-
Lewandowski, D.: Nachweis deutschsprachiger bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlicher Aufsätze in Google Scholar (2007)
0.02
0.022665527 = product of:
0.13032678 = sum of:
0.023689501 = weight(_text_:und in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023689501 = score(doc=284,freq=14.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.018109638 = product of:
0.036219276 = sum of:
0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036219276 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.052308373 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052308373 = score(doc=284,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036219276 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
- Abstract
- In dieser Untersuchung werden die Aufsätze der Jahre 2004 bis 2006 aus den acht wichtigsten deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften des Bibliotheks- und Informationswesens auf ihre Verfügbarkeit in Google Scholar hin untersucht. Dabei zeigt sich, dass Google Scholar keinen vollständigen Nachweis der Artikel bieten kann und sich daher nicht als Ersatz für bibliographische Datenbanken eignet. Google Scholar macht einen Teil der Volltexte direkt verfügbar und eignet sich insofern für einen schnellen und problemlosen Zugang zum Volltext, der traditionelle Wege wie die Bibliothek bzw. die Fernleihe umgeht. Für das Fach Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft bietet Google Scholar insgesamt die Chance, seine Inhalte auch über die Fachgrenzen hinaus bekannt zu machen.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.3, S.165-168
-
Lewandowski, D.; Haustein, S.: What does the German-language information science community cite? (2015)
0.01
0.0077577843 = product of:
0.08921452 = sum of:
0.074726254 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074726254 = score(doc=2987,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.70386016 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
0.014488265 = product of:
0.02897653 = sum of:
0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02897653 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
- Series
- Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.66
- Source
- Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
-
Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.; Kerkmann, F.: Are ads on Google search engine results pages labeled clearly enough? : the influence of knowledge on search ads on users' selection behaviour (2017)
0.00
0.0029272914 = product of:
0.03366385 = sum of:
0.026419718 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026419718 = score(doc=3567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=3567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Series
- Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd. 70
- Source
- Everything changes, everything stays the same? - Understanding information spaces : Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017), Berlin/Germany, 13th - 15th March 2017. Eds.: M. Gäde, V. Trkulja u. V. Petras
-
Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011)
0.00
0.0010357446 = product of:
0.0119110625 = sum of:
0.0039282576 = product of:
0.007856515 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007982805 = product of:
0.01596561 = sum of:
0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01596561 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Date
- 30. 9.2012 19:27:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.117-132
-
Lewandowski, D.: Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle, Stärkung "alternativer Suchmaschinen" : Suchmaschinen und Politik (2005)
0.00
5.561361E-4 = product of:
0.012791129 = sum of:
0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012791129 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
-
Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019)
0.00
3.470785E-4 = product of:
0.007982805 = sum of:
0.007982805 = product of:
0.01596561 = sum of:
0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01596561 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016)
0.00
3.149623E-4 = product of:
0.0072441325 = sum of:
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Footnote
- To appear in Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. 7th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2016, \'Evora, Portugal, September 5-8, 2016.
-
Lewandowski, D.; Mayr, P.: Exploring the academic invisible Web (2006)
0.00
1.707938E-4 = product of:
0.0039282576 = sum of:
0.0039282576 = product of:
0.007856515 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=3752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Content
- Bezug zu: Bergman, M.K.: The Deep Web: surfacing hidden value. In: Journal of Electronic Publishing. 7(2001) no.1, S.xxx-xxx. [Vgl. unter: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/bergman.html].
-
Behnert, C.; Lewandowski, D.: ¬A framework for designing retrieval effectiveness studies of library information systems using human relevance assessments (2017)
0.00
1.707938E-4 = product of:
0.0039282576 = sum of:
0.0039282576 = product of:
0.007856515 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=3700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3700)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper demonstrates how to apply traditional information retrieval evaluation methods based on standards from the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) and web search evaluation to all types of modern library information systems including online public access catalogs, discovery systems, and digital libraries that provide web search features to gather information from heterogeneous sources. Design/methodology/approach We apply conventional procedures from information retrieval evaluation to the library information system context considering the specific characteristics of modern library materials. Findings We introduce a framework consisting of five parts: (1) search queries, (2) search results, (3) assessors, (4) testing, and (5) data analysis. We show how to deal with comparability problems resulting from diverse document types, e.g., electronic articles vs. printed monographs and what issues need to be considered for retrieval tests in the library context. Practical implications The framework can be used as a guideline for conducting retrieval effectiveness studies in the library context. Originality/value Although a considerable amount of research has been done on information retrieval evaluation, and standards for conducting retrieval effectiveness studies do exist, to our knowledge this is the first attempt to provide a systematic framework for evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of twenty-first-century library information systems. We demonstrate which issues must be considered and what decisions must be made by researchers prior to a retrieval test.
