-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.59
0.59002 = product of:
1.18004 = sum of:
0.04987225 = product of:
0.14961675 = sum of:
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040864702 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.031352866 = weight(_text_:web in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031352866 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(8/16)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Source
- WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.47
0.4731523 = product of:
1.081491 = sum of:
0.05448627 = weight(_text_:wide in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05448627 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029559765 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.4375 = coord(7/16)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.42
0.4164444 = product of:
0.8328888 = sum of:
0.04987225 = product of:
0.14961675 = sum of:
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022169823 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.012762985 = product of:
0.02552597 = sum of:
0.02552597 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02552597 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(8/16)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.42
0.4154334 = product of:
1.1078224 = sum of:
0.04987225 = product of:
0.14961675 = sum of:
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.21159002 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21159002 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.375 = coord(6/16)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.40
0.398978 = product of:
1.0639414 = sum of:
0.066496335 = product of:
0.199489 = sum of:
0.199489 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.375 = coord(6/16)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.40
0.398978 = product of:
1.0639414 = sum of:
0.066496335 = product of:
0.199489 = sum of:
0.199489 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.199489 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.199489 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.375 = coord(6/16)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.39
0.385711 = product of:
1.2342752 = sum of:
0.24685504 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24685504 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.24685504 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24685504 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.24685504 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24685504 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.24685504 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24685504 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.24685504 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24685504 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.38
0.37973848 = product of:
0.8679737 = sum of:
0.04987225 = product of:
0.14961675 = sum of:
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.07001776 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07001776 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.4375 = coord(7/16)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.37
0.3675297 = product of:
0.7350594 = sum of:
0.04156021 = product of:
0.12468062 = sum of:
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005345665 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.06475034 = weight(_text_:soziale in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06475034 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.33751306 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(8/16)
- Abstract
- Das Problem der Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Wahrheit durch die Medien führt zu vier zentralen Fragen: Wie viel Wahrheit gibt es in der Welt, über die Journalisten berichten müssen? Wie ermittelt oder recherchiert man diese Wahrheit? Wie trennt man die Spreu vom Weizen? Und wie geht man als Journalist mit dem um, was man als Wahrheit erkannt hat oder erkannt zu haben glaubt? Hier gibt es ganz offensichtlich eine Parallele zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern. Journalisten und Wissenschaftler brauchen erstens Hypothesen, zweitens geeignete Hypothesentests, drittens ein gutes Abgrenzungs-Kriterium und viertens Verfahren, um die erkannten Sachverhalte auf angemessene Weise für eine Kommunikation mit anderen zu repräsentieren, das heißt sie darzustellen. Es gibt zwei große Unterschiede zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern: Journalisten sind in der Regel auf raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen aus, Wissenschaftler in der Regel auf raumzeitlich unbegrenzte Gesetze. Aber diese Unterschiede sind fließend, weil Wissenschaftler raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen brauchen, um ihre All-Aussagen zu überprüfen, und Journalisten sich immer häufiger auf das Feld der allgemeinen Gesetzes-Aussagen wagen oder doch zumindest Kausalinterpretationen für soziale Phänomene anbieten. Der zweite Unterschied besteht darin, dass die Wissenschaft weitgehend professionalisiert ist (zumindest gilt dies uneingeschränkt für die Naturwissenschaften und die Medizin), was ihr relativ klare Abgrenzungs- und Güte-Kriterien beschert hat. Diese fehlen weitgehend im Journalismus.
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
- Theme
- Information
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.35
0.35307467 = product of:
0.8070278 = sum of:
0.04987225 = product of:
0.14961675 = sum of:
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009071894 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.4375 = coord(7/16)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.35
0.3519122 = product of:
0.80437076 = sum of:
0.04987225 = product of:
0.14961675 = sum of:
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006414798 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14961675 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14961675 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.4375 = coord(7/16)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.35
0.34910572 = product of:
0.9309486 = sum of:
0.058184292 = product of:
0.17455287 = sum of:
0.17455287 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17455287 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17455287 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17455287 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17455287 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17455287 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17455287 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17455287 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17455287 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17455287 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.17455287 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17455287 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.375 = coord(6/16)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.29
0.2932602 = product of:
0.670309 = sum of:
0.04156021 = product of:
0.12468062 = sum of:
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005345665 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.12468062 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12468062 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.4375 = coord(7/16)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
- Theme
- Information
-
Stocker, A.; Tochtermann, K.: Anwendungen und Technologien des Web 2.0: Ein Überblick (2009)
0.09
0.09433593 = product of:
0.3773437 = sum of:
0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040864702 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.07352899 = weight(_text_:web in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07352899 = score(doc=4858,freq=22.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.717526 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.18524961 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18524961 = score(doc=4858,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
1.0172163 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.07770041 = weight(_text_:soziale in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07770041 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.40501565 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Das World Wide Web (im Folgenden kurz als Web bezeichnet) verwandelt sich seit einigen Jahren von einem Medium der passiven Konsumenten von Inhalten hin zu einem Netz für aktive User, die Weblogs schreiben, in Foren diskutieren oder Podcasts veröffentlichen. Diese User der zweiten Generation gebrauchen das Web zum Gedankenaustausch und knüpfen als Knoten in virtuellen sozialen Netzwerken Beziehungen zu Gleichgesinnten, mit denen sie sich zu virtuellen Communities formieren. Folglich definiert sich die soziale Komponente des Web 2.0 über ein verändertes Verhalten seiner User. Web-2.0-Plattformen sind jedoch vielmehr sozio-technische Artefakte und basieren auf speziellen Anwendungen und Technologien. Erst die technologische Komponente des Web 2.0 ermöglicht, dass die sozialen Prozesse der User unterstützt werden. Der folgende Grundlagenbeitrag stellt wesentliche Anwendungen und Technologien des Web 2.0 vor.
- Object
- Web 2.0
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
-
Voss, J.: LibraryThing : Web 2.0 für Literaturfreunde und Bibliotheken (2007)
0.09
0.08769629 = product of:
0.20044866 = sum of:
0.018474855 = weight(_text_:web in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018474855 = score(doc=1847,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.041258365 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041258365 = score(doc=1847,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.22655207 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.056416538 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056416538 = score(doc=1847,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.31504512 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.0026728325 = weight(_text_:information in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026728325 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.048488684 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.045785405 = weight(_text_:soziale in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045785405 = score(doc=1847,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.23865776 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.03052275 = weight(_text_:software in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03052275 = score(doc=1847,freq=10.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.24502413 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.0053179106 = product of:
0.010635821 = sum of:
0.010635821 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010635821 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4375 = coord(7/16)
- Abstract
- LibraryThing ist eine zur Klasse der Sozialen Software gehörende Webanwendung, in der Benutzer gemeinsam Bücher verwalten und miteinander in Kontakt treten können. Die Webseite wurde Ende August 2005 veröffentlicht und verzeichnet inzwischen (Juli 2007) über 235.000 Benutzer und 16 Millionen verschiedene Bücher. Jeder Nutzer verfügt über eine eigene Sammlung, die in LibraryThing als "Bibliotheken" oder "Katalog" bezeichnet wird. Die Katalogisierung geschieht in eine gemeinsame Datenbank, die von allen Nutzern direkt bearbeitet werden kann. Da es sich um eine reine Webanwendung handelt, muss zur Nutzung keine weitere Software installiert werden. Die Nutzung ist für bis zu 200 Medien kostenlos, eine jährliche Mitgliedschaft kostet 10 $ und eine lebenslange Mitgliedschaft 25 $. Bibliotheken und andere nichtkommerzielle Einrichtungen zahlen 15 $ pro Jahr. Dieses Preismodell hat sich auch nicht geändert, nachdem 40% des Unternehmens im Mai 2006 vom Gebrauchtbuchhändler AbeBooks übernommen wurden. Die Mehrheit hält weiterhin der Gründer Tim Spalding, der die ursprünglich als privates Projekt begonnene Seite mit inzwischen zwei weiteren Entwicklern und einer Bibliothekarin kontinuierlich weiterentwickelt.
- Content
- "Vom Nutzer zur Community Wie bei anderen Formen Sozialer Software beruht die Popularität von LibraryThing zu einem großen Teil auf den Interaktionsmöglichkeiten, durch die Nutzer miteinander in Kontakt treten und zusammenarbeiten. Neben einem allgemeinen Forum und Diskussionen zu konkreten Büchern, können sich Nutzer zu Gruppen zusammenschließen, beispielsweise die Comic-Liebhaber in der Gruppe Comics' und die deutschsprachigen LibraryThing-Nutzer in der Gruppe German Library Thingers. Per RSS können Nachrichten zu neuen Teilnehmern, Gruppen und Büchern aus Sammlungen von Gruppenmitgliedern abonniert werden. Jeder Benutzer verfügt über eine Profilseite, auf der er sich anderen Nutzern vorstellen kann und wo diese ihm Nachrichten hinterlassen können. Zu den Einträgen einzelner Nutzer, Werke, Bücher und Autoren wird jeweils angezeigt, welche Nutzer über die gleichen Bücher in ihrer Sammlung verfügen - so bringt LibraryThing Menschen zusammen, die sich für die gleichen Bücher interessieren. Jeder Nutzer kann zudem Bücher auf einer Skala von null bis fünf Sternen bewerten und Rezensionen einstellen. Erschließung leichtgemacht Nutzer können in LibraryThing bereits vorhandene Bücher mit einem Klick in ihre eigene Sammlung aufnehmen oder wieder entfernen. Das so kopierte Katalogisat können sie dann beliebig bearbeiten. Die Bearbeitung erfolgt nach dem Wiki-Prinzip direkt im Webbrowser. Bei der Anzeige einzelner Bücher und Werke werden die verschiedenen Metadaten dann zusammengefasst angezeigt. Andere Inhalte, wie die Autorenseiten (vergleichbar mit Personen-Normdatensätzen), können von allen Nutzern verändert werden. Eine wesentliche Rolle bei der Erschließung spielen freie Schlagwörter (Tags), aber auch DDC-Nummern lassen sich eintragen und werden beim Import aus Bibliothekskatalogen übernommen. Mit knapp 15 Feldern (Tags, Rezension, Bewertung, Titel, Autor, Weitere Autoren, Datum, ISBN, LoC-Signatur, DDC-Nummern, bibliographische Daten, Zusammenfassung, Kommentar und bis zu drei Sprachen) ist die Erschließung noch überschaubar und wird vor allem den Bedürfnissen der Nutzer gerecht.
Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken Bereits früh setzte sich Tim Spalding für eine Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken ein. Zum Eintragen von neuen Büchern in LibraryThing können zahlreiche Bibliothekskataloge ausgewählt werden, die via Z39.50 eingebunden werden - seit Oktober 2006 ist auch der GBV dabei. Im April 2007 veröffentlichte Tim Spalding mit LibraryThing for Libraries ein Reihe von Webservices, die Bibliotheken in ihre OPACs einbinden können.4 Ein Webservice ist eine Funktion, die von anderen Programmen über das Web aufgerufen werden kann und Daten zurückliefert. Bereits seit Juni 2006 können über verschiedene offene LibraryThing-Webservices unter Anderem zu einer gegebenen ISBN die Sprache und eine Liste von ISBNs anderer Auflagen und Übersetzungen ermittelt werden, die zum gleichen Werk gehören (thinglSBN). Damit setzt LibraryThing praktisch einen Teil der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) um, die in bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Fachkreisen bereits seit Anfang der 1990er diskutiert werden, aber bislang nicht so Recht ihre Umsetzung in Katalogen gefunden haben. Die Information darüber, welche Bücher zum gleichen Werk gehören, wird von der LibraryThing-Community bereitgestellt; jeder Benutzer kann einzelne Ausgaben mit einem Klick zusammenführen oder wieder trennen. Vergleiche mit dem ähnlichen Dienst xISBN von OCLC zeigen, dass sich thinglSBN und xISBN gut ergänzen, allerdings bietet LibraryThing seinen Webservice im Gegensatz zu OCLC kostenlos an. Neben Empfehlungen von verwandten Büchern ist es im Rahmen von LibraryThing for Libraries auch möglich, die von den Nutzern vergebenen Tags in den eigenen Katalog einzubinden. Ein Nachteil dabei ist allerdings die bisherige Übermacht der englischen Sprache und dass nur selbständige Titel mit ISBN berücksichtigt werden. Die VZG prüft derzeit, in welcher Form LibraryThing for Libraries am besten in GBV-Bibliotheken umgesetzt werden kann. Es spricht allerdings für jede einzelne Bibliothek nichts dagegen, schon jetzt damit zu experimentieren, wie der eigene OPAC mit zusätzlichen Links und Tags von LibraryThing aussehen könnte. Darüber hinaus können sich auch Bibliotheken mit einem eigenen Zugang als Nutzer in LibraryThing beteiligen. So stellt beispielsweise die Stadtbücherei Nordenham bereits seit Ende 2005 ihre Neuzugänge im Erwachsenenbestand in einer Sammlung bei LibraryThing ein.
Beispiel für die Anwendung von LibraryThing for Libraries im Katalog des Waterford Institute of Technology (): Zu einer ISBN werden auf Basis der in LibraryThing gesammelten Daten andere Auflagen und Übersetzungen, ähnliche Bücher und Tags eingeblendet. Soziale Software lebt vom Mitmachen Vieles spricht dafür, dass LibraryThing auf dem besten Weg ist, sich zu einem der wichtigsten Web 2.0-Dienste für die Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken zu entwickeln. Wie schon bei Wikipedia gibt es allerdings noch viel zu oft Berührungsängste und die Vorstellung, dass sich diese Dienste erst durch Hilfe von Außen in der eigenen Einrichtung einführen ließen. Soziale Software lebt jedoch von der Zusammenarbeit und dem freien Austausch von Gedanken und Informationen. Deshalb hilft nur eins: Ausprobieren und Mitmachen. Ebenso wie Wikipedia schwer zu beurteilen ist, ohne selbst mit anderen Wikipedianern einen Artikel erstellt und diskutiert zu haben, erschließt sich LibraryThing erst vollständig durch eine eigene dort angelegte Büchersammlung. Zum Kennenlernen reicht der kostenlose Zugang und mit 15 $ Jahresgebühr können auch Bibliotheken problemlos bis zu 5.000 Medieneinheiten pro Sammlung einstellen. Wenn Sie erstmal mehr mit Library-Thing vertraut sind, werden Ihnen sicherlich weitere Einsatzmöglichkeiten für Ihre Einrichtung und deren Nutzer einfallen. LibraryThing entwickelt sich beständig weiter und dürfte noch für einige Überraschungen gut sein.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 10:36:23
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.09
0.08682389 = product of:
0.27783644 = sum of:
0.05911953 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05911953 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.09335702 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09335702 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.09026646 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09026646 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5040722 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.018076118 = product of:
0.036152236 = sum of:
0.036152236 = weight(_text_:online in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036152236 = score(doc=2905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017017314 = product of:
0.03403463 = sum of:
0.03403463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03403463 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
-
Kleinz, T.: Angst vor der zweiten Internetblase : Web 2.0 hat inzwischen das Establishment erreicht / Medienkonzerne investieren Milliardenbeträge (2006)
0.09
0.08668542 = product of:
0.27739334 = sum of:
0.04147594 = weight(_text_:web in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04147594 = score(doc=178,freq=28.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.4047392 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.121274345 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121274345 = score(doc=178,freq=24.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.66592443 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.03384992 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03384992 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.18902707 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.04194291 = sum of:
0.016603975 = weight(_text_:online in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016603975 = score(doc=178,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.17423344 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.025338933 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025338933 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15493481 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.16354577 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.038850203 = weight(_text_:soziale in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038850203 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.20250782 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- Das US-Magazin Time hat sich in diesem Jahr etwas Besonderes ausgedacht: Statt einen Politiker oder Wissenschaftler zum Jahresende zu würdigen, klebte ein Stück Spiegelfolie auf der Titelseite. Dazu die Überschrift: "Person des Jahres: Du". Damit würdigt das Medium die Millionen von Internetnutzern, die in diesem Jahr die Lust am eigenen Publizieren entdeckt und damit das Internetgeschäft aufgemischt haben. Das Jahr 2006 stand ganz im Zeichen des Internets zum Mitmachen, des so genannten Web 2.0. Eine Vielzahl von neuen Angeboten geben dem Netz eine soziale Dimension: Web 2.0-Angebote sollen von den Nutzern nicht nur konsumiert, sondern auch mitgestaltet werden. Florian Koch vom Branchenverband Bitkom fasst die Entwicklung so zusammen: "Die Grenze zwischen dem privatem PC und dem Internet verwischt. Es entstehen Social Communities, bei denen Nutzer miteinander agieren, sich austauschen, persönliche Dateien ins Web stellen."
- Content
- "Spektakuläre Übernahmen Bekanntester Vertreter der Web 2.0 Communities ist die US-Plattform Espace, die es innerhalb von nur drei Jahren geschafft hat, mehr als 100 Millionen Nutzer zu gewinnen. Die Nutzer berichten hier über ihre persönlichen Vorlieben, stellen Bilder und Videos online. Besonders beliebt ist die Community bei Musikern, die die Plattform entdeckt haben, um ohne Plattenvertrag berühmt zu werden. Allein über die Mund-zu-MundPropaganda in solchen Netzwerken konnten zahlreiche neue Bands ihren Weg zum Publikum finden, berühmtester Vertreter: die Arctic Monkeys. Die Web 2.0-Branche macht in diesem Jahr wieder durch spektakuläre übernahmen von sich reden. So kaufte der Suchmaschinenkonzern Google im Oktober das Video-Portal Youtube für fast 1,7 Milliarden Dollar auf. Konkurrent Yahoo erwirbt viel versprechende Internet-Startups gleich im Dutzend. So hat der Konzern für den Bilderdienst Flickr im Januar 50 Millionen Dollar gezahlt und ihn in sein Portal integriert. Symptomatisch ist auch der Wechsel im Publikumsgeschmack: Stand im vergangenen Jahr noch das Spiel World Of Warcraft im Blickpunkt, genießt nun die Online-Plattform Second Life die gesamte Medienaufmerksamkeit. Auch hier treffen sich virtuelle Charaktere in einer Fantasiewelt. Der Unterschied: Während World Of Warcraft ein althergebrachtes Abenteuer-Spiel mit festen Spielregeln ist, gibt es bei "Second Life" keine Spielhandlung - hier darf jeder selbst bestimmen, was er machen will. Von dem Aussehen der Figuren bis zum Bau eigener Häuser - die Benutzer können hier ihre Kreativität voll ausleben. Das Konzept kommt an: Mitte Dezember konnte Second-Life-Betreiber Linden Labs den zweimillionsten Nutzer feiern. Und auch wirtschaftlich ist das Angebot beeindruckend erfolgreich: Pro Tag werden auf der Plattform eine Million Dollar umgesetzt - die Teilnehmer kaufen dafür virtuelle Kleidung, gehen auf Online-Konzerte und spielen in virtuellen Kasinos.
Neben den vielen neuen Möglichkeiten des Web 2.0 sorgen in den vergangenen Jahren aber auch die Schattenseiten des sozialen Netzes für Unruhe. Espace fahndet zum Beispiel schon seit einiger Zeit nach Pädophilen, die versuchen über das Angebot in Kontakt mit Kindern zu treten. Auch die Sicherheit der Daten ist nicht immer gewährleistet: Immer wieder machen die sozialen Börsen durch Sicherheitslücken von sich reden, besonders in den USA grassiert der Identitätsdiebstahl. Angesichts der großen Summen befürchten viele schon eine zweite Internetblase, Milliardeninvestitionen könnten sich in Luft auflösen. Der Meinung ist Branchenvertreter Koch nicht: "Das Internet hat mit Web 2.0 definitiv eine neue Entwicklungsstufe erreicht, bei der sich auch die Geschäftsmodelle verändern." Viele etablierte Medien-Konzerne integrieren bereits jetzt Web 2.0-Tech-niken in ihre Angebote. Sie wollen sich von den Newcomern nicht die Butter vom Brot nehmen lassen. So hat sich Pro-Sieben-Sat 1 bei dem deutschen Youtube-Konkurrenten Myvideo eingekauft und bringt die Videos seiner Nutzer sogar in einer eigenen Fernsehshow unter. Konkurrent RTL setzt auf die Eigenentwicklung Clipfish und will im Januar mit einem eigenen Fernsehformat auf Sendung gehen. Nachholbedarf in Deutschland Koch sieht in Deutschland Nachholbedarf: "Die meisten Angebote entstehen in den USA und sind häufig noch auf den amerikanischen beziehungsweise englischsprachigen Markt ausgerichtet." Aber: Auch in der Bundesrepublik seien erste Erfolge zu sehen. So konnte die deutsche Kontakt-Börse Xing im Dezember beim Börsengang immerhin 75 Millionen Euro erlösen. Während viele Web 2.0-Angebote noch in den Anfängen stecken, machen sich zahlreiche Vordenker schon Gedanken über die weitere Entwicklung. Der US-Journalist John Markoff rief in der New York Times vorsichtshalber bereits das "Web 3.0" aus. Wie lange dies auf sich warten lassen wird, steht aber noch in den Sternen."
- Footnote
- DAS WEB 2.0 - Bei aller Euphorie über die neuen Möglichkeiten und die eigene Kreativität: Nutzer von Web 2.0-Angeboten sollten einige Ratschläge befolgen. - Urheberrechte achten: Das Urheberrecht gilt auch hier. Es ist nicht erlaubt, kommerzielle Filme oder Fernsehmitschnitte einzustellen. - Daten sparen: Wer alle persönlichen Daten von sich ins Internet stellt, erlebt oft böse Überraschungen. Deshalb sollte man gut überlegen, welche Informationen man von sich preisgibt. - Rechte sichern: Wer Rechte anderer achtet, sollte auch sich selbst schützen. Ein Blick in die Geschäftsbedingungen ist ratsam, bevor persönliche Videos eingestellt werden.
- Object
- Web 2.0
-
Lauw, H.W.; Lim, E.-P.: Web social mining (2009)
0.09
0.08666725 = product of:
0.2773352 = sum of:
0.04767549 = weight(_text_:wide in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04767549 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.06843182 = weight(_text_:web in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06843182 = score(doc=3905,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.11552343 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11552343 = score(doc=3905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074839313 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.038220525 = weight(_text_:software in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038220525 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- With increasing user presence in the Web and Web 2.0, Web social mining becomes an important and challenging task that finds a wide range of new applications relevant to e-commerce and social software. In this entry, we describe three Web social mining topics, namely, social network discovery, social network analysis, and social network applications. The essential concepts, models, and techniques of these Web social mining topics will be surveyed so as to establish the basic foundation for developing novel applications and for conducting research.
- Object
- Web 2.0
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009)
0.08
0.08256216 = product of:
0.33024865 = sum of:
0.085783824 = weight(_text_:web in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085783824 = score(doc=4855,freq=22.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.8371137 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
0.16337478 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16337478 = score(doc=4855,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.8971004 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
0.0661999 = weight(_text_:software in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0661999 = score(doc=4855,freq=6.0), product of:
0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.53142565 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
0.014890149 = product of:
0.029780298 = sum of:
0.029780298 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029780298 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Während in den vergangenen Monaten Themen wie Web 2.0 und Social Software ein erstaunliches Konjunkturhoch erlebt haben, vollzieht sich weitgehend abseits der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung eine technologische Komplementärinnovation. Die wachsende Adaption semantischer Technologien zu Zwecken der strukturierten Erschließung von "Web 2.0 Content", aber auch der Einsatz von Social Software zur kollaborativen Anreicherung von Web Content mit maschinenlesbaren Metadaten sind Ausdruck eines Trends in Richtung "Social Semantic Web". Bezeichnendes Merkmal dieser Entwicklung ist die voranschreitende Konvergenz zwischen Social Software und Semantic Web Technologien. Dieser Beitrag hat das Ziel ein allgemeines Bewusstsein und Verständnis dieser Entwicklung zu schaffen und nähert sich dem Phänomen aus einer nichttechnischen Perspektive.
- Object
- Web 2.0
- Pages
- S.3-22
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Bettel, S.: Warum Web 2.0? Oder : Was vom Web 2.0 wirklich bleiben wird (2009)
0.08
0.07797849 = product of:
0.41588527 = sum of:
0.083607644 = weight(_text_:web in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083607644 = score(doc=4856,freq=16.0), product of:
0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.8158776 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
0.22867706 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22867706 = score(doc=4856,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
1.255679 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
0.10360055 = weight(_text_:soziale in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10360055 = score(doc=4856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.5400209 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die Entwicklungsgeschichte und den Facettenreichtum eines Begriffes, der gleichsam für technologische Innovation, soziale Modernisierung und eine schlaue Marketingstrategie steht. Es zeigt sich, dass die Verortung des Phänomens Web 2.0, gerade aufgrund der Polemik und Polarisierung, die der Begriff hervorgerufen hat, schwieriger ist, als man vermuten mag. Doch eines ist gewiss: Seit das Web 2.0 in unser Bewusstsein gelangt ist, ist das Internet wieder "in".
- Object
- Web 2.0
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
- Theme
- Semantic Web
