Search (97 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Lepsky, K.; Siepmann, J.; Zimmermann, A.: Automatische Indexierung für Online-Kataloge : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests (1996) 0.02
    0.02196036 = product of:
      0.10101766 = sum of:
        0.00895379 = weight(_text_:und in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00895379 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
        0.018109638 = product of:
          0.036219276 = sum of:
            0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036219276 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036219276 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
        0.029957397 = product of:
          0.059914794 = sum of:
            0.059914794 = weight(_text_:kataloge in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059914794 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1351219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.4434129 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0077775535 = product of:
          0.015555107 = sum of:
            0.015555107 = weight(_text_:1 in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015555107 = score(doc=3251,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2173913 = coord(5/23)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the effectiveness of automated indexing and presents the results of a study of information retrieval from a segment (40.000 items) of the ULB Düsseldorf database. The segment was selected randomly and all the documents included were indexed automatically. The search topics included 50 subject areas ranging from economic growth to alternative energy sources. While there were 876 relevant documents in the database segment for each of the 50 search topics, the recall ranged from 1 to 244 references, with the average being 17.52 documents per topic. Therefore it seems that, in the immediate future, automatic indexing should be used in combination with intellectual indexing
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 43(1996) H.1, S.47-56
  2. Sachse, E.; Liebig, M.; Gödert, W.: Automatische Indexierung unter Einbeziehung semantischer Relationen : Ergebnisse des Retrievaltests zum MILOS II-Projekt (1998) 0.01
    0.009846933 = product of:
      0.07549316 = sum of:
        0.01790758 = weight(_text_:und in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01790758 = score(doc=3577,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.036987606 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036987606 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.020597974 = weight(_text_:im in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020597974 = score(doc=3577,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.30917975 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen von MILOS II wurde das erste MILOS-Projekt zur automatischen Indexierung von Titeldaten um eine semantischer Komponente erweitert, indem Thesaurusrelationen der Schlagwortnormdatei eingebunden wurden. Der abschließend zur Evaluierung durchgeführte Retrievaltest und seine Ergebnisse stehen im Mittelpunkt dieses Texts. Zusätzlich wird ein Überblick über bereits durchgeführte Retrievaltests (vorwiegend des anglo-amerikanischen Raums) gegeben und es wird erläutert, welche grundlegenden Fragestellungen bei der praktischen Durchführung eines Retrievaltests zu beachten sind
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.14
  3. Krause, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: PADOK-II : Retrievaltests zur Bewertung von Volltextindexierungsvarianten für das deutsche Patentinformationssystem (1990) 0.01
    0.0086453045 = product of:
      0.06628067 = sum of:
        0.017723909 = weight(_text_:und in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017723909 = score(doc=2653,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
        0.04227155 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04227155 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    Vorgestellt werden die Ergebnisse extensiver Retrievaltests von zwei Varianten von Inhalteserschließungen (Freitext und PASSAT) für das deutsche Patentinformationssystem auf der Basis von Volltexten. Die Tests führte die Fachgruppe Linguistische Informationswissenschaft der Universität Regensburg von 1986-1989 in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Deutschen Patentamt, dem Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe und meheren industrieellen Partnern durch. Der Schwerpunkt des Berichts liegt auf dem allgemeinen Ansatz der Bewertung der Ziele des Projekts und auf der Darstellung der statistischen Evaluierungsergebnisse.
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 41(1990) H.1, S.13-19
  4. Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997) 0.01
    0.007803714 = product of:
      0.059828475 = sum of:
        0.018109638 = product of:
          0.036219276 = sum of:
            0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036219276 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036219276 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
        0.005499561 = product of:
          0.010999122 = sum of:
            0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010999122 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 31(1997) H.1, S.59-68
  5. Knorz, G.: Testverfahren für intelligente Indexierungs- und Retrievalsysteme anhand deutsch-sprachiger sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformation (GIRT) : Bericht über einen Workshop am 12. September 1997 im IZ Sozialwissenschaften, Bonn (1998) 0.01
    0.0056604384 = product of:
      0.043396696 = sum of:
        0.020465806 = weight(_text_:und in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020465806 = score(doc=5080,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
        0.016645677 = weight(_text_:im in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016645677 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Content
    A. Die Initiative "GIRT" 1. Vorträge 2. Ziele und Perspektiven des Projektes GIRT (Krause) 3. Generelle Ergebnisse der TREC-Studien, einschließlich TREC-5 (Womser-Hacker) 4. Ergebnisse des GIRT-Pretests (Kluck) 5. Multilingualität in TREC (Schäuble) B. Abschlußdiskussion und Resumee
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.2, S.111-116
  6. Bollmann-Sdorra, P.: Probleme der Validität bei Retrievaltests (1990) 0.01
    0.00540714 = product of:
      0.04145474 = sum of:
        0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012791129 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
        0.020807097 = weight(_text_:im in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020807097 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
        0.007856515 = product of:
          0.01571303 = sum of:
            0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01571303 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden beispielhaft Probleme der Validität bei Retrievaltests behandelt. Die externe Validität wird im Zusammenhang von Ähnlichkeitsmaßen und Bewertungsmaßen diskutiert. Die interne Validität wird am Beispiel der Mittelwertbildung diskutiert. Es zeigt sich, daß die Forderung nach Validität die zur Auswahl stehenden Methoden einschränkt
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 41(1990) H.1, S.9-12
  7. Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991) 0.01
    0.005329304 = product of:
      0.040857997 = sum of:
        0.021707265 = weight(_text_:und in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021707265 = score(doc=5105,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
        0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012484257 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
        0.0066664745 = product of:
          0.013332949 = sum of:
            0.013332949 = weight(_text_:1 in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013332949 = score(doc=5105,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    Die Einführung von CD-ROM Datenbanken als neue Informationstechnologie hat die Formen der Informationsgewinnung in bestimmten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten grundlegend geändert. Der Beitrag berichtet über Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Begleitforschung bei Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Version der Datenbank MEDLINE. Hierzu wurden drei verschiedene Erhebungen durchgeführt. Hiernach ist die überwiegende Zahl der Endnutzer (89,3%) mit dem jeweiligen Rechercheresultat zufrieden, wobei Benutzer mit geringer Rechercheerfahrung eine höhere Zufriedenheitsrate erreichen als Benutzer mit umfangreicheren Recherchekenntnissen. Die Gründe zur Nutzung von CD-ROM-Systemen resultieren voriwegend aus der klinischen Alltagsroutine oder täglichen Forschungspraxis, während vermittelte Online-Literatursuchen tendenziell häufiger im Zusammenhang mit einmaligen Ereignissen der wissenschaftlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stehen. Die selbständige CD-ROM Literaturrecherche stellt für die befragten Ärzte und Wissenschaftler die bevorzugte Methode der Informationsgewinnung dar. Die analysierten Endnutzerrecherchen weisen allerdings Fehler und Defizite hinsichtlich einer optimalen Suchstrategie auf, die zu unbemerktn Informationsverlusten und zu Fehlbeurteilungen des wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisstandes führen
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 42(1991) H.2, S.107-114. (T.1); 42(1991) H.3, S.177-190 (T.2)
  8. Evans, J.E.: Some external and internal factors affecting users of interactive information systems (1996) 0.00
    0.004566124 = product of:
      0.052510425 = sum of:
        0.007674677 = weight(_text_:und in 6262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007674677 = score(doc=6262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 6262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6262)
        0.04483575 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 6262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04483575 = score(doc=6262,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 6262, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6262)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.27
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  9. TREC-1: The first text retrieval conference : Rockville, MD, USA, 4-6 Nov. 1993 (1993) 0.00
    0.0025009098 = product of:
      0.057520926 = sum of:
        0.057520926 = sum of:
          0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018855637 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
          0.038665287 = weight(_text_:29 in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038665287 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.4, S.411-521
  10. Keen, E.M.: Aspects of computer-based indexing languages (1991) 0.00
    0.0024553295 = product of:
      0.028236289 = sum of:
        0.016645677 = weight(_text_:im in 5072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016645677 = score(doc=5072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 5072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5072)
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 5072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=5072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 5072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries international 91. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Computers in Libraries, London, February 1991
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  11. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC conferences (1995) 0.00
    0.0022973667 = product of:
      0.052839436 = sum of:
        0.052839436 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052839436 = score(doc=1932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 1932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1932)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.20
  12. Bauer, G.; Schneider, C.: PADOK-II : Untersuchungen zur Volltextproblematik und zur interpretativen Analyse der Retrievalprotokolle (1990) 0.00
    0.0020877498 = product of:
      0.024009122 = sum of:
        0.017723909 = weight(_text_:und in 4164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017723909 = score(doc=4164,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4164, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4164)
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 4164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=4164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 4164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag baut auf dem Bericht über das methodische Konzept, über die Durchführung und die Ergebnisse der PADOK-II-Retrievaltests auf (Krause/Wormser-Hacker). Hier werden die Ergebnisse von Zusatztests zum Einfluß des Umfangs der zugrundeliegenden Dokumente (Volltext vs. Titel+Abstract) beschrieben, die eine deutliche Beeinträchtigung der Recall-Werte bei reduziertem Dokumentenumfang zeigen. Zur interpretativen Analyse der Retrievalprotokolle werden vor allem die methodische Einbindung, Ansatzpunkte der Analyse und erste Ergebnisse vorgestelt.
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 41(1990) H.1, S.21-26
  13. Harman, D.K.: ¬The first text retrieval conference : TREC-1, 1992 (1993) 0.00
    0.0018936576 = product of:
      0.043554123 = sum of:
        0.043554123 = sum of:
          0.017777266 = weight(_text_:1 in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017777266 = score(doc=1317,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
          0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025776858 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the 1st Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-1) held in Rockville, MD, 4-6 Nov. 1992. The TREC experiment is being run by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to allow information retrieval researchers to scale up from small collection of data to larger sized experiments. Gropus of researchers have been provided with text documents compressed on CD-ROM. They used experimental retrieval system to search the text and evaluate the results
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.4, S.411-414
  14. Voorbij, H.: ¬Een goede titel behoeft geen trefwoord, of toch wel? : een vergelijkend oderzoek titelwoorden - trefwoorden (1997) 0.00
    0.0017447417 = product of:
      0.020064529 = sum of:
        0.014564968 = weight(_text_:im in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014564968 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.005499561 = product of:
          0.010999122 = sum of:
            0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010999122 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Source
    Informatie professional. 1(1997) no.11, S.23-27
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.00
    0.0016571913 = product of:
      0.0190577 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012772488 = product of:
          0.025544977 = sum of:
            0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025544977 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0016571913 = product of:
      0.0190577 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012772488 = product of:
          0.025544977 = sum of:
            0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025544977 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
    Isbn
    1-85604-123-9
  17. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.00
    0.0014954928 = product of:
      0.017198166 = sum of:
        0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012484257 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.450-451 (R.R. Larson); Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  18. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.00
    0.0014500424 = product of:
      0.016675487 = sum of:
        0.005499561 = product of:
          0.010999122 = sum of:
            0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010999122 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22
  19. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Walsh, C.: ¬The effect of postings information on search behaviour (1994) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=6890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=6890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.1, S.29-40
  20. Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system
    Date
    9.12.1997 18:33:29

Languages

Types

  • a 82
  • s 6
  • r 4
  • m 3
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…