Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"McIlwaine, I.C."
  1. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.00
    0.0029000847 = product of:
      0.033350974 = sum of:
        0.010999122 = product of:
          0.021998243 = sum of:
            0.021998243 = weight(_text_:1 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021998243 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022351854 = product of:
          0.044703707 = sum of:
            0.044703707 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044703707 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 4.2002 12:58:24
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
  2. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004) 0.00
    0.002714016 = product of:
      0.031211182 = sum of:
        0.02396705 = sum of:
          0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007856515 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016110536 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction The representation of place in classification schemes presents a number of problems. This paper examines some of them and presents different ways in which a solution may be sought. Firstly, what is meant by place? The simple answer is a geographical area, large or small. The reality is not so simple. Place, or Topos to Aristotle was more than just an area, it was a state of mind. But even staying an the less philosophical plane, the way in which a place can be expressed is infinitely variable. Toponymy is a well defined field of study, comparable with taxonomy in the biological sciences. It comprehends the proper name by which any geographical entity is known, and part of the world, feature of earth's surface, organic aggregate (reef, forest) an organizational unit (country, borough, diocese), limits of Earth (poles, hemispheres) parts of Earth (oceans, continents), lakes, mountain passes, capital cities or sea parts.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:17:11
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: Interdisciplinarity : a new retrieval problem? (2000) 0.00
    0.0011658146 = product of:
      0.013406867 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2002 18:44:15
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a guide to its use (2000) 0.00
    9.7151217E-4 = product of:
      0.01117239 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Isbn
    90-806152-1-8
    Theme
    International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  5. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC in the twenty-first century (2000) 0.00
    8.818943E-4 = product of:
      0.020283569 = sum of:
        0.020283569 = product of:
          0.040567137 = sum of:
            0.040567137 = weight(_text_:international in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040567137 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.5159926 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  6. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2004 (2004) 0.00
    8.4054976E-4 = product of:
      0.019332644 = sum of:
        0.019332644 = product of:
          0.038665287 = sum of:
            0.038665287 = weight(_text_:29 in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038665287 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2005 12:29:36
  7. McIlwaine, I.C.: Where have all the flowers gone? : An investigation into the fate of some special classification schemes (2003) 0.00
    7.7720976E-4 = product of:
      0.008937912 = sum of:
        0.0031426062 = product of:
          0.0062852125 = sum of:
            0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062852125 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0057953056 = product of:
          0.011590611 = sum of:
            0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011590611 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Prior to the OPAC many institutions devised classifications to suit their special needs. Others expanded or altered general schemes to accommodate specific approaches. A driving force in the creation of these classifications was the Classification Research Group, celebrating its golden jubilee in 2002, whose work created a framework and body of principles that remain valid for the retrieval needs of today. The paper highlights some of these special schemes and highlights the fundamental principles which remain valid. 1. Introduction The distinction between a general and a special classification scheme is made frequently in the textbooks, but is one that it is sometimes difficult to draw. The Library of Congress classification could be described as the special classification par excellence. Normally, however, a special classification is taken to be one that is restricted to a specific subject, and quite often used in one specific context only, either a library or a bibliographic listing or for a specific purpose such as a search engine and it is in this sense that I propose to examine some of these schemes. Today, there is a widespread preference for searching an words as a supplement to the use of a standard system, usually the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). This is enhanced by the ability to search documents full-text in a computerized environment, a situation that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. Today's situation is a great improvement in many ways, but it does depend upon the words used by the author and the searcher corresponding, and often presupposes the use of English. In libraries, the use of co-operative services and precatalogued records already provided with classification data has also spelt the demise of the special scheme. In many instances, the survival of a special classification depends upon its creaior and, with the passage of time, this becomes inevitably more precarious.
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  8. McIlwaine, I.C.; Mitchell, J.S.: ¬The new ecumenism : exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion (2006) 0.00
    6.2359346E-4 = product of:
      0.01434265 = sum of:
        0.01434265 = product of:
          0.0286853 = sum of:
            0.0286853 = weight(_text_:international in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0286853 = score(doc=229,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Theme
    International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  9. McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.00
    5.553256E-4 = product of:
      0.012772488 = sum of:
        0.012772488 = product of:
          0.025544977 = sum of:
            0.025544977 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025544977 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    10. 6.2004 19:22:56
  10. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The UDC and the World Wide Web (2003) 0.00
    4.523282E-4 = product of:
      0.010403548 = sum of:
        0.010403548 = weight(_text_:im in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010403548 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. McIlwaine, I.C.: Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) (2009) 0.00
    4.4094716E-4 = product of:
      0.010141784 = sum of:
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  12. McIlwaine, I.C.; Mitchell, J.S.: Preface to special issue "What is knowledge organization" (2008) 0.00
    4.3642457E-4 = product of:
      0.010037765 = sum of:
        0.010037765 = product of:
          0.02007553 = sum of:
            0.02007553 = weight(_text_:international in 2130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02007553 = score(doc=2130,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.25535014 = fieldWeight in 2130, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this special issue of Knowledge Organization is to explore the definition of the interdisciplinary field of "knowledge organization" through historical and contemporary perspectives. The goal is to provide a shared framework of terminology, theories, methodologies, and approaches to stimulate research. The International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) is the premier international scholarly society devoted to the theory and practice of knowledge organization. At the Ninth International ISKO Conference in Vienna in July 2006, it became clear during informal conversations and discussions within the Scientific Advisory Council that there was a need to present a shared definition of the field of knowledge organization. While a majority of ISKO members are drawn from the field of library and information science (LIS), interest in knowledge organization is not limited to the LIS field. Indeed, contributors to Knowledge Organization (the society's journal) and to ISKO conferences represent areas of interdisciplinary research and application well beyond LIS itself. The excitement engendered by wide interest from many disciplines in the field of knowledge organization has also caused some confusion about the meaning of "knowledge organization" and its relationship to other fields such as "knowledge management." We have invited a group of authors drawn widely from the ISKO community and who among them span a half century of research in the field to address such questions as: