Search (113 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Vision"
  1. Degkwitz, A.: Bologna, University 2.0 : Akademisches Leben als Web-Version? (2008) 0.06
    0.057493515 = product of:
      0.22997406 = sum of:
        0.036578346 = weight(_text_:web in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036578346 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
        0.08168739 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08168739 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
        0.09065048 = weight(_text_:soziale in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09065048 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.47251827 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
        0.021057852 = product of:
          0.042115703 = sum of:
            0.042115703 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042115703 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Die mit dem Bologna-Prozess eingeleiteten Veränderungen haben erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Weiterentwicklung der deutschen Hochschulen und Universitäten. Dies betrifft auch die Bereiche der Informationsinfrastruktur, für die sich neue Anforderungen und Herausforderungen aus dem Bologna-Prozess ergeben. Ökonomisierung und Technologisierung von Geschäfts- und Supportprozessen sind dabei wesentliche Antriebskräfte, die insbesondere die soziale Dimension akademischen Lebens und die damit verbundenen Werte zu verdrängen drohen: Auch in Zeiten von Bologna ist 'Universität, keine Web-Version! Deshalb sind Bibliotheken, Medien- und Rechenzentren sowie Verwaltungen gut beraten, auf der Plattform der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien und unter Einschluss betriebswirtschaftlicher Verfahren eine 'Vision von Qualität', zu entwickeln, wie sie in der Tradition des europäischen Universitätswesens liegt.
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:28:00
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 55(2008) H.1, S.18-22
  2. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: Mein Computer versteht mich (2001) 0.04
    0.03822605 = product of:
      0.20387226 = sum of:
        0.05448627 = weight(_text_:wide in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05448627 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
        0.05911953 = weight(_text_:web in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05911953 = score(doc=4550,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
        0.09026646 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09026646 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5040722 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Was wäre, wenn der Computer den Inhalt einer Seite aus dem World Wide Web nicht nur anzeigen, sondern auch seine Bedeutung erfassen würde? Er könnte ungeahnte Dinge für seinen Benutzer tun - und das vielleicht schon bald, wenn das semantische Netz etabliert ist
    Footnote
    Dt. Übersetzung von: The Semantic Web: a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. In: Scientific American. 284(2001) no.5, S.34-43.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Scammell, A.: Visions of the information future (2000) 0.03
    0.03340832 = product of:
      0.13363329 = sum of:
        0.05448627 = weight(_text_:wide in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05448627 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
        0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029559765 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
        0.024191719 = weight(_text_:information in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024191719 = score(doc=714,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
        0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025395533 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    A synthesis of some of the themes and ideas developed in a recently published book about the future of information: i in the sky: visions of the information future. Common themes included: problems in defining information and defining future time-scales, the ubiquity of information, accessibility, privacy censorship and control, customisation ofinformation products, the development of the World Wide Web, artificial intelligence and cybernetics, changes in working roles and structures of organisations, information literacy, information overload and the organisation and retrieval of information.
  4. Drauz, S.; Plieninger, J.: Nutzerwünsche sind nur bedingt RAK-kompatibel : So wird der Katalog zukunftstauglich: Recommenderdienste - Anreicherungen - Katalog 2.0 - Table of Contents (2010) 0.03
    0.032550756 = product of:
      0.13020302 = sum of:
        0.0147798825 = weight(_text_:web in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0147798825 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
        0.06601339 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06601339 = score(doc=3350,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
        0.04513323 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04513323 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2520361 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
        0.004276532 = weight(_text_:information in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004276532 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    So gewohnt der über das Netz nutzbare Katalog mittlerweile ist, die Entwicklung ist immer noch nicht an ihr Ende gekommen. Verschiedene Funktionalitäten wie Inhaltsangaben, Register, Cover, Empfehlungen zu ähnlicher Literatur sowie Merkmale von Web 2.0 wie Personalisierbarkeit, Listenerstellung, gemeinsame Nutzung und Erschließung sowie RSS können noch hinzukommen - freilich mit unterschiedlicher Wahrscheinlichkeit. Technische, rechtliche und - nicht zu vergessen - wirtschaftliche Schranken machen es unwahrscheinlich, dass alles auf einmal eingeführt werden wird. In diesem Artikel sollen die verschiedenen Versatzstücke eines »Katalogs der Zukunft« dargestellt und bewertet werden, um einen Ausblick zu geben, wohin die Reise gehen kann und wird. Wann der Aufbruch stattfindet und welches die verschiedenen Verweilstationen sind, das ist Sache der Politik, der Finanzen und der Technik; ihre Durchsetzungskraft, Akzeptanz und Rahmenbedingungen die einer jeden Bibliothek. Thema ist aber auch der »Katalog der Gegenwart« und seine bis heute vielfach unausgeschöpften Möglichkeiten. Hier sollen deren Nutzen aufgezeigt, die finanzielle und personelle Machbarkeit erörtert und bibliothekarische Vorbehalte beseitigt werden.
    Content
    "Der herkömmliche Katalog und die herkömmlichen bibliothekarischen Methoden der Erschließung des Bestandes und von Literatur reichen nicht mehr aus. Kommerzielle Anbieter treffen die Informationsbedürfnisse von Benutzern weit eher - sie bieten zum einen weniger (bibliografische Angaben) und zum anderen mehr (Informationen zum Buch und zu ähnlichen Büchern). Für viele Theoretiker und Praktiker geht es darum, die Daten frei(er) zu lassen und sie angepasster, anpassbarer zu machen, so weit möglich. Wenn die Daten gefangen sind, kann man sie befreien, wie dies sogar bei proprietären Systemen zu schaffen ist, hat kürzlich Tim Spalding mit seinem Aufsatz »Breaking into the OPAC« im Buch »Library Mashups« (Nicole C. Engard; London: Facet, 2009; Seite 129-143) gezeigt. Aufwendig zwar, aber durchaus im Bereich des Möglichen! Letztlich aber handelt es sich als Leitfrage stets darum, den Bedürfnissen der Benutzer zu entsprechen, die Handhabung selbsterklärender, die Information reicher, die Weiterführung der Recherche mit anderen Mitteln einfacher zu machen. Sagen wir: Die Zukunft ist da, aber sie ist nur bedingt RAK-kompatibel ..."
  5. Web 2.0-Pionier ortet kollektive Intelligenz im Internet : Technologieschübe kommen über mobile Endgeräte und Spracherkennung (2007) 0.03
    0.03125556 = product of:
      0.12502225 = sum of:
        0.02715238 = weight(_text_:web in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02715238 = score(doc=670,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.26496404 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
        0.078282245 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078282245 = score(doc=670,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.42985234 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
        0.003207399 = weight(_text_:information in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003207399 = score(doc=670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
        0.016380226 = weight(_text_:software in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016380226 = score(doc=670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13149375 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Content
    "Die Vision von der künstlichen Intelligenz wird Wirklichkeit, sagt Computerbuchverleger und Web 2.0-Pionier Tim O'Reilly. Das Leben mit dem Internet sei viel weiter als manche ahnungslose Nutzer meinten. Und es gebe keinen Weg zurück. O'Reilly ist sich allerdings nicht sicher, ob der nächste große Technologie-Schub mit dem WorldWideWeb verbunden ist. " Wenn wir über unseren Umgang mit Computern reden, verbinden wir das immer noch damit, vor einem Bildschirm zu sitzen und auf einer Tastatur zu tippen. Aber Computer werden immer mehr in den Hintergrund gedrängt. Die offensichtliche Veränderung ist zunächst - was ja viele Menschen auch schon beschrieben haben-, dass auch mobile Endgeräte oder Mobiltelefone als Plattform dienen. Damit ist auch verbunden, dass Spracherkennung immer besser wird. Oder dass Fotoapparate mittlerweile mit GPS ausgestattet sind. Wenn Sie damit ein Foto machen, ist der Ort automatisch Teil des Fotos und damit Teil der Information, die Sie zum Beispiel auf eine Web-2.0-Anwendung wie flickr stellen. Und plötzlich lernt das globale Gehirn etwas, was Sie gar nicht beabsichtigt haben", betont O'Reilly. Microsoft habe eine Software vorgestellt, die Photosynth heißt. Mit ihr könnten aus aneinander gereihten Digitalfotos 3-D Modelle entworfen werden. Man müsse die Fotos nur mit "Tags" versehen, also markieren, und jemand anderes nutzt das und führt alles zu einem 3-D Modell zusammen. "Wir bewegen uns also in Richtung künstlicher Intelligenz. Allerdings ist immer noch ein Mensch dahinter, der dem Programm sagt, was es tun soll. Aber das Beispiel zeigt, was mit der Nutzung kollektiver Intelligenz gemeint ist. Wir geben immer mehr Daten in das globale Netzwerk ein, und Menschen schreiben Programme, die neue Verbindungen erstellen. Es ist, als würden die Synapsen des kollektiven Gehirns wachsen. Ich glaube, wir dürfen Überraschungen erwarten", meint O'Reilly.
    Die Informationen aus dem Internet werden nach seiner Erkenntnis auf viele verschiedene Arten zugänglich sein. "Wir denken immer, es gibt Milliarden Computer da draußen - aber das stimmt nicht. Es gibt eigentlich nur einen, und darum geht es im Web 2.0. Alles wird mit allem verbunden. Und was wir heute unter einem Computer verstehen ist eigentlich nur ein Zugangsgerät zu dem einen weltweiten elektronischen Gehirn, das wir erschaffen", sagt O'Reilly. Webexperten halten die Visionen von O'Reilly für realistisch: "So wird die Spracherkennung eine Schlüsseltechnologie sein für den Zugriff auf das vernetzte Weltwissen. Wie häufig hätten wir gerne im Alltag genaue Informationen zu Sportergebnissen, Telefonnummern oder Adressen. Unendlich viele Dinge, die wir, wenn wir gerade im Internet wären sofort 'er-googlen' würden. Da das aber in der Freizeit und von unterwegs selten der Fall ist und der Zugriff über das Handy mit Tastatur oder Touch-screen zu mühselig ist, verzichten wir meistens darauf unseren Wissenshunger sofort zu stillen. Anders wäre es, wenn wir mit einfachen gesprochenen Suchbefehlen unsere Anfrage starten und die Suche dann bei Bedarf eingrenzen könnten, genauso, wie wir es derzeitig mit der PC-Tastatur und der Maus tun und das ganze jederzeit und von jedem Ort aus", kommentiert Lupo Pape, Geschäftsführer von SemanticEdge, die Analysen des Web-2.0-Vordenkers.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Opaschowski, H.W.: ¬Die digitale Revolution fällt aus (2001) 0.03
    0.027947016 = product of:
      0.08943045 = sum of:
        0.020432351 = weight(_text_:wide in 5745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020432351 = score(doc=5745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 5745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5745)
        0.011084911 = weight(_text_:web in 5745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011084911 = score(doc=5745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 5745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5745)
        0.012681495 = product of:
          0.02536299 = sum of:
            0.02536299 = weight(_text_:online in 5745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02536299 = score(doc=5745,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.26614597 = fieldWeight in 5745, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038850203 = weight(_text_:soziale in 5745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038850203 = score(doc=5745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.20250782 = fieldWeight in 5745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5745)
        0.0063814926 = product of:
          0.012762985 = sum of:
            0.012762985 = weight(_text_:22 in 5745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012762985 = score(doc=5745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Content
    "Für Optimisten wie den amerikanischen Computerwissenschaftler Nicholas Negroponte bricht das kommende Digitalzeitalter wie eine Naturgewalt über uns herein. Als Zukunftsforscher kann ich jedoch nicht in den Tenor der üblichen kühnen Prophezeiungen der Medienbranche einstimmen. In Deutschland und den USA wird zwar viel über E-Commerce spekuliert. In Wirklichkeit nutzen aber die privaten Verbraucher dort Shopping, Reisebuchung und Bücherkauf per PC kaum (je unter 3 %), Hornebanking nur 5 % der Amerikaner und 3 % der Deutschen. Obwohl immer mehr Firmen online gehen, halten die Verbraucher weitgehend an ihren außerhäuslichen Konsumgewohnheiten fest. Bisher bietet das Netz gefühls- und erlebnismäßig einfach zu wenig. Auch 2010 werden über 90 % des privaten Verbrauchs nicht über OnlineGeschäfte getätigt. Selbst wenn sich der E-Commerce-Umsatz der privaten Verbraucher jährlich verdoppeln sollte, werden die Online-Geschäfte in Deutschland auch 2002 keine 3 % des Einzelhandelsumsatzes ausmachen (derzeit: 22 Milliarden Mark Einzelhandelsumsatz zu 2,5 Milliarden aus Online-Geschäften). Die Frage, warum Online-Shopping so wenig Resonanz findet, lässt sich auf folgende Ursachen zurückführen: Erlebniskonsum in den Shopping-Centern ist attraktiver; wachsende Ungeduld bei langem Laden der Website, Unzufriedenheit über verwirrend gestaltete Online-Shops, Enttäuschung über nicht verfügbare Produkte sowie Abbruch der Kaufabsicht, wenn das Shop-System abstürzt. Leider findet die digitale Revolution in Deutschland bisher fast nur auf Unternehmensseite statt, die Fragen nach den Bedürfnissen der Konsumenten bleiben weitgehend unbeantwortet.
    Wer sich ernsthaft um die eigene Zukunft Gedanken macht, wird die Altersvorsorge nicht nur als materielle, sondern auch als körperliche, soziale und mentale Daseinsvorsorge begreifen. Denn bessere Lebensbedingungen und medizinischer Fortschritt haben nicht nur die Lebenserwartung, sondern auch die durchschnittliche Rentenbezugsdauer verlängert (zum Beispiel 1960: 10 Jahre, 2000: 20 Jahre). Die meisten werden zukünftig ein Vierteljahrhundert im Ruhestand leben "müssen". Daher werden in der immer älter werdenden Gesellschaft Pharmaforschung, Bio- und Gentechnologien im Kampf gegen Krebs, Alzheimer oder Demenz boomen sowie gesundheitsnahe Branchen, die Care und Wellness, Vitalität und Revitalisierung anbieten. - Frauen bevorzugen weiterhin KKK und nicht WWW - Eine andere optimistische Prognose zum digitalen Zeitalter hält auch nicht stand. So verkündet eine aktuelle Werbekampagne der deutschen Bundesregierung den Slogan "Drei K sind out, WWW ist in. Kinder, Küche, Kirche sind für Frauen nicht mehr das Ein und Alles ..." Diese Behauptung geht weit an der Wirklichkeit des Jahres 2001 vorbei. Die Frauenpower von heute findet noch immer mehr in der Kirche als im World Wide Web statt. Nur 4 % der Frauen in Deutschland (Männer: 13 %) nutzen wenigstens einmal in der Woche privat Online-Dienste. Der Anteil der Frauen, die regelmäßig jede Woche in die Kirche gehen, ist fast fünfmal so hoch (19 %) - von den Besuchen in der Küche ganz zu schweigen; auch Kinder sind noch lange nicht abgeschrieben. Die Zuneigung der Deutschen zum Computer hält sich in Grenzen. Repräsentative Studien belegen, dass derzeit über 80 % der Bevölkerung in der Regel keinen PC zu Hause nutzen, dafür lieber an ihren alten TV-Gewohnheiten zwischen Tagesschau und Sportsendung festhalten, zwischendurch Handy-Kontakte aufnehmen oder den Anrufbeantworter "abarbeiten". Laut Verband der Elektrotechnik hat der Anteil der so genannten Computer-Muffel seit 1998 sogar zugenommen. Das PC-Zeitalter beziehungsweise Online-Jahrhundert ist offenbar schon zu Ende, bevor es überhaupt begonnen hat."
  7. Cerbo II, M.A.: Is there a future for library catalogers? (2011) 0.03
    0.026345212 = product of:
      0.10538085 = sum of:
        0.05448627 = weight(_text_:wide in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05448627 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
        0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029559765 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
        0.012781745 = product of:
          0.02556349 = sum of:
            0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02556349 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008553064 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Is there a future for the library cataloger? For the past thirty years this debate has increased with the continued growth of online resources and greater access to the World Wide Web. Many are concerned that library administrators believe budgetary resources would be better spent on other matters, leaving library users with an overabundance of electronic information to muddle through on their own. This article focuses on the future of the cataloging profession and its importance to the needs of library patrons.
  8. Matson, L.D.; Bonski, D.J.: Do digital libraries need librarians? (1997) 0.02
    0.019116238 = product of:
      0.07646495 = sum of:
        0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029559765 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
        0.012781745 = product of:
          0.02556349 = sum of:
            0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02556349 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.017106129 = weight(_text_:information in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017106129 = score(doc=1737,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
        0.017017314 = product of:
          0.03403463 = sum of:
            0.03403463 = weight(_text_:22 in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03403463 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Defines digital libraries and discusses the effects of new technology on librarians. Examines the different viewpoints of librarians and information technologists on digital libraries. Describes the development of a digital library at the National Drug Intelligence Center, USA, which was carried out in collaboration with information technology experts. The system is based on Web enabled search technology to find information, data visualization and data mining to visualize it and use of SGML as an information standard to store it
    Date
    22.11.1998 18:57:22
    Source
    Online. 21(1997) no.6, S.87-92
  9. Danowski, P.; Heller, L.: Bibliothek 2.0 : Die Zukunft der Bibliothek? (2006) 0.02
    0.016896391 = product of:
      0.13517113 = sum of:
        0.018474855 = weight(_text_:web in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018474855 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
        0.116696276 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.116696276 = score(doc=68,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.640786 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Der Begriff Bibliothek 2.0 (bzw. Library 2.0) lehnt sich an die Begrifflichkeit des Web 2.0 an. Beide Begriffe sind für die bibliothekarische Welt relativ neu und werden bisher hauptsächlich im angloamerikanischen Raum diskutiert. Einige Bereiche des "neuen" Webs werden auch in Deutschland von Bibliothekaren diskutiert, so beispielsweise Weblogs und die Wikipedia. Die Betrachtung sollte hier jedoch nicht enden, sondern vielmehr als Startpunkt dienen. Über den Begriff als solchen kann man sicherlich streiten, jedoch hat er sich als tauglich erwiesen, um bestimmte Veränderungen zu beschreiben. So schreibt Michael Stephens, der den Begriff entscheidend mitprägte, im ALA TechSource Weblog: "I am so pleased with the discussion - and no matter what name you use, I love that the innovations and plans just keep rolling on."
  10. Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995) 0.02
    0.01589084 = product of:
      0.06356336 = sum of:
        0.025338933 = product of:
          0.050677866 = sum of:
            0.050677866 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050677866 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.32709154 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
        0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01904665 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
        0.012762985 = product of:
          0.02552597 = sum of:
            0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02552597 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
    Date
    22. 1.1996 18:26:45
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  11. Collinson, T.; Williams, A.: ¬The alternative library (2004) 0.02
    0.01519204 = product of:
      0.081024215 = sum of:
        0.04767549 = weight(_text_:wide in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04767549 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
        0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025864797 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Much time and effort has been devoted to designing and developing library Web sites that are easy to navigate by both new students and experienced researchers. In a review of the Southampton Institute Library it was decided that in addition to updating the existing homepage an alternative would be offered. Drawing on theory relating to user interface design, learning styles and creative thinking, an Alternative Library navigation system was added to the more traditional library homepage. The aim was to provide students with a different way to explore and discover the wide range of information resources available by taking a less formal approach to navigation based on the metaphor of physical space and playful exploration.
  12. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01
    0.014917726 = product of:
      0.059670903 = sum of:
        0.013557088 = product of:
          0.027114175 = sum of:
            0.027114175 = weight(_text_:online in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027114175 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.02693603 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02693603 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.012762985 = product of:
          0.02552597 = sum of:
            0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02552597 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  13. Hardy, H.E.: Building a digital library on ten thousand dollars a years (1996) 0.01
    0.01363499 = product of:
      0.07271995 = sum of:
        0.0111840265 = product of:
          0.022368053 = sum of:
            0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022368053 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
        0.05405199 = weight(_text_:software in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05405199 = score(doc=6902,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines a practical programme for setting up a low-cost dogotal library server using an electronic mail interface. This approach can be used by any small library, non-profit group or corporation with a volume of information it wishes to make available to the public at minimal cost. Suggests hardware and software configurations and recommends a possible upgrade path. Discusses the reasons for preferring the Linux adaptation of UNIX for the platform for this application. Recommends a mail transport agent and outlines mail server programs available. Provides a bibliography which includes all online and printed references necessary to obtain and configure the software discussed
  14. Lee, F.R.: ¬The library, unbound and everywhere (2004) 0.01
    0.013027472 = product of:
      0.05210989 = sum of:
        0.020432351 = weight(_text_:wide in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020432351 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
        0.015676433 = weight(_text_:web in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015676433 = score(doc=3099,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.15297705 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
        0.009586309 = product of:
          0.019172618 = sum of:
            0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019172618 = score(doc=3099,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=3099,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Google's massive online reading room will digitize the collections of several major libraries, including millions of volumes from the University of Michigan.
    Content
    "When Randall C. Jimerson, the president of the Society of American Archivists, heard of Google's plan to convert certain holdings at Oxford University and at some of the leading research libraries in the United States into digital files, searchable over the Web, he asked, "What are they thinking?" Mr. Jimerson had worries. Who would select the material? How would it be organized and identified to avoid mountains of excerpts taken out of context? Would Google users eventually forgo the experience of holding a book or looking at a historicaldocument? But in recent interviews, many scholars and librarians applauded the announcement by Google, the operator of the world's most popular Internet search service, to digitize some of the collections at Oxford, the University of Michigan, Stanford University, Harvard and the New York Public Library. The plan, in the words of Paul Duguid, information specialist at the University of California at Berkeley, will "blast wide open" the walls around the libraries of world-class institutions.
    David Nasaw, a historian and director of the Center for the Humanities at the City University of New York's Graduate Center, said the ability to use keywords to locate books and documents could save academics traveltime and money and broaden their research. "This all captures people's imagination in a wonderful way," Said Kate Wittenberg, director of the Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia University. "But whether it's right or wrong is not the whole question and not the whole answer." This year Ms. Wittenberg's group completed a three-year study of research habits that included 1,233 students. The study concluded that electronic resources had become the main tool for gathering information, particularly among undergraduates. But Ms. Wittenberg does have concerns. "What I've learned is that libraries help people formulate questions as well as find answers," Ms. Wittenberg said. "Who will do that in a virtual world?" On the other hand, she Said, an enhanced databank could make it easier for students to research topics across disciplines. For example, a topic like "climate change" touches an both political science and science, she Said, and "in the physical world, the books about them are in two different buildings at Columbia." Online research could bring the two subjects together instantly. Robert Darnton, a professor of history at Princeton who is writing a book about the history of books, noted that by looking at a book's binding and paper quality, a researcher can discern much about the period in which it was published, the publisher and the intended audience.
    "There may be some false consciousnesses about this breakthrough, that all learning will be at our fingertips," Mr. Darnton said of the plans to enhance Google's database. He saw room for both Google and real-world research. Libraries have already been changed by the Internet, said Paul LeClerc, president and chief executive of the New York Public Library: But libraries will still be needed to coliect and store information, he said. "TV did replace radio," Mr. LeCIerc said. "Videos and DVD's did not replace people going to the movies. It's still easier to read a book by hand than online." "The New-York Public Library Web site gets three-fourths of a billion hits a year from 200 different countries and territories, and that's with no marketing or advertising," he said. "That's the context in which this new element has to be placed." "We had 13 million reader visits last year," he continued. "We're serving a multiplicity of audiences - we serve people physically and virtually. It's an enormous contribution to human intellectual development." Many university leaders realize that for most people, information does not exist unless it is online, said Paul Courant, provost and executive vice president for academic affairs at the University of Michigan. Mr. Courant envisioned that in 20 years archives would be shared by institutions. While the world needs "tens of thousands of copies of 'To the Lighthouse,"' he said, "we don't need to have a zillion copies of some arcane monograph written by a sociologist in 1951."
  15. Perske, J.: Trendforscher Horx : Künstliche Intelligenz wird überschätzt (2018) 0.01
    0.012729313 = product of:
      0.101834506 = sum of:
        0.0111840265 = product of:
          0.022368053 = sum of:
            0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022368053 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.09065048 = weight(_text_:soziale in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09065048 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.47251827 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Der Hype um autonomes Fahren und KI schaffe gefährliche Illusionen, glaubt Horx. "Digitale Ehrlichkeit" gestehe ein, dass Computer keine realen Probleme lösten. Der Trend- und Zukunftsforscher Matthias Horx hält das Thema Künstliche Intelligenz für ziemlich überschätzt. Es sei "eine Art Fetisch geworden - ein Hype, der gefährliche Illusionen schafft", sagte der Soziologe und Leiter des Zukunftsinstituts in Frankfurt am Main in einem Interview der Deutschen Presse-Agentur. "Die meisten realen Probleme sind viel zu komplex und "lebendig", als dass sie von Datensystemen gelöst werden können." Das gelte auch fürs autonome Fahren. Es sei Zeit für eine "digitale Ehrlichkeit": "Computer und Roboter können weder die Pflege regeln, noch Armut mildern, noch den Verkehr entstauen. Dazu brauchen wir intelligentere soziale, humane Systeme."
    Series
    Heise online
  16. Liew, C.L.; Foo, S.; Chennupati, K.R.: ¬A proposed integrated environment for enhanced user interaction and value-adding of electronic documents : an empirical evaluation (2001) 0.01
    0.011001175 = product of:
      0.058672935 = sum of:
        0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029559765 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
        0.012095859 = weight(_text_:information in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012095859 = score(doc=5196,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
        0.017017314 = product of:
          0.03403463 = sum of:
            0.03403463 = weight(_text_:22 in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03403463 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Will traditional forms of communication seamlessly migrate to the Web? Liew, Foo, and Chennupati report that the top-ranked features of e-journals are those not available in paper journals: querying, navigation, and visualization.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Still the Frontier: Information Science at the Millenium
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.22-35
  17. Kurzweil, R.: Menschheit 2.0 : die Singularität naht (2014) 0.01
    0.010347594 = product of:
      0.08278075 = sum of:
        0.07001776 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07001776 = score(doc=4072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 4072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4072)
        0.012762985 = product of:
          0.02552597 = sum of:
            0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 4072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02552597 = score(doc=4072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 17:33:05
  18. Deaton, A.: Gespaltene Gesellschaft : Ungleichheit (2017) 0.01
    0.008093793 = product of:
      0.12950069 = sum of:
        0.12950069 = weight(_text_:soziale in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12950069 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.6750261 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    In den Industrienationen wächst die Sorge über die wachsende Kluft zwischen Arm und Reich. Soziale Spannungen, verschärft durch Zuzug, Flucht und Migration, gefährden den Zusammenhalt der Zivilgesellschaft.
  19. Gastinger, A.: Von der "electronic library" zur "enhanced library" : ein Bericht von der 9. International Bielefed Konferenz 2009 (2009) 0.01
    0.0074485894 = product of:
      0.03972581 = sum of:
        0.0111840265 = product of:
          0.022368053 = sum of:
            0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022368053 = score(doc=3017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=3017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
        0.021057852 = product of:
          0.042115703 = sum of:
            0.042115703 = weight(_text_:22 in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042115703 = score(doc=3017,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld hat vom 3. bis 5. Februar fast 400 Informationsexperten aus 30 Ländern zur 9. Internationalen Bielefeld Konferenz willkommen geheißen. »Up-grading the eLibrary: Enhanced Information Services Driven by Technology and Economics« lautete das Thema der diesjährigen Konferenz. Im Mittelpunkt stand das Thema »eLibrary«. Geänderte Modelle wissenschaftlicher Zusammenarbeit, neue Technologien, die Anforderungen der Nutzer, aber auch ökonomische Entwicklungen erfordern eine Weiterentwicklung der »electronic library« zur »enhanced library«. Diese Entwicklung birgt neue Herausforderungen, eröffnet aber auch neue Möglichkeiten für eine Optimierung wissenschaftlicher Informationsdienste.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:22:50
    Footnote
    Die Präsentationen zu den Vorträgen sind online verfügbar unter http://conference.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/2009/programme. Ein Tagungsband als Themenheft der Zeitschrift 'Library Hi Tech' ist in Vorbereitung.
  20. Jenkins, S.: ¬The death of the written word (1995) 0.01
    0.007168922 = product of:
      0.057351377 = sum of:
        0.042231552 = product of:
          0.084463105 = sum of:
            0.084463105 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084463105 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.54515254 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015119824 = weight(_text_:information in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015119824 = score(doc=4170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    A Times newspaper journalist counters the popular claim that electronic media, ranging from television broadcasting to CD-ROM books and information services over the Internet and WWW, will eventually supplant conventional printed books, periodicals, newspapers and other similar materials
    Source
    Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.6, S.407-412
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren

Years

Languages

  • e 73
  • d 39
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 90
  • m 14
  • el 10
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…