Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

9.565065E-4 = product of:
  0.01626061 = sum of:
    0.01626061 = weight(_text_:und in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01626061 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)

Footnote

Vgl. auch die Beiträge von Hermes / Bischoff und Gödert bzw. das DORS Projekt im Zusammenhang mit der DDC

5.3707964E-4 = product of:
  0.009130354 = sum of:
    0.009130354 = weight(_text_:in in 7935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009130354 = score(doc=7935,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 7935, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7935)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)

Abstract

Examines ho well UDC numbers performs as a subject retrieval device in online systems. Discusses: truncation, coordination, USC as a discipline based scheme, ranges, and requirements in search software. Gives examples of UDC in pre-coordinated and post-coordinated working systems. Discusses the possible use of UDC as a thesaurus. Outlines improvements that would enable its use in online retrieval