Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Moed, H.F."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Noyons, E.C.M.; Moed, H.F.; Luwel, M.: Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes : a bibliometric study (1999) 0.00 
    6.546369E-4 = product of:
  0.015056648 = sum of:
    0.015056648 = product of:
      0.030113297 = sum of:
        0.030113297 = weight(_text_:international in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030113297 = score(doc=2941,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.38302523 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Abstract
    The general aim of the article is to demonstrate how the results both of a structural analysis, and of a research performance assessment of a research field, can be enriched by combining elements of both into one integrated analysis. In addition, a procedure is discussed to select and analyse candidate benchmark institutes to assess the position of a particular resrach institute, in terms of both its cognitive orientation and its scientific production and impact at the international research front. The combined method is applied in an evaluation of the research scope and performance of the Interuniversity Centre for Micro-Electronics (IMEC) in Leuven, Belgium. On the basis of the comments of an international panel of experts in micro-electronics, the method was discussed in detail. We concluded that the method provides a detailed and useful picture of the position of the institute from an international perspective. Moreover, we found that the results of each of the 2 parts are an added value to the other
  2. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.00 
    3.470785E-4 = product of:
  0.007982805 = sum of:
    0.007982805 = product of:
      0.01596561 = sum of:
        0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01596561 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  3. Korevaar, J.C.; Moed, H.F.: Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics (1996) 0.00 
    2.7327013E-4 = product of:
  0.0062852125 = sum of:
    0.0062852125 = product of:
      0.012570425 = sum of:
        0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 6692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012570425 = score(doc=6692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 6692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 37(1996) no.1, S.117-130

Authors

Years