Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.0014474503 = product of:
      0.033291355 = sum of:
        0.033291355 = weight(_text_:im in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033291355 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.49970993 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Svenonius, E.: ¬An ideal classification for an on-line catalog (1989) 0.00
    0.0010855875 = product of:
      0.024968514 = sum of:
        0.024968514 = weight(_text_:im in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024968514 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988) 0.00
    0.0010235019 = product of:
      0.023540542 = sum of:
        0.023540542 = weight(_text_:im in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023540542 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.35334828 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986) 0.00
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
      0.0047139092 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.