Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Vaughan, L."
  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Search engine coverage bias : evidence and possible causes (2004) 0.00
    0.0015964593 = product of:
      0.018359281 = sum of:
        0.009666322 = product of:
          0.019332644 = sum of:
            0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019332644 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Commercial search engines are now playing an increasingly important role in Web information dissemination and access. Of particular interest to business and national governments is whether the big engines have coverage biased towards the US or other countries. In our study we tested for national biases in three major search engines and found significant differences in their coverage of commercial Web sites. The US sites were much better covered than the others in the study: sites from China, Taiwan and Singapore. We then examined the possible technical causes of the differences and found that the language of a site does not affect its coverage by search engines. However, the visibility of a site, measured by the number of links to it, affects its chance to be covered by search engines. We conclude that the coverage bias does exist but this is due not to deliberate choices of the search engines but occurs as a natural result of cumulative advantage effects of US sites on the Web. Nevertheless, the bias remains a cause for international concern.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:30:29
  2. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003) 0.00
    0.0010420457 = product of:
      0.02396705 = sum of:
        0.02396705 = sum of:
          0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007856515 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016110536 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
  3. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004) 0.00
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
      0.0047139092 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 56(2004) no.1, S.24-33