Search (24 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Case Based Reasoning"
  1. Kolodner, J.: Case-based reasoning (1993) 0.00
    3.864623E-4 = product of:
      0.008888633 = sum of:
        0.008888633 = product of:
          0.017777266 = sum of:
            0.017777266 = weight(_text_:1 in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017777266 = score(doc=526,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Content
    Pt.1: Background: waht is CBR? Case studies of several case-based reasoners. Reasoning using cases. The cognitive model. Pt.2: The case library: representing and indexing cases. Indexing vocabulary. Methods for index selection. Pt.3: Retrieving cases from the case library. Organizational structures and retrieval algorithms. Matching and ranking cases. Indexing and retrieval. Pt.4: Using cases. Adaptation methods and strategies. Controlling adaptation. Using cases for interpretation and evaluation. Pt.5: Pulling it all together. Building a case-based reasoner. Conclusions, opportunities, challenges. Appendix: A case library of case-based reasoning systems
    Isbn
    1-55860-237-2
  2. Aamodt, A.; Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning : foundation issues, methodological variations, and systems approaches (1994) 0.00
    3.415876E-4 = product of:
      0.007856515 = sum of:
        0.007856515 = product of:
          0.01571303 = sum of:
            0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 4570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01571303 = score(doc=4570,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 4570, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4570)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    AI communications. 7(1994) no.1, S.39-59
  3. He, W.; Tian, X.: ¬A longitudinal study of user queries and browsing requests in a case-based reasoning retrieval system (2017) 0.00
    2.4153895E-4 = product of:
      0.0055553955 = sum of:
        0.0055553955 = product of:
          0.011110791 = sum of:
            0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011110791 = score(doc=3600,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on a longitudinal analysis of query logs of a web-based case library system during an 8-year period (from 2005 to 2012). The analysis studies 3 different information-seeking approaches: keyword searching, browsing, and case-based reasoning (CBR) searching provided by the system by examining the query logs that stretch over 8 years. The longitudinal dimension of this study offers unique possibilities to see how users used the 3 different approaches over time. Various user information-seeking patterns and trends are identified through the query usage pattern analysis and session analysis. The study identified different user groups and found that a majority of the users tend to stick to their favorite information-seeking approach to meet their immediate information needs and do not seem to care whether alternative search options will offer greater benefits. The study also found that return users used CBR searching much more frequently than 1-time users and tend to use more query terms to look for information than 1-time users.
  4. He, W.; Erdelez, S.; Wang, F.-K.; Shyu, C.-R.: ¬The effects of conceptual description and search practice on users' mental models and information seeking in a case-based reasoning retrieval system (2008) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.294-309