Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 5
rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeinen%22 5
rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 5
rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahmen%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 5
rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierungs %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 5

Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.00

0.003997606 = product of:
  0.030648313 = sum of:
    0.0062852125 = product of:
      0.012570425 = sum of:
        0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012570425 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011590611 = product of:
      0.023181222 = sum of:
        0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023181222 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012772488 = product of:
      0.025544977 = sum of:
        0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025544977 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)

Abstract: This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
Source: Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.10-15

Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999) 0.00

0.0031164065 = product of:
  0.035838675 = sum of:
    0.015555107 = product of:
      0.031110214 = sum of:
        0.031110214 = weight(_text_:1 in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031110214 = score(doc=4182,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.53735995 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.020283569 = product of:
      0.040567137 = sum of:
        0.040567137 = weight(_text_:international in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040567137 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5159926 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Date: 1. 7.1996 21:26:02
Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.7-10

Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.00
```
0.0019540063 = product of:
  0.02247107 = sum of:
    0.014488265 = product of:
      0.02897653 = sum of:
        0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02897653 = score(doc=187,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.007982805 = product of:
      0.01596561 = sum of:
        0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01596561 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
```
Abstract

The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.

Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The origins of the IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records (2004) 0.00

0.0015964593 = product of:
  0.018359281 = sum of:
    0.009666322 = product of:
      0.019332644 = sum of:
        0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019332644 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008692958 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385917 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract: The IFLA FRBR Study has had a profound impact on international bibliographic control practices since its formal acceptance by IFLA in 1997. The article provides a brief history of the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) Study that was undertaken by a study group appointed by the IFLA Standing Committee of the Section on Cataloguing and the IFLA Division of Bibliographic Control. This history describes the relationship between the FRBR study and a pivotal seminar on bibliographic control held in August 1990 in Stockholm. The article then explores the study group membership, including its commentators and consultants; the project charge; the study process; and several key issues leading up to the publication of its final report.
Date: 5. 8.2006 19:09:29

Byrum, J.D.; Madison, O.M.A.: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records (2000) 0.00

9.905973E-4 = product of:
  0.022783738 = sum of:
    0.022783738 = product of:
      0.045567475 = sum of:
        0.045567475 = weight(_text_:29 in 3949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045567475 = score(doc=3949,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 3949, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)

Date: 29. 8.2005 11:30:41
29. 8.2005 13:19:39

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Types