Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhao, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Zhao, R.; Wu, S.: ¬The network pattern of journal knowledge transfer in library and information science in China (2014) 0.01 
    0.0102093 = product of:
  0.0782713 = sum of:
    0.015522547 = product of:
      0.031045094 = sum of:
        0.031045094 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031045094 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031703662 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
    0.031045094 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031045094 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Bibliothekswesen
  2. Zhao, R.; Wei, X.: Collaboration of Chinese scholars in international articles : a case study of knowledge organization (2017) 0.00 
    0.0021090123 = product of:
  0.02425364 = sum of:
    0.008055268 = product of:
      0.016110536 = sum of:
        0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016110536 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016198372 = product of:
      0.032396745 = sum of:
        0.032396745 = weight(_text_:international in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032396745 = score(doc=3846,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.4120695 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    With the development of Chinese education, more and more Chinese scholars pay attention to inter-departmental, inter-regional and even international collaboration, and publish more high quality articles. Exploring the collaborative situation of Chinese scholars in international articles will help Chinese scholars to understand the international collaborative situation. This paper selected international articles published by Chinese scholars in knowledge organization from WOST as research object, then from three aspects, seven angles, analyzed the collaborative situation of Chinese scholars. And it finds that both the accumulative number of articles and the accumulative number of co-published articles show exponential growth trend, and the collaborative rate of Chinese scholars rises from 50% in 1992 to 92.53% in 2016. Besides, the collaborative size is 2-5 authors. More importantly, higher collaborative size appears with time. Those further indicate the importance of scientific collaboration. Chinese scholars co-publish articles with more and more nations or regions, however 20% top nations or regions have more than 78% co-published research articles with Chinese scholars. It not only reflects that the capacity of Chinese scholars' academic collaboration and academic exchange is growing over the years, but also reflects that the collaborative nations or regions with Chinese scholar are concentrated.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:46:34
  3. Zhao, R.; Wei, M.; Quan, W.: Evolution of think tanks studies in view of a scientometrics perspective (2017) 0.00 
    4.2027488E-4 = product of:
  0.009666322 = sum of:
    0.009666322 = product of:
      0.019332644 = sum of:
        0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 3843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019332644 = score(doc=3843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:46:06

Authors