-
Leyh, G.: ¬Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung : T.1 (1912)
0.05
0.047252413 = product of:
0.21736111 = sum of:
0.015349354 = weight(_text_:und in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015349354 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.031045094 = product of:
0.06209019 = sum of:
0.06209019 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06209019 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06209019 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06209019 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.051355537 = product of:
0.102711074 = sum of:
0.102711074 = weight(_text_:kataloge in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102711074 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1351219 = queryWeight, product of:
5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.7601364 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.057520926 = sum of:
0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018855637 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.038665287 = weight(_text_:29 in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038665287 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.2173913 = coord(5/23)
- Footnote
- Ein Beitrag, der große Auswirkungen auf die Buchaufstellung und die Gestaltung systematischer Kataloge in deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken hatte; Fortsetzung T.2
- Source
- Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 29(1912), S.241-259
-
Leyh, G.: ¬Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung : T.2 (1913)
0.02
0.015607428 = product of:
0.11965695 = sum of:
0.036219276 = product of:
0.07243855 = sum of:
0.07243855 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07243855 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.07243855 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07243855 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.010999122 = product of:
0.021998243 = sum of:
0.021998243 = weight(_text_:1 in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021998243 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Footnote
- Fortsetzung von Teil 1
- Source
- Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 30(1913), S.97-136
-
Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017)
0.00
0.003374467 = product of:
0.038806368 = sum of:
0.012935456 = product of:
0.025870912 = sum of:
0.025870912 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025870912 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.025870912 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025870912 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Abstract
- This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
-
Leyh, G.: Aufstellung und Signaturen (1961)
0.00
7.7859045E-4 = product of:
0.01790758 = sum of:
0.01790758 = weight(_text_:und in 2055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01790758 = score(doc=2055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2055)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
