Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Case Based Reasoning"
  1. Coulon, C.-H.: ¬Die Rolle des Anpassungswissens im CBR : am Beispiel der Ausnutzung von Struktur im CBR (1996) 0.00
    0.0037654496 = product of:
      0.04330267 = sum of:
        0.0144715095 = weight(_text_:und in 5203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144715095 = score(doc=5203,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5203, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5203)
        0.02883116 = weight(_text_:im in 5203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02883116 = score(doc=5203,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.43276152 = fieldWeight in 5203, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5203)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Ein wesentlicher Vorteil des CBR im Vergleich zu generativen Ansätzen ist ein geringer Bedarf an das zu formalisierende Wissen. Insbesondere ist es möglich trotz unvollständigen Anpassungswissens vollständige Lösungen zu finden. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt, wodurch sich Anpassungswissen von Regelwissen unterscheidet und wieviel Anpassungswissen man unbedingt benötigt. Die Leistungsfähigkeit eines wissensarmen CBR-Ansatzes wird am Beispiel der Anpassung toplogischer Strukturen diskutiert
    Source
    Analogie in der Wissensrepräsentation: Case-Based Reasoning und räumliche Modelle. 4. Tagung der deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Trier, 17.-20. Oktober 1995. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  2. Analogie in der Wissensrepräsentation: Case-Based Reasoning und räumliche Modelle : 4. Tagung der deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Trier, 17.-20. Oktober 1995 (1996) 0.00
    0.0031399012 = product of:
      0.036108863 = sum of:
        0.018089388 = weight(_text_:und in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018089388 = score(doc=5201,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
        0.018019475 = weight(_text_:im in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018019475 = score(doc=5201,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27047595 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Enthält die Beiträge: CZAP, H.: Einführung in die Wissensorganisation und Case-Based Reasoning (CBR); ALTHOFF, K.-D., R. TRAPHÖNER u. S. WESS: Efficient integration on induction and Case-Base Reasoning: the INRECA System; SCHIEMANN, I. u. A. WOLTERING: Fallspeicherorganisation in der CBR-Shell Janus; COULON, C.-H.: Die Rolle des Anpassungswissens im CBR (Am Beispiel der Ausnutzung von Struktur im CBR); SCHAAF, J.W.: Fischen und Versenken: ein anytime-Algorithmus zur Suche nach situationsgerechten Fällen; JAENECKE, P.: Erkenntnistheoretische Untersuchungen über fallbezogenes Schlußfolgern; LÖCKENHOFF, H.: Cabse-Based Teaching/Learning for issue orientation and control; BIES, W.: 'Denken in Bildern': zu den Metaphern der Wissensorganisation; PRIBBENOW, S.: Räumliches Wissen: zur Interaktion von Logik und Bildern; STOLLE, M. u. V. KIRCHBERG: Mental maps in der Stadtforschung: Grundlage und Perspektiven; BAYER, H. u. R. BAUEREISS: Der Familienatlas als sozialräumliche Information; HARDT, F., G. TASSOUKIS u. H.P. OHLY: Räumliche Hintergrundinformation in bibliographischen Datenbanken; SALENTIN, K.: Geodemographische Ansätze beim Sampling im Direktmarketingverfahren; PIERAU, K., G. NARWELEIT u. H. THÜMMLER: Entwicklung eines Geographisch-Historischen Informationssystems; LENSKI, W. u. E. WETTE-ROCH: Terminologie und Wissensrepräsentation in pragmatischer Sichtweise; FUGMANN, R.: Die Entlineaririserung und Strukturierung von Texten zur Inhaltserschließung und Wissensrepräsentation; LORENZ, B.: Überlegungen zur Verbundklassifikation; NACKE, O.: Ein einfaches Verfahren zur Analyse großer Wissensmengen; BOL, G., E. HOTZ u. T. STÜTZLE: Neuronale Netze zur Klassifikation von Fehlrern in der statistischen Prozeßregulierung
  3. Mataras, R.L.D.; Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning : an overview (1997) 0.00
    0.0020840913 = product of:
      0.0479341 = sum of:
        0.0479341 = sum of:
          0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01571303 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
          0.03222107 = weight(_text_:29 in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03222107 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    AI communications. 10(1997) no.1, S.21-29
  4. Golding, A.R.; Rosenbloom, P.S.: Improving accuracy by combining rule-based and case-based reasoning (1996) 0.00
    0.0016571913 = product of:
      0.0190577 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012772488 = product of:
          0.025544977 = sum of:
            0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025544977 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Artificial intelligence. 87(1996) nos.1/2, S.215-254
  5. Ram, A.; Santamaria, J.C.: Continuous case-based reasoning (1997) 0.00
    0.0016571913 = product of:
      0.0190577 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012772488 = product of:
          0.025544977 = sum of:
            0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025544977 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Artificial intelligence. 90(1997) nos.1/2, S.25-77
  6. Kohno, T.: Error repair and knowledge acquisition via case-based reasoning (1997) 0.00
    0.0016571913 = product of:
      0.0190577 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012772488 = product of:
          0.025544977 = sum of:
            0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025544977 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Artificial intelligence. 91(1997) no.1, S.85-101
  7. Dearden, A.M.; Harrison, M.D.: Abstract models for HCI (1997) 0.00
    0.001360117 = product of:
      0.015641345 = sum of:
        0.005499561 = product of:
          0.010999122 = sum of:
            0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010999122 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Source
    International journal of human-computer studies. 46(1997) no.1, S.151-177
  8. Czap, H.: Einführung in Wissensorganisation und Case-Based Reasoning (1996) 0.00
    9.948465E-4 = product of:
      0.022881467 = sum of:
        0.022881467 = weight(_text_:und in 186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022881467 = score(doc=186,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 186, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=186)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    CBR ist eng gekoppelt mit Lernen, verstanden als Anreicherung von Wissen. Wissen wird unterteilt in Faktenwissen und Handhabungs-/Orientierungswissen. Letzteres verfügbar zu haben wird als primäres Ziel von Lernen und damit auch von CBR herausgearbeitet. Die Übertragbarkeitsproblematik, d.h. die Nutzung von gespeichertem Erfahrungswissen (alte Fälle und ihre Lösungen) zur Lösung neuer Problemstellungen wird an einem eingängigen Beispiel (Dunckers Bestrahlungsproblem illustriert). Abschließend wird der CBR-Zyklus kurz vorgestellt
    Source
    Analogie in der Wissensrepräsentation: Case-Based Reasoning und räumliche Modelle. 4. Tagung der deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Trier, 17.-20. Oktober 1995. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  9. Jaenecke, P.: Erkenntnistheoretische Untersuchungen über fallbezogenes Schlußfolgern (1996) 0.00
    7.461348E-4 = product of:
      0.0171611 = sum of:
        0.0171611 = weight(_text_:und in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0171611 = score(doc=5204,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.328536 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Mangelndes methodisches Bewußtsein in der Künstlichen Intelligenz hat zur Folge, daß Methoden, die auf einer einzigen zunächst vielversprechenden Idee beruhen, zugunsten anderer fallengelassen werden, sowie sich ernste Schwierigkeiten ergeben. Doch für Methoden gilt nicht das Alles-oder-Nichts-Prinzip; Ziel muß es daher sein, verschiedene sich hinsichtlich ihrer Anwendbarkeit einander ergänzende Methoden aufeinander abzustimmen und zu einem arbeitsfähigen System zu vereinen; das trifft insbesondere auf das bereits vom Ansatz her auf Methodenvielfalt angelegte fallbezogene Schlußfolgern zu. Die von den Kognitionswissenschaften gebotenen Voraussetzungen sind jedoch für solch ein Vorhaben nicht günstig. Es herrscht ein Theorien- und Modellwirrwar, das zu einem Wirrwar von Begriffen, Sichtweisen und Verfahren geführt hat. Die vorliegende Arbeit skizziert einen Ausweg aus dieser unbefriedigenden Situation. Sie orientiert sich an den Fragen 'welche Aufgaben sollen mit fallbezogenem Schlußfolgern gelöst werden?', 'durch welche Merkmale ist dieser Ansatz charakterisiert?' und beschäftigt sich abschließend mit den sich aus den Antworten ergebenden Folgerungen
    Source
    Analogie in der Wissensrepräsentation: Case-Based Reasoning und räumliche Modelle. 4. Tagung der deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Trier, 17.-20. Oktober 1995. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  10. Chen, Z.: ¬A conceptual model for storage and retrieval of short scientific texts (1993) 0.00
    7.0045807E-4 = product of:
      0.016110536 = sum of:
        0.016110536 = product of:
          0.03222107 = sum of:
            0.03222107 = weight(_text_:29 in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03222107 = score(doc=2715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.2, S.209-214
  11. Mahapatra, R.; Sen, A.: Case base management systems : providing database support to case-based reasoners (1994) 0.00
    5.603665E-4 = product of:
      0.012888429 = sum of:
        0.012888429 = product of:
          0.025776858 = sum of:
            0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025776858 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of database management. 5(1994) no.2, S.19-29
  12. Ozturk, P.; Aamodt, A.: ¬A context model for knowledge-intensive case-based reasoning (1998) 0.00
    5.0393963E-4 = product of:
      0.011590611 = sum of:
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International journal of human-computer studies. 48(1998) no.3, S.331-355
  13. Ress, D.A.; Young, R.E.: ¬A distributed fuzzy constraint satisfaction system with context-based reasoning (1998) 0.00
    4.4094716E-4 = product of:
      0.010141784 = sum of:
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International journal of human-computer studies. 48(1998) no.3, S.393-407
  14. Issues and applications of case-based reasoning in design (1997) 0.00
    4.0990516E-4 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 6115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=6115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 6115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Isbn
    0-8058-2313-1
  15. Löckenhoff, H.: Case-Based Teaching/Learning for issue orientation and control (1996) 0.00
    3.8929522E-4 = product of:
      0.00895379 = sum of:
        0.00895379 = weight(_text_:und in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00895379 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Analogie in der Wissensrepräsentation: Case-Based Reasoning und räumliche Modelle. 4. Tagung der deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Trier, 17.-20. Oktober 1995. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  16. Kolodner, J.: Case-based reasoning (1993) 0.00
    3.864623E-4 = product of:
      0.008888633 = sum of:
        0.008888633 = product of:
          0.017777266 = sum of:
            0.017777266 = weight(_text_:1 in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017777266 = score(doc=526,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Content
    Pt.1: Background: waht is CBR? Case studies of several case-based reasoners. Reasoning using cases. The cognitive model. Pt.2: The case library: representing and indexing cases. Indexing vocabulary. Methods for index selection. Pt.3: Retrieving cases from the case library. Organizational structures and retrieval algorithms. Matching and ranking cases. Indexing and retrieval. Pt.4: Using cases. Adaptation methods and strategies. Controlling adaptation. Using cases for interpretation and evaluation. Pt.5: Pulling it all together. Building a case-based reasoner. Conclusions, opportunities, challenges. Appendix: A case library of case-based reasoning systems
    Isbn
    1-55860-237-2
  17. Aamodt, A.; Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning : foundation issues, methodological variations, and systems approaches (1994) 0.00
    3.415876E-4 = product of:
      0.007856515 = sum of:
        0.007856515 = product of:
          0.01571303 = sum of:
            0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 4570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01571303 = score(doc=4570,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 4570, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4570)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    AI communications. 7(1994) no.1, S.39-59