-
Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003)
0.00
0.0035963957 = product of:
0.04135855 = sum of:
0.03266559 = sum of:
0.013332949 = weight(_text_:1 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013332949 = score(doc=5516,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019332644 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.008692958 = product of:
0.017385917 = sum of:
0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017385917 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Abstract
- This paper addresses the process of adapting to a particular culture or context a classification that has grown out of western culture to become a global standard. The authors use a project that adapts DDC for use in a feminist/women's issues context to demonstrate an approach that works. The project is particularly useful as an interdisciplinary example. Discussion consists of four parts: (1) definition of the problem indicating the need for adaptation and efforts to date; (2) description of the methodology developed for creating an expansion; (3) description of the interface developed for actually doing the work, with its potential for a distributed group to work on it together (could even be internationally distributed); and (4) generalization of how the methodology could be used for particular contexts by country, ethnicity, perspective or other defining factors.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
- Date
- 30. 7.2006 16:38:29
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2003) nos.1/2, S.13-31
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.00
0.0034979049 = product of:
0.026817271 = sum of:
0.005499561 = product of:
0.010999122 = sum of:
0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010999122 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010141784 = product of:
0.020283569 = sum of:
0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020283569 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011175927 = product of:
0.022351854 = sum of:
0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022351854 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Abstract
- Discusses the reasons for the decision, taken at Florida International University Library to develop an in house classification system for their local documents collections. Reviews the structures of existing classification systems, noting their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the development of an in house system and describes the 5 components of the new system; geography, subject categories, extensions for population group and/or function, extensions for type of publication, and title/series designator
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
- Source
- Journal of educational media and library sciences. 34(1996) no.1, S.19-34
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.00
0.0034927216 = product of:
0.026777532 = sum of:
0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012484257 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.0047139092 = product of:
0.0094278185 = sum of:
0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0094278185 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009579366 = product of:
0.019158732 = sum of:
0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019158732 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Weinberger, O.: Begriffsstruktur und Klassifikation (1980)
0.00
0.0033264756 = product of:
0.03825447 = sum of:
0.023689501 = weight(_text_:und in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023689501 = score(doc=1440,freq=14.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.014564968 = weight(_text_:im in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014564968 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Abstract
- Klassifikation kann sich auf verschiedene Gegenstandsbereiche beziehen. Sie ist im Prinzip eine extensionale Vorgangsweise resp. ein extensionales Gebilde auch dann, wenn ihr Gegenstand begriffliche Gebilde bzw. Wissen (Wissensbestandteile) sind. Die Erstellung dieses extensionalen Gebildes, das wir 'Klassat' nennen, beruht auf begrifflichen Analysen. Die Probleme der Begriffstrukturen, der Definitionen und der verschiedenen Eigentümlichkeiten gewisser Begriffe der pragmatischen Sprachen stellen daher Grundlagenprobleme der Klassifikationstheorie dar. Hieraus ergibt sich die Aufgabenstellung: Skizzzierung der logischen Grundstruktur der Klassifikation, Hinweis auf die Relevanz methodologischer Momente der Problemsituation für das Klassieren und auf gewisse strukturelle und semantische Eigentümlichkeiten der Begriffsapparatur der modernen Wissenschaften und der Umgangssprache, die Probleme der Klassifizierungsaufgaben mit such bringen und die bewirken, daß die Klassifikationen oft als praktische Annäherungen anzusehen sind
- Source
- Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
-
Henrichs, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation? (1979)
0.00
0.0031316245 = product of:
0.03601368 = sum of:
0.026585862 = weight(_text_:und in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026585862 = score(doc=1423,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
0.0094278185 = product of:
0.018855637 = sum of:
0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018855637 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.00
0.0030368094 = product of:
0.023282206 = sum of:
0.008055268 = product of:
0.016110536 = sum of:
0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016110536 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007982805 = product of:
0.01596561 = sum of:
0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01596561 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.00
0.0029982042 = product of:
0.022986233 = sum of:
0.0047139092 = product of:
0.0094278185 = sum of:
0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0094278185 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008692958 = product of:
0.017385917 = sum of:
0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017385917 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009579366 = product of:
0.019158732 = sum of:
0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019158732 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
- Date
- 1. 6.2010 17:46:26
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.00
0.0029887476 = product of:
0.034370597 = sum of:
0.010403548 = weight(_text_:im in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010403548 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.02396705 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016110536 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Date
- 29. 6.2014 17:31:49
- Source
- New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 7(2001) no.1, S.67-102
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification as a discipline (1957)
0.00
0.002720234 = product of:
0.03128269 = sum of:
0.010999122 = product of:
0.021998243 = sum of:
0.021998243 = weight(_text_:1 in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021998243 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020283569 = product of:
0.040567137 = sum of:
0.040567137 = weight(_text_:international in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040567137 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.5159926 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Pages
- S.1-12
- Source
- Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House,Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.00
0.002714016 = product of:
0.031211182 = sum of:
0.02396705 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016110536 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Content
- 1. Introduction The representation of place in classification schemes presents a number of problems. This paper examines some of them and presents different ways in which a solution may be sought. Firstly, what is meant by place? The simple answer is a geographical area, large or small. The reality is not so simple. Place, or Topos to Aristotle was more than just an area, it was a state of mind. But even staying an the less philosophical plane, the way in which a place can be expressed is infinitely variable. Toponymy is a well defined field of study, comparable with taxonomy in the biological sciences. It comprehends the proper name by which any geographical entity is known, and part of the world, feature of earth's surface, organic aggregate (reef, forest) an organizational unit (country, borough, diocese), limits of Earth (poles, hemispheres) parts of Earth (oceans, continents), lakes, mountain passes, capital cities or sea parts.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:17:11
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.00
0.002714016 = product of:
0.031211182 = sum of:
0.02396705 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016110536 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Abstract
- Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:58:02
-
¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval : Memorandum of the Classification Research Group (1997)
0.00
0.0025622987 = product of:
0.029466435 = sum of:
0.0062852125 = product of:
0.012570425 = sum of:
0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012570425 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.023181222 = product of:
0.046362445 = sum of:
0.046362445 = weight(_text_:international in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046362445 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.5897058 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck aus: Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, Dorking. London: Aslib 1957.
- Imprint
- The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
- Pages
- S.1-9
- Source
- From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
-
Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016)
0.00
0.0025460895 = product of:
0.02928003 = sum of:
0.012888429 = product of:
0.025776858 = sum of:
0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025776858 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0163916 = product of:
0.0327832 = sum of:
0.0327832 = weight(_text_:international in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0327832 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.416985 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.00
0.0024985038 = product of:
0.019155195 = sum of:
0.0039282576 = product of:
0.007856515 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007982805 = product of:
0.01596561 = sum of:
0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01596561 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Date
- 1. 6.2010 17:47:00
- Pages
- S.19-22
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997)
0.00
0.0024924881 = product of:
0.028663613 = sum of:
0.020807097 = weight(_text_:im in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020807097 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.007856515 = product of:
0.01571303 = sum of:
0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01571303 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.10-16
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004)
0.00
0.0021712128 = product of:
0.024968946 = sum of:
0.01917364 = sum of:
0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062852125 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.012888429 = weight(_text_:29 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012888429 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.0057953056 = product of:
0.011590611 = sum of:
0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011590611 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Content
- 1. Introduction The title of this paper is taken from a TV show which has gained considerable popularity in North America: A Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, in which a group of gay men subject a helpless straight male to a complete fashion makeover. In facet analysis, this would probably be seen as an "operation upon" something, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification would place it roughly two-thirds of the way along its facet order, after "types" and "materials," but before "space" and "time." But the link between gay communities and facet analysis extends beyond the facetious title. As Web-based information resources for gay and lesbian users continue to grow, Web sites that cater to, or at least refrain from discriminating against gay and lesbian users are faced with a daunting challenge when trying to organize these diverse resources in a way that facilitates congenial browsing. And principles of faceted classification, with their emphasis an clear and consistent principles of subdivision and their care in defining the order of subdivisions, offer an important opportunity to use time-honoured classification principles to serve the growing needs of these communities. If faceted organization schemes are to work, however, we need to know more about gay and lesbian users, and how they categorize themselves and their information sources. This paper presents the results of an effort to learn more.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:25:18
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990)
0.00
0.0021545368 = product of:
0.024777172 = sum of:
0.015349354 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015349354 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.0094278185 = product of:
0.018855637 = sum of:
0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018855637 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Poli, R.: Framing information (2003)
0.00
0.002128612 = product of:
0.024479039 = sum of:
0.012888429 = product of:
0.025776858 = sum of:
0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025776858 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011590611 = product of:
0.023181222 = sum of:
0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023181222 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 15:29:04
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.00
0.001998803 = product of:
0.015324157 = sum of:
0.0031426062 = product of:
0.0062852125 = sum of:
0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062852125 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0057953056 = product of:
0.011590611 = sum of:
0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011590611 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006386244 = product of:
0.012772488 = sum of:
0.012772488 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012772488 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Abstract
- The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Buchanan, B.: Theory of library classification (1979)
0.00
0.0019578342 = product of:
0.045030188 = sum of:
0.045030188 = weight(_text_:buch in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045030188 = score(doc=641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109575786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Footnote
- Das ultimative Buch zum Verständnis der Facettenklassifikation - Liegt auch in deutscher Übersetzung vor.
