeiten des Berufsalltags. "Halt, ohne uns geht es nicht!" lautete die Überschrift eines Artikels im Verbandsorgan "Info 7", der sich mit der Einrichtung von immer mächtigeren Leitungsnetzen und immer schnelleren Datenautobahnen beschäftigte. Information, Informationsgesellschaft: diese Begriffe wurden damals fast nur im technischen Sinne verstanden. Die informatisierte, nicht die informierte Gesellschaft stand im Vordergrund - was wiederum Kritiker auf den Plan rief, von Joseph Weizenbaum in den USA bis hin zu den Informations-Ökologen in Bremen. Bei den nationalen, manchmal auch nur regionalen Projekten und Modellversuchen mit Datenautobahnen - auch beim frühen Btx - war nie so recht deutlich geworden, welche Inhalte in welcher Gestalt durch diese Netze und Straßen gejagt werden sollten und wer diese Inhalte eigentlich selektieren, portionieren, positionieren, kurz: managen sollte. Spätestens mit dem World Wide Web sind diese Projekte denn auch obsolet geworden, jedenfalls was die Hardware und Software anging. Geblieben ist das Thema Inhalte (neudeutsch: Content). Und - immer drängender im nicht nur technischen Verständnis - das Thema Informationsmanagement. MedienInformationsManagement war die Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar überschrieben, und auch die Folgetagung 2001 in Köln, die der multimedialen Produktion einen dokumentarischen Pragmatismus gegenüber stellte, handelte vom Geschäftsfeld Content und von Content-Management-Systemen. Die in diesem 6. Band der Reihe Beiträge zur Mediendokumentation versammelten Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge auf diesen beiden Tagungen beleuchten das Titel-Thema aus den verschiedensten Blickwinkeln: archivarischen, dokumentarischen, kaufmännischen, berufsständischen und juristischen. Deutlich wird dabei, daß die Berufsbezeichnung Medienarchivarln/Mediendokumentarln ziemlich genau für all das steht, was heute mit sog. alten wie neuen Medien im organisatorischen, d.h. ordnenden und vermittelnden Sinne geschieht. Im besonderen Maße trifft dies auf das Internet und die aus ihm geborenen Intranets zu. Beide bedürfen genauso der ordnenden Hand, die sich an den alten Medien, an Buch, Zeitung, Tonträger, Film etc. geschult hat, denn sie leben zu großen Teilen davon. Daß das Internet gleichwohl ein Medium sui generis ist und die alten Informationsberufe vor ganz neue Herausforderungen stellt - auch das durchzieht die Beiträge von Weimar und Köln.
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (Dokumentarische Aspekte): Günter Perers/Volker Gaese: Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von Gr+J (Weimar 2000) Thomas Gerick: Finden statt suchen. Knowledge Retrieval in Wissensbanken. Mit organisiertem Wissen zu mehr Erfolg (Weimar 2000) Winfried Gödert: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (Weimar 2000) Elisabeth Damen: Klassifikation als Ordnungssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (Köln 2001) Clemens Schlenkrich: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit - Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (Köln 2001) Josef Wandeler: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof'? - Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (Köln 200 1)
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:49:22
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
    Subject
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
  3. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.02 
    0.01959362 = product of:
  0.10449931 = sum of:
    0.06810784 = weight(_text_:wide in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06810784 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.015119824 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015119824 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.021271642 = product of:
      0.042543285 = sum of:
        0.042543285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042543285 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  4. Allen, D.P.: Evaluating hybrid systems (1997) 0.02 
    0.018194344 = product of:
  0.097036496 = sum of:
    0.01069133 = weight(_text_:information in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01069133 = score(doc=797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
    0.031744417 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031744417 = score(doc=797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
    0.054600753 = weight(_text_:software in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054600753 = score(doc=797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    3rd generation automated workflow packages have been designed to facilitate a collaborative effort between management information systems and end users. Describes automated workflow software and the criteria that should be used in evaluating competing packages: design, simulation, modeling, monitoring and management, and document management capabilities (capture, indexing, retrieval and image manipulation)
  5. Treat, H.: Searching images using Ultimedia Manager (1996) 0.01 
    0.014555475 = product of:
  0.0776292 = sum of:
    0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008553064 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
    0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025395533 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
    0.043680605 = weight(_text_:software in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043680605 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    IBM's Ultimedia Manager is a software product for the management and retrieval of image data. It includes both traditional database search and content based search. The 2 main components of Ultimedia Manager are a database population tool to prepare images for query by identifying areas of interest and computing their features, and the query tool for doing retrievals. Application areas include stock photography, electronic libraries, retail, cataloguing, and business graphics
    Source
    Information services and use. 16(1996) no.1, S.15-24
  6. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.01 
    0.01355529 = product of:
  0.07229488 = sum of:
    0.012962549 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012962549 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.044442184 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044442184 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.014890149 = product of:
      0.029780298 = sum of:
        0.029780298 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029780298 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  7. Levasseur, D.: ¬Les solutions reseau pour optimiser la gestion des documents et leur diffusion dans les organisations (Groupware, Workflow, Intranet) (1998) 0.01 
    0.013519954 = product of:
  0.07210642 = sum of:
    0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040864702 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
    0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022169823 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
    0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009071894 = score(doc=5111,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Part 3 of a 3-part series on the electronic management of documents parts 1 and 2 of which appeared in Argus 26(3) 1997 and 27(1) 1998 respectively. Looks at 3 concepts relating to the management and communication of electronic documents within the corporate network: groupware, or the automation of work in groups; workflow, or the management of the flow of information to be treated; and intranet, which indicates the private network of an organization supplying internally the technologies responsible for the success of Internet and the World Wide Web. Considers the advantages of the electronic document operated on computer networks over paper handled through traditional channels focusing on intranet because of the importance it is given as an infrastructure for integration of document management activities and because it represents a major challenge for the information professionals of today
  8. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.01 
    0.012911992 = product of:
  0.06886396 = sum of:
    0.012781745 = product of:
      0.02556349 = sum of:
        0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02556349 = score(doc=2809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012095859 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
    0.043986354 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043986354 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems
  9. Paal, S.; Eickeler, S.: Automatisierung vom Scan bis zum elektronischen Lesesaal (2011) 0.01 
    0.011795778 = product of:
  0.06291082 = sum of:
    0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025864797 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.02956209 = product of:
      0.05912418 = sum of:
        0.05912418 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05912418 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.38160682 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074839313 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Gedruckte Medien, wie Bücher, Zeitschriften und Zeitungen sind kulturhistorisch und marktwirtschaftlich wichtige Informationsquellen auf dem Weg zur Wissensgesellschaft. Um sie elektronisch verfügbar zu machen, um sie bereitzustellen und zu vermarkten, werden vorhandene Dokumente digitalisiert, mit besonderen Analyseverfahren inhaltlich erschlossen und über Web-Portale zur Verfügung gestellt. Es ist jedoch eine besondere Herausforderung, sicher und schnell auf zentral verwaltete Dokumentbestände über das Internet zuzugreifen. Beim Abruf von qualitativ hochwertigen Digitalisaten werden große Datenmengen übertragen. Dadurch steigt der Bandbreitenbedarf und die Zugriffszeiten verlängern sich. Außerdem unterliegen urheberrechtlich geschützte Dokumente besonderen gesetzlichen Beschränkungen. Für die wirtschaftliche Verwertung von digitalisierten Druckmedien ist daher neben der inhaltlichen Erschließung auch der Einsatz von geeigneten Leseanwendungen notwendig. Das Fraunhofer-Institut Intelligente Analyse- und Informationssysteme (IAIS) entwickelt Techniken,um diese Herausforderungen zu meistern.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.8, S.351-354
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  10. Haessler, J.: Entwicklung von Records Management Software : "Weg von einzelnen Projektlösungen hin zum Softwarehersteller" (2009) 0.01 
    0.011542119 = product of:
  0.09233695 = sum of:
    0.015119824 = weight(_text_:information in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015119824 = score(doc=3128,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
    0.07721713 = weight(_text_:software in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07721713 = score(doc=3128,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.6198675 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Records Management Software wird in Deutschland auch von vielen kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen entwickelt. Die IWP sprach mit Joachim Haessler, dem Inhaber der Schwarzwälder Firma HAESSLER. Das Interview führte Ulrike Spree.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.365-368
  11. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.011114637 = product of:
  0.059278067 = sum of:
    0.012962549 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012962549 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.031425368 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031425368 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.014890149 = product of:
      0.029780298 = sum of:
        0.029780298 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029780298 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  12. Lam-Adesina, A.M.; Jones, G.J.F.: Examining and improving the effectiveness of relevance feedback for retrieval of scanned text documents (2006) 0.01 
    0.011107775 = product of:
  0.05924147 = sum of:
    0.00798859 = product of:
      0.01597718 = sum of:
        0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01597718 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009258964 = score(doc=977,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
    0.041993916 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041993916 = score(doc=977,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.442117 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.633-649
  13. Hauer, M.: IC Individual News : multimediale Presseschau - Chancen und Grenzen (1998) 0.01 
    0.010952423 = product of:
  0.058412924 = sum of:
    0.01597718 = product of:
      0.03195436 = sum of:
        0.03195436 = weight(_text_:online in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03195436 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01069133 = weight(_text_:information in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01069133 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
    0.031744417 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031744417 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Object
    INFORMATION CENTER
    Source
    20. Online-Tagung der DGD: Host Retrieval und Global Research, Frankfurt am Main, 5.-7.5.1998. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld u. R. Schmidt
  14. Black, K.: ELISE: an online image retrieval system (1993) 0.01 
    0.010734284 = product of:
  0.057249516 = sum of:
    0.012781745 = product of:
      0.02556349 = sum of:
        0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02556349 = score(doc=6631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008553064 = score(doc=6631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
    0.035914708 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035914708 = score(doc=6631,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Research at De Montfort Univ., Division of Learning Development, in Leicester, is focused on promoting the idea of the electronic library. Describes the Electronic Library Image Service for Europe (ELISE) project funded by the Commission for the European Communities, its overall aim and lists the 5 main challenges for the project team which include: identifying image bank technical requirements; exploring storage and retrieval mechanisms; exploring client needs and design user interfaces; the production of a pilot system; and devising a model for the international interconnection of systems
    Source
    Aslib information. 21(1993) nos.7/8, S.293-295
  15. Casey, C.: ¬The cyberarchive : a look at the storage and preservation of Web sites (1998) 0.01 
    0.010080078 = product of:
  0.08064062 = sum of:
    0.07315669 = weight(_text_:web in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07315669 = score(doc=2987,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
    0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074839313 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Although librarians recognize the Internet as a resource for knowledge and information, they have yet to make a formal effort to collect and preserve the Web sites found there. Addresses the need to set up a cyberarchive and some of the issues involved. With Web sites appearing and disappearing constantly from the Internet, there is an immediate need to recognize that they are precious part of cultural and intellectual history and to preserve them for future study. Issues discussed include: Web site authorship vs. Web space ownership; physical media used to hold Web sites (hard drive, mainframe, CD-ROMs); collection development; acquiring Web sites; and adding Web sites to a collection
  16. Bittleston, R.: Managing documents in the wider ares : intelligent document management (1995) 0.01 
    0.009849897 = product of:
  0.07879917 = sum of:
    0.06810784 = weight(_text_:wide in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06810784 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
    0.01069133 = weight(_text_:information in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01069133 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Looks at a range of techniques which offer intelligent mechanisms for managing documents in a wide area network. Describes differing techniques for increasing bandwidth, reducing data traffic, synchronizing documentation, achieving partial synchronization, audit trails, navigation, distribution control and security
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.5, S.208-213
  17. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.01 
    0.009700675 = product of:
  0.051736932 = sum of:
    0.0111840265 = product of:
      0.022368053 = sum of:
        0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022368053 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018331813 = weight(_text_:information in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018331813 = score(doc=1499,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
    0.022221092 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022221092 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  18. Sherman, R.J.: ¬The electronic book (1993) 0.01 
    0.009683231 = product of:
  0.07746585 = sum of:
    0.033785243 = product of:
      0.067570485 = sum of:
        0.067570485 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067570485 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.43612206 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.043680605 = weight(_text_:software in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043680605 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Describes the Electronic Book (EB) standard developed by the Sony Corporation. It defines compatibility with ISO 9660, the international standard for file structures on CD-ROM. The EB standard defines search methods according to word search, endword search, keyword search, menu search, multi search, graphic search and linking. Provides a summary of EB players covering the Sony DD1-EX, DD8, DD-DR1 and Panasonic KXEBP1. Discusses EB software
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  19. Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995) 0.01 
    0.009573506 = product of:
  0.07658805 = sum of:
    0.014814342 = weight(_text_:information in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014814342 = score(doc=4556,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
    0.061773706 = weight(_text_:software in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061773706 = score(doc=4556,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a term to describe the information required to documents the characteristics of information contained within databases. Describes the elements that make up metadata. A number of software tools exist to help apply document management principles to electronic records but they have, so far, been inadequately applied. Describes 2 initiative currently under way to develop software to automate many records management functions. Understanding document management principles as applied to electronic records are vital to records managers
  20. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.01 
    0.009154798 = product of:
  0.04882559 = sum of:
    0.00798859 = product of:
      0.01597718 = sum of:
        0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01597718 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005345665 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.035491336 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035491336 = score(doc=5863,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 123
  • d 76
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 169
  • m 19
  • x 10
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • el 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications