Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wiegerling, K."
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Capurro, R.; Wiegerling, K.; Brellochs, A.: Informationsethik (1995) 0.01 
    0.007389073 = product of:
  0.08497433 = sum of:
    0.07397521 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07397521 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.696786 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
    0.010999122 = product of:
      0.021998243 = sum of:
        0.021998243 = weight(_text_:1 in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021998243 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Date
    1. 1.1999 19:03:21
    Series
    Konstanzer Schriften für Informationswissenschaft; 18
  2. Wiegerling, K.: Was ist Medienethik? (1999) 0.01 
    0.0064837513 = product of:
  0.04970876 = sum of:
    0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012791129 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
    0.020807097 = weight(_text_:im in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020807097 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
    0.016110536 = product of:
      0.03222107 = sum of:
        0.03222107 = weight(_text_:29 in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03222107 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    Abstract
    Allerorten wird von und über Medienethik gesprochen. wie immer, wenn fehlende Moral bzw. Verantwortung konstatiert wird, artikuliert sich ein Unbehagen, das teils einigermaßen präzise bestimmt werden kann, teils im Diffusen bleibt
    Date
    29. 1.1997 18:49:05

Authors

Types