-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.48
0.47502318 = product of:
0.7341267 = sum of:
0.21122962 = weight(_text_:75400 in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21122962 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23717853 = queryWeight, product of:
9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.89059335 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.07619284 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07619284 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14244758 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.050597228 = weight(_text_:buch in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050597228 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.011497988 = weight(_text_:und in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011497988 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.03288817 = product of:
0.06577634 = sum of:
0.06577634 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06577634 = score(doc=1659,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04749755 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04749755 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.06577634 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06577634 = score(doc=1659,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.004330907 = weight(_text_:in in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004330907 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.033234425 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033234425 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.09759653 = product of:
0.19519307 = sum of:
0.19519307 = weight(_text_:schlagwortregeln in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19519307 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22799754 = queryWeight, product of:
9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.85611916 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.103285074 = product of:
0.20657015 = sum of:
0.20657015 = weight(_text_:schlagwortverzeichnis in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20657015 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.234548 = queryWeight, product of:
9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.88071585 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.64705884 = coord(11/17)
- Classification
- AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
- RVK
- AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
-
Weller, K.; Peters, I.: Reconsidering relationships for knowledge representation (2007)
0.01
0.0061004064 = product of:
0.051853456 = sum of:
0.044781115 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044781115 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.0070723416 = weight(_text_:in in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070723416 = score(doc=216,freq=6.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- Classical knowledge representation methods traditionally work with established relations such as synonymy, hierarchy and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently utilized in elaborated knowledge representation methods and which may be inherently hidden in folksonomies and ontologies.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/Institute/Informationswissenschaft/weller/1189511181reconsider.pdf.
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.01
0.0051730294 = product of:
0.029313833 = sum of:
0.0094853565 = weight(_text_:und in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0094853565 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.00798906 = weight(_text_:in in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00798906 = score(doc=1149,freq=10.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.011839416 = product of:
0.023678832 = sum of:
0.023678832 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023678832 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1764706 = coord(3/17)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Source
- Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.00
0.0030832624 = product of:
0.02620773 = sum of:
0.0070723416 = weight(_text_:in in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070723416 = score(doc=2943,freq=6.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.019135388 = product of:
0.038270775 = sum of:
0.038270775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038270775 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- Describes the developments of the Statistical System for Subject Designation (SSSD): a syntactical system for subject designation for libraries in Croatia, based on the construction of subject headings in agreement with the theory of the sentence nature of subject headings. The discussion is preceded by a brief summary of theories underlying basic principles and fundamental rules of the alphabetical subject catalogue
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Salton, G.: Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction for information retrieval (1972)
0.00
0.0030725112 = product of:
0.026116345 = sum of:
0.018970713 = weight(_text_:und in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018970713 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.0071456316 = weight(_text_:in in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071456316 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.00
0.0028785008 = product of:
0.016311504 = sum of:
0.0047426783 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047426783 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.005649118 = weight(_text_:in in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005649118 = score(doc=3644,freq=20.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.16633868 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.005919708 = product of:
0.011839416 = sum of:
0.011839416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011839416 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1764706 = coord(3/17)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.00
0.002482964 = product of:
0.021105193 = sum of:
0.015330651 = weight(_text_:und in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015330651 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057745427 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 12(1985) S.106 (L. Kalok)
- RSWK
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
- Subject
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.00
0.002194651 = product of:
0.018654533 = sum of:
0.013550509 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013550509 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.005104023 = weight(_text_:in in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005104023 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.00
0.0020732724 = product of:
0.017622815 = sum of:
0.011497988 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011497988 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006124827 = score(doc=5448,freq=8.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- In this paper the possibility to develop a richer relational structure for thesauri is explored and described. The development of a new environmental thesaurus - EARTh (Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus) - is serving as a case study for exploring the refinement of thesaurus relational structure by specialising standard relationships into different subtypes. Together with benefits and opportunities, implications and possible challenges that an expanded set of thesaurus relations may cause are evaluated.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008)
0.00
0.0020558138 = product of:
0.017474417 = sum of:
0.0094853565 = weight(_text_:und in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0094853565 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.00798906 = weight(_text_:in in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00798906 = score(doc=1593,freq=10.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- Classical knowledge representation methods have been successfully working for years with established - but in a way restricted and vague - relations such as synonymy, hierarchy (meronymy, hyponymy) and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships for practical use. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently used in knowledge organization systems (controlled vocabularies, ontologies and folksonomies) and which relations are expressed explicitly or which may be inherently hidden in them.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.100-107
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008)
0.00
0.0019546999 = product of:
0.01661495 = sum of:
0.010840407 = weight(_text_:und in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010840407 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057745427 = score(doc=1855,freq=4.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- The basic elements of faceted thesauri are described, together with a review of their origins and some prominent examples. Their use in browsing and searching applications is discussed. Faceted thesauri are distinguished from faceted classification schemes, while acknowledging the close similarities. The paper concludes by comparing faceted thesauri and related knowledge organization systems to ontologies and discussing appropriate areas of use.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains".
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Engerer, V.: Control and syntagmatization : vocabulary requirements in information retrieval thesauri and natural language lexicons (2017)
0.00
0.0019097284 = product of:
0.016232692 = sum of:
0.008130305 = weight(_text_:und in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008130305 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.008102385 = weight(_text_:in in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008102385 = score(doc=3678,freq=14.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the relationships between natural language lexicons in lexical semantics and thesauri in information retrieval research. These different areas of knowledge have different restrictions on use of vocabulary; thesauri are used only in information search and retrieval contexts, whereas lexicons are mental systems and generally applicable in all domains of life. A set of vocabulary requirements that defines the more concrete characteristics of vocabulary items in the 2 contexts can be derived from this framework: lexicon items have to be learnable, complex, transparent, etc., whereas thesaurus terms must be effective, current and relevant, searchable, etc. The differences in vocabulary properties correlate with 2 other factors, the well-known dimension of Control (deliberate, social activities of building and maintaining vocabularies), and Syntagmatization, which is less known and describes vocabulary items' varying formal preparedness to exit the thesaurus/lexicon, enter into linear syntactic constructions, and, finally, acquire communicative functionality. It is proposed that there is an inverse relationship between Control and Syntagmatization.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998)
0.00
0.0017621261 = product of:
0.014978072 = sum of:
0.008130305 = weight(_text_:und in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008130305 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.0068477658 = weight(_text_:in in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068477658 = score(doc=55,freq=10.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- The terminological consistency of indexers working with a thesaurus as indexing aid remains low. This suggests that indexers cannot perceive easily or very clearly the meaning of each descriptor available as index term. This paper presents the background nd some of the findings of a small scale experiment designed to study the effect on interindexer terminological consistency of modifying the nature of the semantic information given with descriptors in a thesaurus. The study also provided some insights into the respective usefulness of standardized definitions and of traditional networks of hierarchical and associative relationships as means of providing essential meaning information in the thesaurus used as indexing aid
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Formalizing terminology-based knowledge for an ontology independently of a particular language (2008)
0.00
0.0016770745 = product of:
0.0142551325 = sum of:
0.008130305 = weight(_text_:und in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008130305 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006124827 = score(doc=1680,freq=8.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- Last word ontological thought and practice is exemplified on an axiomatic framework [a model for an Integrative Cross-Language Ontology (ICLO), cf. Poli, R., Schmitz-Esser, W., forthcoming 2007] that is highly general, based on natural language, multilingual, can be implemented as topic maps and may be openly enhanced by software available for particular languages. Basics of ontological modelling, conditions for construction and maintenance, and the most salient points in application are addressed, such as cross-language text mining and knowledge generation. The rationale is to open the eyes for the tremendous potential of terminology-based ontologies for principled Knowledge Organization and the interchange and reuse of formalized knowledge.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.00
0.0016462862 = product of:
0.013993433 = sum of:
0.0067752544 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067752544 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007218178 = score(doc=1520,freq=16.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Milstead, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms (2001)
0.00
0.0015805366 = product of:
0.013434561 = sum of:
0.008130305 = weight(_text_:und in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008130305 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.005304256 = weight(_text_:in in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005304256 = score(doc=1148,freq=6.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- Relationships between the terms in thesauri and Indexes are the subject of national and international standards. The standards for thesauri enumerate and provide criteria for three basic types of relationship: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. Standards and guidelines for indexes draw an the thesaurus standards to provide less detailed guidance for showing relationships between the terms used in an Index. The international standard for multilingual thesauri adds recommendations for assuring equal treatment of the languages of a thesaurus. The present standards were developed when lookup and search were essentially manual, and the value of the kinds of relationships has never been determined. It is not clear whether users understand or can use the distinctions between kinds of relationships. On the other hand, sophisticated text analysis systems may be able both to assist with development of more powerful term relationship schemes and to use the relationships to improve retrieval.
- Source
- Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996)
0.00
0.0015325153 = product of:
0.01302638 = sum of:
0.0067752544 = weight(_text_:und in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067752544 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
0.0062511256 = weight(_text_:in in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062511256 = score(doc=6050,freq=12.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004)
0.00
0.0015036858 = product of:
0.012781329 = sum of:
0.0054202033 = weight(_text_:und in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054202033 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.0073611266 = weight(_text_:in in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073611266 = score(doc=2615,freq=26.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.2167489 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Tiberi, M.; De Santis, B.; Plini, P.: Relational semantics in thesauri : an overview and some remarks at theoretical and practical levels (2007)
0.00
0.0013975621 = product of:
0.011879277 = sum of:
0.0067752544 = weight(_text_:und in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067752544 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.005104023 = weight(_text_:in in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005104023 = score(doc=1462,freq=8.0), product of:
0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus is a controlled vocabulary designed to allow for effective information retrieval. It con- sists of different kinds of semantic relationships, with the aim of guiding users to the choice of the most suitable index and search terms for expressing a certain concept. The relational semantics of a thesaurus deal with methods to connect terms with related meanings and arc intended to enhance information recall capabilities. In this paper, focused on hierarchical relations, different aspects of the relational semantics of thesauri, and among them the possibility of developing richer structures, are analyzed. Thesauri are viewed as semantic tools providing, for operational purposes, the representation of the meaning of the terms. The paper stresses how theories of semantics, holding different perspectives about the nature of meaning and how it is represented, affect the design of the relational semantics of thesauri. The need for tools capable of representing the complexity of knowledge and of the semantics of terms as it occurs in the literature of their respective subject fields is advocated. It is underlined how this would contribute to improving the retrieval of information. To achieve this goal, even though in a preliminary manner, we explore the possibility of setting against the framework of thesaurus design the notions of language games and hermeneutic horizon.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.00
0.0013928724 = product of:
0.023678832 = sum of:
0.023678832 = product of:
0.047357664 = sum of:
0.047357664 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047357664 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024967048 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
