Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schamber, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Barry, C.L.; Schamber, L.: Users' criteria for relevance evaluation : a cross-situational comparison (1998) 0.00 
    4.766109E-4 = product of:
  0.008102385 = sum of:
    0.008102385 = weight(_text_:in in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008102385 = score(doc=3271,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Takes a cognitive approach toward understanding the behaviours of end users by focusing on the values or criteria they employ in making relevance judgements, or decisions about whether to obtain and use information. Compares and contrasts the results of 2 empirical studies in which criteria were elicited directly from individuals who were seeking information to resolve their own information problems. In 1 study, respondents were faculty and students in an academic environment examining print documents from traditional text-based information retrieval systems. In the other study, respondents were occupational users of weather-related information in a multimedia environment in which sources included interpersonal communication, mass media, weather instruments, and computerised weather systems. Provides evidence that a finite range of criteria exists and that these criteria are applied consistently across types of information users, problem situation, and source environments
  2. Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: User criteria in relevance evaluation : toward development of a measurement scale (1996) 0.00 
    3.640176E-4 = product of:
  0.006188299 = sum of:
    0.006188299 = weight(_text_:in in 7351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006188299 = score(doc=7351,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 7351, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7351)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Part of a long term project which aims to develop a simple measurement scale based on user criteria, that will yield results applicable to the study of user evaluations in any type of information seeking and use environment. Describes 2 tests which were conducted to determine how users interpret criterion terms drawn from previous user based relevance studies. Presents results of these initial tests and describes conceptual and methodological challenges in long term development of the instrument
  3. Barry, C.I.; Schamber, L.: User-defined relevance criteria : a comparison of 2 studies (1995) 0.00 
    2.401893E-4 = product of:
  0.004083218 = sum of:
    0.004083218 = weight(_text_:in in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004083218 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Source
    Forging new partnerships in information: converging technologies. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'95, Chicago, IL, 9-12 October 1995. Ed.: T. Kinney

Authors