-
Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: Bibliographic information organization in the Semantic Web (2013)
0.02
0.022956887 = product of:
0.1320021 = sum of:
0.060414854 = weight(_text_:katalogisierung in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060414854 = score(doc=2143,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13500103 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.44751403 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.060414854 = weight(_text_:katalogisierung in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060414854 = score(doc=2143,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13500103 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.44751403 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.0039282576 = product of:
0.007856515 = sum of:
0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007856515 = score(doc=2143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0072441325 = product of:
0.014488265 = sum of:
0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488265 = score(doc=2143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
- Abstract
- New technologies will underpin the future generation of library catalogues. To facilitate their role providing information, serving users, and fulfilling their mission as cultural heritage and memory institutions, libraries must take a technological leap; their standards and services must be transformed to those of the Semantic Web. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web explores the technologies that may power future library catalogues, and argues the necessity of such a leap. The text introduces international bibliographic standards and models, and fundamental concepts in their representation in the context of the Semantic Web. Subsequent chapters cover bibliographic information organization, linked open data, methodologies for publishing library metadata, discussion of the wider environment (museum, archival and publishing communities) and users, followed by a conclusion.
- BK
- 06.70 Katalogisierung Bestandserschließung
- Classification
- 06.70 Katalogisierung Bestandserschließung
- Isbn
- 978-1-84334-731-6
-
Woitas, K.: Bibliografische Daten, Normdaten und Metadaten im Semantic Web : Konzepte der bibliografischen Kontrolle im Wandel (2010)
0.01
0.011572471 = product of:
0.08872228 = sum of:
0.022154884 = weight(_text_:und in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022154884 = score(doc=115,freq=24.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
0.0457603 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0457603 = score(doc=115,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.43102458 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
0.020807097 = weight(_text_:im in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020807097 = score(doc=115,freq=8.0), product of:
0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
- Abstract
- Bibliografische Daten, Normdaten und Metadaten im Semantic Web - Konzepte der Bibliografischen Kontrolle im Wandel. Der Titel dieser Arbeit zielt in ein essentielles Feld der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, die Bibliografische Kontrolle. Als zweites zentrales Konzept wird der in der Weiterentwicklung des World Wide Webs (WWW) bedeutsame Begriff des Semantic Webs genannt. Auf den ersten Blick handelt es sich hier um einen ungleichen Wettstreit. Auf der einen Seite die Bibliografische Kontrolle, welche die Methoden und Mittel zur Erschließung von bibliothekarischen Objekten umfasst und traditionell in Form von formal-inhaltlichen Surrogaten in Katalogen daherkommt. Auf der anderen Seite das Buzzword Semantic Web mit seinen hochtrabenden Konnotationen eines durch Selbstreferenzialität "bedeutungstragenden", wenn nicht sogar "intelligenten" Webs. Wie kamen also eine wissenschaftliche Bibliothekarin und ein Mitglied des World Wide Web Consortiums 2007 dazu, gemeinsam einen Aufsatz zu publizieren und darin zu behaupten, das semantische Netz würde ein "bibliothekarischeres" Netz sein? Um sich dieser Frage zu nähern, soll zunächst kurz die historische Entwicklung der beiden Informationssphären Bibliothek und WWW gemeinsam betrachtet werden. Denn so oft - und völlig zurecht - die informationelle Revolution durch das Internet beschworen wird, so taucht auch immer wieder das Analogon einer weltweiten, virtuellen Bibliothek auf. Genauer gesagt, nahmen die theoretischen Überlegungen, die später zur Entwicklung des Internets führen sollten, ihren Ausgangspunkt (neben Kybernetik und entstehender Computertechnik) beim Konzept des Informationsspeichers Bibliothek.
- Content
- Magisterarbeit am Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Vgl. unter: http://woitas.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Kathi-Woitas-Magisterarbeit.pdf.
- Imprint
- Berlin : Humboldt-Universität, Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
-
Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016)
0.00
0.0025611662 = product of:
0.02945341 = sum of:
0.021398142 = product of:
0.042796284 = sum of:
0.042796284 = weight(_text_:kataloge in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042796284 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1351219 = queryWeight, product of:
5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.31672353 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008055268 = product of:
0.016110536 = sum of:
0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016110536 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Date
- 29. 9.2022 17:43:42
- Theme
- Geschichte der Kataloge
-
Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: ISBD, the UNIMARC bibliographic format, and RDA : interoperability issues in namespaces and the linked data environment (2014)
0.00
6.2359346E-4 = product of:
0.01434265 = sum of:
0.01434265 = product of:
0.0286853 = sum of:
0.0286853 = weight(_text_:international in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0286853 = score(doc=1999,freq=4.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- The article is an updated and expanded version of a paper presented to International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions in 2013. It describes recent work involving the representation of International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) and UNIMARC (UNIversal MARC) in Resource Description Framework (RDF), the basis of the Semantic Web and linked data. The UNIMARC Bibliographic format is used to illustrate issues arising from the development of a bibliographic element set and its semantic alignment with ISBD. The article discusses the use of such alignments in the automated processing of linked data for interoperability, using examples from ISBD, UNIMARC, and Resource Description and Access.
-
Dunsire, G.: FRBR and the Semantic Web (2012)
0.00
4.903207E-4 = product of:
0.011277375 = sum of:
0.011277375 = product of:
0.02255475 = sum of:
0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255475 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 10:50:02
-
Ilik, V.: Cataloger makeover : creating non-MARC name authorities (2015)
0.00
4.4094716E-4 = product of:
0.010141784 = sum of:
0.010141784 = product of:
0.020283569 = sum of:
0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020283569 = score(doc=1884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).
-
Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014)
0.00
4.4094716E-4 = product of:
0.010141784 = sum of:
0.010141784 = product of:
0.020283569 = sum of:
0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020283569 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.
-
Tillett, B.B.: AACR2 and metadata : library opportunities in the global semantic Web (2003)
0.00
3.779547E-4 = product of:
0.008692958 = sum of:
0.008692958 = product of:
0.017385917 = sum of:
0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017385917 = score(doc=5510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Explores the opportunities for libraries to contribute to the proposed global "Semantic Web." Library name and subject authority files, including work that IFLA has done related to a new view of "Universal Bibliographic Control" in the Internet environment and the work underway in the U.S. and Europe, are making a reality of the virtual international authority file on the Web. The bibliographic and authority records created according to AACR2 reflect standards for metadata that libraries have provided for years. New opportunities for using these records in the digital world are described (interoperability), including mapping with Dublin Core metadata. AACR2 recently updated Chapter 9 on Electronic Resources. That process and highlights of the changes are described, including Library of Congress' rule interpretations.
-
LeBoeuf, P.: ¬A strange model named FRBRoo (2012)
0.00
3.779547E-4 = product of:
0.008692958 = sum of:
0.008692958 = product of:
0.017385917 = sum of:
0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017385917 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Libraries and museums developed rules for the description of their collections prior to formalizing the underlying conceptualization reflected in such rules. That formalizing process took place in the 1990s and resulted in two independent conceptual models: FRBR for bibliographic information (published in 1998), and CIDOC CRM for museum information (developed from 1996 on, and issued as ISO standard 21127 in 2006). An international working group was formed in 2003 with the purpose of harmonizing these two models. The resulting model, FRBROO, was published in 2009. It is an extension to CIDOC CRM, using the formalism in which the former is written. It adds to FRBR the dynamic aspects of CIDOC CRM, and a number of refinements (e.g. in the definitions of Work and Manifestation). Some modifications were made in CIDOC CRM as well. FRBROO was developed with Semantic Web technologies in mind, and lends itself well to the Linked Data environment; but will it be used in that context?
