-
Online Publikumskatalog auf CD-ROM der Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld : Benutzer-Dokumentation (1991)
0.02
0.022541795 = product of:
0.18033436 = sum of:
0.1579663 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 8945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1579663 = score(doc=8945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.88212633 = fieldWeight in 8945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8945)
0.022368053 = product of:
0.044736106 = sum of:
0.044736106 = weight(_text_:online in 8945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044736106 = score(doc=8945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 8945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.02
0.0158948 = product of:
0.08477227 = sum of:
0.033248167 = product of:
0.0997445 = sum of:
0.0997445 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0997445 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26621342 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.04513323 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04513323 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2520361 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.0063908724 = product of:
0.012781745 = sum of:
0.012781745 = weight(_text_:online in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012781745 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Hoffmann, H.W.: Vom Bandkatalog zum OPAC (1995)
0.00
0.0047721597 = product of:
0.038177278 = sum of:
0.012781745 = product of:
0.02556349 = sum of:
0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 5661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02556349 = score(doc=5661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 5661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025395533 = score(doc=5661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5661)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Catalogue compilation and maintenance are time consuming. Developments from the mechanically produced guard catalogue to the OPAC have taken a course different from that which early pioineers might have predicted. Technical developments do not always match librarians' needs. The OPAC provides many retrieval possibilities, assists interlibrary cooperation and is available worldwide but cannot yet completely replace older catalogue forms. Only in the future will librarians realize whether online catalogues are the ideal system
-
Jepkens, I.: CD-PACs: CD-ROM als Alternative zur Gestaltung von Online-Publikumskatalogen; eine vergleichende Diskussion gestützt auf das Beispield der UB Bielefeld (1991)
0.00
0.0013980033 = product of:
0.022368053 = sum of:
0.022368053 = product of:
0.044736106 = sum of:
0.044736106 = weight(_text_:online in 8910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044736106 = score(doc=8910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 8910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8910)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Jeng, L.H.: From cataloging to organization of information : a paradigm for the core curriculum (1993)
0.00
0.0012027746 = product of:
0.019244393 = sum of:
0.019244393 = weight(_text_:information in 7379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019244393 = score(doc=7379,freq=18.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 7379, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7379)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- The traditional library and information science (LIS) curriculum for organization of information assumes a cataloging paradigm that is built on the concepts and theories developed throughout the history of library cataloging as well as practical knowledge and skills of applying current standards and systems developed specifically for practice in cataloging. Advocates for LIS curriculum reform point out, however, that this cataloging paradigm must be replaced by knowledge of resources and systems management in order to equip LIS graduates with the knowledge and skills needed for an information society. By comparing the traditional and nontraditional curricula in the area of organization of information, this paper proposes a paradigm for organization of information in which information is defined in the context of five attributes and cataloging is perceived as a mode of organizational behavior. Some implications of this paradigm on the core curriculum for organization of information are suggested
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 34(1993) no.2, S.113-126
-
Singerman, R.: American library book catalogues, 1801-1875 : a national bibliography (1996)
0.00
9.44989E-4 = product of:
0.015119824 = sum of:
0.015119824 = weight(_text_:information in 7862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015119824 = score(doc=7862,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 7862, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7862)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.1, S.47-48 (P. Hoare)
- Imprint
- Champaign, IL : Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
-
Millsap, L.: ¬A history of the online catalog in North America (1996)
0.00
7.9885905E-4 = product of:
0.012781745 = sum of:
0.012781745 = product of:
0.02556349 = sum of:
0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 4437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02556349 = score(doc=4437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 4437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Stone, A.T.: ¬An old card catalog goes to the Smithsonian (1996)
0.00
7.9885905E-4 = product of:
0.012781745 = sum of:
0.012781745 = product of:
0.02556349 = sum of:
0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 7376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02556349 = score(doc=7376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 7376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Discusses the falling into disuse of the card catalogue in the face of the online catalogue, briefly tracing the history of the card catalogue. Describes an attempt to find a representative card catalogue to donate to the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, D.C., as an object of historical and scientific interest. The attempt was successful when one from the Union Theological Seminary in Virginia provided an excellent example which the Smithsonian accepted
-
Russell, B.M.: Hidden wisdom and unseen treasure : revisiting cataloging in Medieval libraries (1998)
0.00
4.0092488E-4 = product of:
0.006414798 = sum of:
0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006414798 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.031400457 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Scholars working in the field of mediaeval history and cultural history have recognized that understanding the cataloguing and accessioning of books is central to understanding the transmission of ideas. Unfortunately, general histories of libraries and even the library literature seem content to sketch out a chronological development of cataloguing in line with the 19th and 20th century view of library development, from a simple list to complex intellectual systems. In truth, however, those individuals responsible for cataloguing books in mediaeval libraries faced many of the same challenges as cataloguers today: how to organize information; how to serve local needs; and how to provide access to individual works within larger bibliographic formats. Summarizes recent scholarship in the history of the book that relates to library cataloguing, as well as providing parallels to the cooperative library environment of today
