-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: ¬The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics : the cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies" (2016)
0.02
0.020951275 = product of:
0.08904292 = sum of:
0.016444085 = product of:
0.03288817 = sum of:
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033585835 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033585835 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006124827 = score(doc=2779,freq=8.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Normalization of citation scores using reference sets based on Web of Science subject categories (WCs) has become an established ("best") practice in evaluative bibliometrics. For example, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings are, among other things, based on this operationalization. However, WCs were developed decades ago for the purpose of information retrieval and evolved incrementally with the database; the classification is machine-based and partially manually corrected. Using the WC "information science & library science" and the WCs attributed to journals in the field of "science and technology studies," we show that WCs do not provide sufficient analytical clarity to carry bibliometric normalization in evaluation practices because of "indexer effects." Can the compliance with "best practices" be replaced with an ambition to develop "best possible practices"? New research questions can then be envisaged.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Chang, Y.-W.: Influence of human behavior and the principle of least effort on library and information science research (2016)
0.02
0.020951275 = product of:
0.08904292 = sum of:
0.016444085 = product of:
0.03288817 = sum of:
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033585835 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033585835 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006124827 = score(doc=2973,freq=8.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- General graph random walk has been successfully applied in multi-document summarization, but it has some limitations to process documents by this way. In this paper, we propose a novel hypergraph based vertex-reinforced random walk framework for multi-document summarization. The framework first exploits the Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP) topic model to learn a word-topic probability distribution in sentences. Then the hypergraph is used to capture both cluster relationship based on the word-topic probability distribution and pairwise similarity among sentences. Finally, a time-variant random walk algorithm for hypergraphs is developed to rank sentences which ensures sentence diversity by vertex-reinforcement in summaries. Experimental results on the public available dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
González-Alcaide, G.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Navarro-Molina, C.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Valderrama-Zurián, J.C.: Library and information science research areas : analysis of journal articles in LISA (2008)
0.02
0.020758199 = product of:
0.08822235 = sum of:
0.016444085 = product of:
0.03288817 = sum of:
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033585835 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033585835 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.005304256 = weight(_text_:in in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005304256 = score(doc=1347,freq=6.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- The main fields of research in Library Science and Documentation are identified by quantifying the frequency of appearance and the analysis of co-occurrence of the descriptors assigned to 11,273 indexed works in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database for the 2004-2005 period. The analysis made has enabled three major core research areas to be identified: World Wide Web, Libraries and Education. There are a further 12 areas of research with specific development, one connected with the library sphere and another 11 connected with the World Wide Web and Internet: Networks, Computer Security, Information technologies, Electronic Resources, Electronic Publications, Bibliometrics, Electronic Commerce, Computer applications, Medicine, Searches and Online Information retrieval.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Pratt , J.A.; Hauser, K.: Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared impact of LIS/MIS fields (2008)
0.02
0.020529175 = product of:
0.087248996 = sum of:
0.016444085 = product of:
0.03288817 = sum of:
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033585835 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033585835 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.004330907 = weight(_text_:in in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004330907 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- This study utilized bibliometric tools to analyze the relationship between two separate, but related, fields: Library and Information Science (LIS) and Management Information Systems (MIS). The top-ranked 48 journals in each field were used as the unit of analysis. Using these journals, field cocitation was introduced as a method for evaluating the relationships between the two fields. The three-phased study evaluated (a) the knowledge imported/exported between LIS and MIS, (b) the body of knowledge influenced by both fields, and (c) the overlap in fields as demonstrated by multidimensional scaling. Data collection and analysis were performed using DIALOG and SPSS programs. The primary findings from this study indicate that (a) the MIS impact on LIS is greater than the reverse, (b) there is a growing trend for shared impact between the two disciplines, and (c) the area of overlap between the two fields is predominately those journals focusing on technology systems and digital information. Additionally, this study validated field cocitation as a method by which to evaluate relationships between fields.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Ni, C.; Shaw, D.; Lind, S.M.; Ding, Y.: Journal impact and proximity : an assessment using bibliographic features (2013)
0.02
0.020529175 = product of:
0.087248996 = sum of:
0.016444085 = product of:
0.03288817 = sum of:
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033585835 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033585835 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.004330907 = weight(_text_:in in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004330907 = score(doc=686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Journals in the Information Science & Library Science category of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were compared using both bibliometric and bibliographic features. Data collected covered journal impact factor (JIF), number of issues per year, number of authors per article, longevity, editorial board membership, frequency of publication, number of databases indexing the journal, number of aggregators providing full-text access, country of publication, JCR categories, Dewey decimal classification, and journal statement of scope. Three features significantly correlated with JIF: number of editorial board members and number of JCR categories in which a journal is listed correlated positively; journal longevity correlated negatively with JIF. Coword analysis of journal descriptions provided a proximity clustering of journals, which differed considerably from the clusters based on editorial board membership. Finally, a multiple linear regression model was built to predict the JIF based on all the collected bibliographic features.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
0.02
0.020529175 = product of:
0.087248996 = sum of:
0.016444085 = product of:
0.03288817 = sum of:
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033585835 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033585835 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.03288817 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03288817 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.004330907 = weight(_text_:in in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004330907 = score(doc=2495,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- In theory, articles can attract readers on the social reference sharing site Mendeley before they can attract citations, so Mendeley altmetrics could provide early indications of article impact. This article investigates the influence of time on the number of Mendeley readers of an article through a theoretical discussion and an investigation into the relationship between counts of readers of, and citations to, 4 general library and information science (LIS) journals. For this discipline, it takes about 7 years for articles to attract as many Scopus citations as Mendeley readers, and after this the Spearman correlation between readers and citers is stable at about 0.6 for all years. This suggests that Mendeley readership counts may be useful impact indicators for both newer and older articles. The lack of dates for individual Mendeley article readers and an unknown bias toward more recent articles mean that readership data should be normalized individually by year, however, before making any comparisons between articles published in different years.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010)
0.02
0.020244893 = product of:
0.086040795 = sum of:
0.035777643 = weight(_text_:buch in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035777643 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.019915098 = weight(_text_:und in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019915098 = score(doc=4910,freq=12.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.0068477658 = weight(_text_:in in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068477658 = score(doc=4910,freq=10.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.023500286 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023500286 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- In dieser Arbeit werden zwei Mehrwertdienste für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, die typische Probleme bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur behandeln können. Die beiden Mehrwertdienste semantische Heterogenitätsbehandlung am Beispiel Crosskonkordanzen und Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing, die in unterschiedlichen Phasen der Suche zum Einsatz kommen, werden in diesem Buch ausführlich beschrieben und evaluiert. Für die Tests wurden Fragestellungen und Daten aus zwei Evaluationsprojekten (CLEF und KoMoHe) verwendet. Die intellektuell bewerteten Dokumente stammen aus insgesamt sieben Fachdatenbanken der Fächer Sozialwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sind in das GESIS-Projekt IRM eingeflossen.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.02
0.019497072 = product of:
0.082862556 = sum of:
0.018776136 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018776136 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.044781115 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044781115 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057745427 = score(doc=77,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.013530762 = product of:
0.027061524 = sum of:
0.027061524 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027061524 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Die Webometrie ist ein Teilbereich der Informationswissenschaft der zur Zeit auf die Analyse von Linkstrukturen konzentriert ist. Er ist stark von der Zitationsanalyse geprägt, wie der empirische Schwerpunkt auf der Wissenschaftsanalyse zeigt. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Nutzung linkbasierter Maße in einem breiten informetrischen Kontext und bewerten verschiedene Verfahren, auch im Hinblick auf ihr generelles Potentialfür die Sozialwissenschaften. Dabei wird auch ein allgemeiner Rahmenfür Linkanalysen mit den erforderlichen Arbeitsschritten vorgestellt. Abschließend werden vielversprechende zukünftige Anwendungsfelder der Webometrie benannt, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analyse von Blogs.
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)
0.02
0.018423487 = product of:
0.07829982 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.009201408 = weight(_text_:in in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009201408 = score(doc=244,freq=26.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.27093613 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
Bibliothekswesen
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Li, D.; Russell, T.G.; Finlay, S.C.; Ding, Y.: ¬The shifting sands of disciplinary development : analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation (2011)
0.02
0.01833855 = product of:
0.07793884 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.008840428 = weight(_text_:in in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008840428 = score(doc=4143,freq=24.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- This work identifies changes in dominant topics in library and information science (LIS) over time, by analyzing the 3,121 doctoral dissertations completed between 1930 and 2009 at North American Library and Information Science programs. The authors utilize latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify latent topics diachronically and to identify representative dissertations of those topics. The findings indicate that the main topics in LIS have changed substantially from those in the initial period (1930-1969) to the present (2000-2009). However, some themes occurred in multiple periods, representing core areas of the field: library history occurred in the first two periods; citation analysis in the second and third periods; and information-seeking behavior in the fourth and last period. Two topics occurred in three of the five periods: information retrieval and information use. One of the notable changes in the topics was the diminishing use of the word library (and related terms). This has implications for the provision of doctoral education in LIS. This work is compared to other earlier analyses and provides validation for the use of LDA in topic analysis of a discipline.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Maharana, B.; Nayak, K.; Sahu, N.K.: Scholarly use of web resources in LIS research : a citation analysis (2006)
0.02
0.018157315 = product of:
0.077168584 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
0.008070169 = weight(_text_:in in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008070169 = score(doc=53,freq=20.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The essential purpose of this paper is to measure the amount of web resources used for scholarly contributions in the area of library and information science (LIS) in India. It further aims to make an analysis of the nature and type of web resources and studies the various standards for web citations. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, the result of analysis of 292 web citations spread over 95 scholarly papers published in the proceedings of the National Conference of the Society for Information Science, India (SIS-2005) has been reported. All the 292 web citations were scanned and data relating to types of web domains, file formats, styles of citations, etc., were collected through a structured check list. The data thus obtained were systematically analyzed, figurative representations were made and appropriate interpretations were drawn. Findings - The study revealed that 292 (34.88 per cent) out of 837 were web citations, proving a significant correlation between the use of Internet resources and research productivity of LIS professionals in India. The highest number of web citations (35.6 per cent) was from .edu/.ac type domains. Most of the web resources (46.9 per cent) cited in the study were hypertext markup language (HTML) files. Originality/value - The paper is the result of an original analysis of web citations undertaken in order to study the dependence of LIS professionals in India on web sources for their scholarly contributions. This carries research value for web content providers, authors and researchers in LIS.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016)
0.02
0.018059868 = product of:
0.07675444 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.0076560336 = weight(_text_:in in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076560336 = score(doc=3231,freq=18.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003)
0.02
0.017956844 = product of:
0.07631659 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007218178 = score(doc=5176,freq=16.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007)
0.02
0.017956844 = product of:
0.07631659 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007218178 = score(doc=329,freq=16.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Walters, W.H.; Wilder, E.I.: Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012 (2016)
0.02
0.017956844 = product of:
0.07631659 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=2940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=2940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=2940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007218178 = score(doc=2940,freq=16.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- We investigate the contributions of particular disciplines, countries, and academic departments to the literature of library and information science (LIS) using data for the articles published in 31 journals from 2007 to 2012. In particular, we examine the contributions of authors outside the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada; faculty in departments other than LIS; and practicing librarians. Worldwide, faculty in LIS departments account for 31% of the journal literature; librarians, 23%; computer science faculty, 10%; and management faculty, 10%. The top contributing nations are the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, China, Canada, and Taiwan. Within the United States and the United Kingdom, the current productivity of LIS departments is correlated with past productivity and with other measures of reputation and performance. More generally, the distribution of contributions is highly skewed. In the United States, five departments account for 27% of the articles contributed by LIS faculty; in the United Kingdom, four departments account for nearly two-thirds of the articles. This skewed distribution reinforces the possibility that high-status departments may gain a permanent advantage in the competition for students, faculty, journal space, and research funding. At the same time, concentrations of research-active faculty in particular departments may generate beneficial spillover effects.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Xu, L.: Research synthesis methods and library and information science : shared problems, limited diffusion (2016)
0.02
0.017956844 = product of:
0.07631659 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007218178 = score(doc=3057,freq=16.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Interests of researchers who engage with research synthesis methods (RSM) intersect with library and information science (LIS) research and practice. This intersection is described by a summary of conceptualizations of research synthesis in a diverse set of research fields and in the context of Swanson's (1986) discussion of undiscovered public knowledge. Through a selective literature review, research topics that intersect with LIS and RSM are outlined. Topics identified include open access, information retrieval, bias and research information ethics, referencing practices, citation patterns, and data science. Subsequently, bibliometrics and topic modeling are used to present a systematic overview of the visibility of RSM in LIS. This analysis indicates that RSM became visible in LIS in the 1980s. Overall, LIS research has drawn substantially from general and internal medicine, the field's own literature, and business; and is drawn on by health and medical sciences, computing, and business. Through this analytical overview, it is confirmed that research synthesis is more visible in the health and medical literature in LIS; but suggests that, LIS, as a meta-science, has the potential to make substantive contributions to a broader variety of fields in the context of topics related to research synthesis methods.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.02
0.01789615 = product of:
0.07605863 = sum of:
0.014082102 = weight(_text_:und in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014082102 = score(doc=402,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.04749755 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04749755 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.004330907 = weight(_text_:in in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004330907 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.010148071 = product of:
0.020296142 = sum of:
0.020296142 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020296142 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
-
Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011)
0.02
0.017847152 = product of:
0.0758504 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.006751988 = weight(_text_:in in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006751988 = score(doc=4608,freq=14.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022)
0.02
0.017847152 = product of:
0.0758504 = sum of:
0.013703404 = product of:
0.027406808 = sum of:
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027988197 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027988197 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.027406808 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027406808 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.006751988 = weight(_text_:in in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006751988 = score(doc=949,freq=14.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper analyses the research in Library and Information Science (LIS) and reports on (1) the status of LIS research in 2015 and (2) on the evolution of LIS research longitudinally from 1965 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a quantitative intellectual content analysis of articles published in 30+ scholarly LIS journals, following the design by Tuomaala et al. (2014). In the content analysis, we classify articles along eight dimensions covering topical content and methodology. Findings The topical findings indicate that the earlier strong LIS emphasis on L&I services has declined notably, while scientific and professional communication has become the most popular topic. Information storage and retrieval has given up its earlier strong position towards the end of the years analyzed. Individuals are increasingly the units of observation. End-user's and developer's viewpoints have strengthened at the cost of intermediaries' viewpoint. LIS research is methodologically increasingly scattered since survey, scientometric methods, experiment, case studies and qualitative studies have all gained in popularity. Consequently, LIS may have become more versatile in the analysis of its research objects during the years analyzed. Originality/value Among quantitative intellectual content analyses of LIS research, the study is unique in its scope: length of analysis period (50 years), width (8 dimensions covering topical content and methodology) and depth (the annual batch of 30+ scholarly journals).
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.; Gaur, R.C.: Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science (2015)
0.02
0.017787322 = product of:
0.06047689 = sum of:
0.009592383 = product of:
0.019184766 = sum of:
0.019184766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019184766 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17237774 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01959174 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01959174 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.1741965 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
0.019184766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019184766 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17237774 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
0.006188299 = weight(_text_:in in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006188299 = score(doc=2597,freq=24.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
0.005919708 = product of:
0.011839416 = sum of:
0.011839416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011839416 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.29411766 = coord(5/17)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the author self-citation behavior in the field of Library and Information Science. Various factors governing the author self-citation behavior have also been studied. Design/methodology/approach The 2012 edition of Social Science Citation Index was consulted for the selection of LIS journals. Under the subject heading "Information Science and Library Science" there were 84 journals and out of these 12 journals were selected for the study based on systematic sampling. The study was confined to original research and review articles that were published in select journals in the year 2009. The main reason to choose 2009 was to get at least five years (2009-2013) citation data from Web of Science Core Collection (excluding Book Citation Index) and SciELO Citation Index. A citation was treated as self-citation whenever one of the authors of citing and cited paper was common, i.e., the set of co-authors of the citing paper and that of the cited one are not disjoint. To minimize the risk of homonyms, spelling variances and misspelling in authors' names, the authors compared full author names in citing and cited articles. Findings A positive correlation between number of authors and total number of citations exists with no correlation between number of authors and number/share of self-citations, i.e., self-citations are not affected by the number of co-authors in a paper. Articles which are produced in collaboration attract more self-citations than articles produced by only one author. There is no statistically significant variation in citations counts (total and self-citations) in works that are result of different types of collaboration. A strong and statistically significant positive correlation exists between total citation count and frequency of self-citations. No relation could be ascertained between total citation count and proportion of self-citations. Authors tend to cite more of their recent works than the work of other authors. Total citation count and number of self-citations are positively correlated with the impact factor of source publication and correlation coefficient for total citations is much higher than that for self-citations. A negative correlation exhibits between impact factor and the share of self-citations. Of particular note is that the correlation in all the cases is of weak nature. Research limitations/implications The research provides an understanding of the author self-citations in the field of LIS. readers are encouraged to further the study by taking into account large sample, tracing citations also from Book Citation Index (WoS) and comparing results with other allied subjects so as to validate the robustness of the findings of this study. Originality/value Readers are encouraged to further the study by taking into account large sample, tracing citations also from Book Citation Index (WoS) and comparing results with other allied subjects so as to validate the robustness of the findings of this study.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
