Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

0.008193671 = product of:
  0.07920548 = sum of:
    0.03712347 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03712347 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100994095 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.36758062 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
    0.03712347 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03712347 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100994095 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.36758062 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
    0.0049585416 = product of:
      0.009917083 = sum of:
        0.009917083 = weight(_text_:1 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009917083 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10344828 = coord(3/29)

Date

1. 6.2013 19:59:02

Theme

Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme

0.0060043884 = product of:
  0.05804242 = sum of:
    0.026516767 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026516767 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100994095 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
    0.026516767 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026516767 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100994095 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
    0.0050088842 = product of:
      0.0100177685 = sum of:
        0.0100177685 = weight(_text_:1 in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100177685 = score(doc=5652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10344828 = coord(3/29)

Date

1. 8.2006 18:19:54

Footnote

Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4

Theme

Geschichte der Kataloge

0.0058526224 = product of:
  0.05657535 = sum of:
    0.026516767 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026516767 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100994095 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.026516767 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026516767 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100994095 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.0035418156 = product of:
      0.007083631 = sum of:
        0.007083631 = weight(_text_:1 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007083631 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10344828 = coord(3/29)

Date

1. 8.2006 18:19:17

Theme

Geschichte der Kataloge

0.0025427584 = product of:
  0.036869995 = sum of:
    0.00741788 = product of:
      0.02225364 = sum of:
        0.02225364 = weight(_text_:l in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02225364 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08445894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.029452115 = sum of:
      0.012021321 = weight(_text_:1 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012021321 = score(doc=5575,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02124939 = queryNorm
          0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
      0.017430795 = weight(_text_:29 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017430795 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02124939 = queryNorm
          0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
  0.06896552 = coord(2/29)

Abstract

The fundamental principle of order in the library catalogue is the authorship principle, which serves as the organizing node of an alphabetico-classed system, in which "texts" of "works" are organized first alphabetically by uniform title of the progenitor work and then are subarranged using titles for variant instantiations, under the heading for an "author." We analyze case studies of entries from (1) the first documented imperial library catalogue, the Seven Epitomes (Qilue [??]), in China; (2) Abelard's Works, which featured prominently in the 1848 testimony of Antonio Panizzi; and (3) The French Chef and the large family of instantiated works associated with it. Our analysis shows that the catalogue typically contains many large superwork sets. A more pragmatic approach to the design of catalogues is to array descriptions of resources in relation to the superwork sets to which they might belong. In all cases, a multidimensional faceted arrangement incorporating ideational nodes from the universe of recorded knowledge holds promise for greatly enhanced retrieval capability.

Date

10.12.2019 19:29:36

Source

Library trends. 61(2012) no.1, S.35-48

0.0016093875 = product of:
  0.023336118 = sum of:
    0.01483576 = product of:
      0.04450728 = sum of:
        0.04450728 = weight(_text_:l in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04450728 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08445894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008500358 = product of:
      0.017000716 = sum of:
        0.017000716 = weight(_text_:1 in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017000716 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06896552 = coord(2/29)

Pages

S.1-6

Source

Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee

0.0014835198 = product of:
  0.021511037 = sum of:
    0.009890507 = product of:
      0.02967152 = sum of:
        0.02967152 = weight(_text_:l in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02967152 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08445894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.01162053 = product of:
      0.02324106 = sum of:
        0.02324106 = weight(_text_:29 in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324106 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06896552 = coord(2/29)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

0.0014003487 = product of:
  0.013536704 = sum of:
    0.0049452535 = product of:
      0.01483576 = sum of:
        0.01483576 = weight(_text_:l in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01483576 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08445894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0028334525 = product of:
      0.005666905 = sum of:
        0.005666905 = weight(_text_:1 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005666905 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0057579977 = product of:
      0.0115159955 = sum of:
        0.0115159955 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115159955 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07441174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10344828 = coord(3/29)

Content

Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Treude, L.: Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation: über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung. In: LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx.

Source

Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.1, S.27-48

8.941777E-4 = product of:
  0.025931153 = sum of:
    0.025931153 = sum of:
      0.008500358 = weight(_text_:1 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008500358 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02124939 = queryNorm
          0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.017430795 = weight(_text_:29 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017430795 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02124939 = queryNorm
          0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Abstract

Metadata schemes target resources as information-packages, without attention to the distinction between content and carrier. Most schema are derived without empirical understanding of the concepts that need to be represented, the ways in which terms representing the central concepts might best be derived, and how metadata descriptions will be used for retrieval. Research is required to resolve this dilemma, and much research will be required if the plethora of schemes that already exist are to be made efficacious for resource description and retrieval. Here I report the results of a preliminary study, which was designed to see whether the bibliographic concept of "the work" could be of any relevance among artifacts held by a museum. I extend the "works metaphor" from the bibliographic to the artifactual domain, by altering the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. Case studies of Etruscan artifacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in non-documentary artifacts.

Date

29. 9.2008 19:14:41

8.418194E-4 = product of:
  0.012206381 = sum of:
    0.0050088842 = product of:
      0.0100177685 = sum of:
        0.0100177685 = weight(_text_:1 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100177685 = score(doc=636,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0071974974 = product of:
      0.014394995 = sum of:
        0.014394995 = weight(_text_:22 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014394995 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07441174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06896552 = coord(2/29)

Abstract

The 2012 biennial international research conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization was held August 6-9, in Mysore, India. It was the second international ISKO conference to be held in India (Canada and India are the only countries to have hosted two international ISKO conferences), and for many attendees travel to the exotic Indian subcontinent was a new experience. Interestingly, the mix of people attending was quite different from recent meetings held in Europe or North America. The conference was lively and, as usual, jam-packed with new research. Registration took place on a veranda in the garden of the B. N. Bahadur Institute of Management Sciences where the meetings were held at the University of Mysore. This graceful tree (Figure 1) kept us company and kept watch over our considerations (as indeed it does over the academic enterprise of the Institute). The conference theme was "Categories, Contexts and Relations in Knowledge Organization." The opening and closing sessions fittingly were devoted to serious introspection about the direction of the domain of knowledge organization. This editorial, in line with those following past international conferences, is an attempt to comment on the state of the domain by reflecting domain-analytically on the proceedings of the conference, primarily using bibliometric measures. In general, it seems the domain is secure in its intellectual moorings, as it continues to welcome a broad granular array of shifting research questionsin its intension. It seems that the continual concretizing of the theoretical core of knowledge organization (KO) seems to act as a catalyst for emergent ideas, which can be observed as part of the evolving intension of the domain.

Date

22. 2.2013 11:43:34

Source

Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.3-10

6.705781E-4 = product of:
  0.009723382 = sum of:
    0.006181567 = product of:
      0.0185447 = sum of:
        0.0185447 = weight(_text_:l in 6676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0185447 = score(doc=6676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08445894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 6676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6676)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0035418156 = product of:
      0.007083631 = sum of:
        0.007083631 = weight(_text_:1 in 6676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007083631 = score(doc=6676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 6676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06896552 = coord(2/29)

Abstract

Derivative bibliographic relationships are the primary relationships that exist among the members of a bibliographic family--the set of interrelated works where the relationships among entities express shared semantic or linguistic activity. Derivative bibliographic relationships exist between any new conception of a work and its original source (the progenitor), or its successor, or both. Discipline was a poor predictor of derivative relationships in prior studies of derivative bibliographic relationships. For the present study random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Two sites were chosen to allow a test of the differences in collection development patterns between a university research library and a theological library. Bibliographic families were compiled for each work. Results indicate: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships exist for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works in this study; 2) there is little difference in proportions of derivative bibliographic relationships or in the size of bibliographic families between the two collections; 3) there is a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the size of the bibliographic family); 4) there are significant gaps in coverage of theological bibliographic families online; 5) there is some evidence of differing patterns of derivation between Judaic and Islamic literature and Christian literature; 5) forms and genres are useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature

Source

Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods

6.010619E-4 = product of:
  0.017430795 = sum of:
    0.017430795 = product of:
      0.03486159 = sum of:
        0.03486159 = weight(_text_:29 in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03486159 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.107-109 (G. Campbell)

5.9611845E-4 = product of:
  0.017287435 = sum of:
    0.017287435 = sum of:
      0.005666905 = weight(_text_:1 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005666905 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02124939 = queryNorm
          0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
      0.01162053 = weight(_text_:29 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01162053 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02124939 = queryNorm
          0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Abstract

The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.

Date

29. 8.2004 19:05:56

5.1157793E-4 = product of:
  0.01483576 = sum of:
    0.01483576 = product of:
      0.04450728 = sum of:
        0.04450728 = weight(_text_:l in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04450728 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08445894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee

4.209097E-4 = product of:
  0.0061031906 = sum of:
    0.0025044421 = product of:
      0.0050088842 = sum of:
        0.0050088842 = weight(_text_:1 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050088842 = score(doc=1919,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.09595714 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0035987487 = product of:
      0.0071974974 = sum of:
        0.0071974974 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071974974 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07441174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06896552 = coord(2/29)

Content

"1. What is? Many of us equate the principle activity of knowledge organization with that of ontology, which at its essence is the revelation of the structure of a domain. Among the essential choices that must be made in the construction of ontology are those involving "IsA" relationships. "What is a" is the primary question that defines what belongs inside a set and what, therefore, does not. Employing Dahlberg's concept-theoretic is one approach to defining the elements that belong in a set, although there are many other approaches as well. Whatever method is used, once a set is constituted its members will be considered to be like each other in some way, in other words, they are thought to be the same in some manner, or to some degree. Which leads naturally to the question of how alike must two entities be to be declared the same? Or its correlate, how dissimilar must they be to be declared different? Pondering this question led me to think about musical works that are of the genre "variations on a theme by X." In such works a composer uses a musical mnemonic-a melody usually-to draw listeners into the aural experience, and then, subsequent iterations all contain this original mnemonic but surround it or manipulate it in various ways. The result is always iterative but never boring because each iteration is subtly (or not so subtly) different from the last. And the technique allows the character of the original to be explored fully as well as for it to be reinterpreted by the current composer. In the end it is not so unlike, although a lot more interesting than, multiple citations by an author of another's works- say, like the way each time I cite Patrick Wilson it comes out a little differently. Same but different. Sameness and difference turn out to be essential philosophical positions. Many of the philosophical points of view brought to bear on knowledge organization suggest one or more points of view about this essential question. Semiotics (for example) suggests that signs are always being interpreted anew, phenomenology suggests entities might appear differently as a matter of their individual perception. All points of view are useful because they all shed light on formerly dark corners of the essential questions in knowledge organization.

Date

12. 6.2008 20:18:22

Source

Knowledge organization. 35(2008) no.1, S.3-4

4.0070794E-4 = product of:
  0.01162053 = sum of:
    0.01162053 = product of:
      0.02324106 = sum of:
        0.02324106 = weight(_text_:29 in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324106 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

4.0070794E-4 = product of:
  0.01162053 = sum of:
    0.01162053 = product of:
      0.02324106 = sum of:
        0.02324106 = weight(_text_:29 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324106 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

4.0070794E-4 = product of:
  0.01162053 = sum of:
    0.01162053 = product of:
      0.02324106 = sum of:
        0.02324106 = weight(_text_:29 in 4957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324106 = score(doc=4957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4957)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

3.0053096E-4 = product of:
  0.008715398 = sum of:
    0.008715398 = product of:
      0.017430795 = sum of:
        0.017430795 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017430795 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Date

29. 8.2004 14:09:53

3.0053096E-4 = product of:
  0.008715398 = sum of:
    0.008715398 = product of:
      0.017430795 = sum of:
        0.017430795 = weight(_text_:29 in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017430795 = score(doc=1575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al

2.9782744E-4 = product of:
  0.008636996 = sum of:
    0.008636996 = product of:
      0.017273992 = sum of:
        0.017273992 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017273992 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07441174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik