-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Thesauri on the Web : current developments and trends (2000)
0.05
0.053062417 = product of:
0.16979973 = sum of:
0.06742332 = weight(_text_:wide in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06742332 = score(doc=2558,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.4846142 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.04479914 = weight(_text_:web in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04479914 = score(doc=2558,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.0111840265 = product of:
0.022368053 = sum of:
0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022368053 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0149678625 = weight(_text_:information in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149678625 = score(doc=2558,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.031425368 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031425368 = score(doc=2558,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- This article provides an overview of recent developments relating to the application of thesauri in information organisation and retrieval on the World Wide Web. It describes some recent thesaurus projects undertaken to facilitate resource description and discovery and access to wide-ranging information resources on the Internet. Types of thesauri available on the Web, thesauri integrated in databases and information retrieval systems, and multiple-thesaurus systems for cross-database searching are also discussed. Collective efforts and events in addressing the standardisation and novel applications of thesauri are briefly reviewed.
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.4, S.273-279
-
Shiri, A.: Powering search : the role of thesauri in new information environments (2012)
0.04
0.042326786 = product of:
0.16930714 = sum of:
0.057791423 = weight(_text_:wide in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057791423 = score(doc=1322,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
0.038399264 = weight(_text_:web in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038399264 = score(doc=1322,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
0.019244393 = weight(_text_:information in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019244393 = score(doc=1322,freq=18.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
0.05387206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05387206 = score(doc=1322,freq=16.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Powering search offers a clear and comprehensive treatment of the role of thesauri in search user interfaces across a range of information search and retrieval systems - from bibliographic and full-text databases to digital libraries, portals, open archives, and content management systems.
- Content
- Thesauri : introduction and recent developments -- Thesauri in interactive information retrieval -- User-centered approach to the evaluation of thesauri : query formulation and expansion -- Thesauri in web-based search systems -- Thesaurus-based search and browsing functionalities in new thesaurus construction standards -- Design of search user interfaces for thesauri -- Design of user interfaces for multilingual and meta-thesauri -- User-centered evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Guidelines for the design of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Current trends and developments.
- LCSH
- Information storage and retrieval systems
Information retrieval
World Wide Web
- RSWK
- Information Retrieval
- Subject
- Information Retrieval
Information storage and retrieval systems
Information retrieval
World Wide Web
-
Milstead, J.L.: Specifications for thesaurus software (1991)
0.04
0.0422851 = product of:
0.13531232 = sum of:
0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040864702 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.009586309 = product of:
0.019172618 = sum of:
0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019172618 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009071894 = score(doc=2291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01904665 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.05674277 = weight(_text_:software in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05674277 = score(doc=2291,freq=6.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- Specifications are presented for software designed to support manual development and maintenance of information retrieval thesauri. The specifications are intended to support both evaluation of existing packages for acquisition and design of custom software. Specialized requirements of thesaurus support are emphasized over more general database management requirements. Requirements for integration with larger systems and for the user interface are summarized. Relationships specified by the ANSI standard should be supported, and the relationships should be validated to avoid introduction of conflicting relationships. Flexibility in availability of note and date fields is important, and where required, term classifications should be available. Maintenance procedures should include provision for feedback on the impact of changes, as well as appropriate levels of approval for changes. A wide variety of online displays and printed reports are required, including but not limited to alphabetical, hierarchical, and rotated. In addition, it is desirable to be absle to search the thesaurus database with such capabilities as Boolean logic and proximity operators
- Source
- Information processing and management. 27(1991) no.2/3, S.165-175
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhurry, G.: Assessing the impact of user interaction with thesaural knowledge structures : a quantitative analysis framework (2003)
0.03
0.034973722 = product of:
0.11191591 = sum of:
0.038527615 = weight(_text_:wide in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038527615 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.033048823 = weight(_text_:web in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033048823 = score(doc=2766,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.32250395 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.0063908724 = product of:
0.012781745 = sum of:
0.012781745 = weight(_text_:online in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012781745 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008553064 = score(doc=2766,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025395533 = score(doc=2766,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- Thesauri have been important information and knowledge organisation tools for more than three decades. The recent emergence and phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have yet been carried out to evaluate how end-users, for whom all these efforts are ostensibly made, interact with and make use of thesauri for query building and expansion. The present paper reports a pilot study carried out to determine the extent to which a thesaurus-enhanced search interface to a web-based database aided end-users in their selection of search terms. The study also investigated the ways in which users interacted with the thesaurus structure, terms, and interface. Thesaurusbased searching and browsing behaviours adopted by users while interacting with the thesaurus-enhanced search interface were also examined. 1. Introduction The last decade has witnessed the emergence of a broad range of applications for knowledge structures in general and thesauri in particular. A number of researchers have predicted that thesauri will increasingly be used in retrieval rather than for indexing (Milstead, 1998; Aitchison et al., 1997) and that their application in information retrieval systems will become more diverse due to the growth of fulltext databases accessed over the Internet (Williamson, 2000). Some researchers have emphasised the need for tailoring the structure and content of thesauri as tools for end-user searching (Bates, 1986; Strong and Drott, 1986; Anderson and Rowley, 1991; Lopez-Huertas, 1997) while others have suggested thesaurus-enhanced user interfaces to support query formulation and expansion (Pollitt et.al., 1994; Jones et.al., 1995; Beaulieu, 1997). The recent phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have been carried out to evaluate the ways in which end-users interact with and make use of online thesauri for query building and expansion. The work reported here expands an a pilot study (Shiri and Revie, 2001) carried out to investigate user - thesaurus interaction in the domains of biology and veterinary medicine.
-
¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004)
0.03
0.02977797 = product of:
0.095289506 = sum of:
0.020432351 = weight(_text_:wide in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020432351 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022169823 = score(doc=3243,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.011110757 = weight(_text_:information in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011110757 = score(doc=3243,freq=24.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.02519635 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02519635 = score(doc=3243,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2652702 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.016380226 = weight(_text_:software in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016380226 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.13149375 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."
Enthält die Beiträge: Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction: a pilot study. Aitchison, J., S.G. Dextre-Clarke: The Thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, reading, resources. Shearer, J.R.: A practical exercise in building a thesaurus. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction: key issues and selected readings. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade: vocabulary management software. Will, L.: Thesaurus consultancy. Owens, L.A., P.A. Cochrane: Thesaurus evaluation. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services. Thomas, A.R., S.K. Roe: An interview with Dr. Amy J. Warner. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.95-97 (A. Gilchrist):"It might be thought unfortunate that the word thesaurus is assonant with prehistoric beasts but as this book clearly demonstrates, the thesaurus is undergoing a notable revival, and we can remind ourselves that the word comes from the Greek thesaurus, meaning a treasury. This is a useful and timely source book, bringing together ten chapters, following an Editorial introduction and culminating in an interview with a member of the team responsible for revising the NISO Standard Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual thesauri; formal proof of the thesaural renaissance. Though predominantly an American publication, it is good to see four English authors as well as one from Canada and one from Denmark; and with a good balance of academics and practitioners. This has helped to widen the net in the citing of useful references. While the techniques of thesaurus construction are still basically sound, the Editors, in their introduction, point out that the thesaurus, in its sense of an information retrieval tool is almost exactly 50 years old, and that the information environment of today is radically different. They claim three purposes for the compilation: "to acquaint or remind the Library and Information Science community of the history of the development of the thesaurus and standards for thesaurus construction. to provide bibliographies and tutorials from which any reader can become more grounded in her or his understanding of thesaurus construction, use and evaluation. to address topics related to thesauri but that are unique to the current digital environment, or network of networks." This last purpose, understandably, tends to be the slightly more tentative part of the book, but as Rosenfeld and Morville said in their book Information architecture for the World Wide Web "thesauri [will] become a key tool for dealing with the growing size and importance of web sites and intranets". The evidence supporting their belief has been growing steadily in the seven years since the first edition was published.
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
Electronic information resource searching
- RSWK
- Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Information Retrieval / Inhaltserschließung / Thesaurus (BVB)
- Subject
- Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Information Retrieval / Inhaltserschließung / Thesaurus (BVB)
Information retrieval
Electronic information resource searching
-
Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services (2004)
0.03
0.029670613 = product of:
0.11868245 = sum of:
0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040864702 = score(doc=4863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
0.04957324 = weight(_text_:web in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957324 = score(doc=4863,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
0.019172618 = product of:
0.038345236 = sum of:
0.038345236 = weight(_text_:online in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038345236 = score(doc=4863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009071894 = score(doc=4863,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- The World Wide Web and the use of HTML-based information displays has greatly increased access to online information sources, but at the same time limits the ways in which they can be used. By the same token, Web-based indexing and search engines give us access to the full text of online documents, but make it difficult to access them in any kind of organized, systematic way. For years before the advent of the Internet, lexicographers built weIl-structured subject thesauri to organize large collections of documents. These have since been converted into electronic form and even put online, but in ways that are largely uncoordinated and not useful for searching. This paper describes some of the ways in which XML-based Web services could be used to coordinate subject thesauri and other online vocabulary sources to create a "Thesauro-Web" that could be used by both searchers and indexers to improve subject access an the Internet.
-
Sarre, F.; Güntzer, U.; Myka, A.; Jüttner, G.: Maschinelles Lernen von Relationen für Thesauri und Hypertext (1992)
0.03
0.025134552 = product of:
0.13405095 = sum of:
0.112833075 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112833075 = score(doc=1368,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.63009024 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005345665 = score(doc=1368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015872208 = score(doc=1368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Fortschrittliche Informationssysteme stellen ihren Benutzern 2 wichtige Suchmethoden zur Verfügung: die gezielte (Volltext-) Suche und das Navigieren im Objektbestand mit Hilfe von Hypertext-Links. Der Grund, warum diese beiden Konzepte aber auf breiter Basis noch nicht in jedem Informationssystem Anwendung gefunden haben, ist darin zu sehen, daß der manuelle Aufbau von umfassenden Hypertext-Strukturen auf der einen Seite und von großen Thesauri, die den Erfolg von Volltextsuchen wesentlich steigern, auf der anderen Seite bislang enormen Aufwand und damit hohe Kosten verursachte. Langfristig werden Informationssysteme aber nur dann große Akzeptanz bei der Benutzerschaft erzielen, wenn sie ihre Benutzer mit diesen beiden Techniken unterstützen und wenn sie dynamisch neuen Informationsbedürfnissen anpassen können, also lernfähig sind. Für den einzelnen Benutzer ergibt sich daraus der wesentliche Vorteil, daß er von den Recherche-Erfahrungen anderer Benutzer profitieren kann. In diesem Papier stellen wir eine Lernkomponente vor, die für das Hypertextsystem 'HyperMan' an der TU München entwickelt und implementiert wurde. Wir zeigen beispielhaft, wie Volltext-Suchanfragen der HyperMan-Benutzer von der Lernkomponente untersucht werden, um Thesauruseinträge zu gewinnen. Bei der Entwicklung dieser Lerntechniken zum (automatischen) Thesaurusaufbau konnte auf Erfahrungen mit dem lernfähigen Information Retrieval System 'Tegen' zurückgegriffen werden. In dem HyperMan System werden aber nicht nur Beziehungen (Relationen) zwischen Begriffen erlernt, sondern auch zwischen Textstücken. Wir gehen daher auch darauf ein, wie aufgrund einer Analyse des Benutzerverhaltens sowohl neue Hypertext-Links erlernt als auch vorhandene Links, die zuvor von HyperMans Generierungskomponente automatisch erzeugt wurden, modifiziert werden
-
Lacasta, J.; Falquet, G.; Nogueras Iso, J.N.; Zarazaga-Soria, J.: ¬A software processing chain for evaluating thesaurus quality (2017)
0.02
0.024154661 = product of:
0.096618645 = sum of:
0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022169823 = score(doc=3485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009071894 = score(doc=3485,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01904665 = score(doc=3485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
0.04633028 = weight(_text_:software in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633028 = score(doc=3485,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Thesauri are knowledge models commonly used for information classication and retrieval whose structure is dened by standards that describe the main features the concepts and relations must have. However, following these standards requires a deep knowledge of the field the thesaurus is going to cover and experience in their creation. To help in this task, this paper describes a software processing chain that provides dierent validation components that evaluates the quality of the main thesaurus features.
- Series
- Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI; 10151
-
Gilchrist, A.: ¬The thesaurus in retrieval (1971)
0.02
0.021584526 = product of:
0.11511747 = sum of:
0.01597718 = product of:
0.03195436 = sum of:
0.03195436 = weight(_text_:online in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03195436 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02138266 = weight(_text_:information in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02138266 = score(doc=4593,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.07775763 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07775763 = score(doc=4593,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.81864166 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- RSWK
- Schlagwortnormdatei / Information Retrieval
- Subject
- Schlagwortnormdatei / Information Retrieval
Information retrieval
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Lopez-Huertas, M.J.: Thesaurus structure design : a conceptual approach for improved interaction (1997)
0.02
0.020581814 = product of:
0.082327254 = sum of:
0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040864702 = score(doc=4708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.009586309 = product of:
0.019172618 = sum of:
0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019172618 = score(doc=4708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012829596 = weight(_text_:information in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012829596 = score(doc=4708,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01904665 = score(doc=4708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- The need for thesauri to help users in their search for information in online information systems has been discussed for several decades. Many wide-ranging contributions have been made to solve this problem. Nevertheless, investigation is needed to design a thesaurus structure based on what is relevant for users and generators of information within a specific subject domain. Explores the possibility of creating a thesaurus from the cognitive viewpoint. This approach is based on a system that organizes its representation of knowledge or its classification as closely as possible to the authors' and users' images of the subject domain with the objective of increasing the interaction between users and texts, and thus the communication in a given information retrieval system. Discourse analysis is used as a main method to identify the categories and its relevance for building such a structure is discussed
-
McCulloch, E.: Thesauri: practical guidance for construction (2005)
0.02
0.02009793 = product of:
0.08039172 = sum of:
0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022169823 = score(doc=4724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006414798 = score(doc=4724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01904665 = score(doc=4724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
0.032760452 = weight(_text_:software in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032760452 = score(doc=4724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - With the growing recognition that thesauri aid information retrieval, organisations are beginning to adopt, and in many cases, create thesauri. This paper offers some guidance on the construction process. Design/methodology/approach - An opinion piece with a practical focus, based on recent experiences gleaned from consultancy work. Findings - A number of steps can be taken to ensure any thesaurus under construction is fit for purpose. Due consideration is therefore given to aspects such as term selection, structure and notation, thesauri standards, software and Web display issues, thesauri evaluation and maintenance. This paper also notes that creating new subject schemes from scratch, however attractive, contributes to the plethora of terminologies currently in existence and can limit user searching within particular contexts. The decision to create a "new" thesaurus should therefore be taken carefully and observance of standards is paramount. Practical implications - This paper offers advice to assist practitioners in the development of thesauri. Originality/value - Useful guidance for those practitioners new to the area of thesaurus construction is provided, together with an overview of selected key processes involved in the construction of a thesaurus.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Does the traditional thesaurus have a place in modern information retrieval? (2016)
0.02
0.017830983 = product of:
0.09509858 = sum of:
0.058348138 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058348138 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.320393 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009258964 = score(doc=2915,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
0.027491473 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027491473 = score(doc=2915,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- The introduction (1.0) of this article considers the status of the thesaurus within LIS and asks about the future prospect for thesauri. The main following points are: (2.0) Any knowledge organization system (KOS) is today threatened by Google-like systems, and it is therefore important to consider if there still is a need for knowledge organization (KO) in the traditional sense. (3.0) A thesaurus is a somewhat reduced form of KOS compared to, for example, an ontology, and its "bundling" and restricted number of semantic relations has never been justified theoretically or empirically. Which semantic relations are most fruitful for a given task is thus an open question, and different domains may need different kinds of KOS including different sets of relations between terms. (4.0) A KOS is a controlled vocabulary (CV) and should not be considered a "perfect language" (Eco 1995) that is simply able to remove the ambiguity of natural language; rather much ambiguity in language represents a battle between many "voices" (Bakhtin 1981) or "paradigms" (Kuhn 1962). In this perspective, a specific KOS, e.g. a specific thesaurus, is just one "voice" among many voices, and that voice has to demonstrate its authority and utility. It is concluded (5.0) that the traditional thesaurus does not have a place in modern information retrieval, but that more flexible semantic tools based on proper studies of domains will always be important.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
-
Martínez-González, M.M.; Alvite-Díez, M.L.: Thesauri and Semantic Web : discussion of the evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web (2019)
0.02
0.017779527 = product of:
0.09482414 = sum of:
0.03405392 = weight(_text_:wide in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03405392 = score(doc=5997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
0.05542456 = weight(_text_:web in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05542456 = score(doc=5997,freq=18.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005345665 = score(doc=5997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Thesauri are Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), that arise from the consensus of wide communities. They have been in use for many years and are regularly updated. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals for indexing and searching, today there is a demand for conceptual vocabularies that enable inferencing by machines. The development of the Semantic Web has brought a new opportunity for thesauri, but thesauri also face the challenge of proving that they add value to it. The evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web is examined. Elements and structures in the thesaurus standard, ISO 25964, and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the Semantic Web standard for representing KOS, are reviewed and compared. Moreover, the integrity rules of thesauri are contrasted with the axioms of SKOS. How SKOS has been applied to represent some real thesauri is taken into account. Three thesauri are chosen for this aim: AGROVOC, EuroVoc and the UNESCO Thesaurus. Based on the results of this comparison and analysis, the benefits that Semantic Web technologies offer to thesauri, how thesauri can contribute to the Semantic Web, and the challenges that would help to improve their integration with the Semantic Web are discussed.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Gilchrist, A.: Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies : an etymological note (2003)
0.02
0.01621928 = product of:
0.086502835 = sum of:
0.04767549 = weight(_text_:wide in 4455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04767549 = score(doc=4455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4455)
0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 4455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025864797 = score(doc=4455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4455)
0.012962549 = weight(_text_:information in 4455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012962549 = score(doc=4455,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4455, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4455)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- The amount of work to be done in rendering the digital information space more efficient and effective has attracted a wide range of disciplines which, in turn, has given rise to a degree of confusion in the terminology applied to information problems. This note seeks to shed some light on the three terms thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies as they are currently being used by, among others, information scientists, AI practitioners, and those working on the foundations of the semantic Web. The paper is not a review of the techniques themselves.
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.02
0.016101427 = product of:
0.085874274 = sum of:
0.019172618 = product of:
0.038345236 = sum of:
0.038345236 = weight(_text_:online in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038345236 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012829596 = weight(_text_:information in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012829596 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.05387206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05387206 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.2, S.111-122
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.02
0.015330574 = product of:
0.08176306 = sum of:
0.018143788 = weight(_text_:information in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018143788 = score(doc=4483,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.0380933 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380933 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.02552597 = product of:
0.05105194 = sum of:
0.05105194 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05105194 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
- Source
- Journal of information science. 25(1999) no.2, S.113-131
-
Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012)
0.01
0.01465847 = product of:
0.0781785 = sum of:
0.05430476 = weight(_text_:web in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05430476 = score(doc=3197,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.011110757 = weight(_text_:information in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011110757 = score(doc=3197,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.012762985 = product of:
0.02552597 = sum of:
0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02552597 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 14:03:22
- RSWK
- Semantic Web
- Series
- Chandos information professional series
- Subject
- Semantic Web
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Kempf, A.O.; Neubert, J.: ¬The role of thesauri in an Open Web : a case study of the STW Thesaurus for economics (2016)
0.01
0.01414751 = product of:
0.075453386 = sum of:
0.031352866 = weight(_text_:web in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031352866 = score(doc=2912,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
0.011110757 = weight(_text_:information in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011110757 = score(doc=2912,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
0.032989766 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032989766 = score(doc=2912,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- This paper illustrates the changing role of thesauri interlinked with overall changes of modern information infrastructure services, referring to "STW Thesaurus for Economics" as a case study. It starts with an overview of the history and development of the STW and describes the far-reaching changes brought about by its publication on the Web, with regard to subject indexing, retrieval and new uses for Linked Open Data. It argues that only the most recent technological developments help thesauri to exploit their full potential which is why they more than ever have a place in current information retrieval and infrastructure.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
-
Thesaurus software (2001)
0.01
0.0140004745 = product of:
0.0746692 = sum of:
0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 6773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025864797 = score(doc=6773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 6773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6773)
0.010583877 = weight(_text_:information in 6773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010583877 = score(doc=6773,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 6773, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6773)
0.038220525 = weight(_text_:software in 6773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038220525 = score(doc=6773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 6773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6773)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Members offer comments and suggest resources on programs for creating, maintaining, and publishing thesauri. Formerly a tool for writers and indexers, the thesaurus has taken on a new role as an essential component of the corporate information infrastructure. Many people are using word processor or database programs to create and maintain thesauri, while others are using specialized tools that perform consistency checks and offer special reporting capabilities. Some also use thesaurus modules integrated into another application, such as web publishing, content management, or e-commerce. This article includes material comes from our own experience, email responses from members, and comments from participants in our seminars and roundtables. There's also an introduction to thesauri in a corporate information management system
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Teil 1 der Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964 veröffentlicht (2012)
0.01
0.013763281 = product of:
0.07340416 = sum of:
0.012962549 = weight(_text_:information in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012962549 = score(doc=176,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
0.022221092 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022221092 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
0.038220525 = weight(_text_:software in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038220525 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Die neue internationale Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964-1 ersetzt die Normen ISO 2788 und ISO 5964. Ihr englischer Titel lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval". Die Norm umfasst ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri und berück sichtigt die Notwendigkeit von Datenaustausch, Vernetzung und Interoperabilität. Zu den Inhalten gehören - Konstruktion ein- und mehrsprachiger Thesauri - Unterschied zwischen Begriff und Benennung und ihren Beziehungen - Facettenanalyse und Layout - Einsatz von Thesauri in computergestützten und vernetzten Systemen - Management und Pflege von Thesauri - Richtlinien für Thesaurusmanagement-Software - Datenmodell für ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri - Empfehlungen
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.122-123
