Search (200 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Kneifel, F.: Mit Web 2.0 zum Online-Katalog der nächsten Generation (2009) 0.18 
    0.18437845 = product of:
  0.3687569 = sum of:
    0.066902645 = weight(_text_:wide in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066902645 = score(doc=2919,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
    0.07259172 = weight(_text_:web in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07259172 = score(doc=2919,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
    0.22926253 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22926253 = score(doc=2919,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Das Web 2.0 hat auch bei Bibliotheksnutzern zu veränderten Erwartungshaltungen an bibliothekarische Online-Angebote wie die Kataloge geführt. Diese waren lange Zeit statische Nachweisinstrumente, die heutzutage über das Angebot reiner Bestandsverzeichnisse hinausgehend verschiedene Web 2.0-Funktionalitäten sowie Zusatzinformationen mittels Kataloganreicherung integrierten sollten, um den Erwartungen der Nutzer zu genügen. Die Ergebnisse einer Online-Umfrage unter Nutzern einer Großstadtbibliothek unterstreichen dies: die Nutzer wünschen sich vielfältige Browsingmöglichkeiten, Google-ähnliche Suchmöglichkeiten, zusätzliche Inhalte und ein personalisier-bares Angebot. Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten? Am Beispiel der Stadtbücherei Frankfurt wird dargestellt wie Prinzipien des Web 2.0 - u.a. Nutzerfreundlichkeit und Kollaboration - auf das Online-Angebot übertragbar sind, ohne dabei den Personalaufwand, die rechtliche Absicherung der Bibliothek und Fragen der technischen Implementierung zu vergessen.
    Content
    Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Masterarbeit, 2008 u.d.T.: Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten?
    RSWK
    Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
    Subject
    Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
  2. Steiner, E.S.: OPAC 2.0 : Mit Web 2.0-Technologie zum Bibliothekskatalog der Zukunft? (2007) 0.15 
    0.14964941 = product of:
  0.44894823 = sum of:
    0.08212816 = weight(_text_:web in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08212816 = score(doc=678,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
    0.36682007 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36682007 = score(doc=678,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        1.4499333 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit besteht im Wesentlichen aus zwei Teilen: Der erste Teil beinhaltet eine Einführung in den Begriff Web 2.0 und in die allgemeinen Rahmenbedingungen der zugehörigen technischen Entwicklungen. Des Weiteren werden exemplarische Techniken vorgestellt, die Web 2.0 zugeschrieben werden können sowie einige beispielhafte Anwendungen. Im zweiten Teil wird die Diskussion um Bibliothek 2.0 aufgegriffen, um anschließend näher auf Web 2.0 Techniken in Bibliothekskatalogen bzw. den OPAC 2.0 einzugehen. Verschiedene Techniken, die im OPAC 2.0 Anwendung finden können, werden diskutiert und zuletzt werden einige beispielhafte OPACs vorgestellt.
  3. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.12 
    0.11772944 = product of:
  0.23545888 = sum of:
    0.08212816 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08212816 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.12969047 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12969047 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.02364025 = product of:
      0.0472805 = sum of:
        0.0472805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0472805 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  4. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.11 
    0.11222429 = product of:
  0.22444858 = sum of:
    0.04106408 = weight(_text_:web in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04106408 = score(doc=2672,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.17156437 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17156437 = score(doc=2672,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.011820125 = product of:
      0.02364025 = sum of:
        0.02364025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02364025 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Die verschiedenen unter dem Schlagwort "Bibliothek 2.0" zusammengefassten neuen Dienste und Komponenten wie etwa Wikis, Tagging-Systeme und Blogs sind seit einiger Zeit in aller Munde und dringen über Fortbildungsveranstaltungen, Konferenzen und Publikationsorgane immer mehr in das deutschsprachige Bibliothekswesen ein. Darüber hinaus gibt es öffentlich geförderte Projekte zu bibliothekarischen 2.0-Themen und sogar ein Projekt, welches sich explizit einen 2.0-Katalog zum Ziel gesetzt hat. In diesem Beitrag soll es nun nicht um die Vorstellung eines weiteren Projekts im Dienste des Themas "Bibliothek 2.0" gehen, ebenso hat dieser Beitrag nicht den Anspruch, die Diskussion über die möglichen Vor- oder Nachteile dieser Thematik auf theoretischer Ebene voranzubringen. Vielmehr wird hier ganz praktisch aus Sicht einer kleinen Universitätsbibliothek, der Bibliothek der Helmut-SchmidtUniversität (HSU) - Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, aufgezeigt, wie das Thema "Web/Bibliothek 2.0" durchaus neben und in Unterstützung von weiteren nutzerorientierten Servicedienstleistungen auch in kleinen Schritten positive Auswirkungen für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer haben kann. Der Focus wird dabei auf dem zentralen Arbeits- und Rechercheinstrument der Bibliotheksnutzer liegen, dem Bibliothekskatalog. Speziell wird es darum gehen, wie auf relativ einfache Art und Weise durch Anwendung verschiedener Elemente anderer Dienste und Anbieter sowie das Aufgreifen von Schnittstellen und wenig aufwendigen Verbesserungen, Mehrwert für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer zu erzielen ist. Ein zentraler Begriff bei fast allen Überlegungen, die im Zusammenhang mit der Verbesserung und Anreicherung des Kataloges stehen, war und ist das Thema "Mash-up". Unter Mashups - ein Begriff, der gerade im Zusammenhang mit dem Thema "Web 2.0" im deutschsprachigen Raum eingeführt und adaptiert wurde - wird das Verfahren bezeichnet, Web-Inhalte neu zu kombinieren. Dabei nutzt man bei und für Mashups offene "APIs" (Application Programming Interfaces, also offene Programmierschnittstellen), die von anderen Web-Anwendungen zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  5. Wimmer, W.: Mit dem 'Surfbrett' in die Bibliothek : der World-Wide-Web Katalog der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1996) 0.11 
    0.105297014 = product of:
  0.21059403 = sum of:
    0.113537535 = weight(_text_:wide in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.113537535 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.061596118 = weight(_text_:web in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061596118 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.035460375 = product of:
      0.07092075 = sum of:
        0.07092075 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07092075 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  6. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.09 
    0.087629795 = product of:
  0.2628894 = sum of:
    0.03593107 = weight(_text_:web in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03593107 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
    0.22695832 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22695832 = score(doc=3862,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.8971004 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In this article are compared traditional OPAC systems, enriched OPAC, social OPAC and social cataloguing systems.the aim is to underline new theoretical trends and to offer a taxonomic outline of such tools, according to the interaction level granted to users and to the chance to manage user's generated contents in the point of view of the application of web 2.0 tendecies to libraries, in the library 2.0. At the end, a brief review of softwares, both open source and not, that seem promising for this future application.
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: OPAC, SOPAC and social networking: catalogues of Library 2.0?
  7. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.08 
    0.07870266 = product of:
  0.15740532 = sum of:
    0.07569169 = weight(_text_:wide in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07569169 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
    0.05807338 = weight(_text_:web in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05807338 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
    0.02364025 = product of:
      0.0472805 = sum of:
        0.0472805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0472805 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  8. Dierolf, U.; Mönnich, M.: Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog (KVK) : neue Dienstleistung im World Wide Web (1996) 0.07 
    0.07019801 = product of:
  0.14039601 = sum of:
    0.07569169 = weight(_text_:wide in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07569169 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
    0.04106408 = weight(_text_:web in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04106408 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
    0.02364025 = product of:
      0.0472805 = sum of:
        0.0472805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0472805 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
  9. Wissen, D.: Ist der OPAC von morgen heute schon möglich? (2009) 0.06 
    0.062020816 = product of:
  0.18606244 = sum of:
    0.04106408 = weight(_text_:web in 4426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04106408 = score(doc=4426,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4426, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4426)
    0.14499836 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14499836 = score(doc=4426,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.57313645 = fieldWeight in 4426, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4426)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Wissen Sie, wie sich zukünftig Bibliografien, Kataloge und OPACs bedienen lassen? Wenn wir über die Zukunft von Bibliografien, Katalogen und OPACs nachdenken, denken wir dann zunächst an Medien verzeichnisse oder an offene, kommunikative Webportale, die es jedem ermöglichen, sich nach Art des Web 2.0 an der Erfassung der bibliografischen Daten zu beteiligen? Wenn wir mediale Internet angebote des Web 2.0 genauer betrachtet, bieten diese meh als lediglich die Verzeichnung von Medien. Es zeigt sich, dass angesichts aktueller Entwicklungen in Richtung Web 2.0 die Frage neu gestellt werden sollte, in welcher Form zukünftig mediografische Portale ihren Nutzen haben könnten. Beispielsweise könnte ein OPAC 2.0 jedem Interessenten einen individuellen Zugang zu einem Informationsraum offerieren, der sich funktionell ganz den eigenen Bedürfnissen und Wünschen des Bibliotheksnutzers anpasst und nicht nur Zugang zu Informationen ermöglicht, sondern auch vollmedialen Zugriff, inhaltliche Verweisfunktionen, erweiterten Service sowie Kommunikationsfunktionen. Die Antwort lautet also, dass Archive und Bibliotheken mehr über mediografische Portale nachden ken sollten und nicht über Bibliografien, Kataloge und OPACs! Eine darauf folgend wichtige Frage ist, ob diese Portale sowohl inhaltlich als auch funktionell nicht nur unseren Archiv und Bibliotheksnutzern mehr Service bieten, sondern auch einen höheren Zweck für Archive und Bibliotheken selbst darstellen? Die Online Techniken des Web 2.0 und dessen Portale offerieren virtuelle Welten und neue Möglichkeiten zum Aktiv und Produktivsein, also insgesamt zum Proaktivsein unserer Nutzer. Die Betrachtung solcher Internetangebote zeigt, dass sich mediografische Angebote bereits in einer Entwicklung befinden. Doch wenn es eine solche Entwicklung gibt, muss überlegt werden, wie Archive und Bibliotheken sich hierbei einbringen können. Somit zeichnet sich bei diesem Thema eine Brisanz ab. Denn zu bedenken ist, dass mediografische Daten bereits in Rechercheergebnissen bei Online-Datenbanken, Internet Suchmaschinen, Online Enzyklopädien oder anderen Angeboten eine Rolle spielen.
  10. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.06 
    0.060137443 = product of:
  0.18041232 = sum of:
    0.06809708 = weight(_text_:web in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06809708 = score(doc=1339,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
    0.11231525 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11231525 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.4439496 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    Content
    Foreword - Marshall Breeding Introduction - Sally Chambers 1. Next generation catalogues: what do users think? - Anne Christensen 2. Making search work for the library user - Till Kinstler 3. Next-generation discovery: an overview of the European Scene - Marshall Breeding 4. The mobile library catalogue - Lukas Koster and Driek Heesakkers 5. FRBRizing your catalogue - Rosemie Callewaert 6. Enabling your catalogue for the semantic web - Emmanuelle Bermes 7. Supporting digital scholarship: bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories - Karen Calhoun 8. Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention - Lorcan Dempsey.
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
  11. Wätjen, H.-J.: Hypertextbasierte OPACs im World-wide Web (1996) 0.06 
    0.058377884 = product of:
  0.17513365 = sum of:
    0.113537535 = weight(_text_:wide in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.113537535 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
    0.061596118 = weight(_text_:web in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061596118 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  12. WLN announces World Wide Web access (1998) 0.06 
    0.05573545 = product of:
  0.16720635 = sum of:
    0.09461462 = weight(_text_:wide in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09461462 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
    0.07259172 = weight(_text_:web in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07259172 = score(doc=1769,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    WLN has announced that it will offer WebLN, a WWW interface to the WLN databases and WebLN PAC, which will provide customized Web OPACs for individual libraries and library consortia bibliographic databases. It will also offer Blackwell's Table of Contents records through its MARC Records Service
  13. Lahary, D.: ¬Le jeu de puzzle de l'acces aux catalogues : World Wide Web et/ou Z39.50 (1997) 0.06 
    0.055175275 = product of:
  0.16552582 = sum of:
    0.09366369 = weight(_text_:wide in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09366369 = score(doc=925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.4846142 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
    0.07186214 = weight(_text_:web in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07186214 = score(doc=925,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    To access a remote catalogue the searcher can use the Z39.50 standard as interface, which requires appropriate software; or for databases accessible on the WWW use a common gateway interface. The multibase access advantage of Z39.50 can also be obtained through a Web navigator by inserting a Web server/Z39.50 client software connector: this can be located either on the search site, in an intermediary position or on the database site, so determining the range of databases which can be searched. Z39.50 also offers interesting possibilities for joint and local cataloguing: multibase searching can equally be realised on intranets
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The puzzling game of catalogue access: World Wide Web and/or Z39.50
  14. Long, C.E.: Improving subject searching in Web-based OPACs : evaluation of the problem and guidelines for design (2000) 0.05 
    0.05141434 = product of:
  0.15424302 = sum of:
    0.06623024 = weight(_text_:wide in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06623024 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
    0.08801279 = weight(_text_:web in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08801279 = score(doc=6110,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Online catalog users search predominately by subject, yet it is the most difficult search to perform and retrieves records only about one-half of the time. A new generation of OPACs (online public access catalogs) is on the horizon, the Web-based OPAC. Web-based OPACs allow users to access online catalogs through a WWW (World Wide Web) interface and have the potential to improve patrons' ability to search by subject. But will this potential be realized? This article proposes some basic guidelines that can be incorporated into Web-based OPAC interface design to help users perform subject searches more effectively, and evaluates how well Web-based OPACs currently in operation address the subject searching problem
  15. Janka, D.: Online-Bibliothekskataloge in Gopher und World Wide Web (1995) 0.05 
    0.04864824 = product of:
  0.14594471 = sum of:
    0.09461462 = weight(_text_:wide in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09461462 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
    0.0513301 = weight(_text_:web in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0513301 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  16. Wimmer, W.: Mit dem 'Surfbrett' in die Bibliothek : der World-Wide-Web-Katalog der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1996) 0.05 
    0.04864824 = product of:
  0.14594471 = sum of:
    0.09461462 = weight(_text_:wide in 7103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09461462 = score(doc=7103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 7103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7103)
    0.0513301 = weight(_text_:web in 7103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0513301 = score(doc=7103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 7103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7103)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  17. Matsui, S.; Konno, H.: Evaluation of World Wide Web access to OPACs of public libraries in Japan : functional survey of 46 OPAC systems and end user survey of three of those systems (2000) 0.05 
    0.04864824 = product of:
  0.14594471 = sum of:
    0.09461462 = weight(_text_:wide in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09461462 = score(doc=1762,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
    0.0513301 = weight(_text_:web in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0513301 = score(doc=1762,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  18. Vandenburg, M.: Using Google maps as an interface for the library catalogue (2008) 0.04 
    0.04412888 = product of:
  0.13238664 = sum of:
    0.0513301 = weight(_text_:web in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0513301 = score(doc=2588,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
    0.08105654 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08105654 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.320393 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to describe a proof of concept web application designed to allow users to search for library materials with geographic subject headings using Google Maps as the primary interface for navigation. The purpose of the paper is to describe the development of an innovative tool that one library has created to provide users with a new way to access bibliographic records. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken is descriptive, with the development process for the proof of concept laid out in detail and placed it within the broader contexts of web application development at the host library and the emergence of Web 2.0 tools. Findings - The paper shows that unique and valuable new methods of accessing bibliographic data can be created through the use of application programming interfaces (APIs), one of the more powerful tools available to web application developers today. Research limitations/implications - Challenges of working with geographic information in subject headings of bibliographic records are discussed, and potential methods for dealing with these challenges are described. Originality/value - The paper shows that it is possible to use APIs provided by large internet entities such as Google to create map based navigational tools for accessing bibliographic information. It also shows the value of allowing library systems staff to explore new technologies.
  19. Arfield, J.: Developing a World-Wide Web OPAC (1995) 0.04 
    0.043198254 = product of:
  0.12959476 = sum of:
    0.09366369 = weight(_text_:wide in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09366369 = score(doc=4026,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.4846142 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
    0.03593107 = weight(_text_:web in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03593107 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The development of networked access to academic library catalogue records has been conspicuously slow compared with that of campus wide information systems in general. In cooperation with its systems suppliers BLCMO, the Pilkington Library, Loughborough, UK, is seeking to remedy this situation by developing an interface that allows users to access its OPAC via the W3. The benefits of such a facility are reflected in BLCMP's decision to incorporate a revised version in the forthcoming release of the commercial Talis system; but problems relating to the 'statelessness' of hypertext tranfer protocol (HTTP) and to the inadequacy of traditional catalogue records as access points for electronic information resources are still causes for consideration
  20. Hildreth, C.R.: Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors? : an experimental study (2000) 0.04 
    0.039966345 = product of:
  0.119899035 = sum of:
    0.04730731 = weight(_text_:wide in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04730731 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.07259172 = weight(_text_:web in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07259172 = score(doc=113,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web (simplified here to "Web") is well-known for its "point and click" graphical user interface (GUI) and hyperlink search and navigate capabilities. When OPACs are placed in this operational context, users can easily hyperlink from a bibliographic display to related search terms, class marks, or bibliographic records. This hyperlinking capability is not available in most conventional text-based OPACs. As more and more users undertake their searches on Web-based information retrieval systems such as OPACs, it is natural to ask, "Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors?" This paper presents the findings of an experimental study which compared users' search performance, assessments of ease of use, and satisfaction with search results after use of a Web OPAC or its conventional counterpart. The primary questions addressed by this research center on the influence of two experimental factors, OPAC search interface style and search task level of difficulty, on the dependent variables: actual search performance, perceptions of ease of use, and user assessments of satisfaction with search results. It was hypothesized that Web OPACs would be assessed as easier to use and that they would outperform conventional OPACs when measured by actual search results and users' levels of satisfaction with search results. Web OPAC searchers outperformed Text OPAC searchers, but search task level of difficulty is a major determinant of search success. The study also found little association between searchers' level of satisfaction with results and actual search performance

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 180
  • el 10
  • s 6
  • m 5
  • x 5
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications