Search (335 results, page 2 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004) 0.02 
    0.01746345 = product of:
  0.0698538 = sum of:
    0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025864797 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
    0.0111840265 = product of:
      0.022368053 = sum of:
        0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022368053 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010583877 = weight(_text_:information in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010583877 = score(doc=2634,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
    0.022221092 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022221092 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    A preliminary, purposive survey of definitions and current applications of facet analytical theory (FA) is used to develop a framework for the analysis of Websites. This set of guidelines may well serve to highlight commonalities and differences among FA applications an the Web. Rather than identifying FA as the terrain of a particular interest group, the goal is to explore current practices, uncover common misconceptions, extend understanding, and highlight developments that augment the traditional practice of FA and faceted classification (FC).
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Information Gateway
  2. "Europeana", die digitale Bibliothek Europas, ist online (2009) 0.02 
    0.0172918 = product of:
  0.05533376 = sum of:
    0.009237427 = weight(_text_:web in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009237427 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.09014259 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
    0.029174069 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029174069 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1601965 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
    0.008931517 = product of:
      0.017863033 = sum of:
        0.017863033 = weight(_text_:online in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017863033 = score(doc=2670,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.18744534 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0026728325 = weight(_text_:information in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026728325 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.048488684 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
    0.0053179106 = product of:
      0.010635821 = sum of:
        0.010635821 = weight(_text_:22 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010635821 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    Content
    "Seit Ende 2008 ist Europeana, die multimediale Online-Bibliothek Europas, für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Unter www.europeana.eu haben Internetnutzer aus aller Welt nun Zugriff auf über zwei Millionen Bücher, Landkarten, Aufnahmen, Fotografien, Archivdokumente, Gemälde und Filme aus Nationalbibliotheken und Kulturinstituten der 27 EU-Mitgliedstaaten. Europeana eröffnet neue Wege zur Erkundung des kulturellen Erbes Europas: jeder, der sich für Literatur, Kunst, Wissenschaft, Politik, Geschichte, Architektur, Musik oder Kino interessiert, hat freien Zugang zu Europas größten Sammlungen und Meisterwerken über ein einziges virtuelles Bibliotheksportal, das in allen EU-Sprachen verfügbar ist. Aber das ist erst der Anfang: 2010 wird Europeana den Zugang zu Millionen Objekten eröffnen, die Europas reiche kulturelle Vielfalt widerspiegeln, und interaktive Bereiche, beispielsweise Gemeinschaften für besondere Interessen, bieten. Zwischen 2009 und 2011 werden rund zwei Millionen Euro jährlich dafür bereitgestellt. Die Kommission will ferner den privaten Sektor in den weiteren Ausbau der digitalen Bibliothek Europas einbeziehen. Im September 2007 befürwortete das Europäische Parlament in einer mit überwältigender Mehrheit angenommenen Entschließung die Einrichtung einer digitalen europäischen Bibliothek. José Manuel Barroso, Präsident der Europäischen Kommission, erklärte: »Mit Europeana kombinieren wir Europas Wettbewerbsvorsprung in den Kommunikations- und Netztechnologien mit unserem reichen kulturellen Erbe. Die Europäer haben nun schnell und einfach über ein einziges Portal Zugang zu den riesigen Beständen unserer großartigen Sammlungen. Europeana ist mehr als eine Bibliothek: sie inspiriert die Europäer des 21. Jahrhunderts dazu, der Kreativität ihrer innovativen Vorfahren nachzueifern, wie es die treibenden Kräfte der Renaissance taten. Allein die Möglichkeiten, die Europeana Studenten, Kunstliebhabern oder Schülern bietet, sind faszinierend: sie haben online Zugang zu den Kulturschätzen aller Mitgliedstaaten, können sie kombinieren und gezielt suchen. Europeana ist ein deutlicher Beleg dafür, dass die Kultur im Zentrum der europäischen Integration steht.«
    Die für die Informationsgesellschaft und die Medien zuständige EU-Kommissarin Viviane Reding sagte: »Europeana ermöglicht eine Reise über Zeiten und Grenzen hinweg und regt zu neuen Gedanken darüber an, was unsere Kultur ausmacht. Mehr noch: sie verbindet Menschen mit ihrer Geschichte und - über interaktive Seiten und Werkzeuge - miteinander. Ich rufe nun alle europäischen Kulturinstitutionen, Verlage und Technologieunternehmen auf, Europeana mit weiteren digitalen Inhalten zu füllen. Europeana sollte allen Menschen die Gelegenheit bieten, interaktiv und kreativ ihr eigenes Stück europäischer Kultur zu schaffen und es mit anderen zu teilen. Mein Ziel ist, dass Europeana im Jahr 2010 mindestens 10 Millionen Objekte enthält.« Elisabeth Niggemann, Generaldirektorin der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und Vorsitzende der European Digital Library Foundation (der Organisation hinter Europeana), fügte hinzu: »Durch Europeana werden kulturelle Einrichtungen interessanter für die Generation Web 2.0 - eine Generation, die zur gleichen Zeit am gleichen Ort Texte lesen, Videos sehen, Laute hören und Bilder sehen möchte. Dieses vollständige Multimediaangebot bringtjungen Menschen Europas Kultur, Vergangenheit und Zukunft näher.« Europeana ermöglicht es, die digitalisierten Sammlungen europäischer Bibliotheken, Archive und Museen gleichzeitig zu durchsuchen, d. h. die Nutzer können Themen erforschen, ohne eine Vielzahl von Internetseiten besuchen oder durchsuchen zu müssen. Im Jahr 2005 von der Europäischen Kommission initiiert, wurde Europeana in enger Zusammenarbeit der Nationalbibliotheken und anderer kultureller Einrichtungen der Mitgliedstaaten sowie mit nachdrücklicher Unterstützung des Europäischen Parlaments aufgebaut. Europeana wird von der European Digital Library Foundation betrieben, in der sich die wichtigsten europäischen Verbände von Bibliotheken,Archiven, Museen, audiovisuellen Archiven und kulturellen Einrichtungen zusammengeschlossen haben. Verwaltet wird Europeana von der niederländischen Nationalbibliothek, der Koninklijke Bibliotheek. Über -.000 Kulturorganisationen aus ganz Europa, etwa der Louvre in Paris und das Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, haben Material, z. B. digitalisierte Gemälde und Objekte aus ihren Sammlungen, für Europeana bereitgestellt. Wichtige nationale Dokumente aus Staatsarchiven sind verfügbar und das Institut National de l'Audiovisuel (Frankreich) hat 80.000 Rundfunksendungen geliefert, die das gesamte 2o.Jahrhundert abdecken, angefangen mit einer Übertragung von den französischen Schlachtfeldern aus dem Jahr 1914. Nationalbibliotheken aus ganz Europa haben ferner gedrucktes und handschriftliches Material beigesteuert, darunter digitalisierte Kopien der »großen« Bücher, die der Welt neue Ideen geschenkt haben.
    In den Jahren 2009 bis 2010 werden im Rahmen des Europäischen Forschungsprogramms rund 69 Millionen Euro für die Forschung zu digitalen Bibliotheken bereitgestellt. Im gleichen Zeitraum werden aus dem Teil »Informationsgesellschaft« des Rahmenprogramms für Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Innovation rund 5o Millionen Euro für die Verbesserung des Zugangs zum kulturellen und wissenschaftlichen Erbe Europas bereitgestellt. Hintergrund Die Europäische Kommission befasst sich bereits seit 2000 damit, wie kulturelles Material digitalisiert und online verfügbar gemacht werden kann. Zwischen 2000 und 2005 hat sie mehrere Forschungsprojekte kofinanziert und die bessere Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten gefördert, die ihr kulturelles Erbe online verfügbar machen wollten. Im Juni 2005 machte Kommissarin Reding die digitale Bibliothek Europas zu einer Vorreiterinitiative der »i2010-Initiative« der EU für eine europäische Informationsgesellschaft, durch die Wachstum und Beschäftigung gefördert werden (IP/05/643). Im September 2005 skizzierte die Kommission die erforderlichen Massnahmen, um Europas kulturelles und wissenschaftliches Erbe allen zugänglich zu machen (IP/05/1202). Im August 2008 forderte die Kommission die Mitgliedstaaten auf, ihre Anstrengungen im Hinblick auf einen Beitrag zu Europeana zu verstärken, insbesondere durch die Bereitstellung von mehr Mitteln für die Digitalisierung und klare Zahlenangaben zu dem Material, das sie zu digitalisieren beabsichtigen (IP/08/1255, MEMO/08/546). Die Arbeit der Kommission an der digitalen europäischen Bibliothek wurde begleitet von einer hochrangigen Expertengruppe aus dem öffentlichen und dem privaten Sektor in der kulturelle Einrichtungen, IKT-Industrie und Inhaber von Rechten vertreten waren. Die offizielle Eröffnung von Europeana fand am Donnerstag, den 20. November 2008 im »Palais de Charles de Lorraine« in der Nationalbibliothek in Brüssel statt. Anwesend waren Kommissionspräsident José Manuel Barroso, Kommissarin Viviane Reding (Informationsgesellschaft und Medien), die französische Kulturministerin und amtierende Präsidentin des EU-Rates der Kulturminister, Christine Albanel, die für Kultur und audiovisuelle Medien zuständigen Minister sowie Vertreter kultureller Einrichtungen Europas."
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:08:56
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  3. Peters, C.; Picchi, E.: Across languages, across cultures : issues in multilinguality and digital libraries (1997) 0.02 
    0.017245812 = product of:
  0.09197766 = sum of:
    0.05448627 = weight(_text_:wide in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05448627 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
    0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012095859 = score(doc=1233,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
    0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025395533 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    With the recent rapid diffusion over the international computer networks of world-wide distributed document bases, the question of multilingual access and multilingual information retrieval is becoming increasingly relevant. We briefly discuss just some of the issues that must be addressed in order to implement a multilingual interface for a Digital Library system and describe our own approach to this problem.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  4. Hümmer, C.: TELOTA - Aspekte eines Wissensportals für geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung (2010) 0.02 
    0.017190583 = product of:
  0.091683105 = sum of:
    0.07570162 = sum of:
      0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01597718 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031400457 = queryNorm
          0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
      0.05972444 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05972444 = score(doc=3745,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031400457 = queryNorm
          0.3854811 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
    0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005345665 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
    0.010635821 = product of:
      0.021271642 = sum of:
        0.021271642 = weight(_text_:22 in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021271642 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    TELOTA (The Electronic Life of the Academy) ist eine Initiative der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, die es sich zur Aufgabe gemacht hat, in verstärktem Maße die Möglichkeiten und Chancen der Informationstechnologie für die Akademie und ihre Forschungsvorhaben zu explorieren und umzusetzen. TELOTA betreut die Akademievorhaben in Hinblick auf die Einführung von elektronischen Arbeits- und Publikationsstrategien und trifft deshalb auf sehr unterschiedliche Bedürfnisse und Ausgangssituationen. Nach einer ersten Projektphase, in der vor allem die Breite der Möglichkeiten des elektronischen Mediums exploriert wurden, widmete sich TELOTA zwischen März 2007 und Dezember 2008 der Entwicklung von projektübergreifenden Lösungen für die Bereiche Digitale Edition, Personendatenbanken und elektronische Wörterbücher. Für die Zukunft gibt es erste Ansätze, die elektronischen Ressourcen der Akademie zu einem vernetzten Wissensportal für geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagenforschung auszubauen. Aufgaben und Ziele von TELOTA Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Arbeit der TELOTA-Initiative der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (BBAW). Auf Initiative der "Arbeitsgruppe elektronisches Publizieren" ins Leben gerufen, widmet sich TELOTA seit 2002 der Aufgabe, moderne Informationstechnologie bewusst, geplant und nachhaltig für die Belange der BBAW nutzbar zu machen. Diese Aufgabe versteht sich sowohl im Sinne eines verstärkten Einsatzes zur Unterstützung des Forschungsprozesses als auch im Sinne einer kostenfreien Online-Präsentation von Daten und Ergebnissen für die interessierte Öffentlichkeit. Darüber hinaus soll die verstärkte "Digitalisierung" der Akademievorhaben auch den wissenschaftlichen Austausch und die Kommunikation unter Fachwissenschaftlern erleichtern und fördern (vgl. den Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe "Elektronisches Publizieren" an den Vorstand 2001). Das Akronym TELOTA steht - zusammenfassend für diese Aufgabengebiete - für "The Electronic Life of the Academy".
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  5. Lokales Bibliotheksportal "SISIS-InfoGuide" (2005) 0.02 
    0.016657583 = product of:
  0.08884045 = sum of:
    0.07817305 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07817305 = score(doc=3217,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43653932 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
    0.0063908724 = product of:
      0.012781745 = sum of:
        0.012781745 = weight(_text_:online in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012781745 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004276532 = weight(_text_:information in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004276532 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Content
    "Mit SISIS-InfoGuide stellt die Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH Bibliotheken eine attraktive Lösung zum Aufbau eines lokalen Informationsportals zur Verfügung. Das Portal verbindet die Stärken einer Meta-Suchmaschine mit den Vorteilen komfortabler Services einer benutzerorientierten Bibliothek. SISIS-InfoGuide (www.sisis.de/infoguide) ermöglicht umfassende Recherchemöglichkeiten im lokalen Bestand wie auch in verschiedensten externen Informationsquellen und das rund um die Uhr und ohne die gewohnte Suchoberfläche zu verlassen. Die Suchergebnisse werden benutzerfreundlich und übersichtlich präsentiert. Die benutzerbezogene Verfügbarkeitsprüfung weist durch entsprechende Meldungstexte den schnellsten Weg zum gewünschten Medium oder Dokument. Mit der Erweiterung der Recherchemöglichkeiten und der Integration von Dienstleistungen der Fremdsysteme ergeben sich über das lokale Angebot hinaus natürlich auch erweiterte Bestell- und Lieferfunktionen. Die in SISIS-InfoGuide integrierten Schnittstellen erlauben es, direkt aus SISIS-InfoGuide Dokumentenlieferdienste wie subito, Volltextanzeige, Fernleihfunktionen oder andere OpenURL-Dienste wie z.B. SFX zu nutzen. Die Option der personalisierten Anmeldung eröffnet dem Benutzer eine Vielzahl individueller Einstellungsmöglichkeiten. Die Voreinstellung des Suchmodus (einfach, erweitert, thematisch) ist ebenso wählbar wie die Anzahl und Art der zu durchsuchenden Datenquellen. Hierzu kann er aus der Liste, der von der Bibliothek konfigurierten Datenquellen wie z.B. Bibliothekskatalogen, Onlinedatenbanken, elektronischen Zeitschriften, Online-Buchhändlern etc., ein für seine Suche relevantes Profil zusammenstellen und für weitere Sitzungen abspeichern. Als weitere Einstellungsvarianten gehören dazu: Das Speichern von Merklisten, das Speichern der Suchhistorie und das Anlegen und Bearbeiten von Suchdiensten, die ihn automatisch über neue Treffer informieren. Auf diese Weise kann er sich für seine Suche seine ganz persönliche Wunschumgebung ("Mylibrary") einrichten. Die bereits im SISIS-SunRise webOPAC verfügbaren Selbstbedienungsfunktionen (Kontoübersicht, Möglichkeiten der Bestellung und Verlängerung von entliehenen Medien etc.), erweitert SISIS-InfoGuide um weitere individuelle Dienste. Zusätzliche SISIS-InfoGuide Funktionen wie "Aktuelles" und "weitere Angebote" lassen der Bibliothek freie Hand für Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, individuelle Informationsangebote, Veranstaltungshinweise, Auskunftsdienste oder interessante Links im Sinne der Bibliothek und ihrer Kunden. "Auskunftsdienst" und "Anschaffungsvorschläge" laden den Benutzer zum Dialog mit der Bibliothek ein. Viele verschiedene Dienste - ein Einstieg, intuitive Benutzerführung und Direkthilfen. So fühlt sich jeder Benutzer schnell "zu Hause". Durch die vollständige Integration in die SISIS-SunRise Produktlinie nutzt SISIS-InfoGuide die lokale Benutzerverwaltung für die Rechtevergabe und Kontoverwaltung und kann somit über die SISIS-SunRise Administration an die lokalen Belange angepasst werden."
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  6. Severiens, T.: ¬A distributed portal for physics (2002) 0.02 
    0.016559804 = product of:
  0.066239215 = sum of:
    0.020901911 = weight(_text_:web in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020901911 = score(doc=3620,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
    0.0063908724 = product of:
      0.012781745 = sum of:
        0.012781745 = weight(_text_:online in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012781745 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017106129 = weight(_text_:information in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017106129 = score(doc=3620,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
    0.021840302 = weight(_text_:software in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021840302 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Many subject specific portals were built during the last year. Most of these are simple user-interfaces to databases of subject specific information added with several lists of links. This centralised type of portal often looks fine with its consistent facing but is hard to keep up to date and high priced to maintain. Users expect a service be malntained and available 24 hours, 365 days for at least 10 years and this all free of charge. On the one hand, it seams to be impossible to set up a service matching all this demands, an the other hand, many institutions offer information and services which could be parts of a portal, which are maintained frequently and paid by public via these institutions. The idea is, to collect the existing information and present it in a structured and consistent way. This idea matches in an excellent way with the way knowledge is produced in Physics. Physicists work all over the world often an different continents an the same topic, knowing each others work only from their publications, conferences and online-communication. Information in Physics is published in quite different ways, by journal articles, which can be reviewed, sometimes by peer, or pre-prints. Many information is available in non-textual genres like software sources or datasets or mathematical formula. Distributed Portals make use of the existing information an the web. In the early days of the web, the very popular link-lists where a kind of portal, linking to (all) pages with information an the specific topic. Indeed, these link lists had many properties of modern portals, offering information in a structured and selected way. But they did not offer the information under a common layout (desktop) and did not offer user-specific views onto the information. Modern distributed portals combine the advantages of centralised portals (high information structure, common layout, easy navigation through all the information) with the possibilities of distributed portals (up to date information, low budget implementation, good knowledge coverage).
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  7. Chowdhury, G.G.: Digital libraries and reference services : present and future (2002) 0.02 
    0.016506296 = product of:
  0.06602518 = sum of:
    0.026127389 = weight(_text_:web in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026127389 = score(doc=4466,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
    0.00798859 = product of:
      0.01597718 = sum of:
        0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01597718 = score(doc=4466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016036993 = weight(_text_:information in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016036993 = score(doc=4466,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
    0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015872208 = score(doc=4466,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Reference services have taken a central place in library and information services. They are also regarded as personalised services since in most cases a personal discussion takes place between a user and a reference librarian. Based on this, the librarian points to the sources that are considered to be most appropriate to meet the specific information need(s) of the user. Since the Web and digital libraries are meant for providing direct access to information sources and services without the intervention of human intermediaries, the pertinent question that appears is whether we need reference services in digital libraries, and, if so, how best to offer such services. Current digital libraries focus more on access to, and retrieval of, digital information, and hardly lay emphasis on the service aspects. This may have been caused by the narrower definitions of digital libraries formulated by digital library researchers. This paper looks at the current state of research in personalised information services in digital libraries. It first analyses some representative definitions of digital libraries in order to establish the need for personalised services. It then provides a brief overview of the various online reference and information services currently available on the Web. The paper also briefly reviews digital library research that specifically focuses on the personalisation of digital libraries and the provision of digital reference and information services. Finally, the paper proposes some new areas of research that may be undertaken to improve the provision of personalised information services in digital libraries.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  8. Prasad, A.R.D.; Madalli, D.P.: Faceted infrastructure for semantic digital libraries (2008) 0.02 
    0.0161365 = product of:
  0.08606133 = sum of:
    0.04131103 = weight(_text_:web in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04131103 = score(doc=1905,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
    0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009258964 = score(doc=1905,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
    0.035491336 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035491336 = score(doc=1905,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to argue that digital library retrieval should be based on semantic representations and propose a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken is formal model based on subject representation for digital libraries. Findings - Search engines and search techniques have fallen short of user expectations as they do not give context based retrieval. Deploying semantic web technologies would lead to efficient and more precise representation of digital library content and hence better retrieval. Though digital libraries often have metadata of information resources which can be accessed through OAI-PMH, much remains to be accomplished in making digital libraries semantic web compliant. This paper presents a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries, that will go a long way in providing them and web based information services with products highly customised to users needs. Research limitations/implications - Here only a model for semantic infrastructure is proposed. This model is proposed after studying current user-centric, top-down models adopted in digital library service architectures. Originality/value - This paper gives a generic model for building semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Faceted ontologies for digital libraries is just one approach. But the same may be adopted by groups working with different approaches in building ontologies to realise efficient retrieval in digital libraries.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Information Gateway
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  9. Zeitz, G.: Wissenschaftliche Informationen per Mausklick : Bibliotheken und Forschungsinstitute eröffnen fächerübergreifendes Internetportal - Hessische Einrichtungen sind beteiligt (2003) 0.02 
    0.015675409 = product of:
  0.062701635 = sum of:
    0.027243135 = weight(_text_:wide in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027243135 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.020901911 = weight(_text_:web in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020901911 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.0060479296 = weight(_text_:information in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060479296 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.008508657 = product of:
      0.017017314 = sum of:
        0.017017314 = weight(_text_:22 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017017314 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Content
    "Wissenschaftler brauchen fundierte Informationen aus Quellen, auf die man sich verlassen kann. Die Suche nach solchen Quellen, wissenschaftlichen Aufsätzen, Dissertationen, Büchern, Datenbanken und Linklisten gestaltete sich bislang schwierig: Bibliotheken oder Verlage von Fachzeitschriften mussten einzeln angesteuert werden, einen zentralen, einheitlichen und einfachen Zugang gab es bislang, nicht. Das soll sich jetzt ändern: Das vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) und von der Deutschen; Forschungsgemeinsehaft (DFG) geförderte Internetportal "vascoda", das nach dem Willen seiner Initiatoren auch Grundbaustein für die "Digitale Bibliothek Deutschland" sein soll, will Forschern Zugang zu wissenschaftlicher Information unterschiedlichster Fachrichtungen und unterschiedlichster Formate bieten. Das ist bundesweit in dieser Form ebenso einzigartig wie die Tatsache, dass die an vascoda angeschlossenen Datenbanken ausschließlich ;,geprüfte" Informationen liefern sollen: "Fachbibliothekare und Fachwissenschaftler der Anbieter, die sich unter dem vascoda-Dach zusammengeschlossen haben, prüfen, welche Texte vdrfügbar gemacht werden", sagt Christine Burblies von der vascoda-Geschäftsstelle in Hannover. "So können wir gewährleisten, dass die Informationen wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen genügen." Das macht dann auch den wesentlichen Unterschied zu anderen Suchmaschinen aus: Die Suchmaske des Wissenschaftsportals ist zwar ähnlich einfach zu handhaben wie die Internet-Suchmaschine Google - vascoda verirrt sich aber nicht im World Wide Web. Und während andere Internet-Suchmaschinen nicht den Zugriff auf das so genannte "invisible web" bieten, also beispielsweise auf Bibliothekskataloge, ermöglicht vascoda auch den Zugriff auf dieses unsichtbare Netz. Das Wissenschaftsportal ist unentgeltlich nutzbar, und auch ein Großteil der Informationen ist kostenlos zu beziehen. Es sind aber auch kostenpflichtige Informationen verfügbar - zum Beispiel aus Verlagsangeboten und kommerziellen Datenbanken. Wer Informationen etwa zu soziologischen Fragen sucht, landet sicher auch auf den Internetseiten des Instituts für Soziologie in Darmstadt (www.ifs.tu-darmstadt.de/forsch.htm), das ebenso zu den vascoda-Anbietern gehört wie das Deutsche Institut für Internationale Pädagogik (DIPF) in Frankfurt (www.dipfde/index_1024.htm). In vascoda eingebunden sind zur Zeit 23 virtuelle Fachbibliotheken (ViFas), die vier großen Informationsverbünde EconDoc (Wirtschaft), GetInfo (Naturwissenschaften und Technik), infoconnex (Pädagogik, Sozialwissenschaften, Psychologie) und Medizin sowie die Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB), ein kooperativer Service von 209 Bibliotheken zur Bereitstellung von elektronischen Zeitschriften, -die im Internet publiziert werden. "Wir planen überdies die Erweiterung um das Fach Germanistik, und wenn es soweit ist, wird die Stadt- und Universitätsbibliothek Frankfurt diesen Service bereitstellen", sagt Burblies."
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  10. Stempfhuber, M.; Zapilko, B.: Modelling text-fact-integration in digital libraries (2009) 0.02 
    0.015402123 = product of:
  0.082144655 = sum of:
    0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040864702 = score(doc=3393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
    0.014343925 = weight(_text_:information in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014343925 = score(doc=3393,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
    0.02693603 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02693603 = score(doc=3393,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Digital Libraries currently face the challenge of integrating many different types of research information (e.g. publications, primary data, expert's profiles, institutional profiles, project information etc.) according to their scientific users' needs. To date no general, integrated model for knowledge organization and retrieval in Digital Libraries exists. This causes the problem of structural and semantic heterogeneity due to the wide range of metadata standards, indexing vocabularies and indexing approaches used for different types of information. The research presented in this paper focuses on areas in which activities are being undertaken in the field of Digital Libraries in order to treat semantic interoperability problems. We present a model for the integrated retrieval of factual and textual data which combines multiple approaches to semantic interoperability und sets them into context. Embedded in the research cycle, traditional content indexing methods for publications meet the newer, but rarely used ontology-based approaches which seem to be better suited for representing complex information like the one contained in survey data. The benefits of our model are (1) easy re-use of available knowledge organisation systems and (2) reduced efforts for domain modelling with ontologies.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  11. Fife, E.D.; Husch, L.: ¬The Mathematics Archives : making mathematics easy to find on the Web (1999) 0.02 
    0.015182426 = product of:
  0.08097294 = sum of:
    0.026127389 = weight(_text_:web in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026127389 = score(doc=1239,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
    0.007559912 = weight(_text_:information in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007559912 = score(doc=1239,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
    0.047285642 = weight(_text_:software in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047285642 = score(doc=1239,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.37958977 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Do a search on AltaVista for "algebra". What do you get? Nearly 700,000 hits, of which AltaVista will allow you to view only what it determines is the top 200. Major search engines such as AltaVista, Excite, HotBot, Lycos, and the like continue to provide a valuable service, but with the recent growth of the Internet, topic-specific sites that provide some organization to the topic are increasingly important. It the goal of the Mathematics Archives to make it easier for the ordinary user to find useful mathematical information on the Web. The Mathematics Archives (http://archives.math.utk.edu) is a multipurpose site for mathematics on the Internet. The focus is on materials which can be used in mathematics education (primarily at the undergraduate level). Resources available range from shareware and public domain software to electronic proceedings of various conferences, to an extensive collection of annotated links to other mathematical sites. All materials on the Archives are categorized and cross referenced for the convenience of the user. Several search mechanisms are provided. The Harvest search engine is implemented to provide a full text search of most of the pages on the Archives. The software we house and our list of annotated links to mathematical sites are both categorized by subject matter. Each of these collections has a specialized search engine to assist the user in locating desired material. Services at the Mathematics Archives are divided up into five broad topics: * Links organized by Mathematical Topics * Software * Teaching Materials * Other Math Archives Features * Other Links
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.02 
    0.015012839 = product of:
  0.060051356 = sum of:
    0.039103895 = weight(_text_:web in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039103895 = score(doc=1447,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.0063908724 = product of:
      0.012781745 = sum of:
        0.012781745 = weight(_text_:online in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012781745 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0060479296 = weight(_text_:information in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060479296 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.008508657 = product of:
      0.017017314 = sum of:
        0.017017314 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017017314 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  13. Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education (2003) 0.01 
    0.014867853 = product of:
  0.07929522 = sum of:
    0.041803822 = weight(_text_:web in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041803822 = score(doc=3958,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
    0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012095859 = score(doc=3958,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
    0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025395533 = score(doc=3958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Introduction to various classificatory structures currently used to organize and make collections of Web-based resources in education more accessible to educators, education specialists, and the general public. Presentation of other models which could also be useful.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  14. Severiens, T.; Thiemann, C.: RDF database for PhysNet and similar portals (2006) 0.01 
    0.0142643675 = product of:
  0.07607663 = sum of:
    0.05119902 = weight(_text_:web in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05119902 = score(doc=245,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
    0.012781745 = product of:
      0.02556349 = sum of:
        0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02556349 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012095859 = score(doc=245,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    PhysNet (www.physnet.net) is a portal for Physics run since 1995 and continuously being developed; it today uses an OWLLite ontology and mySQL database for storing triples with the facts, such as department information, postal addresses, GPS coordinates, URLs of publication repositories, etc. The article focuses on the structure and the development of the underlying ontology; it also gives a detailed overview of an online web-based editorial tool, to maintain the facts database.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Knitting the Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Information Gateway
  15. Subject gateways (2000) 0.01 
    0.01374677 = product of:
  0.073316105 = sum of:
    0.022368053 = product of:
      0.044736106 = sum of:
        0.044736106 = weight(_text_:online in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044736106 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.021167753 = weight(_text_:information in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021167753 = score(doc=6483,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
    0.029780298 = product of:
      0.059560597 = sum of:
        0.059560597 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059560597 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.1-93
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  16. Users Council urges continued emphasis on CORC project (1999) 0.01 
    0.013142908 = product of:
  0.07009551 = sum of:
    0.019172618 = product of:
      0.038345236 = sum of:
        0.038345236 = weight(_text_:online in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038345236 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012829596 = weight(_text_:information in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012829596 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
    0.0380933 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0380933 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Information Gateway
  17. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01 
    0.013126675 = product of:
  0.0525067 = sum of:
    0.009586309 = product of:
      0.019172618 = sum of:
        0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019172618 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011110757 = weight(_text_:information in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011110757 = score(doc=4189,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
    0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01904665 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
    0.012762985 = product of:
      0.02552597 = sum of:
        0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02552597 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
    Theme
    Information Gateway
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  18. Semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.01 
    0.0129608 = product of:
  0.06912427 = sum of:
    0.04901933 = weight(_text_:web in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04901933 = score(doc=3371,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
    0.007407171 = weight(_text_:information in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007407171 = score(doc=3371,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
    0.012697767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012697767 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and relationships for digital repositories. Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of both today's possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often unstructured data.
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction to Digital Libraries and Semantic Web: Introduction / Bill McDaniel and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Digital Libraries and Knowledge Organization / Dagobert Soergel - Semantic Web and Ontologies / Marcin Synak, Maciej Dabrowski and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Social Semantic Information Spaces / John G. Breslin A Vision of Semantic Digital Libraries: Goals of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel - Architecture of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Westerki and Ewelina Kruk - Long-time Preservation / Markus Reis Ontologies for Semantic Digital Libraries: Bibliographic Ontology / Maciej Dabrowski, Macin Synak and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Community-aware Ontologies / Slawomir Grzonkowski, Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Gzella, Jakub Demczuk and Bill McDaniel Prototypes of Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromeDL: The Social Semantic Digital Library / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Mariusz Cygan, Adam Gzella, Tomasz Woroniecki and Maciej Dabrowski - The BRICKS Digital Library Infrastructure / Bernhard Haslhofer and Predrag Knezevié - Semantics in Greenstone / Annika Hinze, George Buchanan, David Bainbridge and Ian Witten Building the Future - Semantic Digital Libraries in Use: Hyperbooks / Gilles Falquet, Luka Nerima and Jean-Claude Ziswiler - Semantic Digital Libraries for Archiving / Bill McDaniel - Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Ewelina Kruk and Katarzyna Stankiewicz - Conclusions: The Future of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Aufsatzsammlung
    Semantic Web
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  19. Mayr, P.: ¬Die virtuelle Steinsuppe : kooperatives Verwalten von elektronischen Ressourcen mit Digilink (2007) 0.01 
    0.01279529 = product of:
  0.10236232 = sum of:
    0.09026646 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09026646 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5040722 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
    0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012095859 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Die Bibliothek als Leuchtturm im Datenmeer? Informationskompetenz wird als eine der Stärken von Bibliothekaren gesehen. Natürlich erwarten unsere Benutzer diese Kompetenz nicht nur im Bereich der gedruckten Literatur, sondern auch bei elektronischen Informationsquellen.
    Source
    Wa(h)re Information: 29. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag Bregenz, 19.-23.9.2006. Hrsg.: Harald Weigel
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  20. Meiert, M.: Elektronische Publikationen an Hochschulen : Modellierung des elektronischen Publikationsprozesses am Beispiel der Universität Hildesheim (2006) 0.01 
    0.012616959 = product of:
  0.050467838 = sum of:
    0.009586309 = product of:
      0.019172618 = sum of:
        0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019172618 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009071894 = score(doc=5974,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
    0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01904665 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
    0.012762985 = product of:
      0.02552597 = sum of:
        0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02552597 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Das Internet verändert die Rahmenbedingungen des wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesens einschneidend. Wissenschaftliche Dokumente sind zunehmend elektronisch verfügbar und beginnen, die klassischen Wissenschaftsmedien wie Fachbücher und Fachzeitschriften zu verdrängen. Die Implementierung eines elektronischen Publikationsprozesses ist Voraussetzung für die erfolgreiche Verbreitung wissenschaftlicher Dokumente per Internet. Die Umsetzung setzt jedoch die Einhaltung bestimmter Vorgaben und Regularien voraus, sonst drohen Inkompatibilitäten zwischen den Systemen. Im Kontext von Urheberrechtsnovellierung und Open Access-Bewegung erläutert dieser Beitrag technische und rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen von Online-Publikationen und stellt Projekte und Initiativen vor, die sich auf dem Feld des wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesens betätigen. Ausführlich wurden Problembereiche des aktuellen Publikationsprozesses von Abschlussarbeiten im Studiengang Internationales Informationsmanagement an der Universität Hildesheim mit Hilfe von Interviews untersucht. Auf Grundlage der Zustandsanalyse wurde anschließend der elekronische Publikationsprozess modelliert.
    Date
    1. 9.2006 13:22:15
    Source
    Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
    Theme
    Information Gateway

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 168
  • e 166

Types

  • a 296
  • el 55
  • m 12
  • s 8
  • x 5
  • r 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications